If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Beast)   The Schumer fake sex scandal documents? They copied the language of the Conyers complaint. Wait, the Conyers complaint wasn't copied from another complaint, right?   ( thedailybeast.com) divider line
    More: News, Democratic Party, Daily Beast, Schumer's office, sexual harassment, Chuck Schumer, fake Schumer complaint, Leader Charles Schumer, Senator Chuck Schumer  
•       •       •

2965 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Dec 2017 at 11:55 PM (31 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



70 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2017-12-13 07:57:35 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-12-13 11:53:38 PM  
someone's going to jail for this, and it ain't Schumer.
 
2017-12-13 11:57:28 PM  
Not an internet lawyer, but shouldn't whoever did this be criminally liable? I mean this is libel or some crap, right? Accusing a sitting senator of crimes which have no basis in reality is a crime right?
 
2017-12-13 11:57:44 PM  

Bith Set Me Up: [img.fark.net image 850x848][View Full Size image _x_]


Guess Trump was right!  We are hearing from that guy more and more....
 
2017-12-13 11:58:55 PM  

Weaver95: someone's going to jail for this, and it ain't Schumer.


My guess Stone and/or O'keefe.    Actual jail time, though, i doubt it.
 
2017-12-13 11:59:59 PM  
Thernovith.
 
2017-12-14 12:00:41 AM  

Weaver95: someone's going to jail for this, and it ain't Schumer.


Ain't no one going to jail over this.
 
2017-12-14 12:01:40 AM  
This guy is the truth homie. He's all about responsible investigative journalism with zero degrees of Febreeze.
img.fark.netView Full Size

I mean how could you not take James O'Keefe seriously? He plays the part so authentically.
 
2017-12-14 12:01:56 AM  

ecor1: Accusing a sitting senator of crimes which have no basis in reality is a crime right?


it depends on the senator.  in this case, since Schumer is a democrat the Republicans will demand Schumer resign for actions he didn't commit and then blame everything on Obama.
 
2017-12-14 12:04:20 AM  

Weaver95: ecor1: Accusing a sitting senator of crimes which have no basis in reality is a crime right?

it depends on the senator.  in this case, since Schumer is a democrat the Republicans will demand Schumer resign for actions he didn't commit and then blame everything on Obama.


No, see how needs to resign because it's a FALSE FLAG from the Democrats.

See they plant the false allegations against Schumer to make the real allegations look fake.
 
2017-12-14 12:05:34 AM  
Oh, man, they caught another Republican committing in-person voter fraud! That PROVES how easy it is!
 
2017-12-14 12:05:50 AM  
Expect to see more of this coming into the 2018 midterms.
 
2017-12-14 12:06:56 AM  

Weaver95: someone's going to jail for this, and it ain't Schumer.


I've already seen all the alternative facts percolating on social media in this case, generally one of two theories:

1) That Cernovich and Johnson were the ones who realized the documents were fakes in the first place and that it is the mainstream media who reported them as the truth and deserved to be shamed (who reported them as true? The mainstream media apparently: that the first reporting of the issue was news that reporters had asked Schumer for comment only for him to deny their legitimacy/point out their flaws/call the police means the media got it wrong and the two people crowing to expect another high profile Democratic Senator to resign thanks to them actually were Schumer's savior's.)

2) Has anyone REALLY confirmed they are fake? I mean, just because everyone involved is denying them and they have obvious errors doesn't prove innocence. Why, at least 200 Democrats in Washington probably made secret sexual harassment payouts (based on top secret alt-right Twitter sources) so you should assume that Schumer is guilty of at least one sexual harassment settlement even if this particular one was fake (you know, like the Moore yearbook).
 
2017-12-14 12:08:26 AM  
Woooo moral high ground
 
2017-12-14 12:10:00 AM  

Weaver95: ecor1: Accusing a sitting senator of crimes which have no basis in reality is a crime right?

it depends on the senator.  in this case, since Schumer is a democrat the Republicans will demand Schumer resign for actions he didn't commit and then blame everything on Obama.


Dang that Obama and his time machine. He's been gone for nearly a year and he's still just hanging around. Why won't he just accept that he lost.....?

/ this post is brought to you by the fine people at "It's a Joke, dammit"
 
2017-12-14 12:13:14 AM  
Если вы можете прочитать это, вам не нужны очки.
 
2017-12-14 12:13:21 AM  
I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...
 
