Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Huffington Post wants you to feel very, very sorry for Padilla. Not because he's innocent -- because he was caught and convicted by the Bush Administration   (news.yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

667 clicks; posted to Politics » on 17 Aug 2007 at 3:13 PM (15 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



199 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2007-08-17 10:39:37 AM  
The whole case was a model of efficiency and true American ideals of justice... "conservatives" should be extremely proud of the way it was handled. Extremely proud.
 
2007-08-17 10:59:08 AM  
FTFA: Psychologists, and those who have visited with Jose Padilla over the past three plus years of his incarceration say that they see profound emotional wreckage as a result of his detention.

i16.tinypic.comView Full Size
 
2007-08-17 11:02:09 AM  
It seems to me that the point is that even a terrorist can be dealt with using the laws in place and the judicial system we have.
 
2007-08-17 11:08:47 AM  
Subby, dirty bomb went where? Just like the Iraqi WMD, just keep poking around for something, anything.

simsite9 is entirely correct.
 
2007-08-17 11:22:28 AM  
How can we keep hauling people away without any judicial rights if the Federal courts keep convicting these guys? That's no way to burn down the Constitution.
 
2007-08-17 11:24:42 AM  
wow... wingnut friday on fark. we can has caturday yet?
 
2007-08-17 11:32:20 AM  
simsite9: It seems to me that the point is that even a terrorist can be dealt with using the laws in place and the judicial system we have.

Scuse me? You're saying we have laws in place making it OK to torture? Detain w/o right to a speedy trial?

Seems to me there are no sharp legal minds running the show. They "can't recall" what they're doing. They can't say what they're doing. They can't decide whether Padilla is a citizen entitled to citizen's rights or what rights a terrorist has.

And judging by your post, neither can you.
 
2007-08-17 11:33:00 AM  
It's not even worth engaging you Little Green Freepball assholes in debate any more if you can't understand where the problem lies or how his guilt or innocence is completely farking irrelevant.
 
2007-08-17 11:35:52 AM  
The Flag-Suckers are out in droves today. Somebody get a mop and bucket.
 
2007-08-17 11:48:47 AM  
submitter: Not because he's innocent; because he was caught and convicted by the Bush administration because the administration shredded the Constitution then wiped their ass with it.

Remember the Constitution, assholes?
 
2007-08-17 11:49:51 AM  
Lionel Mandrake: Remember the Constitution, assholes?

No no. They remember the Maine!
 
2007-08-17 11:53:59 AM  
Control_this: simsite9: It seems to me that the point is that even a terrorist can be dealt with using the laws in place and the judicial system we have.

Scuse me? You're saying we have laws in place making it OK to torture? Detain w/o right to a speedy trial?

Seems to me there are no sharp legal minds running the show. They "can't recall" what they're doing. They can't say what they're doing. They can't decide whether Padilla is a citizen entitled to citizen's rights or what rights a terrorist has.

And judging by your post, neither can you.



Christ. I'm on your side, ninny.

This douchebag was given an actual trial, and convicted. The fact that authorities never even brought charges related to a dirty bomb is another large and important point. The fact that his "accomplice" in that part of the case, which again, was never charged, is still being held is obviously extra-judicial, and completely illegal.

My (I thought quite apparent) point was that we can try these people in public, and do it under the same rules as everyone else. Ideally under pre-Patriot Act framework, and without amoral pinheads like, well, everyone involved.
 
2007-08-17 11:54:59 AM  
Welcome to Wingnut Friday. In technicolor(tm)
 
2007-08-17 11:56:26 AM  
TFA: there is no way in hell that anyone can justify turning an otherwise healthy 36 year old into the shell of a man.

Uh... The would-be dirty bomber? You think he was totally rational before he was jailed?
 
2007-08-17 12:00:39 PM  
simsite9:
This douchebag was given an actual trial, and convicted.


I recognized your intent but don't like the implication Padilla was given his rights. It looks like the prosecutors were fortunate to find a way to make it look like he had been given due process. He was hidden away. Moved. Denied access to representation for extended periods. He and we do not know whether his lawyers were given full disclosure of the evidence and whether any of that evidence would have cleared him.

