Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Kotaku)   The upcoming Universal Studios Mario Kart ride will not accommodate folks with a waistline of over 40". Guess the average waistline in the USA is   (kotaku.com) divider line
68
    More: Murica, The Wall Street Journal, Super Mario, Mario Kart, Nintendo, Requirement, Mushroom Kingdom, Revenge of the Mummy, Waist  
•       •       •

1099 clicks; posted to Fandom » on 02 Feb 2023 at 9:05 AM (7 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



68 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
Pocket Ninja [TotalFark] [OhFark]
2023-02-02 8:48:46 AM  
You know, it probably wouldn't be that hard to start a few outraged discussion threads on FB and Twitter based on the idea that this represents a violation of Americans' Constitutional rights.
 
Somacandra [TotalFark] [OhFark]
2023-02-02 8:58:24 AM  
You can't ride basically anything there if you're fat.
 
HotWingConspiracy
2023-02-02 9:08:32 AM  
King Koopa fits in his cart just fine.
 
west.la.lawyer [TotalFark]
2023-02-02 9:09:32 AM  
OOrrrrrr, it is a kids ride
 
RogermcAllen [OhFark]
2023-02-02 9:10:42 AM  
Headline:
Nintendo's Big Mario Kart Ride At Universal Can Only Be Ridden By Thin People
Subhead:
Universal Studios Hollywood's latest ride bars attendees with a waistline over 40 inches

Oh sweetie, thin ends  long before 40 inches.
 
Karma Chameleon
2023-02-02 9:13:34 AM  
I have a thyroid condition!

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
HotWingConspiracy
2023-02-02 9:14:17 AM  

west.la.lawyer: OOrrrrrr, it is a kids ride


This is an obstacle to a whole lot of American kids.
 
mongbiohazard
2023-02-02 9:36:08 AM  

Pocket Ninja: You know, it probably wouldn't be that hard to start a few outraged discussion threads on FB and Twitter based on the idea that this represents a violation of Americans' Constitutional rights.


"Universal Studios is discriminating against conservatives! Evverybody knows those latte sipping, soy boy liberals, are skinnier. They did this on purpose to distance Mario from the word of god!"
 
Marksrevenge
2023-02-02 9:36:46 AM  
It's not like they can just put a bigger seat belt on the ride and call it a day. There's a lot of engineering involved in making the same ride work ergonomically and safely for a 90# rider and for a 350# rider.
 
McGrits [TotalFark]
2023-02-02 9:39:42 AM  

Marksrevenge: It's not like they can just put a bigger seat belt on the ride and call it a day. There's a lot of engineering involved in making the same ride work ergonomically and safely for a 90# rider and for a 350# rider.


I am getting human factors flashbacks. What do mean a 5% Japanese female can't reach/lift the same things as a 95% American male?
 
sniderman
2023-02-02 9:45:59 AM  
Googling "Average American weight":

"Average adult human weight varies by continent, from about 60 kg (130 lb) in Asia and Africa to about 80 kg (180 lb) in North America, with men on average weighing more than women."

50+ pounds more versus those globally? We are a nation of fatasses.

/I *wish* I weighed 180...
 
Glorious Golden Ass [OhFark]
2023-02-02 9:58:38 AM  
Sweet a ride with no line!
 
espiaboricua
2023-02-02 10:11:48 AM  

McGrits: Marksrevenge: It's not like they can just put a bigger seat belt on the ride and call it a day. There's a lot of engineering involved in making the same ride work ergonomically and safely for a 90# rider and for a 350# rider.

I am getting human factors flashbacks. What do mean a 5% Japanese female can't reach/lift the same things as a 95% American male?


Can you lift 414 pounds? I can't, but she can:

Fark user imageView Full Size


Her name is Hiromi Miyake.
 
Magnus Eisengrim
2023-02-02 10:16:24 AM  
From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?
 
