Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Boston Globe)   The coolest pictures of Saturn and its moons you'll see today   (boston.com) divider line
    More: Cool  
•       •       •

7664 clicks; posted to Fandom » on 18 Jun 2008 at 10:25 AM (14 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



63 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2008-06-17 3:46:16 PM  
Cool

Thanks for the link Subby!
 
2008-06-17 3:51:52 PM  
Very cool indeed. I gots me a new background on my 'puter.
 
2008-06-17 3:54:09 PM  
I agree, lets cut all funding to NASA as a result
 
2008-06-17 3:56:20 PM  
Funding NASA reflects a pre-911 mindset.
 
2008-06-17 4:00:40 PM  
Awesome, I've been looking for a new desktop background.
 
2008-06-17 4:02:48 PM  
Excellent pics subby.
 
2008-06-17 4:03:29 PM  
For once a coolest pictures you'll see today headline is accurate.
Thanks subby.
 
2008-06-17 4:11:28 PM  
letdogsvote: Funding NASA reflects a pre-911 mindset.

Mentioning an over hyped event is a post-911 mindset.
 
2008-06-17 5:19:17 PM  
Wow, the rest of the photographs on that site are astounding. Just amazing work.
 
2008-06-17 5:33:09 PM  
Awesome!!
 
2008-06-18 9:42:29 AM  
Whoa, that was incredible.
 
2008-06-18 9:52:08 AM  
Sweet, it's gone green.
 
2008-06-18 10:09:55 AM  
img115.imageshack.usView Full Size
 
2008-06-18 10:33:07 AM  
some of those dont even look real. its awesome though.
good find
 
2008-06-18 10:36:07 AM  
Nice find, spacemitter.
 
2008-06-18 10:51:47 AM  
1. Right Click
2. Set as background.

Thanks Subby
 
Zem
2008-06-18 10:53:41 AM  
That one of Janus and Titan. Holy crap.
 
2008-06-18 10:57:52 AM  
Awesome pictures...just too bad they're b/w and not color.
 
2008-06-18 11:00:10 AM  
Why are there only black and white pictures?
 
2008-06-18 11:00:12 AM  
Yea youd think with the millions we spend on the pace program we could get some color sensing cameras up there
 
2008-06-18 11:00:58 AM  
Zem: That one of Janus and Titan. Holy crap.

Agreed.

Is Titan larger than our Earth? Anyone?
 
2008-06-18 11:05:04 AM  
Remember kids, if certain nuclear "activists" had had their way, Cassini would still be sitting on the launch pad waiting for more studies to determine if it was safe to launch.
 
2008-06-18 11:07:35 AM  
Mentat: Remember kids, if certain nuclear "activists" had had their way, Cassini would still be sitting on the launch pad waiting for more studies to determine if it was safe to launch.

Well thankfully all of the real activists are in retirement homes now.
 
2008-06-18 11:08:29 AM  
Beautiful, simply beautiful
 
2008-06-18 11:13:55 AM  
Those were cool. Another nice site: NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day.
 
hej
2008-06-18 11:14:21 AM  
Anybody know if "full resolution" versions of these shots are available anywhere? Or is what's on that page pretty much it.
 
2008-06-18 11:16:28 AM  
This one is simply amazing.....you feel like you are there!

cache.boston.comView Full Size
 
2008-06-18 11:19:12 AM  
Gravyguts: Yea youd think with the millions we spend on the pace program we could get some color sensing cameras up there

Color isn't that useful to an astronomer. Resolution is- so they cram as many pixels onto the sensor as possible and just do it in black and white.

For a ground-based probe, like Phoenix, they have RGB filters that they put over the lens- they shoot the same picture three times with different filters and then overlay them to get the full color version (this is why shadows have a red/green halo- the light moves in between shots). A probe like Cassini is moving too fast to do something like that.
 
2008-06-18 11:20:15 AM  
Ansel Adams in space. So is spawning life the ultimate purpose of the universe, or is life just some wierd irrelavent by-product? (Sometimes, the thin slimy film on some of the big round balls becomes felf aware!)
 
2008-06-18 11:21:40 AM  
Fake. They were taken on a back lot in Hollywood somewhere, then 'shopped.

/what my neighbor thinks of the space program
//great find, subby!
 
