If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   There are other problems with trying to police which bathroom trans people use aside from it just being none of your damned business   ( rawstory.com) divider line
    More: Cool, White House, President of the United States, trump, Republican Rand Paul, dollar deficit spending, notion John Kelly, Raw Story, Trump's White  
•       •       •

6254 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Feb 2018 at 8:00 AM (23 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



109 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2018-02-09 09:27:51 AM  

Prank Call of Cthulhu: I mean, maybe under really bad lighting (like in your typical Walgreens), the clerk mistook her from Kevin from The Wonder Years.

[img.fark.net image 540x720]


Pretty sure that's Johnny Galiki and not Fred Savage.

/Or is it Becky?
 
2018-02-09 09:43:26 AM  

big pig peaches: oryx: I don't believe any of this happened. You'd have to believe Walgreen's had a bathroom attendant on duty checking to see if you were going to the "correct" bathroom. It;s ridiculous.

This.

Plus it being a Walgreens on Sunset Blvd in LA makes this doubly hard to believe.


Most WAGs have locked bathrooms. It GREATLY reduces theft. The employee that responds to the page hopefully picks the right door to unlock. I've made the mistake once, but it was a very haggard homeless person with long hair and a hat under a bulky coat.
 
2018-02-09 09:50:37 AM  
I call BS on the employees.  They didn't think she's a man, they were just being a total @sshats.  That this is an issue in 2018 and that the employees involved weren't terminated is an indictment on where we are as a culture.

/I get called ma'am periodically and I have a large red beard and a deeper voice.  I figure its a mistake and just laugh about it.
 
2018-02-09 09:53:16 AM  

interstellar_tedium: He finally cut it after too many people called him a girl even after being corrected, funny thing is none of his classmates cared it was all "adults"


popkey.coView Full Size

So the people who knew he was a boy didn't call him a girl and the ones who didn't mistook an unknown person with long hair called him a girl?
 
2018-02-09 09:55:13 AM  

hobnail: Prank Call of Cthulhu: Not perhaps the most feminine of creatures, but if you think this is a dude, you need your eyes examined.

[img.fark.net image 689x425]

No shiat. She's pretty cute.


I wouldn't got that far, but she's nonetheless very obviously a woman.

/Yeah, Studmann69 and all that crap...
 
2018-02-09 10:12:10 AM  
"...didn't put up much of a fight and used the stall while the men used the urinals next to me," Meehan wrote in an email to Walgreens. "This in itself was very humiliating for me and I felt extremely uncomfortable."
THEN
California law, "which protects every person's right to access restrooms based on their gender identity in workplaces, schools and business establishments."

Not being snarky, but wondering....she wouldn't be uncomfortable if the same thing had happened in the women's bathroom with a man identifying as a woman but peeing standing up?  Or she would still?
 
2018-02-09 10:20:54 AM  

Prank Call of Cthulhu: I'm less concerned about the gender of the person sharing the restroom with me as I am the stench level they're going to create. Instead of separating by gender, I'd rather have one restroom devoted to (non-asparagus-related) tinkling and light deuce-dropping (but only if you haven't recently eaten Mexican/Indian food), and one for folks planning on those force-five shiatstorm dumps where they unleash a basketball-size chocolate mud baby or spray a big old spicy fudge dragon all over the toilet that turns the air purple and blows out three fluorescent tubes.


My wife made crock-pot seven-bean diced ham soup the other day, so I completely understand your point.
 
2018-02-09 10:24:16 AM  

vudukungfu: Was it Steven Tyler?

Or Tyler Perry?


Pat.
 
2018-02-09 10:29:23 AM  

big pig peaches: oryx: I don't believe any of this happened. You'd have to believe Walgreen's had a bathroom attendant on duty checking to see if you were going to the "correct" bathroom. It;s ridiculous.

This.

Plus it being a Walgreens on Sunset Blvd in LA makes this doubly hard to believe.


You have to ask for a key at the pharmacy or front counter to get into the bathrooms there. If they didn't do that, they'd have issues with everything from theft to homeless people trying to set up camp in the stalls - like we have had happen where I work, most recently last month.

"What were you going to do when everyone left and the doors were locked?"
"Move over to the bedding department".

It's always good to have a plan, I guess.
 
