Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   Man who has 12 children with 11 woman saids he won't have sex until all his child support is paid off.   ( divider line
    More: Cool  
•       •       •

2974 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 Mar 2002 at 12:25 PM (15 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

45 Comments     (+0 »)
2002-03-24 12:27:56 PM  
"saids" ?!
2002-03-24 12:31:45 PM  
What the fark is wrong with you people? This is , you morons.
2002-03-24 12:32:53 PM  
That's farking pathetic
2002-03-24 12:33:40 PM  
That's supposed to be
img.fark.netView Full Size
. Also, learn proper grammar. I can understand making a mistake, but heck, someone actually used the "é" in the headline two lines below this one.
2002-03-24 12:37:00 PM  
Never gonna live up to his responsibilities
In time, more children
Grandkids will pull the same shiat someday.
Government pays the bill
Entitled due to oppression
Redemption comes from the Lord
2002-03-24 12:37:15 PM  
I give him 4 days.
2002-03-24 12:37:43 PM  
Fark Wars, Episode Two: Attack of the Cools.
I smell a photoshop in that one...
2002-03-24 12:41:04 PM  
Trailer trash women who fall for these guys must have some kind of brain defect.

To bad there will never be a cure for "female brain".
2002-03-24 12:43:23 PM  
Man who can't write for shiat saids he won't fark anymore until all his submissions is rejected.
2002-03-24 12:44:22 PM  
Or Canadians.
2002-03-24 12:46:31 PM  
You whiners are all owned.
2002-03-24 12:48:15 PM  
The award for the Creepiest News Team goes to these people:

[image from too old to be available]
2002-03-24 12:49:37 PM  
Squinth! Help! I can't stay focused in the threads because people keep honking at the COOL tags! I'm going to lose control! He-e-e-e-e-e-l-l-lp!!!
2002-03-24 12:59:50 PM  
This is COOL, yeah yeah!

[image from too old to be available]
2002-03-24 01:02:32 PM  
dude's got game..
unfortunatly though, no condoms
2002-03-24 01:04:11 PM  
2002-03-24 01:06:07 PM  
ok, now i cant believe im the first to say this, and i wouldnt normally, but as you all know, it has to be done...

h00ray for repeats!!!

cracKy's downfall in T minus 5..4..3.......
2002-03-24 01:07:42 PM  
Your'e not the first to say this, CracKness, but you wouldn't know that because this thread was clearcut a few moments ago.
2002-03-24 01:09:25 PM  
So what, are we now deciding who can have kids and who cannot by how much money they make?

I think this is irresponsible too, but the government shouldn't have a right to dictate who may and who may not procreate and how often.

Also, I didn't really understand the article. It mentions jail, and that he's not paying chiuld support and that he doesn't have a job and he made some kind of plea bargain.

Are they saying that they want to put him in jail because he has not paid child support which he can't pay because he doesn't have a job?

Are we now throwing people in jail because they can't pay a fine because they don't have a job? Don't we have better things to spend our tax dollars on than putting some guy in jail because he's too poor to pay a fine?

That's the whole problem with having a system where when you commit a crime they charge you X amount of dollars. The rich shrug it off, and the poor get hit hard. That's not justice or equality.

In fact if I recall, back in the days just after slavery ended, the south continued using slaves by making them into prisoners instead. They simply gave harsh sentances for things which blacks would be convicted of and which whites wouldn't and then had chain gange perform work on the plantations instead. And this way they were able to treat them even worse than they had been trating them because now they were considered criminals.

Well this kind of the same thing, only they're doing it to the poor. They're gearing the punishment in such a way that it doesn't affect the upper class as much as the lower class, so that the upper class can do all the weed and cocaine they like and pay a little fine and the lower class goes to jail for the same crime.
2002-03-24 01:15:59 PM  
One word - VASECTOMY
2002-03-24 01:17:07 PM  
h00ray for clear cuts!!!
2002-03-24 01:23:19 PM  
Sswift: so, are you summing it up that the two people who conceived a child are not 'both' responsible? The dumb women this guys been with apparently have been left to support the children. Whether it's with government assistance, or not(probably with assistance for all his children)the women are the ones bearing the full load and the stigma of what you've just described. Now if this guy is truly disabled, then he just go thru, marry them one by one, of course followed by divorse, all kids would get a social security check.

I think we should put the farker in jail; make him do something for a wage; don't give him a dime; give to the kids(or government) until his full debt is paid off... including his stay at the jail. Oh, and lets not forget, cut off privilege of looking at boobies ha ha
2002-03-24 01:25:30 PM  
ok, I changed my mind

03-24-02 01:15:59 PM Tinrobot
One word - VASECTOMY

you've convinced me, but I think jail time is also good for this low life
2002-03-24 01:28:22 PM  
If he kept it in his goddamn pants he wouldn't have this problem. Dumbass.
2002-03-24 01:30:12 PM  
FARK is starting to really, really SUCK
2002-03-24 01:34:08 PM  
I say we force him to get married and shackled to Loraine Bobbit. You know, one wrong move... He gets the "chop".

2002-03-24 01:49:07 PM  
skidnuts, you must be a woman by the way you are talking, or else a very stuipid man!!!
2002-03-24 01:57:54 PM  
The article says he disabled. Apparently not entirely.
2002-03-24 02:06:42 PM  
Is that what he "saids"?
2002-03-24 02:10:10 PM  
doesn't matter if a person is black, white, hispanic, whatever...this can happen to almost any race bocomofo..

..and this should go under unlikely, not cool...

they should just sentence him to sterilization..unfort. this is against his civil rights...

