The only thing stupid here is his stance on walmart (low prices, business succes = EVIL!!!) being a rich important guy if his kid wants such and such, sure get it for them whatever.

That he is vocal about his stupid anti walmart stance and on the other hand trying to get ahead there isn't massive corruption, it just makes him look like a completely insincere buffoon.

Almost every other politician on either side would be too if you knew enough about them. Just compare the number of politicians who oppose school vouchers with the number who send their kids to and/or went to exclusive private schools, for example.

Over and over and over farkers sadly prove their complete inability to think in anything other than a binary fashion.

It's like there's a physical farking switch in their brains with 'good' on one side and 'bad' on the other and if X = good then not X = bad without fail.

Sure tons of republicans are hypocrites, crooks, jackasses, jerks and otherwise. Tons of East Timorese and Antiguans and Eskimos and Alabamans and Surgeons and Engineers are too... none of these statements have any logical bearing on the question of whether X democrat did something stupid or wrong.

I can't even begin to imagine the thought processes in your heads... what in the farking fark of farker fark's sake does Karl Rove or Abraham Jackoff or the buttsecksing republican congressman have to do with Edwards silly actions in this case?

Gah... you people are scary.

Sunny Ray

I just read an article in "Vanity Fair" starring Karl Rove. The author of the story breakfasted with Mr. Rove, at his well appointed home, on deer sausage that Mr. Rove's son harvested and French Pressed Coffee. He went on to describe the home and its noticable elitists feel. Funny.

I find these shocking allegations that a important political figure may in fact have a higher than average net worth tremendously relevant to the case of a totally different person shopping at a store he disses publicly.