Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Time Out New York)   Jason Segel on working with Paul Rudd: "I slowly open my eyes, and Paul is standing there with his d___ out."   (timeout.com) divider line
    More: Amusing  
•       •       •

5318 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 11 Mar 2009 at 10:50 AM (10 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



84 Comments     (+0 »)
 


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2009-03-11 09:20:55 AM  
Just like a trip to the dentist.
 
2009-03-11 09:30:46 AM  
Sounds like a dream I had.
 
2009-03-11 09:32:37 AM  
i249.photobucket.com

Also, I wish the person who came up with the portmanteau "bromance" would STFU, EABOD and DIAF. In that order.
 
2009-03-11 09:36:10 AM  
You know how I know he's gay..........
 
2009-03-11 10:29:59 AM  
I don't know why I find Paul Rudd so damned funny, but I do. Even that movie he did a decade ago w/ Courtney Love.
 
2009-03-11 10:49:49 AM  
The rise of male frontal nudity in comedy films seems to have (if you'll pardon the expression) risen in what seems like direct inverse proportion to the amount of frontal FEMALE nudity in the same. Starting with "There's Something About Mary" and continuing with "Walk Hard" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," dude-junk is everywhere, now. And even though, I exclude "Watchmen" on principle due to the

And while I suppose turnabout is fair play, and I (at least in theory) support equal-opportunity nakedness, why must it only be one type at a time? What ever happened to the "Porky's" and "Meatballs"-type flicks where horny frat boys would get up and demand their money back if there wasn't a jiggling pair of chesticles dancing across the screen every twenty minutes?

Where's the fairness?
 
2009-03-11 10:51:03 AM  
(Meant to say: "And even though I exclude "Watchmen" on principle due to the fact that it wasn't a comedy and the junk wasn't played for laughs, it's still there.")
 
2009-03-11 10:58:17 AM  

xanadian: Also, I wish the person who came up with the portmanteau "bromance" would STFU, EABOD and DIAF. In that order.


EABOD? "Eat a Bag of Doritos"? Dude...that's harsh

Why not top it off with a Mountain Dew?
 
2009-03-11 11:02:06 AM  
Was it just the Octagon, or did James Westfall and Dr. Kenneth Noisewater also make an appearance?
 
2009-03-11 11:02:14 AM  

xanadian: Also, I wish the person who came up with the portmanteau "bromance" would STFU, EABOD and DIAF. In that order.


Don't get your manties in a bunch.
 
2009-03-11 11:04:50 AM  
It's not even homo eroticism with these Apatow guys anymore. It's just full on ghey.

/nntawwt
 
2009-03-11 11:06:47 AM  

carrion_luggage: Was it just the Octagon, or did James Westfall and Dr. Kenneth Noisewater also make an appearance?


NICE!

And I know most people hate these guys, but I'd drop everything in a heartbeat to be in that "troop".
 
2009-03-11 11:15:16 AM  
FTA - Yeah, and we got to actually hang out with Rush and interview them. We were like, "This might shock you, but we're going to be doing a lot of this weird guy-on-guy dancing." And they're like, "No, that's about par for the course."

This explains a lot about some motherf*ckers around here.
 
2009-03-11 11:17:38 AM  
xanadian: Also, I wish the person who came up with the portmanteau "bromance" would STFU, EABOD and DIAF. In that order.

EABOD? "Eat a Bag of Doritos"? Dude...that's harsh

Why not top it off with a Mountain Dew?


Heh.

DIAF? Dance Immediately and Feverishly?
 
2009-03-11 11:20:26 AM  

JenJens: DIAF? Dance Immediately and Feverishly?


Dildo intensely all frenchmen?
 
2009-03-11 11:27:12 AM  

xanadian: STFU


STFU: Sam Throws Fries Up
 
2009-03-11 11:31:24 AM  

howdyyall9999: Dildo intensely all frenchmen?


Nice.

STFU?

Shoves Things Forcefully Upstairs?
 
2009-03-11 11:36:04 AM  
Paul Rudd always sounded like a porn name to me. Or like a guy who was going for a porn name and missed.
 
