If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Guardian)   "Folk neuroscience" is part of how we talk about ourselves now, but much of what passes as knowledge is inaccurate   ( guardian.co.uk) divider line
    More: Obvious, Neuroscience, cognitive sciences, scientific data, government spending, physical effects, HBP  
•       •       •

1848 clicks; posted to Geek » on 04 Mar 2013 at 12:48 PM (5 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-03-04 02:33:13 PM  
1 vote:
My take on the article: Popular neuroscience is incorrect, but I'm not going to go into specifics on which popular takes are incorrect or why they're incorrect. Take my word for it; I'm a neuropsychologist.
2013-03-04 01:37:13 PM  
1 vote:
can we just fast forward this thread to the "Time Cube" level of mental dilusion and take off from there?
2013-03-04 12:58:12 PM  
1 vote:
otherwise know as "Why do people believe a hastily put together photoshopped email attachment than actual research"
Displayed 3 of 3 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.