Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   Writer tries to shoehorn Alan Parsons Project reference into article on future of AI, fails even worse than Subby when he does the same for Fark headlines   (techopedia.com) divider line
    More: Fail, Consciousness, Computer, Education, Artificial intelligence, Organization, Engine, New York City, Technology  
•       •       •

431 clicks; posted to STEM » on 03 Feb 2023 at 5:35 AM (7 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



16 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2023-02-02 10:38:22 PM  
just jamming in musical references is an enigmatic ocean, anything you pick could be a mood for a day
 
2023-02-02 10:59:37 PM  
I made it about 1/3 of the way through the article.

That was bad. Horrifically bad. Writing that was bad beyond comprehension.

And almost completely ignorant of the subject matter.

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2023-02-02 11:42:16 PM  
...well, they've taken lots of chances before...
 
2023-02-03 12:50:25 AM  
f*cking cancer site with ALL THE POPUPS

besides, Alan Parsons Project is for hungover Pink Floyd fans
 
2023-02-03 2:13:30 AM  

GitOffaMyLawn: I made it about 1/3 of the way through the article.

That was bad. Horrifically bad. Writing that was bad beyond comprehension.

And almost completely ignorant of the subject matter.

[Fark user image 800x450]


It's an article about AI for people who couldn't get their VCRs to stop blinking 12:00.
 
2023-02-03 5:16:11 AM  
What about Operation: Bananarama?
 
2023-02-03 6:24:18 AM  
The AI in the sky is watching you masturbate?
 
2023-02-03 6:36:31 AM  
Why Alan Parsons? Why not:

NM 156 (Remastered)
Youtube OgeJilyRpfw
 
2023-02-03 7:14:01 AM  
.... Which I believe was some sort of hovercraft
 
2023-02-03 7:38:06 AM  

GitOffaMyLawn: I made it about 1/3 of the way through the article.

That was bad. Horrifically bad. Writing that was bad beyond comprehension.

And almost completely ignorant of the subject matter.

[Fark user image 800x450]


I think that article was written by AI itself. I got about as far as you and bailed too.
 
2023-02-03 8:00:46 AM  

Archie Goodwin: GitOffaMyLawn: I made it about 1/3 of the way through the article.

That was bad. Horrifically bad. Writing that was bad beyond comprehension.

And almost completely ignorant of the subject matter.

[Fark user image 800x450]

I think that article was written by AI itself. I got about as far as you and bailed too.


I tried to get ChatGPT to write an article like that, but even it couldn't identify an appropriate lyric from The Alan Parsons Project. It made up fake lyrics twice and gamely proceeded on to the main subject.
 
2023-02-03 8:04:10 AM  

dbirchall: The AI in the sky is watching you masturbate?


Don't answer me
 
2023-02-03 8:23:19 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size


This would have been a better Alan Parsons reference for the article.
 
2023-02-03 10:03:39 AM  

BlackCloudofDespair: [Fark user image 225x224]

This would have been a better Alan Parsons reference for the article.


Aye, robot.
 
2023-02-03 10:13:12 AM  
And I thought this was the weakest shoehorning of the ALP into something:

i.imgflip.comView Full Size
 
2023-02-03 11:01:39 AM  

Ambitwistor: Archie Goodwin: GitOffaMyLawn: I made it about 1/3 of the way through the article.

That was bad. Horrifically bad. Writing that was bad beyond comprehension.

And almost completely ignorant of the subject matter.

[Fark user image 800x450]

I think that article was written by AI itself. I got about as far as you and bailed too.

I tried to get ChatGPT to write an article like that, but even it couldn't identify an appropriate lyric from The Alan Parsons Project. It made up fake lyrics twice and gamely proceeded on to the main subject.


How would you tell the difference?
 
Displayed 16 of 16 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.