If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CornellReview.org)   College Girls: Unpaid Whores   ( cornellreview.org) divider line
    More: Amusing  
•       •       •

24916 clicks; posted to Main » on 20 Mar 2002 at 2:24 PM (16 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

325 Comments     (+0 »)

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Newest | Show all

2002-03-20 11:44:44 AM  
He lost me with the God stuff. Ok, and the whore stuff. Something tells me this guy is a "waiting-til-marriage" Catholic, and girls with t-shirts shake his resolve as they shake their booty. Amen.
2002-03-20 03:13:59 PM  
" Feminist thought has taught young women that equality is achieved by acting like promiscuous sluts. "

My whole opinion of feminism has changed.

I've decided that I too, am a feminist.
2002-03-20 03:14:42 PM  
Why are women "whores" and "sluts" while men are just being men? Aren't men unpaid whores too (or at least wish they could be)?
2002-03-20 03:15:07 PM  
That article was a little winded, huh?
2002-03-20 03:15:56 PM  
Duck and cover, people, here comes the shiatstorm.
2002-03-20 03:15:58 PM  
But why is it liberating for a college-age woman to jump into bed with a man that is not her husband? Why is it freeing to become intoxicated and to hook-up with anonymous frat guys? Why is it an expression of equal rights to give into men's animalistic instincts?

Why are men not held to this guys standards? Why does he think women don't have animalistic instincts as well and want to get laid!
2002-03-20 03:16:23 PM  
Loser. The guy doesn't have a sister.
2002-03-20 03:16:32 PM  
I thought college girls were more like PORNSTAR WANNABES
2002-03-20 03:17:08 PM  
Time to go back to college!
2002-03-20 03:17:44 PM  
Isn't an unpaid whore just a slut?
2002-03-20 03:17:48 PM  
Additionally, other sex-based relationships have become commonplace. In recent years, a new and disturbing arrangement known as "friends with benefits" has emerged.

this bad....hmm
2002-03-20 03:18:09 PM  
This fella sounds upset because he is watching college students every where get a lot of tail, yet getting none himself.

easy college women are the best thing about college.
2002-03-20 03:18:23 PM  
Blackbird: if he does, i bet his name is quentin compson.

okay. no more faulkner references today. promise.
2002-03-20 03:18:24 PM  
ahh this guy is an idiot. He's saying women should be celibate to control men WTF
2002-03-20 03:18:41 PM  
Now that I think about it, I object to the portrayal of men in said article as sex-starved, immoral maniacs. Yeah, sometimes we're like that, but not always, and we don't always enjoy it when we *are* that way. Besides, women want sex sometimes too. (True! I heard it from women, one of whom wanted to sleep with me!)
2002-03-20 03:18:51 PM  
No, most girls are not actually uttering those words, but the slutty sentiments are implicit in the standard female college behavior - wearing tight shirts and pants, getting publicly drunk, hanging on every guy around, and engaging in random sex.

And this is a problem because ...?
2002-03-20 03:18:52 PM  
Want to guess if this guy is getting any?
2002-03-20 03:19:36 PM  
But then again maybe they are more like JUNIOR COLLEGE SLUTS
2002-03-20 03:19:43 PM  
This guy can't get laid, 'cuz all the ladies wanna "become intoxicated and to hook-up with anonymous frat guys?"

10-1 says this guy's not a Greek.
2002-03-20 03:19:59 PM  
Presumably, women could exercise their true power to tame men by using celibacy (and other ladylike behavior) to induce men into monogamous stable relationships and eventually into marriage. Along the way to healthy relationships, women could also gain some self-respect.

Somebody pull the plug on this guy before he ruins it for the rest of us!
2002-03-20 03:20:37 PM  
because biologically, women are the male peacock-- bright plumiage to attract the others cocks (pun intended). man find the pretty lady and the pretty lady decides if she lets the man f*ck her. there was less biological advantage for men to mate with only one person. there are several socio-biological downsides for women to act masculine when it comes to breeding habits. this is what has shaped our social attitudes, not churches, not media, not anything else. somehow recently it seems that people have piles of intellectual garbage around some very simple biology. read some evolutionary psychology books, its interesting stuff.
2002-03-20 03:20:55 PM  
<rant>Awesome article. Exactly how I feel, and no I'm not a "wait until marriage catholic". I'm 20, I'm in college, and I have my share of girls, but at the same time, I'm very selective.

Also, I'm agnostic (non-religious). I'm also smoke and drug free, and that's how I like my girls as well. When I say this, people think I'm a goody two shoes or I'm "Christian" or something.

I'm not religious, I just don't want a girl that's used, I don't want your nasty smoke staining my walls/property, I don't want to hear the excuse "I farked him because I was high/drunk, it didn't mean anything.". I just happen to like moral, clean, down to earth women. Quit confusing it with religion.

There's a term for it: straight-edge.</rant>
2002-03-20 03:21:13 PM  
Along the way to healthy relationships, women could also gain some self-respect.

who says they don't have it already?
2002-03-20 03:22:03 PM  
this guy should have been more funny when being ridiculous
2002-03-20 03:22:26 PM  
This guy needs to give a college chick a good pounding. Come to think of it, so do I.
2002-03-20 03:22:46 PM  
"Look at that college chick, ain't she sweet? I wonder if her pussy is any good to eat ?
Oh yes but I'm so clean cut, I just wanna fark some slut !"