2009-03-11 11:38:12 AM  

Mugato: It's not even homo eroticism with these Apatow guys anymore. It's just full on ghey.

/nntawwt


I am so sick of these farking guys
 
2009-03-11 11:40:38 AM  
STFU? Send turtles for underwear?
 
2009-03-11 11:41:32 AM  
Director's cut of Sex Drive has mucho dong and boobs.
 
2009-03-11 11:44:18 AM  

MaxxLarge: The rise of male frontal nudity in comedy films seems to have (if you'll pardon the expression) risen in what seems like direct inverse proportion to the amount of frontal FEMALE nudity in the same. Starting with "There's Something About Mary" and continuing with "Walk Hard" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," dude-junk is everywhere, now. And even though, I exclude "Watchmen" on principle due to the

And while I suppose turnabout is fair play, and I (at least in theory) support equal-opportunity nakedness, why must it only be one type at a time? What ever happened to the "Porky's" and "Meatballs"-type flicks where horny frat boys would get up and demand their money back if there wasn't a jiggling pair of chesticles dancing across the screen every twenty minutes?

Where's the fairness?


I dont get it - NOBODY wants to see male genitalia in a comedy movie - not even women. Unless they are WHORES!

All the women I know thought that the male nudity in Forgetting Sarah Marshall was disgusting, and made the movie even worse than it already was.
 
2009-03-11 11:45:27 AM  
Tissot: Mugato: It's not even homo eroticism with these Apatow guys anymore. It's just full on ghey.

/nntawwt

I am so sick of these farking guys


Much like the Frat Pack, they'll probably be a memory in four years.
 
2009-03-11 11:45:41 AM  

MaxxLarge: The rise of male frontal nudity in comedy films seems to have (if you'll pardon the expression) risen in what seems like direct inverse proportion to the amount of frontal FEMALE nudity in the same. Starting with "There's Something About Mary" and continuing with "Walk Hard" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," dude-junk is everywhere, now. And even though, I exclude "Watchmen" on principle due to the

And while I suppose turnabout is fair play, and I (at least in theory) support equal-opportunity nakedness, why must it only be one type at a time? What ever happened to the "Porky's" and "Meatballs"-type flicks where horny frat boys would get up and demand their money back if there wasn't a jiggling pair of chesticles dancing across the screen every twenty minutes?

Where's the fairness?


I'm just throwing an idea out there here, but perhaps it's that seeing just boobs, or just penis, the body part is desexualized, satisfying the censors at MPAA. If the naked body parts share the screen, it seems far too sexual for many people (prudes, I'd call them) which means film-makers find themselves in the unappealable and unfathomable grip of the MPAA hidden board of reviewers.

Part of that may legitimately stem from the fact that, in real life, the presence of a naked woman and naked man together in a scene, where both actors are reasonably attractive, almost always does lead to sexual encounters (since most people spend little time in nude beaches or art classes).

Me, I'd like to see nudity be so common as to be unnoticeable, any more than any other clothing choice. But that's just my permissive way.
 
2009-03-11 11:46:33 AM  

Scott the Twat: Paul Rudd always sounded like a porn name to me. Or like a guy who was going for a porn name and missed.


That'd be Paul Rutt.
 
2009-03-11 11:54:37 AM  
Paul Rudd is hilarious. I don't want to see his cock, but he's a funny guy.
 
2009-03-11 12:04:02 PM  

xanadian: DIAF


Don't Infer Acronyms Falsely?
 
2009-03-11 12:06:44 PM  

Lee's_Austin: Much like the Frat Pack, they'll probably be a memory in four years.


The "Frat Pack" is still very much alive and active.
 
2009-03-11 12:09:31 PM  

Tissot: MaxxLarge: The rise of male frontal nudity in comedy films seems to have (if you'll pardon the expression) risen in what seems like direct inverse proportion to the amount of frontal FEMALE nudity in the same. Starting with "There's Something About Mary" and continuing with "Walk Hard" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," dude-junk is everywhere, now. And even though, I exclude "Watchmen" on principle due to the

And while I suppose turnabout is fair play, and I (at least in theory) support equal-opportunity nakedness, why must it only be one type at a time? What ever happened to the "Porky's" and "Meatballs"-type flicks where horny frat boys would get up and demand their money back if there wasn't a jiggling pair of chesticles dancing across the screen every twenty minutes?

