Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Breitbart.com)   Short list of things the Democratic candidates promise to do in their first 100 days in office, including travel the world, re-establish America's moral authority, end the war in Iraq and make all nuclear weapons go away   (breitbart.com) divider line
    More: Unlikely  
•       •       •

410 clicks; posted to Politics » on 04 Jun 2007 at 3:05 AM (15 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



22 Comments     (+0 »)
 
2007-06-04 1:52:08 AM  
Two thumbs up for whoever wrote that headline.
 
2007-06-04 2:01:18 AM  
To be fair, these were said one at a time by many different people. And would you believe it? They had different answers. Who'da thunk it?
 
2007-06-04 2:22:59 AM  
Somacandra: To be fair, these were said one at a time by many different people. And would you believe it? They had different answers. Who'da thunk it?

The point is that they are all either stupid, unrealistic, or both. Except for maybe end the war, which depending on the canidate is possibly unlikely.

The entire debate was them patting each other on the back about how the federal government can solve all your problems. Blech. I'm sick of Bush's crap, but to be honest most of his shiat will be pretty easy to undo, if the next president has the will to do it (which is hardly certain). Things like making everyone dependent on the government for health care would be a lot harder to undo.

/Ron Paul
 
2007-06-04 3:44:40 AM  
Goddamnit, Democrats. You had the biggest opening since Watergate, and you farked around with this useless political posturing and now it's leaking away.

If you hadn't squandered your approval ratings in the first four months of your majority, you would have practically had the Mandate of Heaven in another six when all the nasty skeletons really start piling up around the White House.

/Ignore me, I'm talking out of my heiney.
//Can it plees be third major party tiem now?
 
2007-06-04 4:05:05 AM  
The election is still more than a year away. We are already sick of all the candidates. This perpetual campaign that seems to have developed is not good for anyone.
 
2007-06-04 4:43:56 AM  
Ron Paul want to eliminate the IRS and the Federal Reserve in his first 100 days. How is that more likely than John Edwards traveling around the world?
 
2007-06-04 5:42:29 AM  
I'm voting for the little weird guy cuz his wife is actually kinda hot. He must have balls just to ask her out. I mean if a guy that looks like a cross between a Keebler elf and Gollum can get into her pants he must know something. God Bless America. Only here a could weird little freak get some hot poontang like that.
 
2007-06-04 6:37:00 AM  
Troublemakers A.C.2007-06-04 04:43:56 AM
Ron Paul want to eliminate the IRS and the Federal Reserve in his first 100 days. How is that more likely than John Edwards traveling around the world?


Winner.
 
2007-06-04 7:43:09 AM  
I'd settle for someone saying they will improve the NSC like Ike did. Oversight and reasonable debate within the federal government itself? What a concept! Frankly I will vote for anyone at this point who a) I think has a chance in hell of winning (sorry, but as of now that ain't Ron Paul, sadly) b) promises to fix social security, and by fix I mean make opt out programs, privatize, or remove entirely.
 
2007-06-04 8:02:41 AM  
Done, Done and Done!
Now time to go to Iran and kiss A Man In A Suits hind end to make nice.
She better wear a Burka and have a male family member escort her.
Lantos might qualify if he wears a Kafka.
 
2007-06-04 8:10:19 AM  
InternetLOL: Goddamnit, Democrats. You had the biggest opening since Watergate, and you farked around with this useless political posturing and now it's leaking away.

If you hadn't squandered your approval ratings in the first four months of your majority, you would have practically had the Mandate of Heaven in another six when all the nasty skeletons really start piling up around the White House.


I'm quoting this because it's so true. =(

Was it too much to ask for a little tiny bit of oversight? On anything?
 
2007-06-04 8:59:24 AM  
Troublemakers A.C. Ron Paul want to eliminate the IRS and the Federal Reserve in his first 100 days. How is that more likely than John Edwards traveling around the world?

Why not? Jackie Chan did it in 80 days... in a hot air balloon even!!
 
2007-06-04 9:35:27 AM  
the federal reserve is a private consortium of banks, making money out of nothing, backed by nothing, at interest...
 
2007-06-04 9:43:50 AM  
Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd: "Restore constitutional rights in this country."

He just earned my vote.
 
2007-06-04 10:40:49 AM  
larry00: Lantos might qualify if he wears a Kafka.

[image from upload.wikimedia.org too old to be available]

Que?
 
2007-06-04 10:44:09 AM  
Bloody William: Que?

Hahahah!
 
2007-06-04 10:54:37 AM  
The "free college for everybody" and "educate 100 million children around the world" sounded fun too.

Who was it that openly pandered to the teacher question and said upgrading schools would be his first priority?
 
2007-06-04 10:59:16 AM  
Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd: "Restore constitutional rights in this country."

Unfettered gun owner rights, woohooo I might actually vote for him if he comes out and states that.
 
2007-06-04 11:08:25 AM  
I think Richardson had the best answer: minimum wage for teachers. Who wants to argue with that?

But the smackdown of the evening goes to Obama: "You're about four and a half years late on leadership" to Edwards. Ha!

I think CNN showed some prescience by seating Clinton, Obama and Richardson in the middle, and shoving that wannabe-Kennedy phony to the side.

Richardson also gets points for proposing to boycott the Bejing Games if China doesn't step up on Darfur (seeing that they import something like 80% of their oil from Sudan). That's hard diplomacy right there, folks.
 
2007-06-04 11:49:44 AM  
The point is that they are all either stupid, unrealistic, or both.

I don't consider "restore Constitutional rights in this country" stupid or unrealistic.
 
2007-06-04 12:52:10 PM  
The Why Not Guy: I don't consider "restore Constitutional rights in this country" stupid or unrealistic.

Uh, neither do I. That wasn't in the headline.

Though I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict that the Constitutional rights he's talking about are only the ones Bush has damaged, not the ones that all his predecessors (GOP and Dem) damaged. You know, like maybe restoring the 2nd and 4th Amendments that have been flat-out ignored for "public safety" and the "war on drugs".

rydub: Who wants to argue with that?

Uh, I do. The federal government has absolutely no role to play in education.

Of course, that's just that silly "Constitution" thing getting in the way again.
 
2007-06-04 1:15:53 PM  
Or at least work towards those ends, Subby.

Besides, the first one's pretty doable. If WhatsHisPuss can do it in 80 days, surely the President can do it in 100.
 
Displayed 22 of 22 comments


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.