Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNSNews)   Planned Parenthood's marketing: "We need your money. We're not just about abortion, you know--we also do adoption referrals." Annual report: $908 million in income, 265,000 abortions, 0 adoptions   (cnsnews.com) divider line
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

744 clicks; posted to Politics » on 15 Jul 2007 at 11:13 PM (15 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



96 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2007-07-15 7:30:19 PM  
That's right Smitty, keep submitting these anti-abortion articles. God gives you one brownie point for each one submitted, and I heard you get 10 points if one goes green!
 
2007-07-15 7:31:57 PM  
Someone is going to get a timeout.

Jiggering the URL and resubmitting didn't make it any more interesting or relevant, submitter.
 
2007-07-15 7:38:36 PM  
Our friends got their daughter through a Planned Parenthood referral.
 
2007-07-15 7:38:52 PM  
fezziwig: Someone is going to get a timeout.

Jiggering the URL and resubmitting didn't make it any more interesting or relevant, submitter.


Actually, I find this sort of thing fascinating. Given the history of the organization, it's interesting to see them still carrying out Sanger's eugenics philosophy even at this late a date.
 
2007-07-15 7:42:01 PM  
Weaver95: fezziwig: Someone is going to get a timeout.

Jiggering the URL and resubmitting didn't make it any more interesting or relevant, submitter.

Actually, I find this sort of thing fascinating. Given the history of the organization, it's interesting to see them still carrying out Sanger's eugenics philosophy even at this late a date.


You keep tying it to eugenics. I always find that interesting, especially since your average person going into an abortion clinic has eugenics no where near on their minds.
 
2007-07-15 7:43:21 PM  
I guess this is where sensibleWeaver95 turns into BevetsWever95.

Oh well. I guess we'll see DavidDukeWeaver95 in the next thread.
 
2007-07-15 7:44:42 PM  
clifton: Oh well. I guess we'll see DavidDukeWeaver95 in the next thread.

It's a bit like a game of Twister.
 
2007-07-15 7:48:04 PM  
Nerdlinger: clifton: Oh well. I guess we'll see DavidDukeWeaver95 in the next thread.

It's a bit like a game of Twister.


It drives me nuts. Just when I've written him off as being a complete lunatic, he says something vaguely reasonable that reminds me that he's not Bevets. Then the topic of conversation turns to something like abortion (something I'm pretty moderate on) and he goes off raving about eugenics and shiat.
 
2007-07-15 7:50:24 PM  
clifton: You keep tying it to eugenics. I always find that interesting, especially since your average person going into an abortion clinic has eugenics no where near on their minds.

Sanger CREATED Planned Parenthood with her eugenics philosophy in mind. Go dig up her original writings on the topic - she wanted women to have 'reproductive freedom' yes, but her idea was that women would be aborting inferior babies. And she never retracted her statements in support of Malthusian eugenics, she just got really really quiet about them after WWII. So did all her buddies.

Now, i'm not saying that planned parenthood is still trying to breed a bunch of supermen. But you can't deny that by sticking to Sanger's original plan(s) the end result is going to be less of those kinds of children Sanger always said she didn't want (i.e. kids born to poor people, drug addicts, social undesirables, minorities, ect ect).
 
2007-07-15 7:59:00 PM  
Weaver95: she wanted women to have 'reproductive freedom' yes, but her idea was that women would be aborting inferior babies. And she never retracted her statements in support of Malthusian eugenics, she just got really really quiet about them after WWII.

I don't know a lot about this, and I don't really care, but in the interests of factual accuracy, Sanger criticized Nazi eugenics (you seem to want to imply the opposite) and she never advocated coercive eugenics, that I'm aware of.

Is it really fair to lump in a philosophy that says, for instance, that fetuses with Downs Syndrome should be aborted with one that says that Jews should be sterilized? This is a pretty broad moral spectrum, and simply labeling her a eugenicist doesn't really mean she believes something terribly abhorrent, as you seem to be implying.

Weaver95: Now, i'm not saying that planned parenthood is still trying to breed a bunch of supermen.

They never were, that I'm aware of.

Weaver95: But you can't deny that by sticking to Sanger's original plan(s) the end result is going to be less of those kinds of children Sanger always said she didn't want (i.e. kids born to poor people, drug addicts, social undesirables, minorities, ect ect).

I fail to see the problem with providing drug addicts the ability to not have kids, or with allowing pregnancy to be a planned, desired event for all people, regardless of social class. Why should money be necessary to buy that luxury?

She never, however, advocated eugenics policies against racial minorities, that I'm aware of. Show me some documentation of that claim or take it back--it is, on the face of it, ludicrous, and I suspect you know that.
 
