If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(AZ Family)   It turns out Fox News has a Constitutional right to air suicides on live television   ( azfamily.com) divider line
    More: Followup, News Corp., constitutional right  
•       •       •

11347 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Feb 2014 at 11:24 AM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-02-15 01:48:16 PM  
2 votes:
You people with your death cults and what not who ha

i141.photobucket.comView Full Size
2014-02-15 06:30:11 PM  
1 vote:
"An Arizona judge..."

img.4plebs.orgView Full Size
2014-02-15 12:57:33 PM  
1 vote:

The_Mad_Dutchman: One Bad Apple: Who is the girl ?

News anchor who also committed suicide while on the air live.


Let me guess...she was mad as hell and just wouldn't take it anymore?
2014-02-15 12:50:55 PM  
1 vote:
Hey man, nice shot.
2014-02-15 12:00:59 PM  
1 vote:
I'd start watching Fox News if they aired some entertaining suicides. Why not show someone offing themselves with a potato peeler or one of those fancy butter knives (the small ones rich farks use)? Or why not Olympic high diving off the Grand Canyon? And forget those boring as fark poker games on TV, put some Russian roulette on instead. Who wouldn't want to see Sean Hannity jump out of a plane with no 'chute, and people could guess which numbered hole he'd land head first in?
2014-02-15 11:50:21 AM  
1 vote:
"The First Amendment has some limitations," Robbins said.

It certainly does, but I was not aware one of those limitations was that news outlets had to do everything in their power to censor depictions of nudity because it's uncomfortable to people. Nudity happens, and sometimes it's really shocking. We shouldn't be shielded from seeing the outcome of very real acts of love. It'd be one thing if a news outlet was playing those moments on a loop, so that it could be seen over and over again as though it were a porn, or if it was displaying it for the viewers later in the evening news even though it adds nothing to the story that can't be conveyed without the visuals. But this was a live event, unpredictable things happen. Was it a mistake to not use the time delay? Yea, maybe, depending on one's sensibilities. That does not make it a first amendment issue though.
2014-02-15 11:47:21 AM  
1 vote:
So this will be a nightly show then? Right after O'Reilly?
Displayed 7 of 7 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.