If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Outline)   Noted alt-right superman and date rape apologist Mike Cernovich finds out his "super serum" isn't even Medium strength   ( theoutline.com) divider line
    More: Dumbass, Medium, Freedom of speech, dreary white suspension, Hate speech, Mike Cernovich, particular targeted purpose, Civil Rights Violations, applicable privacy laws  
•       •       •

4149 clicks; posted to Politics » on 21 Feb 2018 at 9:50 PM (21 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



62 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2018-02-21 06:01:55 PM  
I'll bet he feels violated.
 
2018-02-21 06:33:54 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-21 06:39:11 PM  
For the life of me, I can't understand why any of these people are still (or were ever) considered "newsworthy."
And, yes, I know. This is Fark.
 
2018-02-21 06:46:21 PM  
F*ck'em.
 
2018-02-21 06:48:18 PM  
Cernovich posted a video entitled "Why I'm Suing Medium for Civil Rights Violations (Unruh Act)

Have fun with that.
 
2018-02-21 07:11:49 PM  
I hope the alt-whiners spend their money suing any and everyone for their "1st amendment rights" against non-government entities and get laughed out of court.

Y'all can say whatever you want, but no one is required to give you a platform.
 
2018-02-21 07:37:37 PM  

sirrerun: For the life of me, I can't understand why any of these people are still (or were ever) considered "newsworthy."
And, yes, I know. This is Fark.


No, this is America.
 
2018-02-21 08:25:37 PM  

SpaceyCat: I hope the alt-whiners spend their money suing any and everyone for their "1st amendment rights" against non-government entities and get laughed out of court.

Y'all can say whatever you want, but no one is required to give you a platform.


Actually what he's claiming is that he's being discriminated against because he's white.
 
2018-02-21 08:37:47 PM  
Thory about that.
 
2018-02-21 09:19:47 PM  
Oh, man, I just read his "Sex with a trans" article in which, of course, he claims it wasn't about him and nearly died laughing my ass off at the "tears" line.
 
2018-02-21 09:52:16 PM  
Couldn't happen to a nicer d-bag....
 
2018-02-21 09:55:17 PM  
 Gotta be honest, I had no clue what Medium was. And I'm fairly net savvy. "Fairly."
 
2018-02-21 09:56:19 PM  
It's been a year since this guy was pushing Pizzagate and NOW they're banning him?
 
2018-02-21 09:57:48 PM  
Cry moar ya red-blooded ubermensch baby.
 
2018-02-21 10:00:35 PM  
He's less of a date rape 'apologist' and more of a date rape 'advocate'.
 
2018-02-21 10:03:11 PM  
WHO ?
img.fark.netView Full Size


/it was an okay show
 
2018-02-21 10:03:22 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size


/Oblig
 
2018-02-21 10:06:37 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-21 10:06:49 PM  
IDK what medium is, apparently it is LiveJournal 2.0
 
2018-02-21 10:08:24 PM  

fusillade762: Cernovich posted a video entitled "Why I'm Suing Medium for Civil Rights Violations (Unruh Act)

Have fun with that.


Unruh isn't that the guy who shot up a street in NJ, so an Unruh act seems like a threat.
 
2018-02-21 10:12:29 PM  
i don't know what medium is by i'm glad to hear that asshole got banned from some place.
 
2018-02-21 10:15:27 PM  

SpaceyCat: I hope the alt-whiners spend their money suing any and everyone for their "1st amendment rights" against non-government entities and get laughed out of court.

Y'all can say whatever you want, but no one is required to give you a platform.


I wonder how many anti-Trump comments get deleted from r/the_donald on a daily basis.
 
2018-02-21 10:17:11 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-21 10:21:22 PM  
So they're Medium rare. Time for dinner.
 
2018-02-21 10:23:35 PM  

Huggermugger: He's less of a date rape 'apologist' and more of a date rape 'advocate'.


He's more of an out and out asshole.
 
2018-02-21 10:24:09 PM  
For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

img.fark.netView Full Size


Yes, he actually posted these
 
2018-02-21 10:28:35 PM  
Cernovitch banned. Sounds healthy.
 
2018-02-21 10:28:42 PM  

D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these


What I take away from that is that he is over compensating for something.
 
2018-02-21 10:29:10 PM  

I want that sauce Morty!: SpaceyCat: I hope the alt-whiners spend their money suing any and everyone for their "1st amendment rights" against non-government entities and get laughed out of court.

Y'all can say whatever you want, but no one is required to give you a platform.

I wonder how many anti-Trump comments get deleted from r/the_donald on a daily basis.


Quite a few. I've been banned.
 
2018-02-21 10:31:02 PM  

Archie Goodwin: D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these

What I take away from that is that he is over compensating for something.


