fusillade762: What is the logo supposed to be? I get that the thing on the left is a branch with leaves on it. But on the right? Is that a... vulture?
pueblonative: themindiswatching: Everyone has secrets. Obama's "high crime or misdemeanor" will come out soon enough.Last I checked, Presidentin while Blah didn't fall under either category
themindiswatching: arugula does not farking belong in salad
Animatronik: / / This smells like milhous's dirty laundry, there's bound to be more stench coming
IlGreven: impaler: How long until Republicans flat out lying about White House involvement in scandals, and getting caught, turns into its own scandal?...it's been 30 years, and it hasn't happened yet...
Animatronik: First they said it was a grunt in Cincinatti who acted alone, so the President' s ppl couldn't be involved, Now they're saying , well ok it wasn't just some grunt in Cincinatti, senior IRS officials in Washington knew about it, but for some reason that makes White House involvement less likely, not more./Not buying it./ / This smells like milhous's dirty laundry, there's bound to be more stench coming
Trey Le Parc: And that's what's really important, so chalk a "W" in your "win" column, and sleep the sleep of the victorious tonight, my warrior friend.
vpb: Hollie Maea: Darrell Issa is a bad man.Yes, but he's a good anal sphincter.
FlashHarry: [i43.tinypic.com image 640x480]
randomjsa: Liberals used to say that Cheney was the one really in charge and that he had to tell Bush what was going on.That was a problem for them only because they seem to think its completely normal of that nobody knows what is going on, least of all the president.
the_dude_abides: QUESTION: Do you have any reason to believe that anyone in the White House was involved in the decision to screen Tea Party cases?ANSWER: I have no reason to believe that.QUESTION: Do you have any reason to believe that anyone in the White House was involved in the decision to centralize the review of Tea Party cases?ANSWER: I have no reason to believe that.ehh, if that's what cummings is citing as proof to close the investigation, that's pretty weak. not that issa has much credibility, but cummings is just trying to sweep shiat under the carpet.
Hollie Maea: Darrell Issa is a bad man.
SixPaperJoint: So, Issa went on Sunday morning talk shows and gave "misleading and incorrect information".Will he now blame the White House for that too?
fusillade762: [img.fark.net image 463x596]What is the logo supposed to be? I get that the thing on the left is a branch with leaves on it. But on the right? Is that a... vulture?
If you like these links, you'll love
More Farking, less working
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jun 18 2018 00:35:04
Runtime: 0.308 sec (308 ms)