2017-12-14 12:14:15 AM  
Shiat like this is why I am still incredibly suspicious about the anonymous allegation from a supposed Democratic congressional staffer against Franken, especially given Roger Stone's involvement in the other allegations.
 
2017-12-14 12:15:15 AM  

ecor1: Not an internet lawyer, but shouldn't whoever did this be criminally liable? I mean this is libel or some crap, right? Accusing a sitting senator of crimes which have no basis in reality is a crime right?


Textbook.
 
2017-12-14 12:18:12 AM  

cptjeff: Shiat like this is why I am still incredibly suspicious about the anonymous allegation from a supposed Democratic congressional staffer against Franken, especially given Roger Stone's involvement in the other allegations.


Franken wouldn't have resigned if the allegations were provably false.
 
2017-12-14 12:19:33 AM  

The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...


Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.
 
2017-12-14 12:22:04 AM  
Somebody's going to be charged.

""The claims in this document are completely false, my signature is forged, and even basic facts about me are wrong," the former staffer said in a statement. "I have contacted law enforcement to determine who is responsible. I parted with Senator Schumer's office on good terms and have nothing but the fondest memories of my time there."

Indeed, elements of the fake complaint against Schumer appear to have been lifted verbatim from a real sexual harassment lawsuit against Conyers. That complaint was unearthed by BuzzFeed-after Cernovich, a right-wing media personality, provided them with documents from a second, similar complaint against Conyers.

The Conyers complaint references "House Rule 23" and a "mediation" process between Conyers and his accuser. The fake Schumer complaint also describes allegations as falling under "House Rule 23," which of course does not exist in the Senate. The "mediation" process in the Schumer document was never mentioned again."


These alt-right pretend journalists are pretty pitiful. They're used to getting away with stuff like this in their little safe echo chambers. But when they venture outside they just look like clowns.
 
Azz [TotalFark]
2017-12-14 12:23:48 AM  

mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.


What if he was planning to retire anyway?

He has a family to think about too. They will probably get shiat for this whether he stays or goes. And who best to succeed him than a woman? It's a win-win, IMO.
 
2017-12-14 12:27:49 AM  

foo monkey: cptjeff: Shiat like this is why I am still incredibly suspicious about the anonymous allegation from a supposed Democratic congressional staffer against Franken, especially given Roger Stone's involvement in the other allegations.

Franken wouldn't have resigned if the allegations were provably false.


You are an utter moron if you think that. Not in an internety hyperbolic way, but in a "you are truly as dense as a farking rock" way. Franken was fighting very hard to not resign until he was forced out for transparently political reasons, and still maintains his full innocence. The party forced Franken to resign because his presence made messaging very difficult in terms of going after Roy Moore- if Franken is forced out, then the Democrats are cleaning their own house while Republicans are protecting pedophiles. If Democrats let Franken stay because hey, the allegations are false but those Moore allegations are totes true, then the sexual assault thing just becomes another tribal partisan thing. Politics is often about the optics- what things look like rather than what they actually are. That happens because people like you take things at face value. Franken resigned, so the allegations must be true, and the Democratic party is good for forcing him out. It worked- Jones won, Moore lost, and Democrats look like the party of justice.
 
2017-12-14 12:28:16 AM  
If I was betting I'd go with the obvious, Johnson and Cernovich. They bragged about having it Monday, it got released Tuesday.
 
2017-12-14 12:31:44 AM  

Jeff5: If I was betting I'd go with the obvious, Johnson and Cernovich. They bragged about having it Monday, it got released Tuesday.


And when it came out that it was faked they immediately said "umm, yeah: who do you think debunked them when the Fake News tried to call them legitimate?" leading to their followers claiming that this is another case of the alt right having to correct the mainstream media's lies.

It is all so easy to pull off this scam.
 
2017-12-14 12:32:06 AM  
FTA:"Whoever did this -- I don't know if it was a deep state operation, a Soros thing, or if it was just a prankster," Cernovich said on Periscope, "but somebody's in a lot of trouble for forging documents."

Somewhere is some farking idiot who found the first two options much more probable than the last.
 
2017-12-14 12:35:06 AM  

Grungehamster: Jeff5: If I was betting I'd go with the obvious, Johnson and Cernovich. They bragged about having it Monday, it got released Tuesday.

And when it came out that it was faked they immediately said "umm, yeah: who do you think debunked them when the Fake News tried to call them legitimate?" leading to their followers claiming that this is another case of the alt right having to correct the mainstream media's lies.

