Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.
tallguywithglasseson: Walker: it's a factIt's a claim. Should be easy to prove if true.
Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.
rooftop235: [3.bp.blogspot.com image 320x320]
ElBarto79: And on another note; Jerry Seinfeld, at the height of his fame, was dating a 16 year old and no one said anything about it, not even her parents. Is there a double standard here where a heterosexual relationship with a very young girl is ok, even if some people shake their heads, but a homosexual one is criminal?
FuryOfFirestorm: Kevin72: Kevin Clash's crime isn't that he sexed the 18 year old or even 16 year old kid. It's that he was damned cheap with his time care and money and so the kid shoplifts with no direcftion. Would it have been too much trouble to also have encouraged the kid to go to school and make something of his life or at least used his connections to get him a cushy job instead of just loving and leaving the kid?He violated Dan Savage's "Campfire rule", and now he's paying the price.
tallguywithglasseson: HotWingConspiracy: Not really.Unless you consider changing your story for money as an aid to credibility.At best he has made it impossible to believe him one way or the other, and in the absence of any evidence...well it's time to move on to the next grift/armed robbery.He's already said he was paid $125,000 by the Elmo guy to change his story. That's on the record.If he can show that he really did receive $125,000 from the accused shortly before or after changing his story, it certainly helps his credibility at this point -- considering right now there's nothing to back up his claim (which, as I said, should be very easy to back up). And the payoff works both ways. If the Elmo guy paid him $125,000 right around the time the accuser changed his story, that's going to be a tough one for him to explain. $125k isn't "I just wanted it to go away" money.
FraggleStickCar: A 16 year old, boy or girl, is old enough to know whether or not they want to sleep with a 45 year old.
Cythraul: Maybe not socially acceptable for you. I really don't care if people want to have sex with someone half their age, as long as everyone involved is of legal age.
Slaxl: Walker: Cythraul: Looks like this scumbag wants more money.No. Looks like he was paid off to change his story (it's a fact he was as the article states) and it was eating at him.Everything articles state are facts now? Good grief.
Diogenes: Justice needs to be served one way or the other, but...Last week, the Smoking Gun took a look at Stephens, a struggling model/actor who has been arrested a few times on charges ranging from passing a bad check to reckless driving to robbing a former employer at knifepoint....the accuser isn't exactly holding a strong hand.
FirstNationalBastard: If the Sesame folks did an investigation, I can't believe they would cover for someone having sex with an underage boy.
Can't get enough Fark in your life? Try
More threads. More community. More Farking.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Mar 20 2018 10:17:09
Runtime: 0.710 sec (709 ms)