Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Wrap)   Well we do have a long tradition of liberating countries from their duly elected governments   (thewrap.com) divider line
    More: Asinine, Invasion, Cuba, Canada, Tucker Carlson, Eastern Europe, Government, United States, Hillsdale College professor David Azerrad  
•       •       •

1776 clicks; posted to Politics » on 27 Jan 2023 at 12:05 PM (9 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



46 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2023-01-27 11:20:38 AM  
Tucker also has a long tradition of compulsively regurgitating voluminous slurries of acrid fecal matter all over himself, much to the chagrin of his sentient bow tie.

But, y'know, come at us, Tuck.  I think you'll find that our friendly outward demeanour hides a molten crucible of righteous anger that will kick your ass from Vancouver Island to the Long Range Mountains of Newfoundland while singing our national anthem (Bob & Doug McKenzie's "Take Off" featuring Rush's Geddy Lee) and drinking a 2-4 of Molson Dry for every province we cross along the way.
 
2023-01-27 11:23:44 AM  
We tried, they sacked DC and burnt the White House because of it
 
2023-01-27 11:24:00 AM  

Psychopusher: Tucker also has a long tradition of compulsively regurgitating voluminous slurries of acrid fecal matter all over himself, much to the chagrin of his sentient bow tie.

But, y'know, come at us, Tuck.  I think you'll find that our friendly outward demeanour hides a molten crucible of righteous anger that will kick your ass from Vancouver Island to the Long Range Mountains of Newfoundland while singing our national anthem (Bob & Doug McKenzie's "Take Off" featuring Rush's Geddy Lee) and drinking a 2-4 of Molson Dry for every province we cross along the way.


If you sneaky Canadians think you can get away with pummeling American broadcaster Tucker Carlson, I think you'll find that most righteous and GOD FEARING AMERICANS will hold your beer for you.
 
2023-01-27 11:46:36 AM  
You tried that before.  Canada has the Hacker Hellstorm.
 
2023-01-27 12:02:05 PM  
Lead the way Cucker Tarleson.
 
2023-01-27 12:12:12 PM  
It's really amazing what he'll do or say to make sure he loses as little of daddy's frozen chicken money as possible.
 
2023-01-27 12:12:24 PM  
Canadian Bacon (7/12) Movie CLIP - Anti-Canada Propaganda (1995) HD
Youtube pbfBzWJVbX4
 
2023-01-27 12:17:24 PM  
I know for legal reasons he identifies as Entertainment tab, but everyone but that court knows it's Politics tab.
 
2023-01-27 12:20:30 PM  
We can put all the idiots we'd be ousting up at his house. They're all his base anyway. They can sit around and eat Lonely Man TV dinners together and reminisce about how they all had families until they left them/escaped from them.

Eventually it'll probably look like this:

Fark user imageView Full Size


/NTTAWWT
 
2023-01-27 12:26:57 PM  
Subby is correct that Tucker Carlson is bad "entertainment."
 
2023-01-27 12:35:30 PM  
This was a translation error from the Russian handlers - "liberate" should be "sabotage".
 
2023-01-27 12:43:09 PM  
I would pay the very small amount I have in my bank account to put Tucker through one 18 day FTX out in the field in the rain and mud and see how he handles it.

Just once. I don't ask for much. Give me that.
 
2023-01-27 12:50:15 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size

You tried already. It didn't go very well.
 
2023-01-27 12:51:34 PM  
Much like the Ukrainians don't want Russia there Tucker, Canada doesn't want us there either.
 
2023-01-27 1:01:39 PM  
Tucker's so stupid... too stupid to ask "why hasn't Canada invaded us for being so fascist?"
 
2023-01-27 1:03:12 PM  

arrogantbastich: We can put all the idiots we'd be ousting up at his house. They're all his base anyway. They can sit around and eat Lonely Man TV dinners together and reminisce about how they all had families until they left them/escaped from them.

