Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Sandypost.com)   Oregon parent whines about National Guard troops appearing at her kids' school. "It seems a little subversive to have military bonding with kids." In related news, nothing is more pathetic than hippies who refuse to grow up   (sandypost.com) divider line
    More: Dumbass  
•       •       •

573 clicks; posted to Politics » on 05 Oct 2007 at 7:22 PM (15 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



85 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2007-10-05 5:35:28 PM  
This is just the kind of fodder the reactionary right feeds on. Thanks, guys. How about fighting a cause of actual consequence next time?
 
2007-10-05 5:51:21 PM  
This headline is like a Troll Explosion!
 
2007-10-05 5:54:33 PM  
HollandRivers: This headline is like a Troll Explosion!

Shhhhhhhh! You'll wake rush_limbaugh_sent_me!
 
2007-10-05 5:57:21 PM  
[image from img410.imageshack.us too old to be available]


Not particularly useful against an insurgency
 
2007-10-05 6:17:31 PM  
FTA: "I started calling some parents and asked them if they knew anything about it," said Slavick. "I talked to 12 people and nobody knew what was going on. Some of them had been out of class for two days, others for four days. Every parent I spoke with thought it was a little strange."

Why is the National Guard taking kids out of school for 2 to 4 days? That seems excessive...
 
2007-10-05 6:18:13 PM  
That's an awfully small high school kid, Tabatha Static
 
2007-10-05 6:19:24 PM  
Tabatha Static: Not particularly useful against an insurgency

Maybe he should have little kiddie suicide bombs strapped on instead:

i.cnn.netView Full Size
 
2007-10-05 6:21:17 PM  
Ryan2065: Why is the National Guard taking kids out of school for 2 to 4 days? That seems excessive...

RTFA. They were out on the school's soccer field doing team-building exercises:

National Guard personnel teach Sandy High School students team-building activities while propagating an anti-drug message. Some parents don't like the fact that the Guardsmen are in full uniform, but personnel argue that firefighters or police officers would do the same.
 
2007-10-05 6:23:54 PM  
SquirrelsOfDoom: RTFA. They were out on the school's soccer field doing team-building exercises:

National Guard personnel teach Sandy High School students team-building activities while propagating an anti-drug message. Some parents don't like the fact that the Guardsmen are in full uniform, but personnel argue that firefighters or police officers would do the same.


I read the article... I still don't get why it takes 4 days to do this...
 
2007-10-05 6:26:56 PM  
Ryan2065: FTA: "I started calling some parents and asked them if they knew anything about it," said Slavick. "I talked to 12 people and nobody knew what was going on. Some of them had been out of class for two days, others for four days. Every parent I spoke with thought it was a little strange."

Why is the National Guard taking kids out of school for 2 to 4 days? That seems excessive...


FTA:

District officials have brought in the National Guard for each of the past three years as part of the Freshman Focus class. The exercises are done at the beginning of each school year - this year they were held between Monday, Sept. 10, and Thursday, Sept. 13, and between Tuesday, Sept. 18, and Friday, Sept. 21.

The exercises also are designed to introduce the new students to high school and to nurture the ability to withstand peer pressure - especially when it comes to drugs.


What would not be excessive? 30 minutes and a minder present?

This is a small thing to be getting upset about.
 
2007-10-05 6:31:34 PM  
TheConvincingSavant: What would not be excessive? 30 minutes and a minder present?

This is a small thing to be getting upset about.


Oh... So they keep them out for just one period each of the 4 days? Yea, thats no problem... I thought the woman was saying some kids missed 2 to 4 full days of school because of this.
 
2007-10-05 6:55:12 PM  
Ryan2065: Oh... So they keep them out for just one period each of the 4 days? Yea, thats no problem... I thought the woman was saying some kids missed 2 to 4 full days of school because of this.

They may have kept them out for 2 to 4 days, the article is unclear. Though, I don't see this being any different than a field trip. From the article, it sounds like they never left the school grounds.

I suppose the school could have asked parents if they'd want their kids to participate, but really, why? These are the same people protecting these kids, parents and entire school. What's the harm in giving them a little bit of your time when you're in school. After all, it doesn't sound like they were being recruted.
 
2007-10-05 7:28:06 PM  
Tabatha Static: Not particularly useful against an insurgency

maybe not an instant win but massive points for sure,
 
2007-10-05 7:28:44 PM  
TheConvincingSavant:
After all, it doesn't sound like they were being recruted.

Naive. ANY time the military appear in a school, they're recruiting. Teenagers are impressionable and everyone knows it, especially the people looking to put full boots in the sand.
 