McGrits [TotalFark]
2023-02-02 10:18:27 AM  

espiaboricua: McGrits: Marksrevenge: It's not like they can just put a bigger seat belt on the ride and call it a day. There's a lot of engineering involved in making the same ride work ergonomically and safely for a 90# rider and for a 350# rider.

I am getting human factors flashbacks. What do mean a 5% Japanese female can't reach/lift the same things as a 95% American male?

Can you lift 414 pounds? I can't, but she can:

[Fark user image image 612x507]

Her name is Hiromi Miyake.


And she is not 5% Japanese female.

Which is ok, since it is ok for people to be different.
 
Chemlight Battery
2023-02-02 10:26:57 AM  

Magnus Eisengrim: From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?


It's average, not median. So it is skewed by a few extreme outliers like subby's mom.
 
Spartapuss
2023-02-02 10:31:55 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
AgtSmithReloaded
2023-02-02 10:42:53 AM  

mongbiohazard: Pocket Ninja: You know, it probably wouldn't be that hard to start a few outraged discussion threads on FB and Twitter based on the idea that this represents a violation of Americans' Constitutional rights.

"Universal Studios is discriminating against conservatives! Evverybody knows those latte sipping, soy boy liberals, are skinnier. They did this on purpose to distance Mario from the word of god!"


The sad thing is, someone has probably already posted that exact comment, or some derivative of it, unironically, somewhere on social media...or will, before long.

While I do think that it's tone-deaf of Universal not to consider people of larger size when it comes to attractions like these, I don't see it as something worthy of getting one's jimmies rustled.
 
Marcos P
2023-02-02 10:52:00 AM  
Mario can't even fit in his own kart :(
Too much spaghetti

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
EmperorSled
2023-02-02 10:52:38 AM  

Somacandra: You can't ride basically anything there if you're fat.


As someone who's gone to both Disney World and Universal Florida in the same vacation, I can verify this. I was just over 300 last time we went and Disney was pretty much no problem. A few of the rides were tight squeezes but I could get on everything. Universal had many i couldn't ride. Guessing it's because Universal is more extreme, thrill ride type than Disney is.

/going again in 2 weeks
//down to 270s now, hopefully 260s when we go
///no more 3s - wait, always 3 slashies
 
talkyournonsense
2023-02-02 11:07:03 AM  

Magnus Eisengrim: From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?


It really is.
That's why I call myself Canadian fat. Americans have a whole different conception of what Fat is.
I can't wear Asian sized clothes anymore. But I'm still a medium in American sizes.
 
edmo [TotalFark] [OhFark]
2023-02-02 11:16:21 AM  
This is what happens when you let Boeing design ride seating.
 
envirovore [TotalFark] [OhFark]
2023-02-02 11:32:20 AM  

Magnus Eisengrim: From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?


These stats sound fat.

/mid 40's and size 34 waist
//put on weight sometime in the last 25 years, used to be a 32
///heavy nicotine and caffeine diet
 
mongbiohazard
2023-02-02 11:40:38 AM  

AgtSmithReloaded: mongbiohazard: Pocket Ninja: You know, it probably wouldn't be that hard to start a few outraged discussion threads on FB and Twitter based on the idea that this represents a violation of Americans' Constitutional rights.

"Universal Studios is discriminating against conservatives! Evverybody knows those latte sipping, soy boy liberals, are skinnier. They did this on purpose to distance Mario from the word of god!"

The sad thing is, someone has probably already posted that exact comment, or some derivative of it, unironically, somewhere on social media...or will, before long.

While I do think that it's tone-deaf of Universal not to consider people of larger size when it comes to attractions like these, I don't see it as something worthy of getting one's jimmies rustled.


"Conservatives" are so untethered from reality that they're un-satirizable.
 
PirateKing [OhFark]
2023-02-02 11:41:10 AM  

Marcos P: Mario can't even fit in his own kart :(
Too much spaghetti

[Fark user image 425x318]


If anyone needed to swing his arms from side to side, it was ol Cap'n Lou.
 
moothemagiccow
2023-02-02 11:45:22 AM  
It's for kids
 
The Wreckoning [TotalFark]
2023-02-02 11:56:59 AM  

EmperorSled: Somacandra: You can't ride basically anything there if you're fat.