2018-02-09 10:31:35 AM  

RedHeadLover: "...didn't put up much of a fight and used the stall while the men used the urinals next to me," Meehan wrote in an email to Walgreens. "This in itself was very humiliating for me and I felt extremely uncomfortable."
THEN
California law, "which protects every person's right to access restrooms based on their gender identity in workplaces, schools and business establishments."

Not being snarky, but wondering....she wouldn't be uncomfortable if the same thing had happened in the women's bathroom with a man identifying as a woman but peeing standing up?  Or she would still?


obvious transphobia aside, you do know that there aren't urinals in the ladies' room.
 
2018-02-09 10:35:14 AM  

oryx: I don't believe any of this happened. You'd have to believe Walgreen's had a bathroom attendant on duty checking to see if you were going to the "correct" bathroom. It;s ridiculous.


AFAIK, all Walgreens' bathrooms (at least here in OC) are always locked, and an employee needs to come let you or buzz you in. So yeah, in effect a bathroom attendant.
 
2018-02-09 10:47:35 AM  

Alcaste: RedHeadLover: "...didn't put up much of a fight and used the stall while the men used the urinals next to me," Meehan wrote in an email to Walgreens. "This in itself was very humiliating for me and I felt extremely uncomfortable."
THEN
California law, "which protects every person's right to access restrooms based on their gender identity in workplaces, schools and business establishments."

Not being snarky, but wondering....she wouldn't be uncomfortable if the same thing had happened in the women's bathroom with a man identifying as a woman but peeing standing up?  Or she would still?

obvious transphobia aside, you do know that there aren't urinals in the ladies' room.

You do know I was referring to peeing in the toilet while standing up, right?
 
2018-02-09 10:49:27 AM  

hobnail: Prank Call of Cthulhu: Not perhaps the most feminine of creatures, but if you think this is a dude, you need your eyes examined.

[img.fark.net image 689x425]

No shiat. She's pretty cute.


Yup, kind of a P!nk "rocker chick" thing going on...
 
2018-02-09 10:50:06 AM  

tukatz: There is so much controversy about getting the right to use the "proper" bathroom for your chosen gender..... what are people really doing in there?  So much effort for a couple minutes.  Are they doing selfies to brag to their 500 closest friends that they got to choose which bathroom to use?  Maybe they're trying to make friends in there?

Pee, handwash, then GTFO.  Otherwise you're creepy... regardless of birth or chosen gender.


Consider the people that are most opposed to other people using the "wrong" bathroom, and how they like to use public bathrooms.  You can imagine just how horrified a Republican Senator would be if he encountered a female in there!
 
2018-02-09 10:51:22 AM  

RedHeadLover: Alcaste: RedHeadLover: "...didn't put up much of a fight and used the stall while the men used the urinals next to me," Meehan wrote in an email to Walgreens. "This in itself was very humiliating for me and I felt extremely uncomfortable."
THEN
California law, "which protects every person's right to access restrooms based on their gender identity in workplaces, schools and business establishments."

Not being snarky, but wondering....she wouldn't be uncomfortable if the same thing had happened in the women's bathroom with a man identifying as a woman but peeing standing up?  Or she would still?

obvious transphobia aside, you do know that there aren't urinals in the ladies' room.
You do know I was referring to peeing in the toilet while standing up, right?


You think a trans woman using a public restroom is going to pee standing up? With the current stupidity-induced climate of fear of trans people that has been stirred up, she's going to out herself that way or do ANYTHING to draw attenion?

That's cute.
*pats head*
 
2018-02-09 10:53:02 AM  

RedHeadLover: Alcaste: RedHeadLover: "...didn't put up much of a fight and used the stall while the men used the urinals next to me," Meehan wrote in an email to Walgreens. "This in itself was very humiliating for me and I felt extremely uncomfortable."
THEN
California law, "which protects every person's right to access restrooms based on their gender identity in workplaces, schools and business establishments."

Not being snarky, but wondering....she wouldn't be uncomfortable if the same thing had happened in the women's bathroom with a man identifying as a woman but peeing standing up?  Or she would still?

obvious transphobia aside, you do know that there aren't urinals in the ladies' room.
You do know I was referring to peeing in the toilet while standing up, right?


