Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Referee to player: What's your name? Player: Watt. Ref: I said what's your name? Player: Watt. Ref: Do you want to get sent off? I asked you what's your name. Player: WATT. Ref: Ok, that's it, you're off   ( dailymail.co.uk) divider line
    More: Silly  
•       •       •

2143 clicks; posted to Sports » on 07 Mar 2018 at 7:35 AM (27 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



44 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2018-03-07 07:34:39 AM  
I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.
 
2018-03-07 07:42:48 AM  

TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.


Who?
 
2018-03-07 07:44:08 AM  

MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?


No, he's on first.
 
2018-03-07 07:44:46 AM  

MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?


No, Who's on first.
 
2018-03-07 07:48:29 AM  

Neeek: MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?

No, Who's on first.


I don't know.
 
2018-03-07 07:50:26 AM  

TomFooolery: Neeek: MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?

No, Who's on first.

I don't know.


Third base!
 
2018-03-07 07:51:18 AM  

SuperChuck: TomFooolery: Neeek: MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?

No, Who's on first.

I don't know.

Third base!


REPORTED!
 
2018-03-07 07:52:36 AM  

TomFooolery: Neeek: MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?

No, Who's on first.

I don't know.


Do you even know the guys' names?
 
2018-03-07 07:56:35 AM  

zamboni: TomFooolery: Neeek: MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?

No, Who's on first.

I don't know.

Do you even know the guys' names?


No, but I hear he's from Niagara Falls...
 
2018-03-07 07:58:53 AM  
Watt?
 
2018-03-07 07:59:02 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-03-07 08:01:09 AM  

xanadian: zamboni: TomFooolery: Neeek: MythRender: TomFooolery: I hear he's also a pretty good second baseman.

Who?

No, Who's on first.

I don't know.

Do you even know the guys' names?

No, but I hear he's from Niagara Falls...


NIAGRA FALLS! Slowly I turned...

Wait this is going off the rails.
i.imgflip.comView Full Size


And now for something completely different...

A room with a view - Fawlty Towers - BBC
Youtube tcliR8kAbzc
 
2018-03-07 08:25:04 AM  
upload.wikimedia.orgView Full Size
 
2018-03-07 08:26:40 AM  
i.imgur.comView Full Size
 
2018-03-07 08:29:39 AM  
i.ytimg.comView Full Size
 
2018-03-07 08:39:12 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-03-07 08:59:19 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size


RIP mike watt
 
2018-03-07 09:29:50 AM  
Actually I prefer Noh theater
 
2018-03-07 10:00:40 AM  
When they started this routine, I thought dear lord, this is going to be a train wreck.

I was right, but in a good way.


Who’s on First? Goldberg’s TV Show
Youtube iLjVf9MyKn0



/ note to older brothers - don't torment your younger siblings
// they might make you look like a [censored] moron on national television
 
2018-03-07 10:12:56 AM  
Why does the ref need to know his name anyway?
 
2018-03-07 10:36:10 AM  

abhorrent1: Why does the ref need to know his name anyway?


Good news! There's a button you can click at the top of this page and it'll answer your question.
 
2018-03-07 10:37:26 AM  
Since this is the Daily Mail, I now doubt the existence of referees.
 
2018-03-07 10:43:53 AM  

abhorrent1: Why does the ref need to know his name anyway?


The ref writes it down in a notebook, so they remember if the player already has a yellow card.
 
2018-03-07 10:46:48 AM  

UNC_Samurai: Since this is the Daily Mail, I now doubt the existence of referees.


The BBC also reported on this, so I can confirm that referees do exist.

/The BBC story notes that the referee apologized to the club after the match
//The club's chairman accepted it and everyone's laughing about it now
 
2018-03-07 10:55:28 AM  

Neeek: abhorrent1: Why does the ref need to know his name anyway?

The ref writes it down in a notebook, so they remember if the player already has a yellow card.