As someone who's gone to both Disney World and Universal Florida in the same vacation, I can verify this. I was just over 300 last time we went and Disney was pretty much no problem. A few of the rides were tight squeezes but I could get on everything. Universal had many i couldn't ride. Guessing it's because Universal is more extreme, thrill ride type than Disney is.

/going again in 2 weeks
//down to 270s now, hopefully 260s when we go
///no more 3s - wait, always 3 slashies


I was at both last September, and can defintely agree. 6'2", 275. The only ride I had an issue with in Disneyworld is Space Mountain, and I could still ride it.

Fully 50% of the larger rides at Universal were impossible, and it wasn't close. A couple of others (particularly Gringott's and Velocicoaster) I could ride, but but my voice went up an octave thanks to the tight fit.

I don't think the "thrill" rides level is the difference (Rockin Roller Coaster in Disneyworld was no problem). Universal just won't pay the extra money to engineer for more people to ride the rides.
 
Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu
2023-02-02 12:12:34 PM  

The Wreckoning: I was at both last September, and can defintely agree. 6'2", 275. The only ride I had an issue with in Disneyworld is Space Mountain, and I could still ride it.

Fully 50% of the larger rides at Universal were impossible, and it wasn't close. A couple of others (particularly Gringott's and Velocicoaster) I could ride, but but my voice went up an octave thanks to the tight fit.

I don't think the "thrill" rides level is the difference (Rockin Roller Coaster in Disneyworld was no problem). Universal just won't pay the extra money to engineer for more people to ride the rides.


I think it's more the mechanism the ride uses for securing the rider.  I've noticed a lot of newer thrill rides have gone away from the shoulder harness system in favor of a lap constraint.  Seeing as a lot of people's extra weight is distributed around their midsection, the lap constraint would be much more of an issue.

I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.  I will say, the lap constraints definitely make the ride a bit more intense, specifically in the case of the Velocicoaster.  It really makes you feel like you're floating out of your seat at times.  You'd get that with the shoulder harness system a little as well, but then you'd feel the pressure on your shoulders, kind of reaffirming your feeling of safety.
 
Fonaibung
2023-02-02 12:38:46 PM  

sniderman: Googling "Average American weight":

"Average adult human weight varies by continent, from about 60 kg (130 lb) in Asia and Africa to about 80 kg (180 lb) in North America, with men on average weighing more than women."

50+ pounds more versus those globally? We are a nation of fatasses.

/I *wish* I weighed 180...


I weigh well above 180 lbs, but it's ok because I am a Fark Bodybuilder and BMI doesn't apply to me.
 
Wine Sipping Elitist [TotalFark]
2023-02-02 12:44:35 PM  
Nintendo's Big Mario Kart Ride At Universal Can Only Be Ridden By Thin People

That's a funny way of spelling not overweight.
 
Fart And Smunny
2023-02-02 12:47:28 PM  

Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.


This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.
 
natazha [BareFark]
2023-02-02 1:27:33 PM  

Somacandra: You can't ride basically anything there if you're fat.


I was at the County fair a few years ago when security, backed by some uniformed police, escorted a family out the gate. Kid wanted to ride the Farris wheel. He and dad exceeded the 500 lb limit (Big sign and scales). Mom and kid were under 500lbs, but mom was having none of it. Kid was too young to ride by himself (<14 yo). Dad was screaming at the carnie, who called in backup. Dad was going to sue the carnie, police, security, country, fair grounds, etc. as they headed for the gate.

Did you know Disney rebuilt It's a Small World because the boats were hanging up due to people's weight?
 
DeathByGeekSquad
2023-02-02 1:32:32 PM  

Fart And Smunny: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.

This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.


