If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Newsweek)   The real threat isn't nuclear war, it's falling oxygen levels. President Skroob cracks open another can of fresh air   ( newsweek.com) divider line
    More: Scary, Global warming, climate change, President Emmanuel Macron, fossil fuel, fossil fuel exploration, French President Emmanuel, fossil fuels, climate change action  
•       •       •

1893 clicks; posted to Geek » on 25 Sep 2017 at 7:34 PM (42 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



18 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2017-09-25 06:44:30 PM  
It's Perri-Air, subby.
 
2017-09-25 07:16:00 PM  
Oxygen is for losers!
 
2017-09-25 07:40:02 PM  
Can we say environmental eugenics now?  The people who might die aren't the ones our elite care about.
 
2017-09-25 07:55:13 PM  
if all remaining fossil fuels were burned,

the FARK?
 
2017-09-25 08:03:15 PM  

HedlessChickn: It's Perri-Air, subby.


Grrr. Done in one.
 
2017-09-25 08:06:12 PM  

Makh: Can we say environmental eugenics now?  The people who might die aren't the ones our elite care about.


This
 
2017-09-25 08:13:38 PM  
What could ever go wrong?

img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-09-25 08:23:29 PM  
img.fark.netView Full Size
 
2017-09-25 08:23:40 PM  
oxygen in the atmosphere is O2, or O3 in the case of ozone.  that's just inefficient.  break up those molecules and we'll have more than double the amount of oxygen as we have now

problem solved
 
2017-09-25 09:14:14 PM  
Hey, we're feeding the plants almost as fast as we can! We've been slacking off a bit.
 
2017-09-25 09:58:59 PM  
Fro the Scripps O2 program, which has been observing this since 1990: "Oxygen levels are decreasing globally due to fossil-fuel burning. The changes are too small to have an impact on human health, but are of interest to the study of climate change and carbon dioxide. These plots show the atmospheric O2 concentration relative to the level around 1985. The observed downward trend amounts to 19 'per meg' per year. This corresponds to losing 19 O2 molecules out of every 1 million O2 molecules in the atmosphere each year "
 
2017-09-26 01:17:50 AM  

Dead for Tax Reasons: oxygen in the atmosphere is O2, or O3 in the case of ozone.  that's just inefficient.  break up those molecules and we'll have more than double the amount of oxygen as we have now

problem solved


That's an elemental idea.
 
2017-09-26 01:21:13 AM  

covfefe: Dead for Tax Reasons: oxygen in the atmosphere is O2, or O3 in the case of ozone.  that's just inefficient.  break up those molecules and we'll have more than double the amount of oxygen as we have now

problem solved

That's an elemental idea.


It's a radical idea, to be sure.
 
2017-09-26 01:26:36 AM  

JRoo: [img.fark.net image 711x400]


What is that?
 
2017-09-26 02:25:27 AM  
I'll be dead by 2040 so that should save some O2
 
2017-09-26 11:56:23 AM  
media.tenor.comView Full Size
 
2017-09-26 04:12:20 PM  
msrosenreads.comView Full Size
 
2017-09-26 11:04:47 PM  
pictures.jokofy.comView Full Size

/ trees, and of course land plants, and ocean plants
 
Displayed 18 of 18 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter





Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report