2007-10-05 7:31:43 PM  
Also, shouldn't that national guard be trolling through private schools where the children of the upper 1% go to be groomed to take their father's offices in politics one day
 
2007-10-05 7:32:40 PM  
Bonding with the kids? Affirmative.

Teaching them to skip bullets in? Negatory.
 
2007-10-05 7:35:23 PM  
+ 1

I swung by Ashland, OR this past weekend, and the hippies were starting to get on my nerves.
 
2007-10-05 7:36:12 PM  
No Such Agency: Teenagers are impressionable and everyone knows it,

except Hollywood and video game companies.
 
2007-10-05 7:37:51 PM  
I'm an Oregon hippie, so I'm really getting a kick out of these replies...

No, really, I am! And I have two sons, and you'd better believe I'll be KICKING ASS if my boys are browbeaten by some manner militaristic indoctrination in a public high school.

For every Armed Forces recruiter in the hallway, it better be balanced by a Conscientious Objector (CO) assembly or class discussion...
 
2007-10-05 7:42:31 PM  
LookOutForThatTree!:
No Such Agency: Teenagers are impressionable and everyone knows it,

except Hollywood and video game companies.


Touche. Though I think there's a lot of difference between a) not understanding the difference between crime in a video game and real crime, and b) believing the shiny stories a smiling man in a pressed uniform tells you about "seeing the world" and "honor" and "learning a trade". Different kinds of impressionable.
 
2007-10-05 7:44:32 PM  
It is pathetic that only small children and large nations seek to solve problems through violence.

Violence is the most ineffective means of seeking a solution.
 
2007-10-05 7:49:18 PM  
MORE pathetic? No.

But pretty much level with the people who think allowing homosexuals to speak at schools is an effort to "recruit" children to homosexuality.
 
2007-10-05 7:49:43 PM  
No Such Agency

No argument there, I was just snarkin'.
 
2007-10-05 7:55:08 PM  
Were gay students allowed to participate?
 
2007-10-05 8:09:06 PM  
So?

Military people came and talked to us during high school all the time. They were all really cool people that didn't really push anything down our throats. Here was how it would go:

Situation a)

A: Hi, have you thought about your future?
B: No. What are you talking about?
A: Todays military has a wide variety of yadda yadda yadda, here's some info, please talk to your family and make up your mind.

situation b)

A: Hi, have you thought about your future?
b: Yes, and it has nothing to do with the military
A: Cool. Have a nice day. Here, take a pen if you want, I got a shiatload of them.


I doubt it's any different now. Anyone else have any different experiences?
 
2007-10-05 8:13:19 PM  
I've instructed every HS student I know, as soon as they see a member of the military at their school scream BABY KILLER and run the other way
 
2007-10-05 8:15:10 PM  
flozell: I'm an Oregon hippie, so I'm really getting a kick out of these replies...

No, really, I am! And I have two sons, and you'd better believe I'll be KICKING ASS if my boys are browbeaten by some manner militaristic indoctrination in a public high school.

For every Armed Forces recruiter in the hallway, it better be balanced by a Conscientious Objector (CO) assembly or class discussion...


That would be way too much like freedom of thought and exposing children to information they shouldn't see.
 
2007-10-05 8:21:38 PM  
This is outside of the National Guards usual routine, they have a motive, and i seriously doubt it was to simply go be life coaches for a bunch of children.
 
2007-10-05 8:24:35 PM  
Wait, so sending your kids to a GOVERNMENT RUN SCHOOL means they will be inculcated with IDEAS THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORTS?!


I am shocked.

SHOCKED, I say.

/homeschool, duchebags, teach your kids what you believe not what the government wants them to believe.
//wouldn't ever send my hypothetical kids to a 'public' government school.
///anti-drug programs don't work.
////war on personal freedom must end.
 
2007-10-05 8:35:39 PM  
I can see why you don't have kids DrunkJack.

Against the war but supporting the troops Ummon?
 
2007-10-05 8:37:55 PM  
flozell: I'm an Oregon hippie, so I'm really getting a kick out of these replies...

No, really, I am! And I have two sons, and you'd better believe I'll be KICKING ASS if my boys are browbeaten by some manner militaristic indoctrination in a public high school.

For every Armed Forces recruiter in the hallway, it better be balanced by a Conscientious Objector (CO) assembly or class discussion...


I'm pretty sure the hippies up here in Corvallis are trying to band together to fight the rednecks. Ohio has a pretty big left/right split, but I've never seen so many old VW vans parked next to pickups with "Uncle Sam wants you: To speak English" bumper stickers.
/it just isn't natural I tells ya
 
2007-10-05 8:41:40 PM  
DrunkJack: wouldn't ever send my hypothetical kids to a 'public' government school.

This isn't an uncommon opinion with hypothetical parents.
 