It is all so easy to pull off this scam.


Are you playing devil's advocate, or do you actually think some mainstream sources reported this as true?

Because I'm pretty sure that didn't happen.
 
2017-12-14 12:38:46 AM  
I guess for some people social media is as close to starring in a series like Jackass as they are ever going to get.

/lock up whoever forged the signatures
//and everyone who conspired to make this happen
 
2017-12-14 12:48:51 AM  

fragMasterFlash: I guess for some people social media is as close to starring in a series like Jackass as they are ever going to get.

/lock up whoever forged the signatures
//and everyone who conspired to make this happen


Good luck getting that person(s) out of Russia.
 
2017-12-14 12:49:52 AM  

jsnbase: Grungehamster: Jeff5: If I was betting I'd go with the obvious, Johnson and Cernovich. They bragged about having it Monday, it got released Tuesday.

And when it came out that it was faked they immediately said "umm, yeah: who do you think debunked them when the Fake News tried to call them legitimate?" leading to their followers claiming that this is another case of the alt right having to correct the mainstream media's lies.

It is all so easy to pull off this scam.

Are you playing devil's advocate, or do you actually think some mainstream sources reported this as true?

Because I'm pretty sure that didn't happen.


Should have been more clear: Cernovich and Johnson are bluffing that they are the ones who debunked it rather than the ones who provided the original documents to the media in the first place (either created them or passed them off from a third source). It allows them to save face and pillory the media for "botching" something they themselves didn't do due diligence on.

The fact that it got all the way to asking Schumer for comment from multiple news agencies (before the story was published) is a bit sad that they couldn't debunk it well before that but I guess they did not want to declare it a fake before finding out it just is a really shoddy document.
 
2017-12-14 12:54:35 AM  

mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.


Franken was perceived as the biggest obstacle to Gillibrand getting the Dem Nomination in 2020, by Gillibrand. The BS accusations that Roger Stone initiated gave her cover to eliminate him from the field. An innocent man getting screwed was just a side issue.
 
2017-12-14 01:02:02 AM  

Weaver95: someone's going to jail for this, and it ain't Schumer.


Accuse someone of sexual harassment, invariably someone else will say me too, regardless of the veracity of either claim.  Just look at the claims against Franken--they're farcical yet they ruined his Senate career.
 
2017-12-14 01:03:12 AM  

thorpe: Somebody's going to be charged.

""The claims in this document are completely false, my signature is forged, and even basic facts about me are wrong," the former staffer said in a statement. "I have contacted law enforcement to determine who is responsible. I parted with Senator Schumer's office on good terms and have nothing but the fondest memories of my time there."

Indeed, elements of the fake complaint against Schumer appear to have been lifted verbatim from a real sexual harassment lawsuit against Conyers. That complaint was unearthed by BuzzFeed-after Cernovich, a right-wing media personality, provided them with documents from a second, similar complaint against Conyers.

The Conyers complaint references "House Rule 23" and a "mediation" process between Conyers and his accuser. The fake Schumer complaint also describes allegations as falling under "House Rule 23," which of course does not exist in the Senate. The "mediation" process in the Schumer document was never mentioned again."

These alt-right pretend journalists are pretty pitiful. They're used to getting away with stuff like this in their little safe echo chambers. But when they venture outside they just look like clowns.


It is the habit of stupid, arrogent people to think everyone is as dumb as they are. They can't conceive of someone actually outsmarting them.
 
2017-12-14 01:04:50 AM  

Jeff5: mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.

Franken was perceived as the biggest obstacle to Gillibrand getting the Dem Nomination in 2020, by Gillibrand. The BS accusations that Roger Stone initiated gave her cover to eliminate him from the field. An innocent man getting screwed was just a side issue.


Would conspiracy theories count as the "bargaining" stage of grief?
 
2017-12-14 01:05:05 AM  

LoneWolf343: thorpe: Somebody's going to be charged.

""The claims in this document are completely false, my signature is forged, and even basic facts about me are wrong," the former staffer said in a statement. "I have contacted law enforcement to determine who is responsible. I parted with Senator Schumer's office on good terms and have nothing but the fondest memories of my time there."

Indeed, elements of the fake complaint against Schumer appear to have been lifted verbatim from a real sexual harassment lawsuit against Conyers. That complaint was unearthed by BuzzFeed-after Cernovich, a right-wing media personality, provided them with documents from a second, similar complaint against Conyers.

