Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(USA Today)   Muqtada al-Sadr's supporters insist he is not hiding out in Iran, despite reports. They're not sure just where he IS hiding out, but they're pretty sure it's not in Iran. Dick Cheney nods approvingly from an undisclosed location   (usatoday.com) divider line
    More: Dumbass  
•       •       •

937 clicks; posted to Main » and Politics » on 15 Feb 2007 at 2:55 PM (16 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



75 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2007-02-15 2:30:20 PM  
Huh? Me and Dick are hanging out right now having a few beers and getting ready to shoot some lawyers in the face.
 
2007-02-15 2:54:41 PM  
/Against a fixed timetable ever leaving

no offense elchip but at what point would you support a withdrawal. iraq has a democracy, saddam has been removed, they didnt possess(sp) WMD, and the mission changes every day. or are we just supposed to stay there until the fighting is done? its the middle east the fighting will never be done.....

thats the difference between gulf war and now, at least the gulf war had a clear cut defined mission. what the fark does the iraq mission have other than being lumped into war on terror?
 
2007-02-15 2:57:24 PM  
mathmatix: no offense elchip but at what point would you support a withdrawal

We can not withdraw from Iraq until 2009, when a Democrat takes over the White House.

That way, the right wing pundits can spend the next four years...and years beyond...saying that the left surrendered to terrorism.
 
2007-02-15 2:59:20 PM  
And today Iraq closed 7 major crossing points on its eastern border with Iran and 2 on its western border with Syria.

/coincidence?
 
2007-02-15 2:59:43 PM  
mathmatix: what the fark does the iraq mission have other than being lumped into war on terror?

Oil? Isn't that pretty much the only reason we've ever ever ever done all of our charity work in the Middle East?
 
2007-02-15 3:00:21 PM  
Now is the time for a fixed timetable.

Step 1. We leave December 1, 2007. Give the government fair warning.
Step 2. Let every Middle Eastern country know that we will continue to support Israel.
Step 3. Iraq can sink or swim. They had 3 years to figure it out with us providing security. Now, they just have to survive like Detroit.
Step 4. Politely point out that just like North Korea is no threat to us, neither is Iraq or Iran...however, those countries are a threat to the others in their area. Good luck Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey.
Step 5. Until we leave, we use brute force to deal with any Iranians or Syrians crossing borders. We ensure that Iraq's oil is capable of being harvested and shipped. We make sure that Iraq's government is provided with whatever ordinance it wants for its military so that it can secure itself.
Step 5. We leave.

/Saudi Arabia doesn't even have a diplomatic presence in Iraq but Iran does.
 
2007-02-15 3:01:05 PM  
Dear al-Sadr's

You life is almost over.

/ Freedom fries a biatch terrorist
 
2007-02-15 3:01:37 PM  
Involved in a buttsecks marathon with Waldo?

/nothin'
 
2007-02-15 3:01:49 PM  
We should just pull the fark out.

ANY plan to make things work in Iraq would be build on the assumption that said plan would be executed correctly and competently by the Bush administration.

That just ain't gonna happen. It's simply beyond their competency level.

Better we pull our troops out of harm's way than try and put into action any plan that neccitates George W. Bush being a competent CIC.
 
2007-02-15 3:03:55 PM  
1. Kill Moqtada al Sadr

2. Pull out of Iraq

3. Popcorn?
 
2007-02-15 3:04:28 PM  
Blathering Idjut: ANY plan to make things work in Iraq would be build on the assumption that said plan would be executed correctly and competently by the Bush administration.

Or that the freakin' Iraqis would act semi-civilized. Americans, and the West try to improve life for themselves individually, and their fellow man collectively. The rest of the world prefers status quo and does not wish to push for better things for fear that it might get worse.

There is a fundamental difference between the Western thought and Middle Eastern, African and Asian thought. We are different than them.

Its sad, but I have come to the conclusion that democratic freedom is not something that is compatible with some cultures and peoples.
 