2007-07-15 8:06:08 PM  
Weaver95:

Now, i'm not saying that planned parenthood is still trying to breed a bunch of supermen. But you can't deny that by sticking to Sanger's original plan(s) the end result is going to be less of those kinds of children Sanger always said she didn't want (i.e. kids born to poor people, drug addicts, social undesirables, minorities, ect ect).


This is not a bad thing. It enables a kind of Darwinian natural selection in an age when the traditional controls like predation, disease and misadventure are all but nonexistent. Something has to put the balance back. If people choose to opt out of parenthood when it's clearly biologically imminent, then they're not fit to be parents at that time by simple virtue of that choice.

Notice how this neatly sidesteps the "it's not a choice it's a child" argument. Either way, the fitness function is satisfied.
 
2007-07-15 8:08:50 PM  
KrispyKringle: She never, however, advocated eugenics policies against racial minorities, that I'm aware of. Show me some documentation of that claim or take it back--it is, on the face of it, ludicrous, and I suspect you know that.

I'm willing to concede right off the bat that she may well have been racist, but I think it's more than a little absurd to try to claim that Planned Parenthood reflects any bigotry she might have held at the time (hey, even Jefferson owned slaves).

Good things--like, say, the Constitution--can come from flawed people.

Sanger's plan had nothing to do with sterilizing people of a given race, and everything to do with promoting the choice to not have kids. I still can't see how you think it would be a bad thing for the poor, drug addicts, or "social undesirables" (whatever you mean by that) to have the choice and ability to not have children.
 
2007-07-15 8:09:04 PM  
Weaver95: But you can't deny that by sticking to Sanger's original plan(s) the end result is going to be less of those kinds of children Sanger always said she didn't want (i.e. kids born to poor people, drug addicts, social undesirables, minorities, ect ect).

By the way, you're wrong. Poor people are still having lots of babies. Ask any marketing professional about demographics. They'll tell you about how society is getting more and more off balance thanks to birth control. It's the more educated folk who are using birth control.

But whatever. You have a good time pushing your agenda.
 
2007-07-15 8:13:55 PM  
Memphisluvr: They'll tell you about how society is getting more and more off balance thanks to birth control.

Eh? I thought it was because all the evil rich people are grabbing all the money.
 
2007-07-15 8:16:17 PM  
MyNameIsNotMervGriffin: Eh? I thought it was because all the evil rich people are grabbing all the money.

That would be a statement worth discussing if this were a discussion about financial balance. However, this is a discussion about birth control and population.
 
2007-07-15 8:16:37 PM  
stjohn: It enables a kind of Darwinian natural selection in an age when the traditional controls like predation, disease and misadventure are all but nonexistent.

Hmm. If you believe that then we should end all funding for abortion, plus all welfare of any sort and any government-paid medical care.

Seems to me the ability to take care of oneself should include not only the ability to defend against predators, but also the ability to make wise health choices and to earn the money needed to support those choices.
 
2007-07-15 8:24:27 PM  
[image from img91.imageshack.us too old to be available]
 
2007-07-15 8:29:37 PM  
Weaver95
Given the history of the organization, it's interesting to see them still carrying out Sanger's eugenics philosophy even at this late a date.

What the hell is wrong with eugenics? The government forcing it on people is one thing, a parent getting genetic tests and choosing not to have a baby with physical or prone to mental defects is their right.

I don't see a problem with that.
 
2007-07-15 8:32:40 PM  
img178.imageshack.usView Full Size
 
2007-07-15 8:40:34 PM  
Gwendolyn: What the hell is wrong with eugenics? The government forcing it on people is one thing, a parent getting genetic tests and choosing not to have a baby with physical or prone to mental defects is their right.

Yep.

Racist eugenicists certainly gave eugenics a bad name, but now we find that "eugenics" is used as a sort of keyword for "racism" or something, even though that's not what it originally meant.

It's a bit like the badying about of "phrenology" to mean any bad science (even though Franz Gall had one really important, perhaps even revolutionary, idea, that specific cognitive functions are localized in specific places in the brain).
 
2007-07-15 8:42:28 PM  
Dinki: That's right Smitty, keep submitting these anti-abortion articles. God gives you one brownie point for each one submitted, and I heard you get 10 points if one goes green!

Someone scored 10 points.
 
2007-07-15 8:46:58 PM  
265,000 fewer criminals on our streets.
 
2007-07-15 8:56:37 PM  
skitzo: 265,000 fewer criminals on our streets.

Also 265,000 fewer taxpayers.

Looking forward to your Medicare and Social Security?
 
