Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Smithsonian Magazine)   You could just watch some Star Wars movies for the set design. Or you could spend years in your mom's basement using 1990s graphics and some serious airquotes to make Frank Lloyd Wright designs "come to life"   (smithsonianmag.com) divider line
    More: Cool, Frank Lloyd Wright, Computer, Lake Tahoe, Architecture, Chicago, Skyscraper, Apartment, City  
•       •       •

1209 clicks; posted to STEM » on 08 Feb 2023 at 2:50 AM (6 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



19 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2023-02-05 5:37:20 PM  
That was cool.
 
2023-02-05 5:45:03 PM  
Cool work.  Sad trombone headline.
 
2023-02-06 8:38:29 AM  
And the roof leaks in every one of them
 
2023-02-06 1:48:15 PM  
th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.comView Full Size


I think that's a Myst level I never figured out.
 
2023-02-07 3:57:55 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2023-02-08 3:41:05 AM  
Just not Jake Lloyd architecture.
 
2023-02-08 4:02:52 AM  
The reason why most of his designs were never made is because they were severely impractical, if not engineering monstrosities and certifiable death traps.

One that was definitely made was Fallingwater.

upload.wikimedia.orgView Full Size


A residence with a river/waterfall going through it.

No one lives there because it's untenable. It's just supposed to be looked at, like art. Not lived in, like actual farking architecture. It is plagued with so many structural, engineering, and design defects and inefficiencies that it requires annual integrity checks, maintenance, and recallibrating (it moves several inches a year) to keep it from collapsing and falling down stream. Humidity and winter weather does a serious number on it.

I mean, it looks nice as a model:

archeetect.comView Full Size


But is an absolute hellscape engineering-wise. NOTHING is reinforced. The foundation is a literal farking river bed. They installed tension cables to keep the house standing up these days (something FLW would have fought if he were still alive).

Like the character Howard Roark based after him, FLW had an insatiable ego and often argued with and overruled the will of engineers who knew better. His designs constantly forsook the cardinal rule of architecture: That it's meant to be used. By humans. Every day.
 
2023-02-08 4:55:29 AM  
th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.comView Full Size


There is no inherent design flaw in this.  Nope, none whatsoever
 
2023-02-08 7:32:24 AM  
I have a lot of FLW architecture near me, and whenever I see it, I wonder how much drugs he was taking, and what untrained engineer approved the project.
 
2023-02-08 7:42:36 AM  

Ishkur: The reason why most of his designs were never made is because they were severely impractical, if not engineering monstrosities and certifiable death traps.

One that was definitely made was Fallingwater.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 850x558]

A residence with a river/waterfall going through it.

No one lives there because it's untenable. It's just supposed to be looked at, like art. Not lived in, like actual farking architecture. It is plagued with so many structural, engineering, and design defects and inefficiencies that it requires annual integrity checks, maintenance, and recallibrating (it moves several inches a year) to keep it from collapsing and falling down stream. Humidity and winter weather does a serious number on it.

I mean, it looks nice as a model:

[archeetect.com image 696x522]

But is an absolute hellscape engineering-wise. NOTHING is reinforced. The foundation is a literal farking river bed. They installed tension cables to keep the house standing up these days (something FLW would have fought if he were still alive).

Like the character Howard Roark based after him, FLW had an insatiable ego and often argued with and overruled the will of engineers who knew better. His designs constantly forsook the cardinal rule of architecture: That it's meant to be used. By humans. Every day.


it's funny for a while in the late 90s I worked for stow davis furniture and was given the richard meier line to design orders for and his furniture looked like these homes.  little bit of intellectual borrowing, I'm sure.
 
2023-02-08 8:45:15 AM  
I'm pretty sure MoMA did an exhibit like 10 years ago of his unrealized designs that included newly built models (I think that's where I saw it.)
 
2023-02-08 9:24:15 AM  
His designs are often striking and always beautiful. What he needed was a superlative engineer partner who could make all of his designs practical and long-lasting. But the look and feel of his work is utterly unique and shows immense talent.
 
2023-02-08 1:07:17 PM  

Ishkur: The reason why most of his designs were never made is because they were severely impractical, if not engineering monstrosities and certifiable death traps.

One that was definitely made was Fallingwater.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 850x558]

A residence with a river/waterfall going through it.

No one lives there because it's untenable. It's just supposed to be looked at, like art. Not lived in, like actual farking architecture. It is plagued with so many structural, engineering, and design defects and inefficiencies that it requires annual integrity checks, maintenance, and recallibrating (it moves several inches a year) to keep it from collapsing and falling down stream. Humidity and winter weather does a serious number on it.

I mean, it looks nice as a model:

[archeetect.com image 696x522]

But is an absolute hellscape engineering-wise. NOTHING is reinforced. The foundation is a literal farking river bed. They installed tension cables to keep the house standing up these days (something FLW would have fought if he were still alive).

Like the character Howard Roark based after him, FLW had an insatiable ego and often argued with and overruled the will of engineers who knew better. His designs constantly forsook the cardinal rule of architecture: That it's meant to be used. By humans. Every day.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're neither an architect or engineer; you've never owned it or lived there; you're not any sort of architectural historian or anthropologist; in fact you've never actually been, and are in no way qualified to speak to any of your points - you're repeating things you've heard others say.
 
2023-02-08 1:50:00 PM  
I'm not a big fan of that stamped concrete house in LA, but I bet its cool inside anyway

The Prairie style was still his apex
 
2023-02-08 5:05:57 PM  

slantsix: Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're neither an architect or engineer; you've never owned it or lived there; you're not any sort of architectural historian or anthropologist; in fact you've never actually been, and are in no way qualified to speak to any of your points - you're repeating things you've heard others say.


I literally just cutnpasted the wiki.

That's how common knowledge this is. If you want me to send you sources and citations, give me 15 more seconds to google some results.
 
2023-02-08 6:12:09 PM  

Ishkur: slantsix: Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're neither an architect or engineer; you've never owned it or lived there; you're not any sort of architectural historian or anthropologist; in fact you've never actually been, and are in no way qualified to speak to any of your points - you're repeating things you've heard others say.

I literally just cutnpasted the wiki.

That's how common knowledge this is. If you want me to send you sources and citations, give me 15 more seconds to google some results.


Now hold on. Our Farker friend, single link ants 9,didn't spend 4 years at architect school and 8 years of internship just to have some watery tart distributing scimitars fling a Wiki quote around. Maybe there's something to this.
 
2023-02-08 9:56:09 PM  

Ishkur: slantsix: Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're neither an architect or engineer; you've never owned it or lived there; you're not any sort of architectural historian or anthropologist; in fact you've never actually been, and are in no way qualified to speak to any of your points - you're repeating things you've heard others say.

I literally just cutnpasted the wiki.

That's how common knowledge this is. If you want me to send you sources and citations, give me 15 more seconds to google some results.


Why do you care either way, whether it's a success or a piece of crap?

You chose to go negative for no apparent reason at all, and that says more about you, than the building.
 
2023-02-09 2:42:02 AM  

slantsix: Why do you care either way, whether it's a success or a piece of crap?


Do you want the long answer or the short answer?
 
2023-02-09 4:59:36 AM  
Cracked concrete, water leaking in, and he porks your wife?
 
Displayed 19 of 19 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.