There was very little about this which could be characterized as "using the laws in place".
 
2007-08-17 12:06:42 PM  
QU!RK1019: Uh... The would-be dirty bomber? You think he was totally rational before he was jailed?

So it's OK to ignore the Constitutional rights of an American citizen if he not "totally rational?" As defined by you, I suppose.
 
2007-08-17 12:13:37 PM  
QU!RK1019: You think he was totally rational before he was jailed?

What does that have to do with anything?
 
2007-08-17 12:15:58 PM  
Lionel Mandrake: So it's OK to ignore the Constitutional rights of an American citizen if he not "totally rational?" As defined by you, I suppose.

Huh?! I'm just saying that I don't believe that he was "otherwise healthy" before he was captured. Jeez.
 
2007-08-17 12:19:04 PM  
thamike: What does that have to do with anything?

The article says that he's insane, and it says that it must be from torture. I just think maybe he was insane to begin with.
 
2007-08-17 12:26:52 PM  
QU!RK1019: Huh?! I'm just saying that I don't believe that he was "otherwise healthy" before he was captured. Jeez.

OK, settle down...

So now you're a psychologist? Did you make your diagnoses after hours of contact with the man? No?

Jeez.
 
2007-08-17 12:31:09 PM  
QU!RK1019: thamike: What does that have to do with anything?

The article says that he's insane, and it says that it must be from torture. I just think maybe he was insane to begin with.


It does?

FTFA--Psychologists, and those who have visited with Jose Padilla over the past three plus years of his incarceration say that they see profound emotional wreckage as a result of his detention.

I'm not sure where you are going with your point, whatever that is.
 
2007-08-17 12:35:34 PM  
Lionel Mandrake: Remember the Constitution, assholes?

thamike: No no. They remember the Maine!

Woah. A quick-witted, perfectly fitting semi-obscure historical analogy on the internets in a Friday political argument?

You win a
subway-sg.comView Full Size
 
2007-08-17 12:42:12 PM  
Humean_Nature --Ow! I stubbed my fingers on the monitor going after that thing.
 
2007-08-17 12:50:51 PM  
Lionel Mandrake and thamike
I didn't mean to piss you guys off so much. Maybe Padilla was already crazy. That's all I'm saying.
 
2007-08-17 12:52:54 PM  
QU!RK1019: Lionel Mandrake and thamike
I didn't mean to piss you guys off so much. Maybe Padilla was already crazy. That's all I'm saying.


You didn't piss me off. I'm honestly curious as to how you came to that conclusion and what relevance it holds, here.
 
2007-08-17 12:55:48 PM  
QU!RK1019: I didn't mean to piss you guys off so much. Maybe Padilla was already crazy. That's all I'm saying.

No sweat...I'm just in the mood to bust chops...

But, seriously, arguments like "he was already nuts" or even "he was a terrorist" just deflect attention from how this administration has turned our founding documents and ideals into toilet paper.

They get away with it by convicting in the court of public opinion, before a guy is even charged, given counsel, granted a court date, etc...
 
2007-08-17 1:00:05 PM  
QU!RK1019: I didn't mean to piss you guys off so much.


Is this your first ever dose of liberal hate being directed at you?
 
2007-08-17 1:05:32 PM  
Afternoon_Delight: Is this your first ever dose of liberal hate being directed at you?

Seems like you are having trouble finding yours, today.
 
2007-08-17 1:10:20 PM  
thamike: Seems like you are having trouble finding yours, today.

He prefers "conservative" love. Ignore the Constitution, torture Americans...hell, torture everyone!

Violating the founding principles of our nation are like sky rockets in flight for this guy.
 
2007-08-17 1:11:11 PM  
Control_this: There was very little about this which could be characterized as "using the laws in place".

Oh, no doubt about it. This is a case of a guy who is a criminal being absolutely abused by a system without rules. The trial he finally got would have been fair years ago, but at this point, the horse had already gotten out of the barn.

No one comes out of this thing even remotely clean.
 
2007-08-17 1:11:51 PM  
Oh. There it is, AD. There's your dose.
 
2007-08-17 1:12:51 PM  
QU!RK1019: thamike: What does that have to do with anything?