This story doesn't make any sense.
Hulme then reversed his decision to punish Watt with a second yellow card

If he already had one, he would have his name and they have a big number on their back but no name. Seems like they make this way more difficult than it needs to be.
 
2018-03-07 11:11:38 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size


"Watt's my name?"
 
2018-03-07 11:13:32 AM  
i.pinimg.comView Full Size
 
2018-03-07 11:20:54 AM  

cerikpete: [i.pinimg.com image 250x188]



YEEEEAAAAH!
 
2018-03-07 11:22:54 AM  
Who's wife gets the money? Every cent.
 
2018-03-07 11:34:34 AM  

abhorrent1: Neeek: abhorrent1: Why does the ref need to know his name anyway?

The ref writes it down in a notebook, so they remember if the player already has a yellow card.

This story doesn't make any sense.
Hulme then reversed his decision to punish Watt with a second yellow card

If he already had one, he would have his name and they have a big number on their back but no name. Seems like they make this way more difficult than it needs to be.


The second yellow was for the name nonsense. He got the first legitimately.
 
2018-03-07 11:47:36 AM  

abhorrent1: Neeek: abhorrent1: Why does the ref need to know his name anyway?

The ref writes it down in a notebook, so they remember if the player already has a yellow card.

This story doesn't make any sense.
Hulme then reversed his decision to punish Watt with a second yellow card

If he already had one, he would have his name and they have a big number on their back but no name. Seems like they make this way more difficult than it needs to be.


The second yellow was for presumably not providing his name to be written down for the first yellow. Which still seems completely pointless considering they wear numbers.
 
2018-03-07 01:33:40 PM  

omgwtfetc: abhorrent1: Neeek: abhorrent1: Why does the ref need to know his name anyway?

The ref writes it down in a notebook, so they remember if the player already has a yellow card.

This story doesn't make any sense.
Hulme then reversed his decision to punish Watt with a second yellow card

If he already had one, he would have his name and they have a big number on their back but no name. Seems like they make this way more difficult than it needs to be.

The second yellow was for presumably not providing his name to be written down for the first yellow. Which still seems completely pointless considering they wear numbers.


But they could just trade jerseys. It's not like they can just trade names. This while thing is a matter of security. We all feel secure now. Dissenters line up over there so we can get your names.
 
2018-03-07 02:10:05 PM  
WTF? I love Fark now!

/and this thread, soooooo much
 
2018-03-07 02:10:52 PM  
in other news:  

http://www.espn.com/soccer/arsenal/st​o​ry/3410004/arsenal-eye-germanys-joachi​m-low-to-replace-arsene-wenger-sources​

his nose picking and booger eating will be such great tabloid fodder
 
2018-03-07 02:50:48 PM  
hehe, I do love the Wat memes. :D
 
2018-03-07 08:17:16 PM  
Johnny Carson as Reagan, a 'Who's On First' spoof
Youtube 1Evt6As72m4
/git off mah lawn
 
2018-03-08 07:32:18 AM  
In Britain one gets "sent off" from the game just as one might be "made redundant" from a job. Truly the masters of silly euphemisms. In America we get ejected and fired.
 
2018-03-08 09:46:05 AM  
Except made redundant isn't the same as getting fired.

In the US are players injected to play? Here they are sent on and thus can be sent off.
 
2018-03-08 01:12:30 PM  

Neeek: The second yellow was for the name nonsense. He got the first legitimately.


So Legitimately got the first card. What about the second?
 
2018-03-08 04:08:15 PM  

Pfighting Polish: Neeek: The second yellow was for the name nonsense. He got the first legitimately.

So Legitimately got the first card. What about the second?


No!  What's on second

And I'll tell you the pitcher's name.

Tomorrow...
 
2018-03-08 04:21:29 PM  
not enough WAT in this thread
 
2018-03-08 04:22:03 PM  
i0.kym-cdn.comView Full Size
 
2018-03-08 04:24:00 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-03-08 04:58:45 PM  

medius: not enough WAT in this thread


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
Displayed 44 of 44 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report