The Conyers complaint references "House Rule 23" and a "mediation" process between Conyers and his accuser. The fake Schumer complaint also describes allegations as falling under "House Rule 23," which of course does not exist in the Senate. The "mediation" process in the Schumer document was never mentioned again."

These alt-right pretend journalists are pretty pitiful. They're used to getting away with stuff like this in their little safe echo chambers. But when they venture outside they just look like clowns.

It is the habit of stupid, arrogent people to think everyone is as dumb as they are. They can't conceive of someone actually outsmarting them.


See also: James O'Keefe...
 
2017-12-14 01:05:50 AM  

Jeff5: mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.

Franken was perceived as the biggest obstacle to Gillibrand getting the Dem Nomination in 2020, by Gillibrand. The BS accusations that Roger Stone initiated gave her cover to eliminate him from the field. An innocent man getting screwed was just a side issue.


This article was published a week prior to Franken's first accusation:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2​0​17/nov/08/al-franken-big-tech-facebook​-amazon?CMP=twt_gu

It wouldn't surprise me if somebody in big tech was involved in pressuring them to force Franken out.

Especially since the FCC is gearing up to undermine net neutrality.
 
2017-12-14 01:07:31 AM  

mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.


The lies Frankensteiners tell themselves.
 
2017-12-14 01:07:34 AM  

Sin'sHero: fragMasterFlash: I guess for some people social media is as close to starring in a series like Jackass as they are ever going to get.

/lock up whoever forged the signatures
//and everyone who conspired to make this happen

Good luck getting that person(s) out of Russia.


It might be easier to wait for gravity poisoning to run its course than to extradite them.
 
2017-12-14 01:09:15 AM  

Bith Set Me Up: Jeff5: mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.

Franken was perceived as the biggest obstacle to Gillibrand getting the Dem Nomination in 2020, by Gillibrand. The BS accusations that Roger Stone initiated gave her cover to eliminate him from the field. An innocent man getting screwed was just a side issue.

This article was published a week prior to Franken's first accusation:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/20​17/nov/08/al-franken-big-tech-facebook​-amazon?CMP=twt_gu

It wouldn't surprise me if somebody in big tech was involved in pressuring them to force Franken out.

Especially since the FCC is gearing up to undermine net neutrality.


Post hoc ergo proctor hoc.
 
2017-12-14 01:10:09 AM  
Mike Cernovich and James O'Keefe need to be put in jail. Or brought in for a deposition and flipped to squeal on Roger Stone, at least.
 
2017-12-14 01:15:19 AM  

HairyNevus: Mike Cernovich and James O'Keefe need to be put in jail.


if they survive a month in gen pop, then we can let 'em go.
 
2017-12-14 01:22:40 AM  

LoneWolf343: mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.

The lies Frankensteiners tell themselves.


i5.walmartimages.comView Full Size
 
2017-12-14 01:27:12 AM  

Jeff5: mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.

Franken was perceived as the biggest obstacle to Gillibrand getting the Dem Nomination in 2020, by Gillibrand. The BS accusations that Roger Stone initiated gave her cover to eliminate him from the field. An innocent man getting screwed was just a side issue.


JFC here we go again
 
2017-12-14 01:33:22 AM  

cptjeff: foo monkey: cptjeff: Shiat like this is why I am still incredibly suspicious about the anonymous allegation from a supposed Democratic congressional staffer against Franken, especially given Roger Stone's involvement in the other allegations.

Franken wouldn't have resigned if the allegations were provably false.

You are an utter moron if you think that. Not in an internety hyperbolic way, but in a "you are truly as dense as a farking rock" way. Franken was fighting very hard to not resign until he was forced out for transparently political reasons, and still maintains his full innocence. The party forced Franken to resign because his presence made messaging very difficult in terms of going after Roy Moore- if Franken is forced out, then the Democrats are cleaning their own house while Republicans are protecting pedophiles. If Democrats let Franken stay because hey, the allegations are false but those Moore allegations are totes true, then the sexual assault thing just becomes another tribal partisan thing. Politics is often about the optics- what things look like rather than what they actually are. That happens because people like you take things at face value. Franken resigned, so the allegations must be true, and the Democratic party is good for forcing him out. It worked- Jones won, Moore lost, and Democrats look like the party of justice.


Bookmarking this.
 
2017-12-14 01:41:05 AM  
"right-wing social media personalities"

oh, so that's what we're calling them now.
 