2007-02-15 3:05:58 PM  
2007-02-15 03:02:27 PM elchip

we are all honest, the problem is the administration refuses to acknowledge issues and thinks a troop surge is the answer.. when its obvious, our strategies there are not working. Its weird, growing up in the 80's you would hear about guerilla warfare on the news all the time, why does it seem like no one knows how to fight it now in the new century?

I am getting off topic, but this 'as the iraqis stand up we'll stand down' approach isnt working. and at what point does the lack of will power on the iraqi part to get their nation back to a somewhat respectable status get blamed and not the 'we broke it we bought it' policy...
 
2007-02-15 3:06:06 PM  
I say we bomb Tehran just to make sure
 
2007-02-15 3:07:45 PM  
[image from armedforcesjournal.com too old to be available]
 
2007-02-15 3:08:00 PM  
elchip

Training doesn't so much matter when Iraqi troops are afraid of going outside the training base (http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200508/s1432950.htm).

I don't know what we can do about that.
 
2007-02-15 3:08:35 PM  
Dick Cheney nods approvingly from an undisclosed secure location

[image from cigare1.fatcow.com too old to be available]
 
2007-02-15 3:08:52 PM  
mathmatix: the administration refuses to acknowledge issues and thinks a troop surge is the answer.

It would be a possible answer. But 20,000 is just more targets. 100,000 is a stabilizing force.

If we can't send 100,000 more, we need to leave and cut our losses.
 
2007-02-15 3:09:39 PM  
as long as we need oil ... we need the middle east
 
2007-02-15 3:10:10 PM  
2007-02-15 03:08:52 PM I_C_Weener

thanks for that, i am not so eloquent with my words, but that clears it up and hits the point moreso than what i was trying to type......
 
2007-02-15 3:10:15 PM  
elchip: and we need to try harder to get the freaking Iraqis trained so that their country doesn't collapse when we leave.

After three years of creating Police Academy troops, what magic do you care to wave over the process to make all this work? Details, please.
 
2007-02-15 3:10:38 PM  
you guys keep talking about 'pull out' and withdrawal like that was ever part of the plan

the plan was that we needed a new spot for our military presence in the middle east... we had worn out our welcome in Saudi Arabia and Iraq is closer to Iran... and Saddam was a bad man and he had weapons of mass destruction (we should know we sold him to him... well at least dubbyas daddy and rummy did...

we're not there for 'nation building'... we're there for Carlyle Group profits and that oil thing...
 
2007-02-15 3:10:42 PM  
Just hang a nuke up over every major city in the middle east. If they all don't knock this shiat off by Dec 1st, 2007, we'll fix the problem for them.
 
2007-02-15 3:12:25 PM  
Tatsuma: I say we bomb Tehran just to make sure

My plan does not disallow this. We might as well use our small nukes. Unused weapons are useless weapons.
 
2007-02-15 3:12:56 PM  
Yeah, because terrorists always tell the truth.
 
2007-02-15 3:14:34 PM  
Pocket Ninja: We can not withdraw from Iraq until 2009, when a Democrat takes over the White House.

That way, the right wing pundits can spend the next four years...and years beyond...saying that the left surrendered to terrorism.


Honestly, why do you think the best the DNC's putting forth is a black man and the most hated woman in politics? You think the Democrats want to win this time?
 
2007-02-15 3:16:09 PM  
You think the Democrats want to win this time?

i laughed too hard at your post... good show..
 
2007-02-15 3:16:51 PM  
orrinbloquy: After three years of creating Police Academy troops, what magic do you care to wave over the process to make all this work? Details, please.

That is the crux of it. After 3 years, we still get..in ever increasing damage...roadside bombs, car bombs, etc... Most of the targets were our troops initially, then police recruits, now its civilians. So, we have helped some. We and our recruits are protected but the truly innocent are dying. And the rate is increasing.

And our new recruits are not helping patrol their own country.

Us leaving may result in chaos, but it might result in a stabilizing force when we announce a deadline for our leaving.

I never wanted the deadline before. But Iraq is just not picking up their end of the bargain.
 
2007-02-15 3:17:13 PM  
2007-02-15 03:10:42 PM Gooseycheeks


Just hang a nuke up over every major city in the middle east. If they all don't knock this shiat off by Dec 1st, 2007, we'll fix the problem for them.



great now every arab will have radioactive mutant powers.... thats a brilliant solution....


