Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Animal rights activists plead their case by mailing lab workers used sanitary napkins and needles, saying they're infected with HIV, and accusing them of being pedophiles. Your dog wants a little farking dignity   (fe22.story.media.ac4.yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

6733 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Dec 2008 at 4:45 PM (14 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



147 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2008-12-23 1:36:02 PM  
If you ever get the choice between Caribou in blueberry sauce, and Medallions of Ostrich... go with the Caribou.

... with grated Puffin on top mmmmmmmmmmmm
 
2008-12-23 1:44:10 PM  

OlafTheBent: Medallions of Ostrich...


I cooked Ostrich for the first time a few weeks ago. Terrible mistake. It had a bad aftertaste and stunk up the house.

Have never eaten Caribou...interested....
 
2008-12-23 1:48:42 PM  
Four British animal rights activists ..

i28.photobucket.comView Full Size


/does not like British animal rights activists.
 
2008-12-23 1:57:42 PM  
OlafTheBent: If you ever get the choice between Caribou in blueberry sauce, and Medallions of Ostrich... go with the Caribou

They serve both of those at Club Baby Seal.
 
2008-12-23 1:58:26 PM  

what_now: Have never eaten Caribou...interested....


Very tender... not so "gamey" as venison IMO. The blueberry sauce was interesting. Not something I'd try every day, but it was good.
 
2008-12-23 2:09:28 PM  

OlafTheBent: Very tender... not so "gamey" as venison IMO. The blueberry sauce was interesting. Not something I'd try every day, but it was good.


So is it more like elk than venison?

And as far as ostrich, the closest I've had is emu and it was like bland shoe leather.

/loves me some smoked venison tenderloin
 
2008-12-23 2:31:06 PM  

OlafTheBent: Very tender... not so "gamey" as venison IMO.


so...like moose?
 
2008-12-23 2:53:57 PM  
I had ostrich burgers once (at a roadside place in San Simeon, California - choice between that and McD's was obvious) and liked them quite a bit. Never eaten caribou, though I wouldn't say no if it was served to me by someone who knows what they're doing.
 
2008-12-23 4:34:02 PM  
No matter how I feel personally about my dogs- I love them and I know they are infatuated with me- animals must be treated as private property so long as the law is concerned. As outrageous as wanton animal cruelty is, laws banning it are based on our own disapproval, not any coherent theory or "animal rights". As evidenced by the fact that the "rights" in question go out the window whenever there is a legitimate human need or desire, such as food, medical research, clothing, or even cosmetics. And that's they way it should be.

We don't have rights because we feel, we have them because we can think and are capable of recognizing that other individuals have rights. Except, apparently, animal rights activists.

/dogs can understand "mine"
//it's "not mine" that's the problem
 
2008-12-23 4:48:40 PM  

what_now: Four British animal rights activists ..

/does not like British animal rights activists.


I always knew hippie animal rights activists would kick start the zombie apocalypse...
 
2008-12-23 4:48:40 PM  
They are always hurting their own cause more than helping it.
 
2008-12-23 4:48:51 PM  
That sort of behaivior makes me want to go kill a monkey.
animals.nationalgeographic.comView Full Size
 
2008-12-23 4:51:30 PM  
submitter: Animal rights activists plead their case by mailing lab workers used sanitary napkins and needles, saying they're infected with HIV, and accusing them of being pedophiles. Your dog wants a little farking dignity

You know, even I consider that a little gross. And it takes a lot to get me to that point.

I worked as a janitor once for six months at a high school. Girls can be very, very nasty if they want to be.
 
2008-12-23 4:52:09 PM  

Churchill2004: whenever there is a legitimate human need or desire, such as food, medical research, clothing, or even cosmetics


I agree with you except for cosmetics. Even with food there can be laws passed that regulate how animals are raised and slaughtered.
 
2008-12-23 4:53:03 PM  
I love animals but these people are clueless. The tactics they use alienate more people than they inspire. But they're too thick-headed to realize that.

/eats meat
//LOTS and LOTS of meat
 
2008-12-23 4:54:02 PM  
You know who else experimented on 'sub humans'?

biografie.leonardo.itView Full Size


/hotlinked
 
2008-12-23 4:54:58 PM  
Animals don't pay taxes so they don't deserve rights
 
2008-12-23 4:55:19 PM  

PoopStain:

I worked as a janitor once for six months at a high school.


content7.flixster.comView Full Size

Is this you?
 
2008-12-23 4:55:21 PM  
Animal rights activists are a big reason green party types get ignored. They tend to be wackjobs who had the world handed to them by rich capitalist daddie's and this s their revenge. They become useless vegetarians.
 
2008-12-23 4:55:35 PM  

PoopStain: submitter: Animal rights activists plead their case by mailing lab workers used sanitary napkins and needles, saying they're infected with HIV, and accusing them of being pedophiles. Your dog wants a little farking dignity

You know, even I consider that a little gross. And it takes a lot to get me to that point.