Where's the fairness?

I dont get it - NOBODY wants to see male genitalia in a comedy movie - not even women. Unless they are WHORES!

All the women I know thought that the male nudity in Forgetting Sarah Marshall was disgusting, and made the movie even worse than it already was.


I don't think it ruins a movie in anyway, unless you're that homophobic. And I thought Forgeting Sarah Marshall was good. I also don't think a woman wanting to see some balls makes her a whore. I mean I love tits and ass, does that make me a whore?
 
2009-03-11 12:13:19 PM  

museamused: xanadian: DIAF

Don't Infer Acronyms Falsely?


Did I Already Fart?

/yes, many times actually
 
2009-03-11 12:14:19 PM  
kronicfeld: Lee's_Austin: Much like the Frat Pack, they'll probably be a memory in four years.

The "Frat Pack" is still very much alive and active.


Agreed to a certain extent. They're still around and making films, but they're no where near as popular as they were about four years ago or as popular are Rudd, Segel, Rogen, Jonah Hill or Michael Cera, for that matter, are now.
 
2009-03-11 12:19:25 PM  

RantCasey: I don't think it ruins a movie in anyway, unless you're that homophobic. And I thought Forgeting Sarah Marshall was good. I also don't think a woman wanting to see some balls makes her a whore. I mean I love tits and ass, does that make me a whore?



Agreed. I thought the movie was quite funny and the nudity was meant to highlight the vulnerability of the character. Some naked, vulnerable Rudd would have made it even better.
 
2009-03-11 12:27:23 PM  
I'll gladly be a whore if it means I can wake up and see Paul Rudd standing there with his dick hanging out.
 
2009-03-11 12:36:27 PM  
Hi, I get called Paul Rudd all the time (or that guy from Clueless/40 year old Virgin/etc. when they don't know his name), and just want to say Jason Segel is gay for looking.

That's how I know he is gay.
 
2009-03-11 12:38:36 PM  
I request a fairness doctrine of nudity in comedies. I need boobage to console my manwangshock. I had no idea this guy was thuh gei. I like the new comedy dynasty/ies, while hit or miss, they are mostly hit expecially compared to comedies from 15-20+ years ago. Hell, even sandler fell off after the first few movies, same with ol jimmy mask boy.
 
2009-03-11 12:59:28 PM  

Lee's_Austin: kronicfeld: Lee's_Austin: Much like the Frat Pack, they'll probably be a memory in four years.

The "Frat Pack" is still very much alive and active.

Agreed to a certain extent. They're still around and making films, but they're no where near as popular as they were about four years ago or as popular are Rudd, Segel, Rogen, Jonah Hill or Michael Cera, for that matter, are now.


Correct, they're no where near as popular as the Apatow guys because the Frat Pack members are still more popular/famous.
 
2009-03-11 01:12:12 PM  

RantCasey: Tissot: MaxxLarge: The rise of male frontal nudity in comedy films seems to have (if you'll pardon the expression) risen in what seems like direct inverse proportion to the amount of frontal FEMALE nudity in the same. Starting with "There's Something About Mary" and continuing with "Walk Hard" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," dude-junk is everywhere, now. And even though, I exclude "Watchmen" on principle due to the

And while I suppose turnabout is fair play, and I (at least in theory) support equal-opportunity nakedness, why must it only be one type at a time? What ever happened to the "Porky's" and "Meatballs"-type flicks where horny frat boys would get up and demand their money back if there wasn't a jiggling pair of chesticles dancing across the screen every twenty minutes?

Where's the fairness?

I dont get it - NOBODY wants to see male genitalia in a comedy movie - not even women. Unless they are WHORES!

All the women I know thought that the male nudity in Forgetting Sarah Marshall was disgusting, and made the movie even worse than it already was.

I don't think it ruins a movie in anyway, unless you're that homophobic. And I thought Forgeting Sarah Marshall was good. I also don't think a woman wanting to see some balls makes her a whore. I mean I love tits and ass, does that make me a whore?