/just kidding....
 
2007-02-15 3:18:45 PM  
elchip: Great. We have slightly over 100,000 troops stationed in Germany, Italy, and the UK. We have 1.1 million in the United States. We have 6,000 in other Middle Eastern countries. I know there are rules about combat fatigue, but barring that, why can't we use some more of them?

Because contrary to various stupid reports, the US Army is NOT 'stretched to the breaking point', and they want to ensure it stays that way.
 
2007-02-15 3:20:23 PM  
I hope Sadr dies after getting struck by lightning. Clear signal from God/Allah that maybe he and his followers have been heading down the wrong path.
 
2007-02-15 3:20:52 PM  
orrinbloquy: After three years of creating Police Academy troops, what magic do you care to wave over the process to make all this work? Details, please.

Slow and steady wins the race:

http://www.defenselink.mil/home/dodupdate/iraq-update/Handovers/index.html (pops)
 
2007-02-15 3:21:15 PM  
elchip: It's in the ISG report that El Presidente has so "wisely" ignored.

OK, what's their recommendations? We've tried sending in the LA freaking PD for training and it still doesn't help.
 
2007-02-15 3:21:38 PM  
Gooseycheeks: Just hang a nuke up over every major city in the middle east.

Well, something similar did work for Dionysius when Damocles started acting uppity.
 
2007-02-15 3:22:28 PM  
elchip: In a perfect world, this is what we should do to the whole region.

I like it. But why no love for Palestine? We all know it's going to happen sooner or later.
 
2007-02-15 3:22:59 PM  
elchip: Sounds like they're not army material :P

Well, the military types were, um, killed or routed a few years ago. Oooops.

Great. We have slightly over 100,000 troops stationed in Germany, Italy, and the UK. We have 1.1 million in the United States. We have 6,000 in other Middle Eastern countries. I know there are rules about combat fatigue, but barring that, why can't we use some more of them?

Rumsfeld wanted lean and mean. He didn't understand that we can outfight anyone with lean and mean, we just can't out-stabilize them with lean and mean. Sure, send them over there.

But, we get resistance from Congress for speaking about increasing our presence. How big a squawk would there be if Bush said, "We are sending 100,000 more soldiers over there to beat down the resistance and hopefully not get a bunch of innocents killed, or themselves killed. Thanks for electing me."
 
2007-02-15 3:26:00 PM  
Yesterday's headline was much better.
 
2007-02-15 3:26:07 PM  
"Great. We have slightly over 100,000 troops stationed in Germany, Italy, and the UK. We have 1.1 million in the United States. We have 6,000 in other Middle Eastern countries. I know there are rules about combat fatigue, but barring that, why can't we use some more of them?
---

Probably because for every "combat arms" trooper, there are 10-12 support troops that bring in supplies, maintain equipment, patch them up, etc.

So, you figure that with about 140K US troops in Iraq today, probably only about 14K or so are actually combat arms MOSs, even though the clerks, drivers, etc. often find themselves in combat roles. Which probably puts them at roughly equal strengh or less with the various militias, terrorist cells, etc.
 
2007-02-15 3:29:16 PM  
Have the Iraqi people scheduled the parade yet?

you know the one where our troops are welcomed as liberating heroes.. I'm still waiting for that. Once we get the parade scheduled THEN we can start setting the timetable for withdrawal.

/not really... we're stuck there and will be for a loooooooong time
 
2007-02-15 3:30:01 PM  
mathmatix [TotalFark]

2007-02-15 03:10:42 PM Gooseycheeks
Just hang a nuke up over every major city in the middle east. If they all don't knock this shiat off by Dec 1st, 2007, we'll fix the problem for them.
great now every arab will have radioactive mutant powers.... thats a brilliant solution....
/just kidding....


Every arab isn't a radioactive mutant?

lies... damn dirty lies.
 
2007-02-15 3:32:14 PM  
elchip: No.

Why no? It's obvious that the best way to find out if al-Sadr is hiding in Iran is to firebomb the country until we get him.