In a stall, my dude. Bathrooms usually have stalls. Being uncomfortable in her case was because she was surrounded by men in the men's bathroom as a woman. In your hypothetical scenario, the only thing that's different from any other bathroom encounter is what way someone's shoes are facing.

But when you said "man identifying as a woman" you not only showed your hand, your fumbled the entire deck onto the table and knocked all the chips over.
 
2018-02-09 10:56:47 AM  

Alcaste: RedHeadLover: Alcaste: RedHeadLover: "...didn't put up much of a fight and used the stall while the men used the urinals next to me," Meehan wrote in an email to Walgreens. "This in itself was very humiliating for me and I felt extremely uncomfortable."
THEN
California law, "which protects every person's right to access restrooms based on their gender identity in workplaces, schools and business establishments."

Not being snarky, but wondering....she wouldn't be uncomfortable if the same thing had happened in the women's bathroom with a man identifying as a woman but peeing standing up?  Or she would still?

obvious transphobia aside, you do know that there aren't urinals in the ladies' room.
You do know I was referring to peeing in the toilet while standing up, right?

In a stall, my dude. Bathrooms usually have stalls. Being uncomfortable in her case was because she was surrounded by men in the men's bathroom as a woman. In your hypothetical scenario, the only thing that's different from any other bathroom encounter is what way someone's shoes are facing.

But when you said "man identifying as a woman" you not only showed your hand, your fumbled the entire deck onto the table and knocked all the chips over.


That's fair AND that's what I was wondering.  Thanks for the response!
 
2018-02-09 10:57:10 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 10:58:33 AM  
Round two. . .

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 10:59:58 AM  
Round three. . .

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 11:00:33 AM  
Bonus round!

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 11:02:44 AM  
Bottom line:  Looks aren't enough to tell where someone should "officially" be peeing, and what's under their clothes is none of your damn business.
 
2018-02-09 11:10:42 AM  

WilderKWight: Bottom line:  Looks aren't enough to tell where someone should "officially" be peeing, and what's under their clothes is none of your damn business.


Thank you! The birth-certificate madness has to stop. The impending Prop 1 in Anchorage this year goes so far as to specify "original birth certificate " for bathroom access. So:

Female on driver's license? Check
Female on US passport? Check
Has a vagina? Check
Original birth cert says "Male"?

Go use the men's room for "public safety". Enjoy your inevitable harassment and possibe bonus beating for the greater good.

Seriously, fark these people.
 
2018-02-09 11:14:00 AM  
Someone who identifies with a different gender than their body parts dictate may feel uncomfortable using the bathroom of their birth gender.

People using a bathroom and having someone physically of the opposite gender come in will also feel uncomfortable.

We will eventually have to make one person bathrooms everywhere to protect everyone's rights and feelings.

Bathrooms are no longer about bodily functions.  They are now a political issue.
 
2018-02-09 11:19:16 AM  

tukatz: Someone who identifies with a different gender than their body parts dictate may feel uncomfortable using the bathroom of their birth gender.

People using a bathroom and having someone physically of the opposite gender come in will also feel uncomfortable.

We will eventually have to make one person bathrooms everywhere to protect everyone's rights and feelings.

Bathrooms are no longer about bodily functions.  They are now a political issue.


Trans people have been using public bathrooms since forever. Only after the religious right lost on same-sex marriage did bathrooms become a political issue. All of the bathroom bills and the attendant panic they induce have been the creation of GOP legislators or ballot initiatives pushed by evangelical family associations.

You want to blame a group for causing this issue to be front and center, look to republicans and their fundie friends, not trans people who are trying to lead lives that are as normal as possible.
 
2018-02-09 11:19:20 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 11:23:27 AM  
A lot of business the have two restrooms, the kind with one toilet and a lock on the door have woman and men designations and simply made them restrooms.   Me,  if I gotta pee right now and the mens room is locked I'll use the women's room. Better that getting my socks wet. If ever confronted I'll just say I'm trans.
 
2018-02-09 11:26:52 AM  

AugieDoggyDaddy: A lot of business the have two restrooms, the kind with one toilet and a lock on the door have woman and men designations and simply made them restrooms.   Me,  if I gotta pee right now and the mens room is locked I'll use the women's room. Better that getting my socks wet. If ever confronted I'll just say I'm trans.