2017-12-14 01:51:14 AM  
 Despite knowing he probably uses his social media impressions as foreplay, I do take a peak now and then. Gorilla Mind Set is literally just seeing which turds stick. The guy only cares about the poop-scoop and credit when he manages to get a turd to hang on the wall.

Unfortunately Mike is in it for the money and whatever celebrity grade applies to someone below an Instagram model. I think he just stepped on his own dick here. Hard to see him creating this.

IMO: Mikey got so blinded by the thought of a Schumer turd stuck over his mantel. He was fooled by a document which contained plagiarism from the Conyers documents for which he was the source. He was even fooled for 24 hours longer than other reports given he had the doc Mon and most everyone else got it Tues. Makes the case for him just being someone's sock puppet for the Conyers stuff.

No matter how big he is able to grow his persona it will never fill the void of living in his own lie every waking moment of the day.
 
2017-12-14 01:55:09 AM  

Charletron: Jeff5: mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.

Franken was perceived as the biggest obstacle to Gillibrand getting the Dem Nomination in 2020, by Gillibrand. The BS accusations that Roger Stone initiated gave her cover to eliminate him from the field. An innocent man getting screwed was just a side issue.

JFC here we go again


When Gillibrand campaigned for Hillary's Senate seat she knew, as did the entire Country, everything now known about Bill Clinton's indiscretions. She proudly accepted his help and money and campaigned with him, but now that it's politically expedient she's tossing him under the proverbial bus. She also took campaign money from Trump, but said little about him until after she had ratfarked Franken.

Franken was railroaded before the ethics investigation HE ASKED FOR in part because he put his hand on a woman's waist, said railroading led by an opportunist who has proven she will stab ANYBODY in the back if it's expedient. She wouldn't be in the Senate without the help the Clintons gave her but she was ready to piss on them to raise her profile.
 
2017-12-14 01:58:44 AM  

cptjeff: foo monkey: cptjeff: Shiat like this is why I am still incredibly suspicious about the anonymous allegation from a supposed Democratic congressional staffer against Franken, especially given Roger Stone's involvement in the other allegations.

Franken wouldn't have resigned if the allegations were provably false.

You are an utter moron if you think that. Not in an internety hyperbolic way, but in a "you are truly as dense as a farking rock" way. Franken was fighting very hard to not resign until he was forced out for transparently political reasons, and still maintains his full innocence. The party forced Franken to resign because his presence made messaging very difficult in terms of going after Roy Moore- if Franken is forced out, then the Democrats are cleaning their own house while Republicans are protecting pedophiles. If Democrats let Franken stay because hey, the allegations are false but those Moore allegations are totes true, then the sexual assault thing just becomes another tribal partisan thing. Politics is often about the optics- what things look like rather than what they actually are. That happens because people like you take things at face value. Franken resigned, so the allegations must be true, and the Democratic party is good for forcing him out. It worked- Jones won, Moore lost, and Democrats look like the party of justice.


Only to people that believe the bullshiat and drink the proverbial koolaid.
 
2017-12-14 02:23:22 AM  

Jeff5: Charletron: Jeff5: mrparks: The Homer Tax: I know that "super concerned not trolls honest" liberals who only appeared for and posted in Franken threads and have never posted once in any other thread in a decade would disagree...

But us regulars saw this coming a mile away, right?

If was an obvious BS campaign to weaponize the Liberals' own morals against theM...

Franken must not play well with other Dems or something. Watch his seat go red because of third party siphoning.

Franken was perceived as the biggest obstacle to Gillibrand getting the Dem Nomination in 2020, by Gillibrand. The BS accusations that Roger Stone initiated gave her cover to eliminate him from the field. An innocent man getting screwed was just a side issue.

JFC here we go again

When Gillibrand campaigned for Hillary's Senate seat she knew, as did the entire Country, everything now known about Bill Clinton's indiscretions. She proudly accepted his help and money and campaigned with him, but now that it's politically expedient she's tossing him under the proverbial bus. She also took campaign money from Trump, but said little about him until after she had ratfarked Franken.

Franken was railroaded before the ethics investigation HE ASKED FOR in part because he put his hand on a woman's waist, said railroading led by an opportunist who has proven she will stab ANYBODY in the back if it's expedient. She wouldn't be in the Senate without the help the Clintons gave her but she was ready to piss on them to raise her profile.


I'll look forward to 8x10^6 threads about her crimes against the poor Clintons in 2019.
 
Displayed 50 of 70 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report