2007-07-15 9:04:49 PM  
MyNameIsNotMervGriffin: Also 265,000 fewer taxpayers.

Looking forward to your Medicare and Social Security?


That's what unrestrained immigration is for. You've got to figure that at least 10% of those 20 million new "immigrants" have to be paying into SS.
 
2007-07-15 9:08:27 PM  
skitzo: 265,000 fewer criminals on our streets.

How many million fewer law-abiding lovers?
 
2007-07-15 9:09:26 PM  
I'm all for aborting severely disabled/retarded babies. Can they tell whether or not your kid will be a Yankees fan? cuz that's ground for an abortion too.
 
2007-07-15 9:15:42 PM  
Planned Parenthood is doing some very good work, not just abortions. Free/low cost gyno services, birth control, STD testing, etc.
 
2007-07-15 9:16:15 PM  
MyNameIsNotMervGriffin: stjohn: It enables a kind of Darwinian natural selection in an age when the traditional controls like predation, disease and misadventure are all but nonexistent.

Hmm. If you believe that then we should end all funding for abortion, plus all welfare of any sort and any government-paid medical care.

Thanks to the farkwits in charge for the last 12 years, it's more like that than ever. While we're at it, let's remove the warning labels, handrails, crosswalk signals, and seat belts. That should help too. Not that you were looking, but my point was that civilization alters the evolutionary patterns brought on by natural selection. If you remove all barriers to natural selection, you wind up with a nation of obese idiots unprepared for any type of adversity beyond fitting behind the wheel.


Seems to me the ability to take care of oneself should include not only the ability to defend against predators, but also the ability to make wise health choices and to earn the money needed to support those choices.


This has nothing to do with allowing the unprepared/unfit to opt out of breeding. In the classical, natural sense, you have to work pretty hard to fall off the wagon of life in this country. Everyone's pretty much going to make it through the night without being eaten or falling into a volcano. This is my point. It's hard to get culled. Really hard. So hard that population density will reach unsustainable levels before too long. So keeping that safety valve open, however small, is a Good Thing. I'm gonna go out on a limb and embrace the classical Republican value of small government and minimal meddling in the lives of the people. To both ends, a $500 legalized, subsidized abortion is, in the most extreme cases, much cheaper than a lifetime of assistance or incarceration.
 
2007-07-15 9:17:18 PM  
This thread may melt the internet.

[image from i207.photobucket.com too old to be available]
 
2007-07-15 9:24:26 PM  
Annual report: $908 million in income, 265,000 abortions, 0 adoptions

A woman's right to choose: Priceless.
 
2007-07-15 9:37:36 PM  
For the year July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006, Planned Parenthood received $345.1 million in clinic income, $305.3 million in taxpayer funding and $212.2 million in donations. Total income reached $902.8 million while total expenses came to $847.0 million, leaving a profit of $55.8 million.

I'd say they're making a killing.
 
2007-07-15 9:38:31 PM  
But.....when's the IPO??
 
2007-07-15 9:48:16 PM  
submittard: Planned Parenthood's marketing: "We need your money. We're not just about abortion, you know--we also do adoption referrals." Annual report: $908 million in income, 265,000 abortions, 0 adoptions


They provide adoption REFERRALS, not actual adoption services. Read your own goddamned headline.
 
2007-07-15 9:57:59 PM  
Whats the C in CNS news stand for, Christian or Crap ?

I smell propaganda, and it tastes worse than chicken.
 
2007-07-15 10:07:05 PM  
I don't feel the urge to take care of other people's unwanted children, so if abortion is legal and someone else wants to fund it, that's their business.
 
2007-07-15 10:09:20 PM  
I dont know about you farkers, but I am a genetically superior superman.
 
2007-07-15 10:14:57 PM  
I think it would be funny to do an abortion reality show. Get a bunch of girls together and have them use abortion as birth control. Film the whole thing, they would get pregnant over and over. It would really hack people off if you did it right. Film them saying things like "I'm pregnant again, that means I wont get my period and I can fark for 12 weeks before I get rid of the baby!" Show the same few girls over and over and have them talk about the fact they create fetus after fetus, then throw them away.

comedy gold
 
2007-07-15 10:24:44 PM  
eqtworld: I think it would be funny to do an abortion reality show. Get a bunch of girls together and have them use abortion as birth control. Film the whole thing, they would get pregnant over and over. It would really hack people off if you did it right. Film them saying things like "I'm pregnant again, that means I wont get my period and I can fark for 12 weeks before I get rid of the baby!" Show the same few girls over and over and have them talk about the fact they create fetus after fetus, then throw them away.

comedy gold


What's funny is, I bet the ratings would be through the roof.
 
