Pick: God, I hate Democrats.
Headso: Skanque: I keep seeing a lot of right-wing outrage in the comments on various websites about this whole Benghazi thing, but what the hell is the scandal?The president is a black dude
Pick: Wow, Hicks tells the truth and the libs all come unglued like Hillary at a Congressional hearing. Woot!!! I love it.What a bunch of sore losers. God, I hate Democrats.
Marcus Aurelius: This guy practically screams "TEABAGGER".[static.guim.co.uk image 460x276]
badhatharry: Covering up a terrorist attack is a scandal. Falsely blaming an American and putting a target on his back for the rest of his life is a scandal. Threatening witnesses is a scandal. Lying to the American people is a scandal. Lying under oath is a crime.
rnld: o5iiawah: The hearings which are taking place now is the first we've heard from the "Whistleblowers" and we still dont have a credible answer as to why the official position of the administration in the 2 weeks after the attack was that it was related to the YT video.How were these guys whistleblowers?
Zeppelininthesky: They can't say because they have no idea. No one has been able to tell us the exact lie.
fusillade762: Pick: Wow, Hicks tells the truth and the libs all come unglued like Hillary at a Congressional hearing. Woot!!! I love it.What a bunch of sore losers. God, I hate Democrats.2001-09-30?Wow, you've been laying in wait a LOOOONG time. I must say I admire your sniper-like dedication.
LordJiro: Buffalo77: [fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net image 550x409]Wow, that is some seriously impressive projection. IMAX level, even.
Pick: What a bunch of sore losers. God, I hate Democrats.
cameroncrazy1984: Cletus C.: probably trueBased on what evidence?
Skanque: Oh.... hmmmm. So Stevens pretty much farked his own chicken? Interesting.
theknuckler_33: Oh, so that demotion story was pure unadulterated bullshiat, eh?
MSFT: Diogenes: Is Benghazi a Fark tag yet?The REAL scandal is that this is taking away from the birth certificate discussion. Why doesn't anyone want to look into that??????
Skanque: jjorsett: Skanque: The only thing I can think is that security was inadequate at the consulate on that day, a fact that we can blame on republicans who cut the state department budget for embassy security.And even assuming that to be true, what about the folks who went ahead and put people in there anyway knowing that the security was inadequate? Do they bear any responsibility, or is that reserved for people with (R) by their names?This is the most rational argument made about anything scandal-worthy I've seen yet. Problem with this is that embassy security was cut across the board, so was there anything in particular about Benghazi that was especially dangerous? What about all the embassies in Muslim parts of the world? Did we need to abandon all our diplomatic missions because of these security issues? And don't diplomats and their staff assume a significant risk being in these places in the first place? For this to be scandalous there would have to be specific documents addressing a lack of security at the Benghazi installation in particular, and proof that said reports were ignored.
Diogenes: Is Benghazi a Fark tag yet?
Want more news before we break it? Try
See what's behind the green doorand help keep the tap flowing
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: May 25 2018 07:43:34
Runtime: 0.486 sec (485 ms)