profplump: RogermcAllen: The adults would figure out the rule form the previous set, then the rule would change and they were wrong. A child who was essentially choosing random blocks performed better because they weren't trying to use previously learned rules.The article describes it poorly, but your understanding is not correct. The sets required to win the game are explicitlynot random, and random guessing doesnot explain the superior performance of the children.The specific set of blocks required to activate the lights changed regularly, but not randomly -- it had a defined relationship to previously correct sets. For example, if red worked by itself, sets containing red might not work in future trials. Or if red and blue worked together the next set might need to contain one of those two to work, and the set after that might require the other.
Splish: Basically they constantly changed the rules of the game so that what was a winning move last round now isn't
If you like these links, you'll love
Total accessTotal knowledgeTotal Fark
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jun 18 2018 15:45:42
Runtime: 0.337 sec (336 ms)