2008-06-18 11:22:17 AM  
bugmn99: Zem: That one of Janus and Titan. Holy crap.

Agreed.

Is Titan larger than our Earth? Anyone?


Titan is larger then Mercury.
Yet, smaller than Ganymede (Jupiter moon)
 
2008-06-18 11:22:39 AM  
hej: Anybody know if "full resolution" versions of these shots are available anywhere? Or is what's on that page pretty much it.

Try here. (new window)

I haven't looked through the images yet, but it's the NASA page for those images...
 
2008-06-18 11:25:51 AM  
On a quick lookthrough, it seems you can get the high res images on NASA's page. You just have to go through several pages of thumbnails to find the one you want, which isn't so bad. All the pictures are amazing...
 
2008-06-18 11:28:13 AM  
Awesome. Thanks for sharing, subby.
 
2008-06-18 11:28:33 AM  
GristleDick: So is spawning life the ultimate purpose of the universe, or is life just some wierd irrelavent by-product?

It's a weird irrelevant byproduct. I'm still shocked that life on Earth went with the whole organic molecule thing. It's an absurdly complex way to have self replicating patterns. The plasma creatures living in our sun don't believe long chain molecules can actually be alive.
 
2008-06-18 11:42:00 AM  
Cassini pix: Link (new window)
 
2008-06-18 11:44:54 AM  
I love this stuff. All subby's who post this stuff are awesome. Its these types of picture that spark peoples imagination in all facets of life. awesome!
 
2008-06-18 11:47:13 AM  
 
2008-06-18 11:47:38 AM  
Another cool set from the site. I posted it but it didn't go green.

Link (new window)
 
2008-06-18 11:51:46 AM  
I hate you subby, and I curse you for posting this awful link...because now it's going to be hours before I can decide which of these gorgeous images should be my background. ;-)

Actually, thanks for the awesome link. Those pictures are amazing, truly amazing.
 
2008-06-18 11:53:51 AM  
I do indeed love it when astronomy photos are green lit.

/nerd
//proud of it
 
2008-06-18 12:04:55 PM  
Awesome, thanks subby!
 
2008-06-18 12:43:15 PM  
axess.comView Full Size
 
2008-06-18 12:49:14 PM  
another vote for desktop backgrounds...

thanks subby
 
2008-06-18 12:49:47 PM  
t3knomanser: For a ground-based probe, like Phoenix, they have RGB filters that they put over the lens- they shoot the same picture three times with different filters and then overlay them to get the full color version (this is why shadows have a red/green halo- the light moves in between shots). A probe like Cassini is moving too fast to do something like that.

A+++ Brilliant explanation would read again!!!111
 
2008-06-18 12:50:30 PM  
These are by far the coolest pics I've seen this month. Period.
 
2008-06-18 1:07:05 PM  
Broz_Tito: Why are there only black and white pictures?

Because most of space is in black and white. Color is restricted mostly to earth. That's why they use all those artificial color filter thingees, to make space things look more normal.
 
2008-06-18 1:13:40 PM  
t3knomanser:
Color isn't that useful to an astronomer.


It is pretty useful and interesting to those of us paying for it. Not to mention the great pub they get from fabulous photos.
 
2008-06-18 1:21:00 PM  
TheGreyPiper Because most of space is in black and white. Color is restricted mostly to earth. That's why they use all those artificial color filter thingees, to make space things look more normal.

I would go that far. T3knomanser's explanation is better. Things in space can be colorful, especially things like planets.

But yes, "color" pictures that you see of astronomical images usually have their colors added/manipulated in some way to make them "look pretty" when released to the public. For example, Jupiter does have distinct colors, but they are usually made much much more vivid by the people at agencies like NASA because that looks nicer.

Lack of colors is usually not due to things moving too fast, but its simply not worth the time on telescopes to take 3 pictures through different filters. Its much more cost and time efficient to take 1 really nice black and white image. Plus, most astronomy nowadays isnt even done at visual wavelengths, so the concept of "color" as it would apply to what the human eye sees in a picture doesnt even really apply. X-Rays or IR light can't be seen by the human eye, so its color in a picture designed to be seen by the human eye is not real.
 
2008-06-18 1:23:19 PM  
The "would" in my first line should read "wouldnt" obviously.
 
Displayed 50 of 63 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.