That is such a thing that a guy person would say - That if I dont enjoy looking at cocks in a movie then I must be homophobic! Yeah, whatever.

And you cannot compare men liking to look at T&A, to women liking to look at penis. Men are mentally, physically - physiologically - different then women, especially when it comes to sex. As everyone knows - guys are visual. So it is standard for a man to like looking at that, but for a woman...not so much unless they are a ________!

/I am kinda joking about the whore thing, but just making a point
 
2009-03-11 01:17:23 PM  
Paul Rudd consistently cracks me up. His delivery just toasts me every time.
 
2009-03-11 01:17:40 PM  
rocky_howard: Correct, they're no where near as popular as the Apatow guys because the Frat Pack members are still more popular/famous.

This is true; no argument. The Apatow clique is more the flavor of the month now so they seem to be more popular/famous. I just don't see them being nearly as popular in a few years as they are now, but will probably still be relevant much like the Frat Pack players.
 
2009-03-11 01:23:33 PM  

mattharvest: Scott the Twat: Paul Rudd always sounded like a porn name to me. Or like a guy who was going for a porn name and missed.

That'd be Paul Rutt.


Hadn't thought of that one! I was thinking Paul Rod. Or Pull Rod.
 
2009-03-11 01:38:06 PM  
What a hacky, douchey interview. My guess is that Segel is pretty sick of those hackneyed questions from everyone...I know I am. And yeah, bromance inventor? DIAF while EABOD.
 
2009-03-11 01:40:32 PM  

Tissot: /I am kinda joking about the whore thing, but just making a point


A stupid point?

While studies have confirmed that men are more visual in terms of responding to sexual cues, those same studies have also confirmed that it's only a measure of degree. Women are quite responsive to visual stimulation, including nudity. Suggesting somehow that a woman is immoral or abnormal for enjoying the naked male (or female, if they're gay) form is beyond close-minded. It's outright ignorant and foolish.

If you don't like seeing a penis, that's your problem, not ours.
 
2009-03-11 01:50:44 PM  

RantCasey: Tissot: MaxxLarge: The rise of male frontal nudity in comedy films seems to have (if you'll pardon the expression) risen in what seems like direct inverse proportion to the amount of frontal FEMALE nudity in the same. Starting with "There's Something About Mary" and continuing with "Walk Hard" and "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," dude-junk is everywhere, now. And even though, I exclude "Watchmen" on principle due to the

And while I suppose turnabout is fair play, and I (at least in theory) support equal-opportunity nakedness, why must it only be one type at a time? What ever happened to the "Porky's" and "Meatballs"-type flicks where horny frat boys would get up and demand their money back if there wasn't a jiggling pair of chesticles dancing across the screen every twenty minutes?

Where's the fairness?

I dont get it - NOBODY wants to see male genitalia in a comedy movie - not even women. Unless they are WHORES!

All the women I know thought that the male nudity in Forgetting Sarah Marshall was disgusting, and made the movie even worse than it already was.

I don't think it ruins a movie in anyway, unless you're that homophobic. And I thought Forgeting Sarah Marshall was good. I also don't think a woman wanting to see some balls makes her a whore. I mean I love tits and ass, does that make me a whore?


Just because someone doesn't want to look at dicks makes them homophobic?
 
2009-03-11 02:02:09 PM  

mattharvest: Tissot: /I am kinda joking about the whore thing, but just making a point

A stupid point?

While studies have confirmed that men are more visual in terms of responding to sexual cues, those same studies have also confirmed that it's only a measure of degree. Women are quite responsive to visual stimulation, including nudity. Suggesting somehow that a woman is immoral or abnormal for enjoying the naked male (or female, if they're gay) form is beyond close-minded. It's outright ignorant and foolish.

If you don't like seeing a penis, that's your problem, not ours.


1) You just made up that stuff about the study - men and women could not possibly be more different in terms of sexual stimulation

2) My original point was simply that most women that I know would prefer not to see male genitalia in a stupid comedy just for shock effect - and especially not from that Jason Segel dude. If it fits the movie/scene - a la Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises - then that is good, and also if they are purposely watching porn.

