Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Reuters)   Microsoft announces new feature that will let you simulate your participation in Teams meetings for just $10/month   (reuters.com) divider line
    More: Stupid, Google, Microsoft, Reuters, Silicon Valley, UBS, OpenAI-owned ChatGPT, Poetry, Microsoft Corp  
•       •       •

849 clicks; posted to STEM » on 02 Feb 2023 at 10:13 AM (6 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



14 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2023-02-02 8:57:59 AM  
Isn't simulating participation in a Teams meeting called turning off your camera and going on mute?
 
2023-02-02 10:20:15 AM  
All the cool kids, I am told, have used Open Broadcaster to generate a video stream to show them sitting in front of the camera, feigning interest.
 
2023-02-02 10:26:20 AM  
I already simulate participation in my Teams meetings, for free.

It's my belief that 99% of meetings between more than two people are huge wastes of time that should have just been individual conversations.
 
2023-02-02 10:27:20 AM  
Will it join and speak too? So I don't even have to login?

$10/mo to so a third of my job for me seems like a bargain
 
2023-02-02 10:27:49 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2023-02-02 10:28:44 AM  
Just waiting for the AI to accidentally give your discussions to your competitors.
 
2023-02-02 10:40:27 AM  
"It looks like the company is planning to fire you and replace you with 3 offshore contractors that will work for half your salary. What would you like to do?

Update my resume
Start hoovering up proprietary and privileged data
Shop for assault weapons on Bing
 
2023-02-02 10:56:19 AM  

mongbiohazard: I already simulate participation in my Teams meetings, for free.

It's my belief that 99% of meetings between more than two people are huge wastes of time that should have just been individual conversations.


It depends, my line of work is silicon design and validation, and when you are getting ready to go to tape out, you'd better have all the engineers on the same page. I sometimes have Teams meetings with a hundred or more people on them, but most are smart enough to let the leads do the talking unless they have specific gating issues to discuss. As always, YMMV..
 
2023-02-02 11:13:39 AM  
Neat! You can pay for a beta program to do your business critical meetings.

I'm sure this will go swimmingly, especially after the MS 365/Teams outage a week or two ago.
 
2023-02-02 11:20:23 AM  

Pocket Ninja: Isn't simulating participation in a Teams meeting called turning off your camera and going on mute?


i.pinimg.comView Full Size
 
2023-02-02 11:53:02 AM  

Dick Gozinya: Pocket Ninja: Isn't simulating participation in a Teams meeting called turning off your camera and going on mute?

[i.pinimg.com image 219x302]


If you've got an Nvidia graphics card, they just updated Nvidia Broadcast to include an effect which simulates your eyes looking at the camera even when you're looking away.

I've got multi-monitors, and my camera is on top of a screen I'm usually not looking at, so it's not really useful for me, but probably would make most people look like they're being more attentive.
 
2023-02-02 12:07:24 PM  
Amateurs. I made a one-time payment of $8 for a cardboard cutout of myself, and I haven't had to go to a meeting since.
 
2023-02-02 12:46:47 PM  
So, if everyone's simulation is attending the meetings without their owners, and the bots hold the meeting by themselves, will the bots take over the company?  The country?  The WORLD!?
 
2023-02-02 1:39:05 PM  

Diocletian's Last Cabbage: So, if everyone's simulation is attending the meetings without their owners, and the bots hold the meeting by themselves, will the bots take over the company?  The country?  The WORLD!?


IIRC, in Asimov's I Robot books the machines had already taken over human society before people figured it out. We'd offloaded so many tasks to them, we basically handed them control of everything one piece at a time, slowly, for faster financial systems and such. We automated so much that eventually it was all machines talking to other machines, and making all the actual decisions.

Pretty realistic.
 
Displayed 14 of 14 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.