2007-07-15 10:44:44 PM  
KrispyKringle: What's funny is, I bet the ratings would be through the roof.

If you could get a network to carry it, it would be bigger than Idol. Film the girls going in and talking about their boobs getting bigger and feeling pregnant again, then film how happy they are when they come out. "And the doc prescribed vicodin!, my boyfriend is going to be stoked!".

Repetition and a casual attitude by the girls would be key. I bet you could find people who would want to be on the show. People love being on TV, and with so many hundreds of thousands of abortions every year there are probably a few who would make good cast members just by going about their business.
 
2007-07-15 10:45:45 PM  
eqtworld: I think it would be funny to do an abortion reality show. Get a bunch of girls together and have them use abortion as birth control. Film the whole thing, they would get pregnant over and over. It would really hack people off if you did it right. Film them saying things like "I'm pregnant again, that means I wont get my period and I can fark for 12 weeks before I get rid of the baby!" Show the same few girls over and over and have them talk about the fact they create fetus after fetus, then throw them away.

comedy gold


Wow. I think that ends the thread, which is probably a good thing before this thread gets, let's say, interesting.

KrispyKringle: clifton: Oh well. I guess we'll see DavidDukeWeaver95 in the next thread.

It drives me nuts. Just when I've written him off as being a complete lunatic, he says something vaguely reasonable that reminds me that he's not Bevets. Then the topic of conversation turns to something like abortion (something I'm pretty moderate on) and he goes off raving about eugenics and shiat.


People who you see as completely level-headed, calm and insightful when it comes to 98% of the topics out there can become 'lunatics' once the proper topic button is pressed. You can see a whole different side of a person in some touchy or heated topics, and abortion is one of the biggest.

/Off to bed
//I'll read this thread at work
 
2007-07-15 11:09:31 PM  
AntiNorm: They provide adoption REFERRALS, not actual adoption services. Read your own goddamned headline.

Well, I see that all I had to add to the discussion has been posted already...
 
2007-07-15 11:16:43 PM  
stjohn: So hard that population density will reach unsustainable levels before too long.

Do you realize how many hundreds of years old that lie is? Usually each subsequent generation adds ".. and this time it's true!"
 
2007-07-15 11:21:30 PM  
EET MOR FEETUS!!!

/FEETUS YUMMAHZ
 
2007-07-15 11:21:48 PM  
KrispyKringle: Racist eugenicists certainly gave eugenics a bad name, but now we find that "eugenics" is used as a sort of keyword for "racism" or something, even though that's not what it originally meant.

It's a bit like the badying about of "phrenology" to mean any bad science (even though Franz Gall had one really important, perhaps even revolutionary, idea, that specific cognitive functions are localized in specific places in the brain).


Of course you'd say that....you have the brainpan of a stagecoach tilter.
 
2007-07-15 11:22:39 PM  
//godless unwashed mutant masses FTW!
 
2007-07-15 11:29:43 PM  
I will make a donation in subby's name to Planned Parenthood. It might look funny under "subby", but it will be a donation just the same.
 
2007-07-15 11:33:33 PM  
KrispyKringle: She never, however, advocated eugenics policies against racial minorities, that I'm aware of. Show me some documentation of that claim or take it back--it is, on the face of it, ludicrous, and I suspect you know that.

*snort*

Let me know how that works out for you.

Things I'm still waiting on him to answer from mid-June on:

- Explanation of why the events of Hurricane Katrina mean that the ACLU shouldn't take separation of Church and State cases in Louisiana.
- Explanation of why gays shouldn't exercise their rights if it might upset religiously motivated homophobic bigots.
- Explanation of why he accused me of having espoused anti-Catholic views and had conversations with him about Catholicism prior to this month.

I'll add yours to the list.
 
2007-07-15 11:34:37 PM  
If you ban coat hangers, only criminals will have coat hangers

But seriously. It's not a matter of banning a service which will only go underground into the classic back alley abortions, but to make a civilization that welcomes all children. With the falling birth rates we should be able to welcome all children just to maintain.

I've posted this before, and I'll post it again, and every time I feel it is a valid thing to post.
The Global Baby Bust (Pops)
 
2007-07-15 11:41:58 PM  
Props to subby for going against the Fark mob rule mentality.
 
2007-07-15 11:46:16 PM  
Weaver95: Actually, I find this sort of thing fascinating. Given the history of the organization, it's interesting to see them still carrying out Sanger's eugenics philosophy even at this late a date.

This.

(is retarded)
 
Displayed 50 of 96 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.