3) You can look at penis all day long, and I am one of the most sexually open people you'll find, but the only penis I personally want to look at is my own.
 
2009-03-11 02:11:13 PM  

Tissot: mattharvest: Tissot: /I am kinda joking about the whore thing, but just making a point

A stupid point?

While studies have confirmed that men are more visual in terms of responding to sexual cues, those same studies have also confirmed that it's only a measure of degree. Women are quite responsive to visual stimulation, including nudity. Suggesting somehow that a woman is immoral or abnormal for enjoying the naked male (or female, if they're gay) form is beyond close-minded. It's outright ignorant and foolish.

If you don't like seeing a penis, that's your problem, not ours.

1) You just made up that stuff about the study - men and women could not possibly be more different in terms of sexual stimulation

2) My original point was simply that most women that I know would prefer not to see male genitalia in a stupid comedy just for shock effect - and especially not from that Jason Segel dude. If it fits the movie/scene - a la Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises - then that is good, and also if they are purposely watching porn.

3) You can look at penis all day long, and I am one of the most sexually open people you'll find, but the only penis I personally want to look at is my own.


1) Absolutely. This is why posters of male teen idols sell so poorly.

2) Good thing you're not friends with whores.

3) Why do you want to personally look at your penis?
 
2009-03-11 02:12:28 PM  

Epiphany: Just because someone doesn't want to look at dicks makes them homophobic?


Homophobic is probably taking things a bit (maybe even a lot) far, but I would definitely agree that having some kind of terrible aversion to nudity, be it male or female, is childish at best and at worst probably indicative of some other more deep-seated issues. If you're a grown man and the sight of male nudity makes you so uncomfortable that you would prefer to avoid movies that show it, then yes, I would say you probably have either some serious growing up left to do or some sexuality/image problems to work out.
 
2009-03-11 02:19:54 PM  
I slowly open my eyes, and Tissot is standing there with his fail out.
 
2009-03-11 02:22:24 PM  

SGRick: Tissot: mattharvest: Tissot: /I am kinda joking about the whore thing, but just making a point

A stupid point?

While studies have confirmed that men are more visual in terms of responding to sexual cues, those same studies have also confirmed that it's only a measure of degree. Women are quite responsive to visual stimulation, including nudity. Suggesting somehow that a woman is immoral or abnormal for enjoying the naked male (or female, if they're gay) form is beyond close-minded. It's outright ignorant and foolish.

If you don't like seeing a penis, that's your problem, not ours.

1) You just made up that stuff about the study - men and women could not possibly be more different in terms of sexual stimulation

2) My original point was simply that most women that I know would prefer not to see male genitalia in a stupid comedy just for shock effect - and especially not from that Jason Segel dude. If it fits the movie/scene - a la Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises - then that is good, and also if they are purposely watching porn.

3) You can look at penis all day long, and I am one of the most sexually open people you'll find, but the only penis I personally want to look at is my own.

1) Absolutely. This is why posters of male teen idols sell so poorly.

2) Good thing you're not friends with whores.

3) Why do you want to personally look at your penis?


1) Grown women do not buy posters of male teen idols - only young girls do. And they are a completely different animal than what we are discussing here.

2) I could use a whore as a friend right about now

3) Maybe I am a narcissist and I am in love with my own manhood
 
2009-03-11 02:40:01 PM  
60% of the time Paul Rudd's dick is out all the time.
 
2009-03-11 02:40:20 PM  

PolloDiablo: Epiphany: Just because someone doesn't want to look at dicks makes them homophobic?

Homophobic is probably taking things a bit (maybe even a lot) far, but I would definitely agree that having some kind of terrible aversion to nudity, be it male or female, is childish at best and at worst probably indicative of some other more deep-seated issues. If you're a grown man and the sight of male nudity makes you so uncomfortable that you would prefer to avoid movies that show it, then yes, I would say you probably have either some serious growing up left to do or some sexuality/image problems to work out.


I don't want to see his dick, so there's something wrong with me? I'm not going to watch the movie. I don't want to see someone get gang raped either. I don't want to see animals farking. I turn away. Maybe theres something wrong with you?
 
Displayed 50 of 84 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter




In Other Media
Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report