Mostly the fact that his entire life style is entirely funded by a settlement he got when his rich wife left his pitiful ass. Something he truly hopes you'll look past as he claims how alpha he is all the time.
 
2018-02-21 10:32:51 PM  
By the way- avoid becoming angry- avoid his website and amazon "book" listings.
Like this https://www.amazon.com/MAGA-Mind​set-Ma​king-America-Great/dp/9527065925/ref=s​r_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1519270238&s​r=1-4
you'll thank me later.
If drunk or pretty stoned- you might have a laugh.
 
2018-02-21 10:32:57 PM  
I'm no expert, but it seems like there's something wrong with this guy.
 
2018-02-21 10:34:03 PM  

Wretschko: Oh, man, I just read his "Sex with a trans" article in which, of course, he claims it wasn't about him and nearly died laughing my ass off at the "tears" line.


Fake news.

It was really five seconds with a trans woman on porn hub and his hand stimulating.
 
2018-02-21 10:43:58 PM  

D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these


Don't forget the best part of his manliness. He lives on the alimony from his first marriage. She was the first corporate counsel for Facebook. He is so manly that he is supported by a woman who was willing to pay him tens of millions to go away. And I think he currently lives in his second wifes' parents basement. I could be wrong about the last bit.
 
2018-02-21 10:46:23 PM  
...and nothing of value was lost...
 
2018-02-21 10:54:07 PM  
Don't you mean Mike Cernovich, ÜberGooch subby?
 
2018-02-21 10:55:23 PM  

SpaceyCat: I hope the alt-whiners spend their money suing any and everyone for their "1st amendment rights" against non-government entities and get laughed out of court.

Y'all can say whatever you want, but no one is required to give you a platform.


Maybe one of the Fark lawyers can jump in and give a better answer.  But actually that's not true.

No one is required to give you a platform, but similarly they can't keep you from accessing an existing platform.

One of the cases I remember from my undergraduate Constitutional Law class (too many damn years ago) dealt with a kid who was kicked out of a mall in California back in the 1960s for wearing a jacket that said "F*** the War!"  Once they kicked him out they made it a criminal trespass case after banning him from the mall.

He sued for violation of his free speech rights.  He argued that banning him from the mall had the same effect as banning him from the public square and thereby eliminating his ability to exercise his free speech rights.

The mall, and the State of California, argued that  the mall was private property.  The mall was not required to provide him a platform in which to engage in speech.

There are some twists and turns in the arguments and the reasoning behind the decision but essentially the court sided with the kid.  The mall HAD violated the kid's free speech rights.

But I can't remember the case name.  For some reason I want to say the decision was handed down in 1972... but I could be wildly wrong about that.

Maybe one of the many lawyers on Fark can jump in.
 
2018-02-21 10:56:04 PM  
"I am a paying customer of Medium. They are denying me access to services based on my race and gender."

I didn't know 'asshole' was a race.
 
2018-02-21 11:05:22 PM  

Strategeryz0r: Archie Goodwin: D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these

What I take away from that is that he is over compensating for something.

Mostly the fact that his entire life style is entirely funded by a settlement he got when his rich wife left his pitiful ass. Something he truly hopes you'll look past as he claims how alpha he is all the time.


dsmith42

Don't forget the best part of his manliness. He lives on the alimony from his first marriage. She was the first corporate counsel for Facebook. He is so manly that he is supported by a woman who was willing to pay him tens of millions to go away. And I think he currently lives in his second wifes' parents basement. I could be wrong about the last bit.

The Rational Wiki article on him has even more well documented awfulness, a lot of which he's tried to retroactively delete. That anyone listens to him at all is a sad, pathetic, and infuriating indictment ofbour culture
 
2018-02-21 11:09:08 PM  
Maybe FTFA:
"Updated at 02/21/2018 5:05 PM: Following the publication of this fake news story, Mike Cernovich posted a video entitled "Why I'm Suing Medium for Muh Freezed Peach Violations (JaRule Act)." In this video he claims that by suspending his account Medium has effectively made his vagina hurt for being an angry unemployed white man with no talent, and insists that despite the (1728% totally true) pending lawsuit, he's not getting anyone retarded enough to follow him on Medium anyway, so it doesn't even matter."
 
2018-02-21 11:10:01 PM  

YouWinAgainGravity: "I am a paying customer of Medium. They are denying me access to services based on my race and gender."

I didn't know 'asshole' was a race.


More like a species.
 
2018-02-21 11:11:12 PM  

D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these


OMFG!!!!

The only thing scarier than someone who would post something like this are the people who would RT of like the posts.

I guess that's why all the Republican leaders and right-wing personalities (including Cernovich) have multiple marriage.... weak semen.
 
