Satanic_Hamster: A cell phone? Yes, all serious / real professional photographers use cell phones to take their planned photo shoots.
d23: Found it.http://gothamist.com/2013/08/11/nsfw_photos_topless_woman_atop_empi. ph p#photo-1yeah, NSFW, but the final line in the story is right.
kertus: Would be legal in Canada
unchellmatt: Care chases
unchellmatt: OH NO!!! You mean CHILDREN may have seen BREASTS?!?!?! Heavens!I'll never understand that shiat for as long as I live. I grew up with parents who were / are artists. I saw paintings, drawings and pictures similar in nature to the ones in the article from when I was pretty much, well, alive. Only it was the early late 60s early 70s, so more sagging and lots more bush.ANYway, I don't get this "There were CHILDREN there who say the breasts" shiat that comes up all over the US. Who farking cares? No wonder so many kids are farked up about their bodies and sexuality! From day 1 they're told they should be ashamed of them and that tits are bad.No. Tits are awesome. They should be free, let them flap in the breeze! Ditto wangs. Just let that shiat be.Care chases, graphic murders, fights, that's all kosher, but tits? That's just out of the question./no, I'm not a nudist//would never dream of subjecting an unsuspecting public to my pale, pimply ass///but really, get the fark over it already
jackiekennedy: "HAD wonderful breasts" Did she thereafter die?
unchellmatt: No. Tits are awesome. They should be free, let them flap in the breeze!
Harry Freakstorm: Costa Plente Estates.
MythDragon: unchellmatt: No. Tits are awesome. They should be free, let them flap in the breeze!Do your boobs hang low?very mildly NSFW. If your boss/co-workers would get offended by fully clothed animated boobies in a shirt don't watch. Otherwise it's all good.
WhyteRaven74: kertus: Would be legal in Canadabeing topless is legal in New York
zvoidx: Technically, breasts are for children.
unchellmatt: ANYway, I don't get this "There were CHILDREN there who say the breasts" shiat that comes up all over the US.
x23: "as 30-year-old photographer Allen Henson captured the image on his cell phone."does not compute.and after seeing the pics i am certainly no more convinced the label should be 'photographer'.
hillary: So if I visit the Empire State Building and my fly is accidentally open and some idiot posts a photo, I could get sued. Good to know. Think I'll avoid the Empire State Building on my planned upcoming visit to NYC. Suggest all other Farkers do likewise.
here to help: x23: "as 30-year-old photographer Allen Henson captured the image on his cell phone."does not compute.and after seeing the pics i am certainly no more convinced the label should be 'photographer'.Just a creeper taking advantage of dumb hot chicks.Ladies... you do realize there are FEMALE non scummo photographers in the world you could offer to model for if you are looking get some exposure, right? Hooking up with a dude like this raises the odds you'll just get typecast as another porn skag.
Want to see behind the curtain? Try
It's how we feed the squirrel
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jun 22 2018 11:14:01
Runtime: 0.532 sec (532 ms)