Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Nancy Pelosi can't wait to start "draining the swamp" of lobbyists and special-interest groups. No doubt her lobbyist friends at Exxon and AmGen will be the first to go   (news.yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Unlikely  
•       •       •

409 clicks; posted to Politics » on 20 Dec 2006 at 6:11 PM (16 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



32 Comments     (+0 »)
 
2006-12-20 1:59:53 PM  
Then she'll be up to her ass in alligators...
 
2006-12-20 2:10:48 PM  
That's the worst euphemism for peeing I've ever heard.
 
2006-12-20 2:26:05 PM  
I like how the Yahoo link is used instead of the RealClearPolitics link.
 
2006-12-20 2:40:52 PM  
Submitter, will you need to adjust your daily routine in any way after the new year in order to have time for your newfound interest in watching over our elected officials ?
 
2006-12-20 3:09:15 PM  
I was going to comment on this subject, but I have to go "drain the swamp".
 
2006-12-20 3:10:23 PM  
Ugh, I thought that sounded like a euphemism, but that just sounds gross.
 
2006-12-20 3:33:29 PM  
I'm glad Real Clear Politics has suddenly decided to become a watchdog of governmental malfeasance. No, really. I am.
 
2006-12-20 4:01:14 PM  
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...

/and that's the problem, isn't it?
 
2006-12-20 4:31:40 PM  
Dalton Voss: I like how the Yahoo link is used instead of the RealClearPolitics link.

TFA:

[image from i109.photobucket.com too old to be available]
 
2006-12-20 4:41:31 PM  
I, for one, am looking forward to Speaker Pelosi's crusade against undue influence and corruption in Washington. Any little bit that she can clean up is less that we have to worry about. But it does seem a bit hypocritical of her if she starts playing the game herself, isn't it?

I think I'll adopt a wait-and-see attitude.
 
2006-12-20 6:12:52 PM  
Scooby's'pawn: I think I'll adopt a wait-and-see attitude.

I think there are quite a few people doing that, myself included. They've been talking a good talk so far, but I think people in general are disillusioned enough with our government at this point that they're going to demand some serious walking too. Which is a good thing, and a welcome change, if it holds.
 
2006-12-20 6:30:16 PM  
Opinions are like assholes...

Everyones got one and they all spout shiat.

Except for opinion columns... they're the runny diarrhea after a night of bad Mexican food.
 
2006-12-20 6:37:00 PM  
Maybe at least she'll be competent. That'd be an improvement.
 
2006-12-20 6:49:53 PM  
For PACs, a cool $15,000 will get you two.



Dear Nancy,
We didn't vote for change to see shiat like this.
Please do better in the future.

Love,
America
 
2006-12-20 6:50:02 PM  
MyNameIsNotMervGriffin

http://news.yahoo.com/s/realclearpolitics/20061219/cm_rcp/nancys_circle
 
2006-12-20 6:58:43 PM  
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/12/19/MNGVHN29211.DTL

Just saying.
 
2006-12-20 7:43:22 PM  
 
2006-12-20 8:02:01 PM  
Craig341: http://news.yahoo.com/s/realclearpolitics/20061219/cm_rcp/nancys_circle

Meh. You want to see RCP next to the headline, ask Drew to make an icon for it. Yahoo has one; RCP don't.
 
2006-12-20 8:27:21 PM  
If we wait for a clean politician to start, we're screwed anyway. Forget that whole 'he who is without sin' thing; somebody just throw a damn rock.

C'mon Nancy, make good on all that talk.
 
2006-12-20 9:37:44 PM  
Nice "Yahoo" news link, dumbass.

What a joke.

Learn to read.
 
2006-12-20 9:39:03 PM  
Ticket? For PACs, a cool $15,000 will get you two.

I would like to see the full invitation along with all the different pricings. Sometimes when the Congressperson I worked for held fundraisers, PACs were charged more, simply because they could give more. Of course, PAC's are only allowed by FEC rules to give a U.S. Representative $5k per election (primary and general) for $10k total per cycle. Intrigued how Pelosi's finance people are handling this.

/hated learning FEC laws
//knows it's not that hard to get around them
 
2006-12-20 9:44:18 PM  
Nevermind, I found it in another link. It's a fundraiser for the DCCC in her honor. PAC's are allowed to give much more to them. And hey, regular folk only have to pay $1k per ticket.