I typically operate under the assumption that things going fast are designed for teens to average height/shape adults.  As someone who is 6'4", I recognize that I won't have the same options as everyone else.
 
PlaidJaguar
2023-02-02 1:46:18 PM  
As long as there's a test seat you can try before you get in line.

There are a bunch of rides I can't fit on - I'm too tall for most of the underhang with shoulder-straps style roller coasters, my knees don't always fit under the seat in front of me, and I'm too round for some types of ride restraint.  When I was at Busch Gardens I appreciated that they had test seats out in front of where the line started, so I could actually check if I was going to fit prior to committing to the wait.

It's no fun to stand in line for upwards of 40 minutes just to find out the ride is too small for you.
 
skyotter
2023-02-02 1:49:44 PM  

AgtSmithReloaded: it's tone-deaf of Universal not to consider people of larger size


Universal *considered* people of larger size.

And after considering them, Universal decided they couldn't safely accommodate them.
 
baron von doodle [OhFark]
2023-02-02 1:51:43 PM  

sniderman: Googling "Average American weight":

"Average adult human weight varies by continent, from about 60 kg (130 lb) in Asia and Africa to about 80 kg (180 lb) in North America, with men on average weighing more than women."

50+ pounds more versus those globally? We are a nation of fatasses.

/I *wish* I weighed 180...


We're 38.5% more person per capita.
 
Fart And Smunny
2023-02-02 1:54:24 PM  

DeathByGeekSquad: Fart And Smunny: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.

This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.

I typically operate under the assumption that things going fast are designed for teens to average height/shape adults.  As someone who is 6'4", I recognize that I won't have the same options as everyone else.


Yup. While I would love to live in a world where every person of every body shape was accommodated, I also do not demand that everywhere has all shelves accessible to my 5'2" ass.
 
Great_Milenko
2023-02-02 2:07:15 PM  

west.la.lawyer: OOrrrrrr, it is a kids ride


How dare you discriminate against overly privileged man-childs like that?
 
McGrits [TotalFark]
2023-02-02 2:18:38 PM  

Fart And Smunny: DeathByGeekSquad: Fart And Smunny: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.

This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.

I typically operate under the assumption that things going fast are designed for teens to average height/shape adults.  As someone who is 6'4", I recognize that I won't have the same options as everyone else.

Yup. While I would love to live in a world where every person of every body shape was accommodated, I also do not demand that everywhere has all shelves accessible to my 5'2" ass.


You got some long legs.
 
DeathByGeekSquad
2023-02-02 2:50:34 PM  

Fart And Smunny: DeathByGeekSquad: Fart And Smunny: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.

This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.

I typically operate under the assumption that things going fast are designed for teens to average height/shape adults.  As someone who is 6'4", I recognize that I won't have the same options as everyone else.

Yup. While I would love to live in a world where every person of every body shape was accommodated, I also do not demand that everywhere has all shelves accessible to my 5'2" ass.


POP QUIZ HOTSHOT:  You're selecting seats for your economy flight and notice that the Exit Row is available.  WHAT DO YOU DO?
 
Fart And Smunny
2023-02-02 3:03:44 PM  

DeathByGeekSquad: Fart And Smunny: DeathByGeekSquad: Fart And Smunny: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.

This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.

I typically operate under the assumption that things going fast are designed for teens to average height/shape adults.  As someone who is 6'4", I recognize that I won't have the same options as everyone else.

Yup. While I would love to live in a world where every person of every body shape was accommodated, I also do not demand that everywhere has all shelves accessible to my 5'2" ass.

POP QUIZ HOTSHOT:  You're selecting seats for your economy flight and notice that the Exit Row is available.  WHAT DO YOU DO?


Try not to cry.
Cry a lot.
 
Fart And Smunny
2023-02-02 3:05:01 PM  

McGrits: Fart And Smunny: DeathByGeekSquad: Fart And Smunny: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.

This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.

I typically operate under the assumption that things going fast are designed for teens to average height/shape adults.  As someone who is 6'4", I recognize that I won't have the same options as everyone else.