Oof, you were so close. You can use any bathroom you want as it is - there's no law against it. I use the ladies room all the time, especially at the bar, because sometimes the line is nuts. If anyone confronts me I just say the line was too long and move on. Because, good golly gosh, it's not actually a political issue and trans people aren't for your gawking.
 
2018-02-09 11:31:47 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 11:41:30 AM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 12:03:11 PM  
This should simply follow the Mrs. Khan model.  If you looka like a man, use the mens room.  If you not looka like a man, use the woman's room.  Nobody would know or care because in each case of the bending, you are using stalls 100% of the time.  By enshrining this nonsense into law you open the door to pervs to just go wherever they want.
 
2018-02-09 12:03:34 PM  
CIS gender male here. Checked my privileges so on and so forth. A few thoughts:

What happens if they are Trans MtF and get "busted" by a female with a sharp eye on their way to the stall? Do they finish like a boss like they are supposed to or do they 'nope' out of there for fear of "retaliation"?

Anyway can't we all just make a third bathroom, label it "For Everyone" or "one size fits all", toss a bowl in there and no one would be the wiser?

Also in LGBT, why is it that most GBT's have a thing for guys? If there's something you all have in common it seems to be that. I'm going to duck and cover now, I don't really know what I'm talking about, and you all blew it when we elected you know who by deciding not to vote.
 
2018-02-09 12:03:55 PM  

CivicMindedFive: This should simply follow the Mrs. Khan model.  If you looka like a man, use the mens room.  If you not looka like a man, use the woman's room.  Nobody would know or care because in each case of the bending, you are using stalls 100% of the time.  By enshrining this nonsense into law you open the door to pervs to just go wherever they want.


Which means that, really, they should have a urinal room and a stall room.
 
2018-02-09 12:24:38 PM  

padraig: hobnail: Prank Call of Cthulhu: Not perhaps the most feminine of creatures, but if you think this is a dude, you need your eyes examined.

[img.fark.net image 689x425]

No shiat. She's pretty cute.

I wouldn't got that far, but she's nonetheless very obviously a woman.

/Yeah, Studmann69 and all that crap...


Loaf's Tray: hobnail: Prank Call of Cthulhu: Not perhaps the most feminine of creatures, but if you think this is a dude, you need your eyes examined.

[img.fark.net image 689x425]

No shiat. She's pretty cute.

Yup, kind of a P!nk "rocker chick" thing going on...


Full disclosure, I have a thing for queer girls. Which can be awkward, as I am a dude.

/bi dude, but still.
//married a bi girl so it's all good
 
2018-02-09 01:53:39 PM  
Everybody likes to pretend the opposition is about trans folk, but that's a strawman at best.   People prefer the status quo: zero tolerance for any manly-looking perv loitering in the ladies room.

eKonk: I'm going to go on the record that, while in principle I don't care which bathroom anyone uses, I am opposed to a shared unisex bathroom.


I've got no objection to single-user unisex bathrooms, opposed to shared unisex facilities.    Mostly because that' becomes as an excuse to tear out urinals, ensuring everybody is equally inconvenienced by the slow throughput of stalls.  For all the social awkwardness of a wall full of urinals with maybe a tiny partition between, it is efficient.
 
2018-02-09 02:01:01 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 02:07:52 PM  

ChicagoKev: Everybody likes to pretend the opposition is about trans folk, but that's a strawman at best. People prefer the status quo: zero tolerance for any manly-looking perv loitering in the ladies room.


Then please explain to thos of us who are directly and negatively affected by trans bathroom panic why GOP/fundamentalists are crafting laws that specify "original birth certificate" as the sole determinant for bathroom privileges. Trans people in *most* states can get their state ids updated to reflect their new gender. The US state department issues passports with new gender markers. Those are good enough to get into a foreign country, but apparently not a bathroom in some jurisdictions. IF trans people were a diversion/strawman, then the bill would be crafted to call for a much looser standard than original birth certificate. But no, they aren't. They are SPECIFICALLY crafted to target the trans community. "Keeping pervs out of bathrooms" is just the side effect.

And really, the people pushing these laws seem to have forgotten about trans men, whom they want to send to the women's room where there WILL be problems, because the women in there will assume they're pervy rapists invading their space.

Wait, maybe that's the plan. Shame the trans women and keep them terrified of public restrooms, and put trans men in a position of having the cops called when they need to pee. Sigh.
 
