Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Wall Street Journal)   Half of all children are below average intelligence. Obvious tag outsmarts Scary tag; Stupid tag held back a year   (opinionjournal.com) divider line
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

15826 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Jan 2007 at 11:56 AM (16 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



372 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2007-01-16 10:28:34 AM  
"Stupid babies need the MOST love!"
 
2007-01-16 10:32:20 AM  
In other news, three out of four people make up 75% of the population.
 
2007-01-16 10:33:51 AM  
That was the lamest article ever.
 
2007-01-16 10:36:14 AM  
Well, statistically, Average is usually pretty close to Median. So, yes, it makes perfect sense that half would be below the average.

Submitter has taken a throwaway line in the article and is trying to spin it into an alarmist headline. I know which half submitter comes from.
 
2007-01-16 10:36:31 AM  
That is the dumbest statement I have ever read dealing with statistics. Do they just not know what the word "average" means?
 
2007-01-16 10:39:18 AM  
[image from myconfinedspace.com too old to be available]
 
2007-01-16 10:47:01 AM  
TFA: How about raising intelligence? It would be nice if we knew how, but we do not.

Um, how about making sure every kid is read to, a lot, from infancy on? You can't do well in school if you don't have an extensive vocabulary before you get to kindergarten. The first four years or so are when your brain develops intelligence; after that it's all about accumulating knowledge and making connections between things you know.

PLEASE READ TO YOUR KIDS. You can start when they're just a few months old. If you don't have kids, volunteer at the library to read to someone else's.

It's also a good idea to SIGN to your infant, starting at about 5 to 8 months old. Sign language helps infants develop communication and vocabulary skills that they can use BEFORE their vocal chords are mature enough to produce speech. Speech is a very complex function, and language can be learned many months before speech is possible.

I wish we could put a 50% tax on TVs, videos, and video games, and use the revenue to subsidize children's books. That would do more for our educational system than doubling our school funding.
 
2007-01-16 10:47:32 AM  
I tried reading that article but it's too early in the morning to put my thinking liver to work. I'll try again after lunch.
 
2007-01-16 10:50:36 AM  
tchamber: Submitter has taken a throwaway line in the article and is trying to spin it into an alarmist headline.

Submitter here. I think you're missing the humor in both my headline and TFA.

Of COURSE half of all kids are below average intelligence. Even if the average IQ was 210, half of all kids would be below it.

The fact is that some kids are smarter than other kids, and honest grading will reflect that. The author is pointing out that education reformers seem to assume every kid can get straight As if the teachers try hard enough, but unless the school lowers its standards to avoid hurting anyone's feelings, it ain't gonna happen.
 
2007-01-16 10:55:28 AM  
Half the people are below average! OH NOES!!!!
 
2007-01-16 10:56:00 AM  
Well, actually, it depends on what qualification you are using to define "average." If you consider "average" to include the middle two standard deviations, and you assume a normal curve, then only 34% of children would be below "average."
 
2007-01-16 10:59:07 AM  
tchamber: Submitter has taken a throwaway line in the article and is trying to spin it into an alarmist headline.

New here?
 
2007-01-16 11:02:41 AM  
oh PLEASE. stats can say anything you want.

yeah, some people are born brighter than others. what you want to care about is educating your child to his or her best potential. HELLO?????
 
2007-01-16 11:04:19 AM  
I should have said "normal distribution" and not "normal curve."

Oh, and beyond that, I have very little faith in IQ tests. First, they aim to measure innate "intelligence," generally via use of subtests. If you have an idea of what areas will be covered, and what methods they use to evaluate those areas, you can teach to the test. Most will have a vocabulary component. Most will have a math component. Many will have a "duplicate this patten" test, and a test involving symbols representing letters or numbers, and you have to match as many as you can of a page of symbols to the letters/numbers they represent. You can teach to all of these to inflate IQ scores.

Beyond that, since people go in with different levels of preparation to these subtests, it entirely confounds any measure of "innate" intelligence.

/MA, Experimental Psych
 
2007-01-16 11:05:53 AM  
MyNameIsNotMervGriffin: Of COURSE half of all kids are below average intelligence. Even if the average IQ was 210, half of all kids would be below it.

I disagree with your logic. This assumes an even disitribution of IQ points above and below the mean. Let's say there are 10 people in the world:

5 have an IQ of 150.
4 have an IQ of 50.
1 has an IQ of 120.

That gives you an average IQ of 107, 4 of which are above and 6 of which are below. This whole argument always rubs me the wrong way.

/As you were
 
2007-01-16 11:13:05 AM  
HaywoodJablonski: Let's say there are 10 people in the world

Let's pretend there are nearly a hundred million kids in school in the US. Let's further pretend this means both the average and median are far less likely to be as bizarrely skewed as in your example.
 
2007-01-16 11:15:09 AM  
RodneyToady: Oh, and beyond that, I have very little faith in IQ tests.

Amen. I hate the way we use them to brand people and map out their lives for them. I pulled my son out of school and home-schooled him for several years because he was clearly very bright, but was having problems adjusting to a traditional classroom, and they wanted to IQ test him.

No way.
 
2007-01-16 11:16:15 AM  
Haywood Jablonski

This assumes an even disitribution of IQ points above and below the mean. Let's say there are 10 people in the world:

5 have an IQ of 150.
4 have an IQ of 50.
1 has an IQ of 120.


If there are only 10 people in the world, and you have all ten scores, you're looking at the population, not a sample. You can't assume a normal distribution because the data itself shows what amounts to a bimodal distribution. Neither a mean nor a median would be useful in this case.
 
