The media's based towards a horse race, which increases ratings, which increases ad sales, which increases money.

Thus, how Clinton's winning Ohio tonight (which I think will happen, it sucks, but) will be spun as Comeback Kid II and not "While Hillary won Ohio's popular vote, the delegate count was split pretty much evenly, which means she's really no closer to closing the pledged delegate gap with Obama as before, and she's running out of states in which to do that."

I mean, I've already seen the media lay down the groundwork for this, namely Scarborough on MSNBC last night saying "If Clinton wins one of the two big ones, the race goes back to zero." WTF, that's not even CLOSE to being correct.

Not to mention HuffPo's point of CNN clearly being biased in favor of Hillary (not that that stopped Tina Fey and the SNL crew from insisting the last CNN debate was an Obama jerkoff session) is completely correct.

SharkUW: robsul82: Not to mention HuffPo's point of CNN clearly being biased in favor of Hillary (not that that stopped Tina Fey and the SNL crew from insisting the last CNN debate was an Obama jerkoff session) is completely correct.

Every debate is a jerkoff session. I wouldn't hold it against any particular station. The candidates won't show up if it isn't agreed that it will be. There's always somebody willing to shove a camera in their face.

I'm sorry, I just draw a difference between Campbell Brown having an orgasm when Obama speaks (Tina Fey's reality) and Campbell Brown insisting Obama backtracked on Cuba without his even saying anything (actual reality).

puffy999: I'm waiting for someone in the anti-Obama crowd to start claiming his voters think of him as Jesus. Some of the straw-men seem to be heading in that direction.

Dude, if barneyfifesbullet hasn't come in and claimed Hillary's the only electable Democrat this year, I'm sure it'll be coming shortly.

bartink: subset sum: * General electric owns 80% of NBC. (NBC, in turn, owns 80% of MSNBC.)

* Saturday Night Live is on NBC.

* SNL is biased toward Hillary Clinton.

* General Electric is biased toward war.

* GE wants HRC to win the Democratic nomination.

GE prefers McCain to win in November, or HRC as an acceptable #2 choice.

I can't understand without an O'Reilly style meaningless flowchart.

I have thought that overall MSNBC has been in love with Obama, but never counted Hillary out. Their math guy Chuck Todd seems to think its over without multiple Hillary blowouts tonight. Joe Scarborough gushes over Obama's speeches. Matthews literally drools over Obama. Even Tucker has trouble being too critical of Obama. Only in Dan Abrams do I detect a pro-Hillary bias.

/Obama supporter
//just calling it how i c it

I agree MSNBC is the 24/7 most favorable to Obama, but Chuck Todd thinks that way for a reason, namely that mathematically Hillary needs to blow out Obama the rest of the way to make up the pledged delegate gap. Futhermore, Scarborough's joining the chorus saying "if Hillary wins one of the two big ones, the race goes back to zero" when nothing of the sort is actually true.