2018-02-09 02:13:24 PM  

Eclectic: ChicagoKev: Everybody likes to pretend the opposition is about trans folk, but that's a strawman at best. People prefer the status quo: zero tolerance for any manly-looking perv loitering in the ladies room.

Then please explain to those of us who are directly and negatively affected by trans bathroom panic why GOP/fundamentalists are crafting laws...


As I said people prefer the status quo --  it's only the activists/fundamentalists who want to see things change, and a subset of them are pushing for either extreme.

I've noticed a female-presenting person in the men's room a few times, never felt the urge to challenge their presence, much less "panic".
 
2018-02-09 02:19:19 PM  

ChicagoKev: Eclectic: ChicagoKev: Everybody likes to pretend the opposition is about trans folk, but that's a strawman at best. People prefer the status quo: zero tolerance for any manly-looking perv loitering in the ladies room.

Then please explain to those of us who are directly and negatively affected by trans bathroom panic why GOP/fundamentalists are crafting laws...

As I said people prefer the status quo --  it's only the activists/fundamentalists who want to see things change, and a subset of them are pushing for either extreme.


The status quo is that trans people use the bathroom that:
a) they are most comfortable in
b) matches their presentation
c) is least likely to cause problems or an incident (See b)

That's the way it's been for years and years and years. I've been post-op for 14 years, and up until about two years ago, I've never had to worry about laws banishing me to the mens room. They are a solution in search of a problem.

ChicagoKev: I've noticed a female-presenting person in the men's room a few times, never felt the urge to challenge their presence, much less "panic".


Good for you. But I have to tell you that publicly outing ones self like that is an invitation for harassment or worse. Personally, I've survived a rape and an attempted strangulation because I was outed against my will. So I won't be using the men's room anywhere, ever. Not stupid enough to put a target on my own back.
 
2018-02-09 02:24:05 PM  

Prank Call of Cthulhu: [img.fark.net image 850x636] et al


Well played.
 
2018-02-09 02:26:23 PM  
I have never understood all the fuss. It doesn't matter what 'gender' they are, they would still have to use a stall in their preferred bathroom. So you (as in the pearl clutchers) will not be exposed to anything, unless they walk out of the stall before 'adjusting' their clothing.
 
2018-02-09 02:27:35 PM  

tukatz: We will eventually have to make one person bathrooms everywhere to protect everyone's rights and feelings.


I'm OK with this. I hate having to share a restroom with other guys anyway. I don't want to hear Jethro in the next stall grunting and making poop noises. I don't want to smell him. I don't want to see his feet under the stall. I don't want to watch him leave the stall and head straight for the door without even glancing at the sink. I don't want to stand at a urinal and have Jethro stand next to me, either.

Individual bathrooms with locking doors. That's the ticket.
 
2018-02-09 02:29:14 PM  

bratface: I have never understood all the fuss. It doesn't matter what 'gender' they are, they would still have to use a stall in their preferred bathroom. So you (as in the pearl clutchers) will not be exposed to anything, unless they walk out of the stall before 'adjusting' their clothing.


Yeah, the last time I saw anyone's junk in a public bathroom was... never. :)
 
2018-02-09 02:33:29 PM  

Eclectic: bratface: I have never understood all the fuss. It doesn't matter what 'gender' they are, they would still have to use a stall in their preferred bathroom. So you (as in the pearl clutchers) will not be exposed to anything, unless they walk out of the stall before 'adjusting' their clothing.

Yeah, the last time I saw anyone's junk in a public bathroom was... never. :)


Well, jeez..! You're just not tapping your foot the right way or looking into the right holes drilled into the stalls.
 
2018-02-09 02:34:41 PM  

WilderKWight: Eclectic: bratface: I have never understood all the fuss. It doesn't matter what 'gender' they are, they would still have to use a stall in their preferred bathroom. So you (as in the pearl clutchers) will not be exposed to anything, unless they walk out of the stall before 'adjusting' their clothing.

Yeah, the last time I saw anyone's junk in a public bathroom was... never. :)

Well, jeez..! You're just not tapping your foot the right way or looking into the right holes drilled into the stalls.


I missed those classes as the LGBT Academy :(
 
2018-02-09 02:51:15 PM  

Eclectic: ChicagoKev: Everybody likes to pretend the opposition is about trans folk, but that's a strawman at best. People prefer the status quo: zero tolerance for any manly-looking perv loitering in the ladies room.

