Bucky Katt: Weird or stupd: anyone takes seriously anything the Daily Fail has to say on this subject.
ZAZ: A lawyer representing the Jackson family reportedly objected to the evidence, claiming it was 'triple hearsay', as the conversation was relayed to Branda Richie through the assistance of a medium. But the judge let the evidence stand nonetheless.Pop quiz time, law school students. You are on the panel reviewing the jury verdict on appeal. You have a preserved objection to the medium-relayed spiritual hearsay. Do youa. Reverse for legal errorb. Affirm because the jury would have had to be nuts to take the statement seriouslyorc. Take another puff of state-legal medical marijuana and hope your headache goes away?
Want to see behind the curtain? Try
It's how we feed the squirrel
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Apr 25 2018 11:27:58
Runtime: 0.165 sec (165 ms)