2007-10-05 8:48:13 PM  
Persepolis, you had it mild.

The army and coast guard were both pretty easy going - but the marines were staging push up contests and other manly crap with, I must say, pretty decent prizes for a high school crowd.

There were more than a few cases where I had to re-explain the truth to a few of my friends after they got done talking with a military recruiter. The crap that got put in their minds was amazing. My favorite was that the national guard rarely is involved in other nations. *At a time when quite a few guard units are over in Iraq, mind you*. Or that you can choose a non combat role after basic. You can refuse service in Iraq, etc. The list went on and freaking on.

The fact that your conversations can be summed up in a Question-Response-Statement formula is amazing.

When I had the unfortunate experience of needing a pen for my next class, I made the mistake of trying and grabbing one from their cup. It took no less than five minutes to back away from the conversation with tact (I refuse to just tell people off, Its not my style, and saying no over again didnt work.)

My favorite was their continued use of false dichotomy. It was either college or the army for a future. And even if you chose higher education - they had their witty response about the free money. Of course - we just had an article on Fark that shows how much they respect that.

Whatever... Im on the chicks side - indoctrinating our youth before they go through the neuronal cropping in the teen years is retarded. They just arnt made for that shiat yet. If I was my parent, I wouldnt have trusted myself with a god damned butter knife at that age, much less my future.
 
2007-10-05 8:55:21 PM  
StarlingFive: The army and coast guard were both pretty easy going - but the marines were staging push up contests and other manly crap with, I must say, pretty decent prizes for a high school crowd.

Yeah, the marines had a pull up contest with us as well. I didn't really mind. I ended up getting a t-shirt because I could do 15. I don't see how anyone would be offended by it. We were forced to do "manly crap" in gym all the time.

When I had the unfortunate experience of needing a pen for my next class, I made the mistake of trying and grabbing one from their cup. It took no less than five minutes to back away from the conversation with tact (I refuse to just tell people off, Its not my style, and saying no over again didnt work.)

I can see how that would get annoying though. I'm lucky I didn't get that. The recruiters in the Northern Virginia area were all cool.

Whatever... Im on the chicks side - indoctrinating our youth before they go through the neuronal cropping in the teen years is retarded.

Well then you should be against high school altogether. Or even peer groups.

Everyone from every angle is trying to indoctronate you ever sicne you are a kid. Thank God we have brains and are able to think for ourselves.
 
2007-10-05 9:02:25 PM  
who else will fight for someone else's bottom line if not children too young to know better.
 
2007-10-05 9:07:45 PM  
I think that abortion doctors should have team building exercises like grab the tadpole with the forceps or vacuum up the grapes in the kool-aid.
 
2007-10-05 9:09:15 PM  
It is an ominous sign when the very Legions themselves are disowned by the citizens they strive to protect. The deep, subtle loathing of the military will - if unopposed - eventually harm the general public discourse and outlook on the institution as a whole. The indoctrinated distaste for anything relating to the defense of the United States will take a toll on the ranks of possible recruits. Whether this prompts the government to abandon foreign intervention and delusions of grandeur (as so many would hope to accomplish) is uncertain, however. Equally possible is that it simply looks elsewhere for a means of sustaining commitments abroad. Such could manifest itself in two ways; the more unfavorable of these being the draft. Yet the other alternative - federated barbarians from beyond the Rhine - is not wholly without precedent even in this age. Do we want the Legions to be composed of individuals nether committed nor entirely loyal to the United States of America? Do we desire to see the reduction of Washington to a reliance upon foreign soldiers for our endeavors abroad?

It is true that the Scourge of God himself was stopped by such men. But they did not save Rome.
 
2007-10-05 9:11:36 PM  
Persepolis:

Everyone from every angle is trying to indoctronate you ever sicne you are a kid. Thank God we have brains and are able to think for ourselves.


One problem. When the FFA tried recruiting me - I had very little chance of dieing. When the future teachers association people tried imparting with me the value of public service as a teacher - I didn't need to sign a multi year contract with prison time if I didn't show up.

And moreover, the science club didn't outright lie to me over and over again about the benefits of joining, nor did they offer large monetary upfront enlistment bonuses.

Furthermore, no member of any other orginization who ever promoted themselves at my school EVER paid new recruits to try and recruit me. My freind who did join up tried getting me to join because he would get and extra one thousand dollars - which he said he would split with me if I joined.

They are sick bastards with no freaking morals. If you want to not care - go ahead. I praise the people who do.

P.P.S. I like to think of myself as smart, at least back in highschool - but for farks sake - Do you really, really, really, think that high schoolers are prepared to make these kind of decisions in a high pressure social environment? My point being, I dont think we have the brains and are able to think for ourselves, and in fact, most research in social psychology tends to point otherwise.