It really is quite interesting to see how many PAC's give to so many people. Tray is a great place that gives lots of giving info for everyone and anyone.
 
2006-12-20 9:49:02 PM  
I need to make a macro of this for every political thread about congress for the next 6 months...

"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"

If ANYTHING involving how the political machine itself works changes within 2 years I will be profoundly shocked. (that being all the special interest groups, lobbyists, PaCs, and of course the two major parties)

No smart dog ever pisses on the leg of the person who feeds it.

/humping it, on the other hand...
 
2006-12-20 10:39:39 PM  
Corvus

No matter who is in control, the republicants or the democraps, they will all be corrupt. If thats what you were implying.
 
2006-12-20 10:58:11 PM  
It would have been better just to post the link to the SF Examiner instead. At least we have the lesser of the two evils now.
 
2006-12-20 11:28:28 PM  
I'm just going to get on my knees and pray we won't get fooled again.
 
2006-12-21 12:30:11 AM  
revskippy: No smart dog ever pisses on the leg of the person who feeds it.

It would work if they take away the need to feed from the lobbyist's teat. Like people have said wait and see. She's already shaken things up by a) leading democrats to a win even though most people generally dislike her, and b) putting the froshes in good seats.
 
2006-12-21 1:15:21 AM  
McCain, feingold campaign finance reform was suppose to fix the money problems in election politics... It wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. By the way it was bipartisan legislation that democrats supported more than republicans and EVERYONE who voted for it raved about what a great thing they just did.

Just like that law, lobby reform will be 1 page banning lobbyists from being within 100 ft of a member of congress and 736 pages of exceptions to the rule. And everyone who votes for it will declare it a "huge victory for honest politics" and mysteriously years later when the lobbyist still run washington not a single reporter will ever ask them why it failed to accomplish anything. If I ever heard any reporter take John McCain to task for the failure of the law that bears his name I would probably drop dead from shock, and if I survived I would subscribe to whatever media outlet that reporter worked for and read them everyday.

There are two things that democrat voters and republican voters have in common.

1. both sides believe that the people they vote for are honest and the other side is corrupt.

2. by virtue of point 1 it's pretty obvious that both democrat and republican voters have shiat for brains.
 
2006-12-21 2:38:00 AM  
Wow, replace a few words for a Canadian politics spin!

"I love Liberals blaming things Hypothetically that Conservatives WILL do in the future.

Hahahaha it's so funny. Keep living through the looking glass guys.

Blaming Conservatives for things they havn't even done while ignoring what the Liberals DID.

Liberal Party: The party of OTHER people's responsibility."

Haha! Polar opposites! That's what we are!
 
2006-12-21 5:29:15 AM  
Car_Ramrod
/hated learning FEC laws
//knows it's not that hard to get around them


F'reals man. When I was doing finance for one of the campaigns I was on, we'd constantly get people calling up because they wanted to donate like $220,000, when we told them that the max donation for a statewide campaign is $22,300 they'd send in 10 maxed out checks from 10 different employees of their company, or members of their family. Really easy way around campaign finance laws.

When I was snooping around a while back I noticed that Abramoff had given Bush's re-election campaign a few hundred grand through various members of his family.

But campaign finance bored the crap out of me, so I started doing doing Advance work (aka, come to work drunk, bribe people, hit on chicks, piss off the other campaign and hang out with celebs)
 
2006-12-21 9:41:52 AM  
DWT Samus: F'reals man. When I was doing finance for one of the campaigns I was on, we'd constantly get people calling up because they wanted to donate like $220,000, when we told them that the max donation for a statewide campaign is $22,300 they'd send in 10 maxed out checks from 10 different employees of their company, or members of their family. Really easy way around campaign finance laws.

Um... you realize that you've just admitted to committing a felony by accepting those checks? Knowingly accepting money donated in violation of campaign finance laws is a federal crime. Has been since the 1920s. Passing money on to friends and family with the express purpose of subverting campaign finance limits is a violation of federal election law.

Wait... crap. Sorry. That's federal, not state. Even still, at the federal level that crap's already illegal.
 
2006-12-21 5:59:36 PM  
If this headline had had a 'Republitard' in it, there would be thousands of posts by now. Farkers are strangely silent when it's for their team, though.

/hate hypocrits of all kinds.
 
Displayed 32 of 32 comments


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.