Destructor: Should the devil himself were to appear and make statements; would it be wise to discard it?
Destructor: Trust, but verify. Its okay to be skeptical, very skeptical... But not necessarily out-of-the-box dismissive.
Destructor: Here's something for you guys to consider who are quick to dismiss the article.What right wing greedy money grubbing corporation wouldn't like to SAVE money by building a green building? That's the point, right? Use less energy both in heating and cooling? That's less money and more evil PROFIT$.(Besides, from a technological point of view, they're just plain cool.)So, if they're not as green as they say they are, that's actually news EVERYONE can use. If the right wing rag IS lying about it, how come someone like MSNBC doesn't get on the ball, and call them out. It would be a wonderful scandal, they'd sell lots of airtime and ad space. And it would be wonderful, too.But, no, lets just ignore it because its evil right wing propaganda straight from the Koch bros or something...*sigh*
Destructor: What right wing greedy money grubbing corporation wouldn't like to SAVE money by building a green building?
TwoHead: Logically it would make sense for the buildings which use the most energy to be converted to take advantage of modern efficiencies while buildings which use less energy would be lest cost efficient to update.Since we are dealing with Daily Make Shiat Up here I am going to assume that logic never entered into the creation of the linked article.
Can't get enough Fark in your life? Try
More threads. More community. More Farking.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Mar 23 2018 00:19:42
Runtime: 0.299 sec (299 ms)