I worked as a janitor once for six months at a high school. Girls can be very, very nasty if they want to bepay them enough.

 
2008-12-23 4:55:54 PM  
Can we begin testing products on animal rights people?
 
2008-12-23 4:56:10 PM  
Let's wish insulin-dependent diabetes on each and every one of them :)

/gonna go have a bacon grilled-cheese sammich now
 
2008-12-23 4:56:24 PM  

Churchill2004: No matter how I feel personally about my dogs- I love them and I know they are infatuated with me- animals must be treated as private property so long as the law is concerned. As outrageous as wanton animal cruelty is, laws banning it are based on our own disapproval, not any coherent theory or "animal rights". As evidenced by the fact that the "rights" in question go out the window whenever there is a legitimate human need or desire, such as food, medical research, clothing, or even cosmetics. And that's they way it should be.

We don't have rights because we feel, we have them because we can think and are capable of recognizing that other individuals have rights. Except, apparently, animal rights activists.

/dogs can understand "mine"
//it's "not mine" that's the problem


To be fair, there are plenty of activists out there who advance coherent theories of animal equality.

Unfortunately for their ideas, however, most are just hardcore utilitarians, and so they have a hard time describing why anyone should get rights.
 
2008-12-23 4:56:36 PM  
Kill them all, and put them on someone table.

The activists of course, not the animals that would be wrong.
 
2008-12-23 4:57:24 PM  
Typical liberal behavior.

Juvenile.
Stupid.
Knee-jerk.
 
2008-12-23 4:58:42 PM  
Purported biohazard agents through the mail?
That's a waterboarding.

Seriously. These people are terrorists by any definition you care to use, and worse, they are incompetent terrorists. They should be prevented from breeding or passing their kknowledge or beliefs on to a new generation.

Perhaps they could be used for medical experiments, since they object to using animals?
 
2008-12-23 4:58:51 PM  
dealbreaker.comView Full Size

"Hello, lab? I'm going to kill all your families and set your place of business on fire! Can you at least take out the cats, first?"

 
2008-12-23 5:00:00 PM  

wildcat daisy: They are always hurting their own cause more than helping it.


It's hard not to hurt your own cause when you are basically an idiot.

I know this story was about sending bio-harards through the mail but I do have a legal question, if there is a legal expert on Fark.

Can you tell me how it is that the animal rights activists get things into the courts. They don't raise animals, they don't eat animals so where is their standing? If I want to stop the local school district teaching Pythagoras' Theorem, I would need to have a student in the school. Roe vs. Wade required a pregnant woman who had been denied an abortion in order to bring the case to court. So whence cometh the standing of the animal rights activist?

In this case, it's blackmail. Lock them up.
 
2008-12-23 5:00:18 PM  
I wonder what would happen if one of these animal activists or a family member contracts some horrible illness, the cure for which was developed because of animal testing. Refuse out of principle, perhaps?
 
2008-12-23 5:01:11 PM  

Only_A_Lad:

To be fair, there are plenty of activists out there who advance coherent theories of animal equality.


I don't think any idea that animals are somehow equal to us is coherent.

The idea that animals are inherently more tasty than us though, has yet to be confirmed through thorough taste tests.
 
2008-12-23 5:03:43 PM  
that's a flogging
 
2008-12-23 5:04:14 PM  
Some tests are necessary (I guess) but on the other side I know of tests that are duplicated on the same types of animals with the same results year after year. I know some people who work in the ANU in Canberra who do the actual animal tests - one aspect of their work involves repeating tests that they've done months and months ago (you're not suppose to duplicate proven tests because that's just being cruel) - but they do. When I asked them why they just say it pays the bills. Alas they have to become detached from their actions - how else can you do this sort of thing.
 
2008-12-23 5:04:50 PM  
Anyone who accuses anyone else of being a pedo just to beat the person down ought to be horsewhipped. Scientologists have been known to do that to their critics, too. It's the one crime in our society where you are taken as guilty until proven innocent.

Damn you, cultists of all stripes.
 
2008-12-23 5:04:56 PM  
Churchill2004 We don't have rights because we feel, we have them because we can think and are capable of recognizing that other individuals have rights. Except, apparently, animal rights activists.


So, I guess you think it's O.K. to beat very young children, then. They have some trouble with the concept, as well
 
2008-12-23 5:05:46 PM  

Teknowaffle: Only_A_Lad:

To be fair, there are plenty of activists out there who advance coherent theories of animal equality.


I don't think any idea that animals are somehow equal to us is coherent.

The idea that animals are inherently more tasty than us though, has yet to be confirmed through thorough taste tests.


Such taste tests have been preformed, and the results varied person to person.
 
2008-12-23 5:06:08 PM  

Churchill2004: As evidenced by the fact that the "rights" in question go out the window whenever there is a legitimate human need or desire, such as food, medical research, clothing, or even cosmetics. And that's they way it should be.