Think, elchip, think.

I_C_Weener: My plan does not disallow this. We might as well use our small nukes. Unused weapons are useless weapons.

At this point, there's only one thing to do. We must nuke them from orbit. It's the only solution.

[image from imagesource.art.com too old to be available]
 
2007-02-15 3:36:48 PM  
Why no? It's obvious that the best way to find out if al-Sadr is hiding in Iran is to firebomb the country until we get him.

i ws thinking shock and awe from spain to china... takes care of that whole middle east thing and gets china militarily motivated... might as well just put a bullseye on all of europe and asia, call it old america
 
2007-02-15 3:37:17 PM  
Tatsuma: At this point, there's only one thing to do. We must nuke them from orbit. It's the only solution.

Now that China has the ability to destroy our orbital nukes, we must use them in a first strike on China. We can't waste them on one terrorist. However, our ICBMs are just sitting in those silos. Might as well fire 'em up. Russia would wet their pants if they still work.
 
2007-02-15 3:37:56 PM  
elchip: Check it out. Independently targeting particle beam phalanx. Fwap! Fry half a city with this puppy. We got tactical smart missiles, base plasma pulse rifles, RPGs, we got sonic electronic ball breakers, we got nukes, we got knives, sharp sticks...

I think we should develop a MOAB that fires sharp stick with really pointy ends at the enemy. It wouldn't cost us a lot of money, and hey, psychological terror! What's worse than a body full of shrapnel? Acupunture, tree-sized
 
2007-02-15 3:38:07 PM  
2007-02-15 03:30:01 PM Gooseycheeks

well if they want to stand a chance in the war, they better hope they are....


iran is sending their sylar after americans...
 
2007-02-15 3:39:58 PM  
mathmatix: i ws thinking shock and awe from spain to china... takes care of that whole middle east thing and gets china militarily motivated... might as well just put a bullseye on all of europe and asia, call it old america

I say we team up with China. We get Western Europe, South America, Africa and half of the Middle East. They get Eastern Europe, Asia, half of the Middle-East and Australia.

And just for the sake of it, we bomb France into oblivion

I_C_Weener: Now that China has the ability to destroy our orbital nukes, we must use them in a first strike on China. We can't waste them on one terrorist. However, our ICBMs are just sitting in those silos. Might as well fire 'em up. Russia would wet their pants if they still work.

Russia portrayed villains so many times on tv and movies, we should bomb them just to make sure anyway.
 
2007-02-15 3:40:46 PM  
elchip: Gaza would be given to Egypt and West Bank would be given to Jordan.

Yeah, I'm sure Egypt and Jordan would just love to get that territory back.

Although IMO, Gaza and the West Bank should become two separate (maybe loosely related) states. They don't have too much in common.
 
2007-02-15 3:42:09 PM  
some people say: Although IMO, Gaza and the West Bank should become two separate (maybe loosely related) states. They don't have too much in common.

Why? I'm sure you can build a viable country based on hatred of Jews, hatred of the West and hatred of "getting a job and work toward an economy instead of putting all your money into terrorism when it hasn't worked for 60 years now"
 
2007-02-15 3:42:42 PM  
Tatsuma: Russia portrayed villains so many times on tv and movies, we should bomb them just to make sure anyway

Their accent is sinister...almost as sinister as Germans. We should hit all of the old Eastern Block...just to make sure.
 
2007-02-15 3:43:34 PM  
Tatsuma: Why? I'm sure you can build a viable country based on hatred of Jews, hatred of the West and hatred of "getting a job and work toward an economy instead of putting all your money into terrorism when it hasn't worked for 60 years now"

A viable independence movement, yes. Country, not so much.
 
2007-02-15 3:45:21 PM  
I_C_Weener: Their accent is sinister...almost as sinister as Germans. We should hit all of the old Eastern Block...just to make sure.

What has Romania ever done for us, anyway?

some people say: A viable independence movement, yes. Country, not so much.

Why? I'm sure that the terrorists will gladly become taxi drivers, factory workers and law-abiding citizens the second they have all their demands agreed upon and given their own state
 
Displayed 50 of 75 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.