Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Breitbart.com)   Universal Press Syndicate prez explains how Ann Coulter has not committed plagiarism in a well-reasoned, carefully researched response that won't make the slightest bit of difference   (breitbart.com) divider line
    More: Obvious  
•       •       •

598 clicks; posted to Politics » on 11 Jul 2006 at 4:01 PM (16 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



52 Comments     (+0 »)


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2006-07-11 2:56:38 PM  
UPI = Moonie owned
 
2006-07-11 2:57:54 PM  
Mr. Clarence Butterworth: UPI = Moonie owned

Universal Press Syndicate /= United Press International
 
2006-07-11 3:01:25 PM  
Ahh. My bad.
 
2006-07-11 3:04:14 PM  
Ehh... anything worth being said about her has been done 100000x over. Who cares, she's the ultimate AW and deserves no more greenlit threads.
 
2006-07-11 3:05:43 PM  
I wish the faux outrage over non issues would be left to the shameless "conservatives" who have nothing else. There are plenty of legitimate issues to complain about these days.
 
2006-07-11 3:09:18 PM  
I am only here to say two words..

Mann Coulter.
 
2006-07-11 3:11:16 PM  

Last week, the Crown Publishing Group, which released "Godless," also dismissed questions about Coulter's works, calling them "as trivial and meritless as they are irresponsible."


Found some typos in their article...
 
2006-07-11 3:12:26 PM  
Here's an idea lets take Ann and Michelle Malkin and hypnotize them into believing each other is Hillary Clinton then lock them into a room together. The carnage that would ensue could improve the whole world.

/I'd buy that for a dollar!
 
2006-07-11 3:16:49 PM  
Of course it won't make any difference. Just as studies have shown that no logic applies to political partisanship, most people have already made up their minds about Coulter. They either love her or loathe her, and an article such as this will merely reinforce what her supporters already believe or cause her detractors to say it's bullshiat.

And life goes on...
 
2006-07-11 3:17:53 PM  
The pathetic physical insults should be left to the "Michael Moore is fat" crowd also.
 
2006-07-11 3:24:49 PM  
I have to say, there's nothing on earth I'd rather do than bend her over the arm of my couch, flip up her skirt, and f*ck the everlovin' crazy right out of her.

Oooooh yeah.
 
2006-07-11 3:35:05 PM  
No surprise that the outfit that makes money off of her warblings will defend and minimize her plagarism.
 
2006-07-11 3:35:06 PM  
El_Swino: flip up her skirt, and f*ck the everlovin' crazy right out of her.

To each his own I guess.

But dudes in skirts just ain't that hot.

Tastes vary I guess. And do not EVER want to taste that.
 
2006-07-11 3:35:18 PM  
El Swino are you enough of a gentleman to give him(her?) a reach around.
 
2006-07-11 3:36:58 PM  
a well-reasoned, carefully researched response

What the hell is so carefully researched about, "There are only so many ways you can rewrite a fact and minimal matching text is not plagiarism" and "Universal Press Syndicate is confident in the ability of Ms. Coulter, an attorney and frequent media target, to know when to make attribution and when not to"? That's not research, that's just a denial.
 
2006-07-11 3:43:26 PM  
Smitty: well-reasoned, carefully researched response

Maybe Coulter will consider doing some of that in her next book. It would be a nice change.
 
2006-07-11 3:51:20 PM  
Plagiarism is not big on my list of reasons to hate this fugly biatch.

Her attack on the 911 widows is reason alone to cock punch this harpe
 
2006-07-11 3:56:32 PM  
timmy_the_tooth: Mann Coulter.


...has a penis.


/just wanted to steal tgot's thunder.
 
2006-07-11 4:07:34 PM  
ChairmanKaga: Her attack on the 911 widows is reason alone to cock punch this harpe

I understand your reaction to her screed... but, to date, no one here has refuted her claim that those 4 women of privilege have, without consent from the other couple of thousand victims' family members, have set themselves up as the "voice" of those families.