People are herd-oriented. We are easily pressured, and we generally do not enjoy thinking for ourselves. And even if people do get tricked in to joining up deserve it for not researching the matter fully - its still a shame, and they need protected.

Im not even saying to ban the buggers - just make sure they arnt lieing pricks with no limits.
 
2007-10-05 9:19:01 PM  
StarlingFive: One problem. When the FFA tried recruiting me - I had very little chance of dieing.

Does this somehow change your ability to choose for yourself?

They are sick bastards with no freaking morals. If you want to not care - go ahead. I praise the people who do.

I praise the people who value the concept of personal choice.

(I had more written out, but thought it might be construed as offensive to the people who do choose to join the armed forces, we'll just have to agree to disagree)

Im not even saying to ban the buggers - just make sure they arnt lieing pricks with no limits.

Heck, agree to agree it seems.
 
2007-10-05 9:21:53 PM  
When we were younger, military recruiting was encouraging us to help protect America -- and they were pretty honest about it.

Military recruiting today exists for one reason: to get more bodies on board to die for oil in Iraq. That's all it's about, and that's why the military shouldn't be anywhere near our kids.
 
2007-10-05 9:22:50 PM  
Meh, I'm okay with this as long as they don't pull the crap that StarlingFive's recruiters were. Also, I agree that that they should present an alternative to it, but it's a government funded school so you're gonna have the occasional propaganda run.
 
2007-10-05 9:29:57 PM  
The_Sponge: + 1

I swung by Ashland, OR this past weekend, and the hippies were starting to get on my nerves.


Probably best to stay out of Ashland, then--since, you know, the hippies are the ones who live there and all.

Just sayin'.
 
2007-10-05 9:30:20 PM  
"It seems a little subversive to have military bonding with kids."

But subversive is good, right? Fighting the power and all that, right?
 
2007-10-05 9:33:44 PM  
Persepolis: I praise the people who value the concept of personal choice.

That's what I don't understand. Do people believe the United States will suddenly abandon her foreign adventures if the recruitment levels for the military decline substantially? That's a very dangerous assumption to be making, especially when the United States has so many commitments aboard. Do they think it'd be in the best interest of anyone that an army of draftees and levied soldiers are used in place of our current motivated, all volunteer force?

Nihawānd would attest to the folly of such thinking. Any army of conscripts and foreign mercenaries does not replace a dedicated, loyal and seasoned force.
 
2007-10-05 9:36:06 PM  
Persepolis: Heck, agree to agree it seems.

Indeed. However, I still think that letting recruiters go on with their asshattery because personal choice is important is slightly odd.

Personal choice should not negate moral standards on the side of the people putting up those said choices. If anything, knowing that people have personal choices should make their obligations to moral standards higher and more precise.

Let it be a choice, put the real facts out, and stop the idiotic recruiters from giving the whole dam system a bad reputation.

I'm not generally against the system. But I hate this part of it with a passion.
 
2007-10-05 9:36:48 PM  
flozell: I'm an Oregon hippie, so I'm really getting a kick out of these replies...

No, really, I am! And I have two sons, and you'd better believe I'll be KICKING ASS if my boys are browbeaten by some manner militaristic indoctrination in a public high school.

For every Armed Forces recruiter in the hallway, it better be balanced by a Conscientious Objector (CO) assembly or class discussion...


What, so YOU being a Conscientious Objector at home as a parent in the life of your child isn't a good enough balance? Wow.
 
2007-10-05 9:41:24 PM  
StarlingFive: Let it be a choice, put the real facts out, and stop the idiotic recruiters from giving the whole dam system a bad reputation.

All I was saying was based on what I saw, it was handled just as it should be.

From this article, I really don't see where the line was crossed.
 
2007-10-05 9:43:44 PM  
Persepolis:

Fair enough - I'm probably being a bit of an activist asshat on the matter, but the lady has justifiable reasons to be worried about it. Even if the situation at hand isnt quite what happens after they hit highschool.
 
2007-10-05 9:49:02 PM  
it's a farking National Guardsman. National guard. parents are farking stoopid.
 
2007-10-05 10:04:15 PM  
StarlingFive: Whatever... Im on the chicks side - indoctrinating our youth before they go through the neuronal cropping in the teen years is retarded. They just arnt made for that shiat yet. If I was my parent, I wouldnt have trusted myself with a god damned butter knife at that age, much less my future.

They are not showing up with a helicopter to take kids to Iraq that day. They are just talking to the kids. The kids will still come home where they can talk to you, and you can contradict everything the military says if you choose.
 
Displayed 50 of 85 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.