If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Slate)   Fox News knows exactly who to blame for Boko Haram kidnapping and murdering hundreds of Nigerian schoolgirls: Hillary Clinton   ( slate.com) divider line
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

2121 clicks; posted to Politics » on 09 May 2014 at 7:42 PM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-05-09 08:03:03 PM  
5 votes:
It's like watching Rob Ford being twelve feet away from a pile of crack and leashed with a nine foot chain.
2014-05-09 08:20:14 PM  
2 votes:
I'm beginning to suspect that the people who adhere to Fox News are not what one would consider critical thinkers.
2014-05-09 08:00:18 PM  
2 votes:

OnlyM3: Trailltrader [TotalFark]

Not surprising she's at fault- look at how she's lied about Benghazi!!
Yes, they did.

But you only care about murdered people when the president has an "R" after his name.

i59.tinypic.comView Full Size
2014-05-09 07:50:22 PM  
2 votes:
First Obama, now Clinton.

This is turning out to be quite a scandal!  I will FW: FW: FW: this off to twelve of my like minded friends!
2014-05-10 09:43:01 AM  
1 vote:
I'm pretty sure that everyone is a terrorist should always add the phrase is a terrorist after naming any person is a terrorist or group of people are terrorists in every sentence they are a terrorist utter. Otherwise, the terrorists are terrorists have won.
2014-05-10 05:47:57 AM  
1 vote:
This is clinton's BokoGhazzi.
2014-05-10 04:54:06 AM  
1 vote:

Name_Omitted: Off topic, but why did we not care when they killed 60 boys at a school and told the girls to go home and get married?  What changed between February and now, or is it just that imprisonment is worse than death?

Is there a point when we weren't pretty much in favor of dropping missiles on these assholes at every opportunity?  They've been around since like the '80s in one form or another and we've pretty much always avoided it just on grounds that we can't  find a legal reason to interfere unilaterally.

It's not like "Muslim radical group" had a positive connotation right up until last week or anything, or like we used to all think Africa was a magical land of peace and plenty and reasonable neighbors.
2014-05-09 09:15:47 PM  
1 vote:

Mrbogey: The_Forensicator: You mean the same twat who didn't put them on the terror watch list?

The hero of Benghazi?

Yea, when the phone rings, you want Hillary answering.

False dilemma. She won't answer the phone.

What difference does it make?
2014-05-09 08:40:18 PM  
1 vote:
By this logic, we should just go ahead and label every country, organization, or group of people in the world a terrorist state/organization. Just in case.
2014-05-09 08:14:53 PM  
1 vote:

Dinki: OnlyM3: Yes, they did.

Sigh.. I know this is a waste of time, but what was the lie? And how material to ANYTHING was the so-called lie? Did the so-called lie change the way the US responded to the attack? Did the so-called lie change any factual piece of information so that people could not determine that the 4 US citizens were dead and they were killed by Islamic Fundamentalists? Did the so-called lie stop any of the investigations into why the tragedy occurred? Again, what was the material impact of the so-called lie?

Too bad libulardos, OnlyM3 doesn't have to respond because he has already won this thread. Deal with it.
2014-05-09 08:11:23 PM  
1 vote:

IlGreven: You didn't see one Democrat ask that Bush or Rice be impeached over Karachi.

How can you even compare the two?

I mean, Obama and Bush.  Total false equivalence.

If God sends famine and pestilence and war, it because he's a just God.  When Satan does it, it's because he's evil.  You don't say "oh, hey, famine and pestilence and war happen either way, so good is now the same as evil!"

That would be absurd.

Bush is not the same as Obevil.
2014-05-09 08:09:17 PM  
1 vote:
They're murdering the girls now?  I only remember reading about the boys being murdered (e.g., being burned alive being one method).  But, you know, we only care when girls are being kidnapped.
2014-05-09 08:01:10 PM  
1 vote:
Surprisingly stupid, even for Fox.
2014-05-09 07:47:56 PM  
1 vote:
Thats great derp there Fox pundits. Dont hyper-extend your brains.
2014-05-09 07:42:12 PM  
1 vote:
Now that his presidency is entering its final act, Obama's got to be feeling a certain amount of relief that we will now be easing into the era when everything is Hillary Clinton's fault instead of his.

Except for the fact that I can't think of any stronger candidate, and that the democrats are not clever enough to pull off that level of Jedi mind trick, I would have some hope Hillary would turn out to be a stalking horse.
2014-05-09 04:52:40 PM  
1 vote:
Trailltrader [TotalFark]

Not surprising she's at fault- look at how she's lied about Benghazi!!

Yes, they did.

But you only care about murdered people when the president has an "R" after his name.
Displayed 16 of 16 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.