The article says that he's insane, and it says that it must be from torture. I just think maybe he was insane to begin with.


we'll never know, will we?

Secret courts, government approved torture/interrogation, military tribunals and a civilan court system that's a miracle of gutless cowardice. This 'conviction' was a sad day for all of us. Not because the guy was guilty, but because it represents a failure of our 'justice' system. The rules were not followed. We abused and tortured someone because we (as a society) were scared of him. I find nothing here that's good or noble. Nothing here that helped us beat 'the terrorists'. All I can see is a massive failure of our constitutional protections.

We've 'turned a corner' alright, and it's leading us into a bad, bad neighborhood.
 
2007-08-17 1:18:43 PM  
Weaver, is that you? I think I'm getting all misty-eyed.
 
2007-08-17 1:20:50 PM  
You know, I was just kindof reacting to how overdramatic the article was. Like this...

TFA: If this is what the framers had in mind by the Bill of Rights, they would have called it the Bill of Wrongs instead.

Re-reading it, of course I see the focus is on constitutional violations in his detention. And I don't disagree with the author in that sense. I think the part about Padilla's sanity seemed to try to paint him in too innocent of a light, and that's what stuck in my craw, if you will.

I'm disgusted with the way the war on terror is being conducted, and this is no exception. But I feel like trying to do something like defending a jihadist's character just weakens the whole argument, you know?
 
2007-08-17 1:24:48 PM  
thamike: Weaver, is that you? I think I'm getting all misty-eyed.

When we fought the Cold War, we distinguished ourselves from the Soviets by saying WE didn't torture people. We had a system of laws, people had rights and we respected those right while balancing them against an enemy who routinely used the most vile of means to keep their population under control. And for over 60 years (give or take), we held the 'Evil Empire' at bay while keeping hold of our values.

Then came 9/11. And we forgot those values. When push came to shove and our backs were against the wall - we abandoned the core values that make this country great. We started to use the very same means we said we despised from our enemy during 60 years of fighting the Cold War. Now we're torturing our own citizens, we're wiretapping our own people and we seem to be ok with the abuse of our rights. Our leaders tell us that it's necessary to strip away the Bill of Rights. well - if it's a choice between our rights and letting a potential terrorist get away, I'll choose to save my rights. Every. Time.
 
2007-08-17 1:28:52 PM  
Weaver95: thamike: Weaver, is that you? I think I'm getting all misty-eyed.

When we fought the Cold War, we distinguished ourselves from the Soviets by saying WE didn't torture people. We had a system of laws, people had rights and we respected those right while balancing them against an enemy who routinely used the most vile of means to keep their population under control. And for over 60 years (give or take), we held the 'Evil Empire' at bay while keeping hold of our values.

Then came 9/11. And we forgot those values. When push came to shove and our backs were against the wall - we abandoned the core values that make this country great. We started to use the very same means we said we despised from our enemy during 60 years of fighting the Cold War. Now we're torturing our own citizens, we're wiretapping our own people and we seem to be ok with the abuse of our rights. Our leaders tell us that it's necessary to strip away the Bill of Rights. well - if it's a choice between our rights and letting a potential terrorist get away, I'll choose to save my rights. Every. Time.


YES! This that those and the other!
 
2007-08-17 1:36:18 PM  
Weaver95: When we fought the Cold War, we distinguished ourselves from the Soviets by saying WE didn't torture people. We had a system of laws, people had rights and we respected those right while balancing them against an enemy who routinely used the most vile of means to keep their population under control. And for over 60 years (give or take), we held the 'Evil Empire' at bay while keeping hold of our values.

Then came 9/11. And we forgot those values. When push came to shove and our backs were against the wall - we abandoned the core values that make this country great. We started to use the very same means we said we despised from our enemy during 60 years of fighting the Cold War. Now we're torturing our own citizens, we're wiretapping our own people and we seem to be ok with the abuse of our rights. Our leaders tell us that it's necessary to strip away the Bill of Rights. well - if it's a choice between our rights and letting a potential terrorist get away, I'll choose to save my rights. Every. Time.


FTW.
 
2007-08-17 2:42:19 PM  
Weaver95 Weaver95: When we fought the Cold War... we held the 'Evil Empire' at bay while keeping hold of our values.