2018-02-21 11:11:48 PM  
If god existed this asshat would have a flesh eating bacteria in his rectum. And wang.
 
2018-02-21 11:22:46 PM  

D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these


Approves
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-21 11:30:50 PM  

Jacobite_55: D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these

OMFG!!!!

The only thing scarier than someone who would post something like this are the people who would RT of like the posts.

I guess that's why all the Republican leaders and right-wing personalities (including Cernovich) have multiple marriage.... weak semen.


    Wives: 2
Orgasms: 0
 
2018-02-21 11:30:51 PM  

D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these


I thought to make a joke about what his super serum might be, never even suspecting he was actually discussing his semen.

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-21 11:32:49 PM  

D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these


Wha? Whaa? Heh heh...No stop. Hah hah...Ouch...hurts to laugh this much.
 
2018-02-21 11:33:08 PM  

D_PaulAngel: For those unfamiliar with his particpartibrand of MRA WTFery...

[img.fark.net image 425x586]

Yes, he actually posted these


media.giphy.comView Full Size
 
2018-02-21 11:43:14 PM  

Jacobite_55: SpaceyCat: I hope the alt-whiners spend their money suing any and everyone for their "1st amendment rights" against non-government entities and get laughed out of court.

Y'all can say whatever you want, but no one is required to give you a platform.

Maybe one of the Fark lawyers can jump in and give a better answer.  But actually that's not true.

No one is required to give you a platform, but similarly they can't keep you from accessing an existing platform.

One of the cases I remember from my undergraduate Constitutional Law class (too many damn years ago) dealt with a kid who was kicked out of a mall in California back in the 1960s for wearing a jacket that said "F*** the War!"  Once they kicked him out they made it a criminal trespass case after banning him from the mall.

He sued for violation of his free speech rights.  He argued that banning him from the mall had the same effect as banning him from the public square and thereby eliminating his ability to exercise his free speech rights.

The mall, and the State of California, argued that  the mall was private property.  The mall was not required to provide him a platform in which to engage in speech.

There are some twists and turns in the arguments and the reasoning behind the decision but essentially the court sided with the kid.  The mall HAD violated the kid's free speech rights.

But I can't remember the case name.  For some reason I want to say the decision was handed down in 1972... but I could be wildly wrong about that.

Maybe one of the many lawyers on Fark can jump in.


It has to do with public vs private forum, first of all; and also with content as opposed to method of expression.

Basically, in the case you cite, the mall is  privately owned property, but is free to all entrants so it's a quasi-public space; they can't tell colored people to use the back door, and they can't ban profanity just because the owner doesn't like it. If it was a private-use mall, with a restricted entry fee, then maybe; but it wasn't.

In the case of Twitter or Medium, they have membership or use fees; they ALSO have Terms of Service Agreements that usually disallow certain types of postings, that the site admins have been ignoring for the past years or decades because it drives ad clicks; but the TOS is a valid contract and they can enforce it whenever they want...as long as they are not punitively selective.
 
2018-02-21 11:49:54 PM  

Gyrfalcon: Jacobite_55: SpaceyCat: I hope the alt-whiners spend their money suing any and everyone for their "1st amendment rights" against non-government entities and get laughed out of court.

Y'all can say whatever you want, but no one is required to give you a platform.

Maybe one of the Fark lawyers can jump in and give a better answer.  But actually that's not true.

No one is required to give you a platform, but similarly they can't keep you from accessing an existing platform.

One of the cases I remember from my undergraduate Constitutional Law class (too many damn years ago) dealt with a kid who was kicked out of a mall in California back in the 1960s for wearing a jacket that said "F*** the War!"  Once they kicked him out they made it a criminal trespass case after banning him from the mall.

He sued for violation of his free speech rights.  He argued that banning him from the mall had the same effect as banning him from the public square and thereby eliminating his ability to exercise his free speech rights.

The mall, and the State of California, argued that  the mall was private property.  The mall was not required to provide him a platform in which to engage in speech.

There are some twists and turns in the arguments and the reasoning behind the decision but essentially the court sided with the kid.  The mall HAD violated the kid's free speech rights.

But I can't remember the case name.  For some reason I want to say the decision was handed down in 1972... but I could be wildly wrong about that.

Maybe one of the many lawyers on Fark can jump in.

It has to do with public vs private forum, first of all; and also with content as opposed to method of expression.

Basically, in the case you cite, the mall is  privately owned property, but is free to all entrants so it's a quasi-public space; they can't tell colored people to use the back door, and they can't ban profanity just because the owner doesn't like it. If it was a private-use mall, with a restricted entr ...


Thanks.
 
Displayed 50 of 62 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report