2007-01-16 11:19:36 AM  
We'll be needing a crop of halfwits to do the jobs illegal immigrants won't do.
 
2007-01-16 11:24:33 AM  
totalsecurity: We'll be needing a crop of halfwits to do the jobs illegal immigrants won't do.

I've half a mind to take offense at that.

Oh, wait...
 
2007-01-16 11:34:15 AM  
Of COURSE half of all kids are below average intelligence. Even if the average median IQ was 210, half of all kids would be below it.
 
2007-01-16 11:35:49 AM  
[image from myfolsom.com too old to be available]

"Well, the world needs ditch diggers too."
 
2007-01-16 11:52:24 AM  
Will N. Dowd: I wish we could put a 50% tax on TVs, videos, and video games, and use the revenue to subsidize children's books.

you probably want to teach my kids sex education too, you farking hippie.

/dumb people make better citizens, because they don't question authority
 
2007-01-16 11:56:42 AM  
Your mom says I do good on tests.
 
2007-01-16 11:59:18 AM  
Median! Mean! Mode! these threads are usually about as fun as the irony ones.
 
2007-01-16 12:01:10 PM  
And historically, 40% of all sick days take place on a Friday or a Monday.

No child left behind means that the top 5% are going as slow as the bottom 5%. No wonder our kids are so bored that they get into trouble.
 
2007-01-16 12:01:18 PM  
Control_this: Your mom says I do good on tests testes.

Fixed that for you. And he's no mom.
 
2007-01-16 12:01:50 PM  
That reminds me of a line I just read in a Richard Dawkins book, where he laughs about politicians getting up in arms because they just learned that half of the population has an IQ below 100.
 
2007-01-16 12:02:07 PM  
While we're at it...

Nearly 3/4 of working Americans make less than the average wage!
 
2007-01-16 12:02:39 PM  
I love this thread.
 
2007-01-16 12:03:13 PM  
Except in Lake Wobegon.
 
2007-01-16 12:03:14 PM  
I_C_Weener: "Well, the world needs ditch diggers too."


Thanks for making my day already. That was awesome. lol
 
2007-01-16 12:03:26 PM  
I always get a postive score on my AIDS tests!!!
 
2007-01-16 12:03:58 PM  
Smitty obviously doesn't live in Lake Wobegon.
 
2007-01-16 12:04:25 PM  
The other have of us should feel good about this news. Hell I'm smarter and better than HALF of you out there. I'm intellectually superior and will most likely make more have better sex and live longer.

//Check the research. If you can read that is.
 
2007-01-16 12:04:39 PM  
"Imagine how stupid the average person is, and then realize that HALF of them are supider than THAT!"

/Carlin
 
2007-01-16 12:04:44 PM  
"I hear this excuse all the time and I dismiss it!"
 
2007-01-16 12:04:45 PM  
Will N. Dowd: I wish we could put a 50% tax on TVs, videos, and video games, and use the revenue to subsidize children's books. That would do more for our educational system than doubling our school funding.


There are already plenty of books available to kids in first world countries. That doesn't mean their parents are going to read to them, or that they're going to be interested in reading. Apples and trees, you know.
 
2007-01-16 12:05:08 PM  
Stupid people are good for comic relief! DeeDeeDee.
 
2007-01-16 12:05:15 PM  
*stupider

//dammit
 
2007-01-16 12:05:29 PM  
Cooper speaks good.
 
2007-01-16 12:06:06 PM  
Man, that doesn't say much for the other 66%.
 
2007-01-16 12:06:40 PM  
FYI, the average IQ will always be 100, by definition.
Originally, it's a number that describes the child's mantal age divided by its chronological age, multiplied by 100.
 
2007-01-16 12:07:19 PM  
Dudes.. no mater how smart you make our kids, half will always be below average intelligence. that's what AVERAGE means. What you have to do is a statistical comparison over time. are we getting less intelligent than our parents? more?
 
2007-01-16 12:07:24 PM  
Them article seem to say peoples only lerns as much as the IQ is letting them.

Dumb people can lerning to read and a smart one might not cant read.
 
2007-01-16 12:07:52 PM  
Will N. Dowd: Um, how about making sure every kid is read to, a lot, from infancy on? You can't do well in school if you don't have an extensive vocabulary before you get to kindergarten. The first four years or so are when your brain develops intelligence; after that it's all about accumulating knowledge and making connections between things you know.

PLEASE READ TO YOUR KIDS. You can start when they're just a few months old. If you don't have kids, volunteer at the library to read to someone else's.

It's also a good idea to SIGN to your infant, starting at about 5 to 8 months old. Sign language helps infants develop communication and vocabulary skills that they can use BEFORE their vocal chords are mature enough to produce speech. Speech is a very complex function, and language can be learned many months before speech is possible.

I wish we could put a 50% tax on TVs, videos, and video games, and use the revenue to subsidize children's books. That would do more for our educational system than doubling our school funding.


I bet you don't immunize your children, do you?
 
2007-01-16 12:08:09 PM  
According to the tickle IQ test, I'm a frickin genius. I also get 700 emails a day telling me about all of the great deals on all products ever made.
 
2007-01-16 12:08:11 PM  
SacManGel, Stupid people are good for comic relief! DeeDeeDee.

I agree. I worked with a lady that looked like a silverback gorilla and was slightly smarter than a bag of potatoes... man was she hilarious! She shiat herself laughing so hard one day and it was the funniest thing I ever saw.
 
2007-01-16 12:08:32 PM  
samhllsfrakt: it's a number that describes the child's mantal age divided by its chronological age,

heh heh heh...
 
2007-01-16 12:08:47 PM  
you lost me at "half"
 
Displayed 50 of 372 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.