/not defending Coulter
 
2006-07-11 4:09:52 PM  
pontechango: The real flamewars are being waged in the greenlit headlines, these days. :(
 
2006-07-11 4:11:25 PM  
Has anyone ever even figured out why a woman has such a huge Adam's Apple? I mean jeez...time to come out of the closet Ann...or Bob...whatever your real name is. That pic really shows it too.

/Sorry...didnt read TFA...she/he's (or is it 'it's) too biased to have anything important to say anyway.
 
2006-07-11 4:15:06 PM  
*Shakes fist at Bladel!*

/compalins at how Fark is turning into a big left-wing website!
//not really, but thats what the lefties' whitey-tighties are all in knots about.
///har har har
////I'm only doing this because I love you all.
//No really, and I haven't started drining yet.
//Another Coulter thread on fark, WHOOO HOOOO!!!
 
2006-07-11 4:16:45 PM  
Mordant: The pathetic physical insults should be left to the "Michael Moore is fat" crowd also.


*Welcomes Mordant with open arms, Gives him a GREAT BIG HUG ... *grabs a little ass just to let him know that I care*

... couple years too late, but welcome to the party.
 
2006-07-11 4:17:55 PM  
Has anyone seen the SuperNews cartoon on Current TV? I believe it involves Ms. Coulter in bed with Hitler. Satan shows up all jealous and upset because she left him and took their child (the antichrist) with her even after he paid for her(his) sex change operation.
 
2006-07-11 4:19:27 PM  
Surprise, surprise! The syndicate that makes money on her column defends her.

Doesn't change the fact that she's a troll.
 
2006-07-11 4:22:50 PM  
In case z_gringo is sick, or something:


I think she's hot.


/worried by his absence.
 
2006-07-11 4:24:35 PM  
Did I just see an honest mistake of fact in the initial post, a polite correction in the second post, and an admission of fault in the third post, with no flaming? Is this fark?
 
2006-07-11 4:26:00 PM  
Forced Perspective: Did I just see an honest mistake of fact in the initial post, a polite correction in the second post, and an admission of fault in the third post, with no flaming? Is this fark?

shut up loser!
 
2006-07-11 4:27:06 PM  
Forced Perspective
FOADIAF.
 
2006-07-11 4:27:09 PM  
I think Coulter is the biggest biatch around and a perfect example of everything that's wrong with America right now.

Having said that it was pretty clear from the start that the accusations of plagarism were about as non-substantial as the existence of the Cruise/ Holmes baby.

Of course that won't keep me from referring to her in the future as "accused plagarist Ann Coulter." The phrase is technically accurate, after all and definetly falls into the category of things she herself have defined as acceptable.
 
2006-07-11 4:28:59 PM  
`If my uncle had tits, he'd be Ann Coulter'
 
2006-07-11 4:30:53 PM  
accusations of plagarism were about as non-substantial

I'd say pilfering 1/3rd of a 850 word piece from the LA Times without attribution and quoting 10 of 23 examples straight from the Heritage Foundation without attribution count as "substantial." Those are just two examples.
 
2006-07-11 4:32:09 PM  
Uh, not that I know whether she commited plagiarism or not, but two media companies who make money off her (her syndicator and her publisher) aren't exactly neutral parties.
 
2006-07-11 4:32:13 PM  
the_gospel_of_thomas: but thats what the lefties' whitey-tighties are all in knots about.

Funny, I thought it was because of that asshole warmongering president that won't go away or get nabbed for war crimes...
 
2006-07-11 4:36:49 PM  
Yeah, a lot of it is much ado about nothing. She's still a moron who's "arguments" run the gamut of "someone else's argument" to "here's the 'facts' I found on Google that support my childish insults" and she's a racist. The only one I found on the Internets that I'd consider copying is the sentence that starts "The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam..." As for the other examples I've seen, UPI is right, and the DailyKos liberals need to stop propagandizing and playing political games and think for themselves; pot, kettle and all that. It's desperation and its making you spin, probably even unconciously at this point. It's getting like a cult just like the damn Freepers. You won't be desperate or feel if you learn and educate yourself about the things you are concerned about. Calling some of this stuff plagiarism is, quite clearly to me, not because you are concerned about plagiarism, it is because you are concerned about the bile that woman spews and you want to 'get' her. That's fine, she's a hateful biatch, but if that's your concern focus on that instead of on plagiarism.
 