I'm no PETA-phile, but torturing animals just so you can look pretty is a little sick, no?
 
2008-12-23 5:08:22 PM  
I find the idea that these people might think that the HIV virus would survive that long hilarious. Any person who is trained to deal with biohazard waste knows that HIV is fragile.
 
2008-12-23 5:09:59 PM  
Anchorage Alaska

Blondies

Sourdough pancakes, Very rich chocolate milk, and reindeer sausage.

Absolutely full of win.

Just gotta watch out for the bits of red glass.

/Never liked the addition of Rudolph
 
2008-12-23 5:11:44 PM  

PoopStain: I worked as a janitor once for six months at a high school. Girls can be very, very nasty if they want to be.



Is that how you chose your name?


Anyone who doesn't like animal testing is welcome to volunteer themselves for experiments.
 
2008-12-23 5:11:51 PM  

LMark:

So, I guess you think it's O.K. to beat very young children, then. They have some trouble with the concept, as well


They don't even have to be all that young, as far as I'm concerned. Like my daddy used to say
"Beat your kids twice a day; if you don't know why...they do"
 
2008-12-23 5:12:53 PM  
Some wackjobs from that group started harassing people at a company I worked at, they used Huntingdon in the past.
They just did web searches for e-mail addresses at the company, and then random office workers ended up with "You're a puppy killer!" e-mails, along with some threats.
 
2008-12-23 5:15:27 PM  

Teknowaffle:
The idea that animals are inherently more tasty than us though, has yet to be confirmed through thorough taste tests.


Human flesh is very close to pork. So if you're a big fan of pork versus other meats, humans would probably be tastier to you than most other animals.
 
2008-12-23 5:15:40 PM  
actually, i think the bigger deal is made of these things, the more it helps their case. Don't call them terrorists, because that legitimizes them. Just send them to prison every time they commit crimes, right? Maybe watch these animal rights groups a little more closely (that's the law enforcement end of it), and prosecute them whenever they break the law.

Also, this is an animal:

scienceblogs.comView Full Size


and this is a human:

jesus-is-savior.comView Full Size


I'll care about the fat dogs when we've got the whole starving children thing taken care of.

(links are hot, starvation is not)
 
2008-12-23 5:18:42 PM  
I think we should stop testing with animals and start testing with animal rights activists.
 
2008-12-23 5:19:17 PM  
Now everybody knows that the needles contain Hepatitis NOT HIV. That is first of all. Second of all, what the fark do these asshats want us to test this dangerous stuff on? Do we immediately just take human babies into labs and inject them with glowy shiat that we think may cure cancer when there are 3562987523097 perfectly disgusting rats out there we should be testing them on?
 
2008-12-23 5:19:28 PM  
"I'd rather die here than in the White Coats' tank... it's little enough dignity we've got left."
 
2008-12-23 5:19:33 PM  

CleverGuy81: actually, i think the bigger deal is made of these things, the more it helps their case. Don't call them terrorists, because that legitimizes them. Just send them to prison every time they commit crimes, right? Maybe watch these animal rights groups a little more closely (that's the law enforcement end of it), and prosecute them whenever they break the law.

Also, this is an animal:

and this is a human:

I'll care about the fat dogs when we've got the whole starving children thing taken care of.

(links are hot, starvation is not)


This is NOT a troll and I know it sounds dickish but we humans control the breeding of both dogs and ourselves. We bring dogs into the world and we SHOULD care for them properly, especially given the special relationship between our species.

And if your region of the world is a squalid hellhole of starvation and disease, stop breeding. Nature is saying "no more here, please. All full up."
 
2008-12-23 5:19:36 PM  

globalwarmingpraiser: I find the idea that these people might think that the HIV virus would survive that long hilarious. Any person who is trained to deal with biohazard waste knows that HIV is fragile.


Fragile yes, but in the right conditions, HIV can survive a while. Needles are a good place for it to hang around.

Viability of HIV-1 in syringes: implications for interventions among injection drug users. (new window)

We have determined that the duration of survival of HIV-1 in syringes typically used by injectors of illicit drugs can exceed 6 weeks. The percentage of syringes with viable virus varied with the volume of blood remaining in the syringes and the temperature at which syringes were stored. These experiments underscore the need for needle exchange programs and other HIV prevention interventions that promote the availability of clean syringes and the removal of potentially infectious ones from circulation.
 
2008-12-23 5:21:07 PM  

itazurakko: I had ostrich burgers once


You know, they say ostrich has less fat, but you eat more of it.
 
2008-12-23 5:21:31 PM  

LMark: So, I guess you think it's O.K. to beat very young children, then. They have some trouble with the concept, as well


Honestly, I'm kinda OK with the idea of killing children under say a year old. They are much less intelligent then chimps a that age.
 
Displayed 50 of 147 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.