Then please explain to thos of us who are directly and negatively affected by trans bathroom panic why GOP/fundamentalists are crafting laws that specify "original birth certificate" as the sole determinant for bathroom privileges. Trans people in *most* states can get their state ids updated to reflect their new gender. The US state department issues passports with new gender markers. Those are good enough to get into a foreign country, but apparently not a bathroom in some jurisdictions. IF trans people were a diversion/strawman, then the bill would be crafted to call for a much looser standard than original birth certificate. But no, they aren't. They are SPECIFICALLY crafted to target the trans community. "Keeping pervs out of bathrooms" is just the side effect.

And really, the people pushing these laws seem to have forgotten about trans men, whom they want to send to the women's room where there WILL be problems, because the women in there will assume they're pervy rapists invading their space.

Wait, maybe that's the plan. Shame the trans women and keep them terrified of public restrooms, and put trans men in a position of having the cops called when they need to pee. Sigh.


I am almost 100% certain the mean conservatives weren't touching you in scary places before activists started yammering about enshrining in law letting anybody go into whatever bathroom they want.  If people used the bathroom that matched their outward appearance like the status quo since bathrooms there would be no need to have any kind of law.  The worst outcome, IMO, is to create laws that state anybody can self-identify as anything in terms of bathroom and locker room usage.  The number of problems it solves is near zero while it creates a lot of potential problems with giving pervs legal access.
 
2018-02-09 02:58:52 PM  

CivicMindedFive: Eclectic: ChicagoKev: Everybody likes to pretend the opposition is about trans folk, but that's a strawman at best. People prefer the status quo: zero tolerance for any manly-looking perv loitering in the ladies room.

Then please explain to thos of us who are directly and negatively affected by trans bathroom panic why GOP/fundamentalists are crafting laws that specify "original birth certificate" as the sole determinant for bathroom privileges. Trans people in *most* states can get their state ids updated to reflect their new gender. The US state department issues passports with new gender markers. Those are good enough to get into a foreign country, but apparently not a bathroom in some jurisdictions. IF trans people were a diversion/strawman, then the bill would be crafted to call for a much looser standard than original birth certificate. But no, they aren't. They are SPECIFICALLY crafted to target the trans community. "Keeping pervs out of bathrooms" is just the side effect.

And really, the people pushing these laws seem to have forgotten about trans men, whom they want to send to the women's room where there WILL be problems, because the women in there will assume they're pervy rapists invading their space.

Wait, maybe that's the plan. Shame the trans women and keep them terrified of public restrooms, and put trans men in a position of having the cops called when they need to pee. Sigh.

I am almost 100% certain the mean conservatives weren't touching you in scary places before activists started yammering about enshrining in law letting anybody go into whatever bathroom they want.  If people used the bathroom that matched their outward appearance like the status quo since bathrooms there would be no need to have any kind of law.  The worst outcome, IMO, is to create laws that state anybody can self-identify as anything in terms of bathroom and locker room usage.  The number of problems it solves is near zero while it creates a lot of potential problems with ...


Damn marginalized people, asking for explicit anti-discrimination protections! If they just kept their heads down and mouths shut and kept hiding, the GOP wouldn't have to punish them!
*rolls eyes*
 
2018-02-09 03:02:49 PM  

CivicMindedFive: I am almost 100% certain the mean conservatives weren't touching you in scary places before activists started yammering about enshrining in law letting anybody go into whatever bathroom they want.


Oh, actually, let me honestly answer this. After I transitioned, my employer at the time demanded I use a bathroom in a building not owned by the company.  Then after I was a good girl, I got to use the one in the basement parking garage, as long as I took a spotter with me to guard the door. Totally not illegal in the state I was in. So yeah, why ask for anti-discrimination protections? Because of businesses and municipalities being able bullshiat like that.
 
2018-02-09 04:23:26 PM  

WilderKWight: Prank Call of Cthulhu: [img.fark.net image 850x636] et al

Well played.


img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2018-02-09 05:01:48 PM  
What's so hard about just going in the bathroom that matches your sex? If you want to see d!cks in the ladies room, just go to pornhub like the rest of us.
 
Displayed 50 of 109 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report