Eventually it'll probably look like this:

[Fark user image 575x360]

/NTTAWWT


Dang, can you imagine how long the line to the ball tanning machine would be?
 
2023-01-27 1:04:12 PM  

oldfarthenry: [Fark user image 414x231]
You tried already. It didn't go very well.


Don't worry, we'll be greeted as liberators this time.
 
2023-01-27 1:10:55 PM  

special20: arrogantbastich: We can put all the idiots we'd be ousting up at his house. They're all his base anyway. They can sit around and eat Lonely Man TV dinners together and reminisce about how they all had families until they left them/escaped from them.

Eventually it'll probably look like this:

[Fark user image 575x360]

/NTTAWWT

Dang, can you imagine how long the line to the ball tanning machine would be?


I double Tucker is sharing and they're all Canadian. Their money is worthless here.
 
2023-01-27 1:11:18 PM  
Double? Doubt.
 
2023-01-27 1:16:58 PM  
Canadian here: Liberation from farking what, Tucker?
 
2023-01-27 1:17:12 PM  

Andy Andy: oldfarthenry: [Fark user image 414x231]
You tried already. It didn't go very well.

Don't worry, we'll be greeted as liberators this time.


Well, I guess we best be getting used to 1600 Pennsylvania Blvd being called the "White Hooss"
 
2023-01-27 1:24:31 PM  
Carlson deadpanned he was "completely in favor of a Bay of Pigs operation to liberate" Canada.

He does know how that worked out, right?

Of course he doesn't.
 
2023-01-27 1:24:55 PM  

vevolis: Canadian here: Liberation from farking what, Tucker?


The EEEBILS of SOSHULIZM, of course.  Single-payer healthcare is OF THE DEBBIL!  We're a WELFARE STATE and we're WEAK and PATHETIC!  There aren't even any rockets or exploding ordnance in our national anthem, just pathetic touchy-feeling stuff about sacred hearts and maple syrup or whatever!
 
2023-01-27 1:26:17 PM  
You don't want to pick a fight with Canada.

Canada has two national sports and both of them sanction fighting.
 
2023-01-27 1:27:07 PM  

special20: Tucker's so stupid... too stupid to ask "why hasn't Canada invaded us for being so fascist?"


Read that in Mr washy wash voice. Bing bong.
 
2023-01-27 1:28:12 PM  

Ishkur: You don't want to pick a fight with Canada.

Canada has two national sports and both of them sanction fighting.


They are fighting.  There are just some boring bits with goals and shiat in between bouts.
 
2023-01-27 1:31:54 PM  

Ishkur: You don't want to pick a fight with Canada.

Canada has two national sports and both of them sanction fighting.


There's fighting in curling?
 
2023-01-27 1:33:14 PM  

NewportBarGuy: I would pay the very small amount I have in my bank account to put Tucker through one 18 day FTX out in the field in the rain and mud and see how he handles it.

Just once. I don't ask for much. Give me that.


Right after Hannity finally gets waterboarded.
 
2023-01-27 1:39:29 PM  

Andy Andy: Ishkur: You don't want to pick a fight with Canada.

Canada has two national sports and both of them sanction fighting.

There's fighting in curling?


If you get drunk enough.
 
2023-01-27 1:40:45 PM  

Andy Andy: Ishkur: You don't want to pick a fight with Canada.

Canada has two national sports and both of them sanction fighting.

There's fighting in curling?


There is the way I play it.
 
2023-01-27 1:42:26 PM  
I'm not listening to that rabble-rousing fecal pulse-jet directly, but the article seems to provide enough information to safely conclude that he really needs a good throat punch.

At what point does the tide finally turn where viewers stop tuning in to listen to the incoherent illogical rants of this waste of carbon chains? When do enough people realize he's just stirring the pot and that following his lead hurts them regardless of how much it hurts "them"?