Well at least we pretended to.

Senator McCain may recall the commies as having tortured him using North Vietnamese proxies. I look at it like both sides tortured him and his loyal opposition. During the Reagan years, we were a bit more public with School of Americas, the torture, death squads, raping nuns, and arming all sides of a conflict.

I can't tell any difference between the torture in secret CIA camps or the Hanoi Hilton, and the oil poor in Nigeria, Venezuela, or Saudi Arabia.

Communism, Democracy, terrorism, capitalism, it's all the same to me, just different pompoms to wave while the violence is conducted by crazies, militaries and mercenaries, a few get rich, millions get killed or displaced, and everybody is supposed to be part of some good v. evil struggle.
 
2007-08-17 3:01:48 PM  
Obviously this guilty verdict means that the super sekrit courts aren't needed anymore.
 
2007-08-17 3:21:17 PM  
Control_this: Communism, Democracy, terrorism, capitalism, it's all the same to me, just different pompoms to wave while the violence is conducted by crazies, militaries and mercenaries, a few get rich, millions get killed or displaced, and everybody is supposed to be part of some good v. evil struggle.

we have always been at war with Oceana.
 
2007-08-17 3:22:39 PM  
Weaver95: When we fought the Cold War, we distinguished ourselves from the Soviets by saying WE didn't torture people. We had a system of laws, people had rights and we respected those right while balancing them against an enemy who routinely used the most vile of means to keep their population under control. And for over 60 years (give or take), we held the 'Evil Empire' at bay while keeping hold of our values.

Except for the stuff you didn't hear about, of course.
 
2007-08-17 3:26:10 PM  
Huffington Post wants you to feel very, very sorry for Padilla. Not because he's innocent -- because he was caught and convicted by the Bush Administration
it's funny because it's true.
 
2007-08-17 3:30:11 PM  
FTFA: "show that those who maim, humiliate, kill, and psychologically torture in the name of counterfeit, homogenized purity are the true terrorists."

WTF? From where did this bullshiat come? This kind of crap is why liberals have such a bad name.
 
2007-08-17 3:30:44 PM  
Pro Zack: it's funny because it's true.

Did your parents have any children that lived?
 
2007-08-17 3:31:40 PM  
I don't feel sorry for padilla, I do feel sorry for the founders, I would imagine you could get wicked chaffing from spinning in your grave.
 
2007-08-17 3:35:13 PM  
Lefties clearly want to extend the Constitutional protections we have as citizens to all those around the world they feel are "resisting" US "imperialism" and "hegemony."

Question for the lefties: what other Constitutional protections besides habeas corpus should we extend to alien enemy combatants who plot to set bombs off among civilians in the US and who attack our servicemen and women overseas?

- Voting rights?
- Right to keep and bear arms?
- Protection from unreasonable search and seizure?
- Prohibition of excessive bail?

What else?

You know, if you feel the US is so rough on your ideological compatriots, why don't you just go over and join them in their their struggle? They could use your propagandistic prowess over in Syria, Pakistan, the Palestinian areas, etc. because most of the shiat coming from those guys just gets laughed off as nonsense. They need a credibility boost, and what better than some mewling, mincing, fawning western leftists to articulate their message in a way that gets some traction.
 
2007-08-17 3:37:05 PM  
eastbaywatch:

Padilla's an American citizen, douche.
 
2007-08-17 3:37:05 PM  
Padilla is such an obvious sham...so obviously railroaded..I cannot believe there's any debate.

If America ever stood for anything, those days are gone.

/no more hope
 
2007-08-17 3:40:58 PM  
Headso: I don't feel sorry for padilla, I do feel sorry for the founders, I would imagine you could get wicked chaffing from spinning in your grave.

It's part of the Bush energy plan to reduce our dependency on foreign oil. Rape the Constitution then hook up those spinning corpses to a dynamo....WEEEE!
 
2007-08-17 3:49:33 PM  
Lionel Mandrake: eastbaywatch:

Padilla's an American citizen-douche
Who went to Pakistan to learn how to blow shiat up.

FTFY
 
Displayed 50 of 199 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.