AND both parties involved are equally at fault for this fiasco..all of his eleven partners..after all, it does take two to tango
2002-03-24 02:11:28 PM  
Should Luther Crawford be sent to jail instead of receiving a no-sex deal?
Choice--------------------Votes--Percent of 4458 votes

Yes, He Belongs In Jail----4247---------------------95%

No, The Agreement Is Fair--211-----------------------5%

Thanks for participating in our survey.

You are welcome!

2002-03-24 02:14:45 PM  
I think as long as he has the money to support all of his kids, then he can have as many as he wantys. I actually praise him for being able to support 12 kids. My dad couldn't even pay child support for 2.
However, this no sex deal, I would like to see how long that will last. I give him a week.
2002-03-24 02:16:38 PM  
This is not the best day for the courts in Louisville, not because they are going to hold this fella, but because they let him go in the first place. It's about a little responsibility. Man can have as many children as he wants, but with the understanding that if he does so, he may be responsible for those children. He abdicates that responsibility, the mother has the option of seeking a court order to force him to take that responsibility. It's not that poor folks have less rights to procreate, but rather they have the same responsibilities to provide for those children. A smart man knows the limitations of his abilities. This fella is good at getting gals pregnant, not so good at providing for his kids...

That being said, these gals he's been with should, say after #4, looked at his track record and said to themselves, "self, this fella ain't no good." There is an element of responsibility here, but these gals are raising these kids, they've got the responsibility staring them in the face every morning.

There are lots of examples of poor folks having large families--some of our parents might have been in that boat. This fella is getting raked over luke-warm coals for not addressing his responsibilities. The courts have been asked to intravene by these ladies, and the courts have to address each case. This fella isn't being persecuted because of having sex, he's looking at jail time for ignoring his responsibilities, and a slew of civil suits against him. A richer fella WOULD be able to sweep this under the rug, but if he didn't, he'd be just as wrong. You spins the wheel, you takes your chances. This bugger has done just that, and you would think after #4 he might get the idea, but the courts don't enforce good sense, but the law. This guy found himself behind the eight-ball paternity-wise 12 times...and hasn't been paying any of them? Then he is responsible for the consequences of his actions. My wife are splitting, and I plan on taking care of our daughter, and no court had to order that. You have a child, you change your life--or you declare yourself unfit and get the hell out of the way and let your former partner get on with her life...
2002-03-24 02:47:45 PM  
"Well, I don't know if I got 12 for real," Crawford told Foshee. "That's what they say. I know two ain't mine so I say 10."
Hold up guys! It was only 10 kids. That's okey-dokey isn't it? Uh...yeah. This guy's been around for too long not to learn to wrap that rascal. He's responsible for paying child support, but he just goes around screwing more women...and not for money it would appear. I agree with his ex-girlfriend;
img.fark.netView Full Size
. I'd love to be in the courtroom, though, when he's found in contempt of court; will he try a Clintonism and claim that it wasn't really sex? What, because there wasn't any Barry White playing?
2002-03-24 03:12:16 PM  
Wasn't this already up here about a week ago?
2002-03-24 03:46:21 PM  
Hey, havign 10 kids wasn't all that uncommon that long ago you know... Back in the farming days... heck there's probalby a lot of farm families still like that today. :-)

So this guy should gather all his gilfreinds and kids together and move out west and make themsevles a farm. :-)

Oh and those of you bashing this guy... don't you tihnk these CHICKS bear a little bit of responsibility for having these kids too? These chicks knew this guy didn't have a job when they banged him, chose not to wear protection. They bear a lot of responsibility for this situation as well.

As far as I'm concerned, the parent who gets custody of the kid should have to pay for it. You don't want to pay for the kid yourself, give it to the other parent. These women don't want to pay for the kids they helped create, give em to this guy, who'll then probably put them up for adoption since he can't care for them himself. It's probably the best thing for the kids anyhow, then they'll get TWO parents who can care for them adequately. Or find another guy who'll be willing to help care for the kids.

Okay I don't really think half this stuff I'm just throwing an idea out there. There's a lot of stuf fto consider in cases like this, and I don't think it's fair to just blame the guy and say he's the one in the wrong and the women are bearing al the burden.... which they also irresponsibly helped to create.

Do you have to pay child support for kids if your ex girlfreind marries another guy? And what if she then dumps that guy? How does that work?

Do women may child support if the man gets custody?

What about abortions... If a guy has a child with a woman, can she get an abortion without his consent? I think so. That doesn't seem fair. Of coruse that's a whole other topic. :-)
2002-03-24 04:01:26 PM  
But will he still be able to put da ball in de hoop ?
2002-03-24 04:44:10 PM  
"They should have let him stay in jail," King said. "It
ain't gonna work. It's not gonna work."

see first it ain't gonna, then it not gonna

2002-03-24 04:55:36 PM  
2002-03-24 04:59:33 PM  
This is Cool?. what in the fark
2002-03-24 07:30:38 PM  
I think FARK admin is on a "Cool" binge. Kind of like when you start laughing uncontrollably, and you just can't stop.
2002-03-24 08:50:57 PM  
This is a repost. Hmm. It's Cool tho.
2002-03-24 09:12:43 PM  
As I've been saying... mandatory sterilization of low income individuals is the only way to proceed...
2002-03-24 11:58:38 PM  
Umm castration...than he gets both, he becomes his own inner jail and no sex. i love trying to please all sides.
2002-03-25 07:23:17 PM  
If he wants to not have sex, he needs to get married.
Displayed 45 of 45 comments

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.