2006-07-11 4:37:29 PM  
Me fail English? That's unpossible!
 
2006-07-11 4:37:36 PM  
the_gospel_of_thomas: the lefties' whitey-tighties

Moran, lefties wear hemp thongs not whitey-tighties (them's for righties)
 
2006-07-11 4:38:18 PM  
whidbey: Funny, I thought it was because of that asshole warmongering president that won't go away or get nabbed for war crimes...

That's Wednesday. This is TUESDAY.

/if your think that you were let down for not having "Fitzmas" this year, you are really going to be upset when the non-existant war crimes of GWB ... go on being non-existant ... I'd recomend moving to canada and spending all your disposable income on pot.
 
2006-07-11 4:39:11 PM  
... *looks around, uncertain* .... "leftie Tighties?"


/my bad. Sorry.
 
2006-07-11 4:40:31 PM  
the_gospel_of_thomas: spending all your disposable income on pot.

let me assure you, you don't need to move to Canada to do that...
 
2006-07-11 4:42:17 PM  
the_gospel_of_thomas: you are really going to be upset when the non-existant war crimes of GWB ... go on being non-existant

We should all be. What a shame indeed if he gets off scot-free.

I'd recomend moving to canada and spending all your disposable income on pot.

Actually, it's pretty damn easy to do that here in Seattle...:)
 
2006-07-11 4:58:16 PM  
OK, what happens next

1) Plagiarism found in other Coulter books
2) Denial continues, but gets more flaky
3) Publishers admit plagiarism, firing Coulter
4) Coulter is ostracized from all intelligent political communities
5) Coulter gets her own show on Fox News
 
2006-07-11 5:20:17 PM  
6)Profit!!
 
2006-07-11 6:07:46 PM  
That's an ANN baby
 
2006-07-11 7:02:24 PM  
Kos agrees that Coulter has not plagiarized anything. No, really.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/7/11290/58796
 
2006-07-11 7:18:33 PM  
Geotpf: Kos agrees that Coulter has not plagiarized anything.


FTFA:

What these examples show is that Coulter is a lazy writer who rips off other people's research, but stealing someone else's arguments isn't "plagiarism". It's just being a lazy, unimaginative writer.

* ::


Probably true. Still Ann thinks her shiat doesn't stink and folks like that sometimes don't think the rules apply to them. It is still possible she did it.
 
2006-07-11 7:56:19 PM  
skylabdown: I am offended at the way many folks here on Fark castigate sexual minorities. I think they need to be sent to sensitivity training ASAP.


transformers are fine. They are human beings. I have no problems with them at all.

Ann Coulter is an entirely different .. um... beast.

Yes... beast.
 
2006-07-11 8:19:20 PM  
My favorite part of her publishers' denials? "Well, Ann Coulter is a LAWYER, so she MUST know what she's doing, DUH."

It's a bald-faced appeal to false authority.
 
2006-07-12 12:13:06 AM  
Forced Perspective: Did I just see an honest mistake of fact in the initial post, a polite correction in the second post, and an admission of fault in the third post, with no flaming? Is this fark?

Yes. Some of us graduated from junior high, believe it or not.
 
2006-07-12 4:11:09 AM  
My favorite bit was when one of the blog-accusers actually stooped to SHOWING an example of an AC plagerism in her new book. Within less than 24 hours it came out that the source she had "plagerized" had itself used as it's OWN source - an unpublished copy of Coulter's new book.

So... Ann plagerized from... herself.

Stunning.
 
Displayed 50 of 52 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.