They just don't write love songs like they used to...
2002-03-20 03:24:19 PM  

Interesting how you want a girl that isn't "used", but you make no such guarantee of your own history to her. Not quite fair, is it?

2002-03-20 03:24:36 PM  
The link went the way of Fark-a-mo Jones, but, judging from the sentiment of this thread, this guy was as dull as dishwater
2002-03-20 03:24:56 PM  
I wish he would inject some religion into his argument, that would really seal it for me.

Most. Biased. Argument. Ever.
2002-03-20 03:25:29 PM  
Can the moral high ground ever be reclaimed? Perhaps...one church pew at a time.

Excuse me while I puke.
2002-03-20 03:25:53 PM  
Raydr, agnostic does not equal non-religious. You may be both, but you can be agnostic and still be religious - just not a religion based on the belief of a god.
2002-03-20 03:26:06 PM  
$5 says this guy is a republican.



2002-03-20 03:26:28 PM  
Rwkasten:This guy can't get laid, 'cuz all the ladies wanna "become intoxicated and to hook-up with anonymous frat guys?" 10-1 says this guy's not a Greek.

Obviously. Fratties don't do chicks, they circle-jerk on biscuits.
2002-03-20 03:26:36 PM  
This guy ain't been hanging around Chantaclear or The Royal Palm. If you go home empty handed, shame on you.

(Similar the the Voo in College Park in it's hayday)
2002-03-20 03:28:14 PM  
Most every girl I now is a slut. And the ones I think are nice and pure are probably sluts too. No reason to complain about it. I'd probably be the sluttiest girl in town if I was female.
2002-03-20 03:28:33 PM  
The Taliban is looking for guys like this to swell their dwindled cranks, er, ranks.
2002-03-20 03:28:43 PM  
How can we take seriously anyone who lists Willy Wonka's Ooompa-Loompas as a source?
2002-03-20 03:28:58 PM  
Gorgeous: And you're right. Everyone says the same thing...and I'll admit that I'm a hypocrite, but also, at least I can say that I've cared about every girl I slept with, and that it was in a relationship. If they can tell me the same thing, I'm alright with it.

I've turned down "hot" girls before....because I barely knew them, and they were just being easy. I guess maybe I place too much value on sex? If it's easy to come by...it's not as valuable/meaningful, and I don't want it.
Plus, I'd rather not catch something...the more guys a girl has done, the better the chances are that she has something, right?

God I sound like a loser. Look at all those "I"s too.

The good thing though, is if I do sleep with a girl, at least we both know it means something to both of us, and I'm not using her for just sex and vice versa. It seems better that way.
2002-03-20 03:29:04 PM  
I know know is spelled know not now.
2002-03-20 03:29:06 PM  
I would be he uses the Ithaca College sluts (one of my friends was quite proud to be one...go figure) just as bad as any of the other Cornell blueblood assholes.
2002-03-20 03:29:28 PM  
Raydr, I didn't say he was catholic for the hell of it, or to make fun of catholics. I mention it because I flipped through some of his other columns... it's kind of obvious that's where he's coming from. And huzzah for him.

And Huzzah for straight-edge:
[image from straight-edge.com too old to be available]
Whether it's farking or whether it's playing golf.
2002-03-20 03:29:43 PM  
"In recent years, a new and disturbing arrangement known as "friends with benefits" has emerged. In this arrangement, men are not even forced to perform the normal duties of boyfriends, i.e. flowers, Valentine's Day cards, rides to the abortion clinic, etc. Instead, girls consider these guys "just friends" whom they happen to screw every now and again. No strings, no attachments, no dinners. Just sex when they feel like it."
jesus....where can I meet these "friends"!

2002-03-20 03:29:51 PM  
This is Cornell for you: The only thing crazier than Cornell left-wingers are Cornell right-wingers. Must have something to do with endless winter, hills, and gorges.

I have examples.
2002-03-20 03:29:52 PM  
What a load of crap.
2002-03-20 03:30:14 PM  
totally retarded
2002-03-20 03:30:24 PM  
ScreamingInDigital: Yeah, I know, but I didn't want to turn this into a religious debate, or have to explain the differences between Atheist/Agnostic/etc....

A lot of people don't know what agnostic means, so I just always follow it with "(not religious)".
2002-03-20 03:30:37 PM  
of course they're unpaid, because if you pay for it, it's illegal
2002-03-20 03:31:00 PM  
i'm glad men have absolutely no part in this "whoring" of american women. girls are evil!

this guy's a goober.

*girl gone wild*
2002-03-20 03:31:07 PM  
read more of the guys stuff its all here including a rebut from the girls are whores article. This guy is a right wing jerkoff, just look at his pic, 1970's hair and standing on front of a flag...
2002-03-20 03:31:12 PM  

[image from cornellreview.org too old to be available]

is the face of someone who ain't gettin' any.

Displayed 50 of 325 comments

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Newest | Show all

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.