Yup. While I would love to live in a world where every person of every body shape was accommodated, I also do not demand that everywhere has all shelves accessible to my 5'2" ass.

You got some long legs.


Nah. I'm just really good at climbing. It's a necessary skill when you're short.
 
Fano
2023-02-02 3:06:35 PM  

Magnus Eisengrim: From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?


Those women sound like Mrs Kool-Aid. 5'3" and 171 pounds? There isn't enough flour in the whole nation:
 
Fart And Smunny
2023-02-02 3:08:47 PM  

Fano: Magnus Eisengrim: From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?

Those women sound like Mrs Kool-Aid. 5'3" and 171 pounds? There isn't enough flour in the whole nation:


... I'm 5'2" and a bit over 180.

And my waist is still under 34.

That is to say that some of us hold that weight more tightly than you think. :)
 
Fano
2023-02-02 3:10:58 PM  

McGrits: Fart And Smunny: DeathByGeekSquad: Fart And Smunny: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: I remember this became sort of newsworthy way back when the initial Harry Potter rides opened up years ago.  From the article, it sounds like Universal's 40 inch "limit" is in line with what they've used in those rides in the past, so if you were good with those you should probably be good with this one.

This is a really apt callback. For better or for worse, this isn't the first, or even second or third time Universal Studios has put this exact limit on riders. Does it suck for the people above 40" waist? Yes. Is it unexpected? Not unless you weren't aware that this is the precedent for any ride that requires restraints.

I typically operate under the assumption that things going fast are designed for teens to average height/shape adults.  As someone who is 6'4", I recognize that I won't have the same options as everyone else.

Yup. While I would love to live in a world where every person of every body shape was accommodated, I also do not demand that everywhere has all shelves accessible to my 5'2" ass.

You got some long legs.


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
Fano
2023-02-02 3:13:03 PM  

Fart And Smunny: Fano: Magnus Eisengrim: From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?

Those women sound like Mrs Kool-Aid. 5'3" and 171 pounds? There isn't enough flour in the whole nation:

... I'm 5'2" and a bit over 180.

And my waist is still under 34.

That is to say that some of us hold that weight more tightly than you think. :)


funnymemes.coView Full Size
 
Fart And Smunny
2023-02-02 3:23:28 PM  

Fano: Fart And Smunny: Fano: Magnus Eisengrim: From FastStats - Body Measurements (cdc.gov)

Men:
Height in inches: 69.0
Weight in pounds: 199.8
Waist circumference in inches: 40.5

Women:
Height in inches: 63.5
Weight in pounds: 170.8
Waist circumference in inches: 38.7


This can't possibly be true... can it?

Those women sound like Mrs Kool-Aid. 5'3" and 171 pounds? There isn't enough flour in the whole nation:

... I'm 5'2" and a bit over 180.

And my waist is still under 34.

That is to say that some of us hold that weight more tightly than you think. :)

[funnymemes.co image 614x808]


Thankfully, that is not my shape. More of a hobbit situation.
 
PvtStash
2023-02-02 3:43:47 PM  
ahh live'n the lie:


"Can Only Be Ridden By Thin People"

what's "thin?"

everyone under a 40 inch waist apparently.
 
leeksfromchichis [TotalFark]
2023-02-02 3:56:46 PM  

HotWingConspiracy: King Koopa fits in his cart just fine.


That's my only complaint.  Fat people, of which I am one, must obey physics.

But Mario Kart has some heckin' chonky MFers.  It's not all Walugi in his skinny ass purple suit. DK and Koopa sized riders should be accommodated!
 
Tom Marvolo Bombadil
2023-02-02 5:28:53 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size


/I await the upcoming Chuck Tingle version
 
Displayed 50 of 68 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Redisplay/refresh comments
This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

Want to see behind the curtain? Try

TotalFark

It's how we feed the squirrel

learn more | sign up
On Twitter

  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.