Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Townhall)   Yes,Obama did not order a gutting of work requirements, but his administration is urging liberal states to do that   ( divider line
    More: Obvious, President Obama, the liberal state, Pants On Fire, welfare recipients, get to the point, United States  
•       •       •

562 clicks; posted to Politics » on 02 Oct 2012 at 7:59 AM (5 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2012-10-02 09:11:03 AM  
1 vote:
"Fact-checkers are Often Partisans Posing as Neutralists"

2012-10-02 08:35:07 AM  
1 vote:

thurstonxhowell: moanerific: PonceAlyosha: PC LOAD LETTER: "State's Rights, but only if we agree with the rights."

The GOP conception of states rights means that their (red) states gets to decide who gets rights.

Funny Liberals are the exact same way when it comes to gay marriage, pot legalization, and restrictions on gun rights.

Your first two examples are cases of liberals wanting to give more people more rights.

You're missing the point. He's trying to point out that both sides r teh bad, and that's why you should always and only vote Republican.
2012-10-02 08:19:46 AM  
1 vote:
FTFA: "But states can do that by keeping better records of job attainment and by enticing more people to go onto welfare, which will boost the number of those leaving it."

While the article in general is a piece of farce, the statement above is where it loses touch with any semblance of reality. Anyone that's actually been to a social services office can tell you that the only thing the people there would like to "entice you" to do is gtfo their faces so that they don't have to deal with you.

They won't encourage you to get on welfare or food stamps, most of them don't even give a fark about you or your problem, you think they give a shiat if it effects the job numbers?!?

I love how these geniuses go on and on about the vast government conspiracies to enslave the populace via welfare. If they would have actually interacted with a government agency at any point they should be fully aware that they aren't capable of working together to finish a sack race, much less conspire to assist an incumbent president get re-elected through some obscure plot.

If you're going to be insane about an issue, at least be entertaining.
2012-10-02 08:13:40 AM  
1 vote:
Old News... I love the fact that he's telling defense comnies not to give notice of pending lay offs as perscribed by law because such notices would be given on November 1st. And the best part, he's telling them that we the tax payer will cover any legal bills that result from law suits resulting from not giving this notice. I guess this is just his way of keeping the lawyers employed. fuktard!
2012-10-02 08:07:22 AM  
1 vote:
More KKKrap from KKKlownhall, brought to you by!
2012-10-02 08:02:36 AM  
1 vote:
"State's Rights, but only if we agree with the rights."
Displayed 6 of 6 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.