ttc2301: I want those two minutes back.
TripcodeMel: I will only begin to even CONSIDER accepting this line of reasoning when someone can tell me how it can be implemented.
BuckTurgidson: Joe, your problem isn't guns, it's me mercifully suffocating you to death with a pillow to the reluctant but nodding acceptance of everyone on Earth who is not also as retarded as you are./ Would you sell a pillow at WalMart?
MayoSlather: The potential for dozens of deaths is still too much. Pretty much hunting rifles and shotguns that can hold no more than 2 rounds is the appropriate limit that should be available for sale. Everything else is simply unnecessary.
GAT_00: enforcerpsu: GAT_00: violentsalvation: The Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees someone's right to own a firearm entirely disconnected from any service in a militia. But you are welcome to interpret it anyway you want.The Supreme Court also once ruled that black people are property.Just because the USSC says so doesn't mean it's actually right.This has been argued to death.The sentence, the way it is written, guarantees a individual right to bear arms.Oh, and just so you know, you are already in the militia. Every able bodied male 18 and above is part of the USA unorganized militia.Facts. How do they work?The right to bear arms is a clause dependent on being in a militia. Militias have no value without organization, because they are unable to be effective. All you have with an unorganized militia is a lynch mob.And unorganized militia is a contradiction in terms, like compassionate conservatism.
GAT_00: Drug use is not a fundamental right.The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
GAT_00: Would you listen to a murderer telling you murder should be legal?
GAT_00: loonatic112358: GAT_00: Would you listen to a murderer telling you murder should be legal?listen yes, agree with, probably notSo where's the line where we should suddenly listen and agree with the person committing the crime over the people who put the law into place?
GAT_00: Farker Soze: GAT_00: Farker Soze: GAT_00: The right to bear arms is a clause dependent on being in a militia.No, it clearly isn't, as all research into original intent points to. Please, disagree with it if you want, but don't lie about it.I'm sorry I'm capable of understanding how clauses work in English.Clearly you don't, as the militia part is not a qualifying clause.How do internal commas work again?
loonatic112358: nigeman: no not at all. if somebody wants to kill someone they will, if someone is angry, they can pull a trigger pretty quickly, and kill someone that otherwise would not have died, further it makes a whole bunch of crimes far easier to do and that is to say nothing of accidents with guns. Further you can's have a drive by without a gun. This is all very simple to understand, it won't stop all murder, but it will stop a lot of them. To say that that isn't good enough is ridiculous.i think that's the only logical argument i've heard yet against firearms
whatshisname: Wise_Guy: You know how bad Canada sucks? Our shiattiest, coldest, nobody-wants-to-live-there-because-it's-freezing-and-sucks-so-bad states--the ones way at the top of the map, are where Canada farking begins! That's better than anything they got-- North Dakota is like Florida to them. Minnesota is like the Bahamas.I live in Canada's largest city. It's at about the same latitude as Southern Oregon. We have a lake effect so the winters are mild and the summers are pleasant.But by all means, keep being the poster child for the ignorant American.
whatshisname: radiobiz: This is fun. Let's pull more dumb statements out of our butts and post em.Sorry, it's not 47%, it's 46% of Americans believe God created humans in their current form within the last 10000 years.
whatshisname: Farker Soze: Handguns are piss-poor at killing people. 6 out of 7 people shot with one survive.And only 1 in 100,000 people who have an iPhone thrown at them actually die.What's your point?
pedrop357: jaytkay: But not as stupid as bedwetters who "need" a gun to to drive to 7-11 for a Slurpee.They're only surpassed by the bedwetters who freak out about the idea that the guy getting a Slurpee and minding his own business might be carrying a gun.
dbubb: When I was a kid the future featured jet packs and interplanetary travel. I guess we didn't get there because it was too dangerous.
GAT_00: As if we needed more evidence that any Gizmodo article gets greened, no matter what it is about.
gameshowhost: MayoSlather: Pretty much hunting rifles and shotguns that can hold no more than 2 rounds is the appropriate limit that should be available for sale. Everything else is simply unnecessary.2? You've obviously never gone barn pigeon hunting.
MayoSlather: Pretty much hunting rifles and shotguns that can hold no more than 2 rounds is the appropriate limit that should be available for sale. Everything else is simply unnecessary.
MayoSlather: He's intentionally being outlandish, but the central point is there must be a line drawn when determining what is the acceptable level of killing machine citizens can possess.
Lsherm: That's quite possibly the stupidest argument against guns I've ever read.
Want more stories with less ads? Try
It's what the cool kids are doing.It's also how we pay the bills.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Mar 24 2018 04:45:11
Runtime: 0.900 sec (899 ms)