Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(AP)   Stock market improves from "photos of sad traders" to "photos of excited traders"   (hosted.ap.org) divider line
    More: Spiffy  
•       •       •

1381 clicks; posted to Business » and Main » on 14 Oct 2008 at 12:09 PM (14 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



33 Comments     (+0 »)
 
2008-10-14 12:13:13 PM  
Is it wrong that I still want them to jump?
 
2008-10-14 12:13:33 PM  
What is funniest about these photos is that next to nobody trades on the floor anymore. There is no point.

What you need to capture the real essence of stock trading now is some guy with an 8 monitor arm smashing his keyboard all over the place with keys flying everywhere.

Then they are close.
 
2008-10-14 12:14:41 PM  

deebee230: What is funniest about these photos is that next to nobody trades on the floor anymore. There is no point.

What you need to capture the real essence of stock trading now is some guy with an 8 monitor arm smashing his keyboard all over the place with keys flying everywhere.

Then they are close.


I want to work for that IT department.

/hmm...
 
2008-10-14 12:18:24 PM  
At least a few of my recent purchases are showing green numbers. Now about the ones I bought 3 weeks ago. I guess I just hold and hope.
 
2008-10-14 12:19:30 PM  
I can't help but feel this is all being orchestrated, and that some people are going to make a metric shiat-ton of money on this while the economy still takes a dive over the next few months.
 
2008-10-14 12:27:03 PM  
I hope this isn't just a dead cat bounce.
 
2008-10-14 12:31:11 PM  

deebee230: What is funniest about these photos is that next to nobody trades on the floor anymore. There is no point.


You should tell that to all the people trading on the floor. Clearly they are all doing it wrong and they should be corrected.
 
2008-10-14 12:33:12 PM  

Rethorn: I hope this isn't just a dead cat bounce.


This isn't a dead-cat bounce. This is the ass-end of the Titanic raising itself up into the air.
 
2008-10-14 12:34:25 PM  

Senescent Dawn: Rethorn: I hope this isn't just a dead cat bounce.

This isn't a dead-cat bounce. This is the ass-end of the Titanic raising itself up into the air.


I like you.
 
2008-10-14 12:34:36 PM  

Senescent Dawn: This isn't a dead-cat bounce. This is the ass-end of the Titanic raising itself up into the air.


That's what I'm thinking as well.
 
2008-10-14 12:35:42 PM  

Senescent Dawn: Rethorn: I hope this isn't just a dead cat bounce.

This isn't a dead-cat bounce. This is the ass-end of the Titanic raising itself up into the air.


So, is it sinking still then? I'm opening a trading account, only 24 and already putting 15% into 401k, so I want to buy things w/ the spare cash looking longterm...

I was rushing to buy in, but do people honestly think it's going to go down again? I mean, I guess it will, w/ recession having hit the big boys, in 6-9 months people won't be able to buy buy buy...

/hold on to it
//buy now
///hold on to it
////buy now
 
2008-10-14 12:35:58 PM  

Senescent Dawn: This isn't a dead-cat bounce. This is the ass-end of the Titanic raising itself up into the air.


Does that mean that the tax payers are Leonardo DeCaprio, and the banking firms are Kate Winslet sitting there watching us freeze to death?
 
2008-10-14 12:37:04 PM  
img387.imageshack.usView Full Size


Smell my finger!!!!
 
2008-10-14 12:41:02 PM  
Anybody catch Colbert's photos last week mimicing trader desperation? Pretty funny. I liked the dining on the shoe leather. In fact, I wouldn't see surprised if some of the writers from TDS and TCR are frequent fark visitors.
 
2008-10-14 12:41:07 PM  

deebee230: What is funniest about these photos is that next to nobody trades on the floor anymore. There is no point.

What you need to capture the real essence of stock trading now is some guy with an 8 monitor arm smashing his keyboard all over the place with keys flying everywhere.

Then they are close.


They have and you can see it here (new window)(not a rickroll)
 
2008-10-14 12:41:23 PM  

icstepec: I was rushing to buy in, but do people honestly think it's going to go down again? I mean, I guess it will, w/ recession having hit the big boys, in 6-9 months people won't be able to buy buy buy...


It's hard to tell. The economy would have tanked on its own. The government is basically simulating an extremely large group of irrationally exuberant investors, keeping the market afloat with artificial demand. It "works," but every time they do this they forestall needed corrections, and become less and less fiscally solvent. The problem is so big by now that they may only have bought us a few extra months.

That said, you're 24. It won't hurt you long term to invest. If you lose a couple grand in the market now, it's no big.
 
