wademh: Soup4Bonnie: From the link in TFA:

The justices will consider the lawsuits brought by six GOP-led states, which argue that forgiveness will disrupt state entities that profit from federal student loans, as well as a lawsuit backed by the Job Creators Network Foundation, a conservative advocacy organization, featuring two borrowers in Texas who are partially or fully left out of the president's relief.

The fact that the justices have agreed so quickly to take both cases suggests that they're eager to deliver a decisive ruling on the policy involving more than 30 million Americans, said Laurence Tribe, a Harvard law professor.

Like other legal experts, Tribe doesn't have much hope that the plan will survive the Supreme Court.
"It's basically put the program in deep freeze until it proceeds to most likely dismantle it," Tribe said.

Higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz agreed that an eagerness to make a ruling doesn't bode well for proponents of the president's plan, "because ruling against forgiveness is less complicated."

Dan Urman, a law professor at Northeastern University, also predicted the Supreme Court will rule against Biden. He said the conservative justices believe government agencies exert too much authority and "violate the separation of powers."

For SCOTUS to deny Biden, they have to claim that the HEROS Act has been abused. They will want to, or the usual suspects will, but it will require some fast stepping. It is a broad authority that was granted.

So SCOTUS will essentially have to invalidate the HEROS Act or rule that the pandemic didn't constitute a qualified national emergency even though it was a declared national emergency. Awkward.

I rather expect they'll try to duck and decide the plaintiffs lacked standing.