2008-10-14 12:47:53 PM  

Senescent Dawn: Rethorn: I hope this isn't just a dead cat bounce.

This isn't a dead-cat bounce. This is the ass-end of the Titanic raising itself up into the air.


Your opinion. It enlightened me.
 
2008-10-14 1:01:32 PM  

icstepec: I was rushing to buy in, but do people honestly think it's going to go down again? I mean, I guess it will, w/ recession having hit the big boys, in 6-9 months people won't be able to buy buy buy...


My suggestion would be to buy mega-corp stock which has high dividend yields due to having been beaten down. There's others, but the example I'm familiar with is GE. It usually carries a 2-3% dividend yield, but with the stock having been beaten down it's more like a 5-6% yield on shares you buy at the current price. That's really tough to beat, plus you'll get capital appreciation as the shares go up in value. GE is not the kind of stock you 'trade' though, you'll want to hold onto it forever and ever.
 
2008-10-14 1:23:25 PM  
You'd think that guys who did this all day for a living would be a bit more even-keeled.
 
2008-10-14 1:24:34 PM  

Senescent Dawn: Rethorn: I hope this isn't just a dead cat bounce.

This isn't a dead-cat bounce. This is the ass-end of the Titanic raising itself up into the air.


+1 I lol'ed
 
2008-10-14 1:25:01 PM  
the_geek: GE is not the kind of stock you 'trade' though, you'll want to hold onto it forever and ever.

...and ever and ever. Pretty good Roth IRA option.
 
2008-10-14 1:28:37 PM  
Right on the nose subby!
 
2008-10-14 1:28:56 PM  
What was the Dow in 1995? 4500? 5000?

That's where you can seriously expect it to fall in the next (pick one: 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24) weeks. Then you will have hit bottom.
(that phrase has sexual overtones, no?)

baltimoresun.comView Full Size
 
2008-10-14 1:35:47 PM  

Rethorn: Does that mean that the tax payers are Leonardo DeCaprio, and the banking firms are Kate Winslet sitting there watching us freeze to death?


Sort of, except you got it backwards. You have to ask yourself who's farking, and who's getting farked.

/steamy car windows ftw
 
2008-10-14 1:44:24 PM  
Just my opinion, I'm not a licensed broker or anything, but what I've been doing is to trade off between XOP and SDS. I had a bunch of SDS up through Friday, then switched over to XOP. Then this morning I cashed the XOP and bought SDS again, and sold it later when the dow flatlined. It's a risk, I know, you have to guess the market direction. But given how much we've been swinging, it seems like you can make a ton by switching between short and long over a few days time.
 
2008-10-14 1:45:42 PM  
And I think the Dow will actually bottom around 7000, not 5000. Inflation has been fairly tame but not non-existent since 1995.
 
2008-10-14 2:13:30 PM  
Amusingly enough this was on this weekend. Past-O-Rama (new window)
 
2008-10-14 2:35:14 PM  

Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: And I think the Dow will actually bottom around 7000, not 5000. Inflation has been fairly tame but not non-existent since 1995.


Here's an inflation adjusted graph of the Dow over the last 85 years. Only updated up to August, it is actually down to perhaps 65 on the chart. Looks like it could go down quite a bit more.

i34.tinypic.comView Full Size
 
2008-10-14 3:13:38 PM  

2chris2: Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: And I think the Dow will actually bottom around 7000, not 5000. Inflation has been fairly tame but not non-existent since 1995.

Here's an inflation adjusted graph of the Dow over the last 85 years


The pic doesn't appear to be working. Link, perhaps?
 
2008-10-14 3:14:31 PM  
It is re-adjusting to photos of sad traders for this afternoon.
 
2008-10-14 3:35:48 PM  

Debeo Summa Credo: 2chris2: Incontinent_dog_and_monkey_rodeo: And I think the Dow will actually bottom around 7000, not 5000. Inflation has been fairly tame but not non-existent since 1995.

Here's an inflation adjusted graph of the Dow over the last 85 years

The pic doesn't appear to be working. Link, perhaps?


http://i34.tinypic.com/33madc7.gif
 
2008-10-14 4:17:11 PM  
I think if you start a trend line at 1981 on that chart and carry it to 1995 and then straight, it will show we should be right around 7500 if you take out the internet boom. Which seems about right to me...
 
2008-10-14 10:13:29 PM  
Where's those pictures of Colbert making "sad trader faces" and grinning broadly while dining on a boot?
 
Displayed 33 of 33 comments


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.