Actually never mind, I think I have the answer ☹
 
2023-01-27 1:45:04 PM  
As noted above, the US did actually attempt that in 1812. With British assistance, Canadians managed to beat them back, and burn down the President's House for good measure (painted white afterwards to cover the soot stains). By the terms of the 1814 Treaty of Ghent that ended the war, the US returned to its 1812 borders. In the Treaty of 1818, Washington and Westminster agreed in principle on the 49th-parallel border between the US and British North America, as it still then was, and that's where the border remains.

Americans prefer to see the conflict as a draw, as the US was not forced to yield territory (though it did so voluntarily in the 1818 Treaty), and neither side was ever again game for a re-match.

Canadians, of course, celebrate the war as a Canadian/British victory, and a key event in building Canadian identity. (Stephen Harper was a big 1812 buff during the Obama Administration for some reason.)

Times have changed.

Annexing the True North (or at least the densely-populated southern part) would not have been an especially difficult assignment for the US armed forces, had President Trump cared enough to replace Justin Trudeau with Maxime Bernier or Danielle Smith---no more difficult than the 1938 annexation of Austria, say. Our southern neighbours outnumber us by about ten to one, and outgun us by a lot more than that.

Among the goals of our foreign policy towards the US (like that of the UK after the war of 1812) is to make sure the US is never again tempted to "liberate" Canada---much like Finnish foreign and economic policy towards the Soviet Union before 1991. Much of the time, that means doing what Uncle Sam wants us to do, regardless of how keen we might be on it. We're NATO members in good standing, for example, and don't seriously oppose US hegemony in the Americas, even when the US is in the hands of someone with little interest in liberal democratic values (a Nixon or a Trump).

If Tucker were serious about regime change in Canada, I'd ask, sure, but why? The threat alone is enough to convince the Canadian "regime" to go easy on anything that might annoy assholes, Canadian or American.

The Emergency Act was a very last resort, applied when local police (depending on who you ask) either were overwhelmed by the task of removing protesters (many camped on private property long after they'd worn out their welcome from the owners) who refused to move on, or, being disproportionately assholes themselves, simply refused to take action against their own.
 
2023-01-27 2:22:42 PM  

MikeyFuccon: As noted above, the US did actually attempt that in 1812. With British assistance, Canadians managed to beat them back, and burn down the President's House for good measure (painted white afterwards to cover the soot stains). By the terms of the 1814 Treaty of Ghent that ended the war, the US returned to its 1812 borders. In the Treaty of 1818, Washington and Westminster agreed in principle on the 49th-parallel border between the US and British North America, as it still then was, and that's where the border remains.

Americans prefer to see the conflict as a draw, as the US was not forced to yield territory (though it did so voluntarily in the 1818 Treaty), and neither side was ever again game for a re-match.

Canadians, of course, celebrate the war as a Canadian/British victory, and a key event in building Canadian identity. (Stephen Harper was a big 1812 buff during the Obama Administration for some reason.)

Times have changed.

Annexing the True North (or at least the densely-populated southern part) would not have been an especially difficult assignment for the US armed forces, had President Trump cared enough to replace Justin Trudeau with Maxime Bernier or Danielle Smith---no more difficult than the 1938 annexation of Austria, say. Our southern neighbours outnumber us by about ten to one, and outgun us by a lot more than that.

Among the goals of our foreign policy towards the US (like that of the UK after the war of 1812) is to make sure the US is never again tempted to "liberate" Canada---much like Finnish foreign and economic policy towards the Soviet Union before 1991. Much of the time, that means doing what Uncle Sam wants us to do, regardless of how keen we might be on it. We're NATO members in good standing, for example, and don't seriously oppose US hegemony in the Americas, even when the US is in the hands of someone with little interest in liberal democratic values (a Nixon or a Trump).

If Tucker were serious about regime change in Canada, I'd ask, sure, but why? The threat alone is enough to convince the Canadian "regime" to go easy on anything that might annoy assholes, Canadian or American.

The Emergency Act was a very last resort, applied when local police (depending on who you ask) either were overwhelmed by the task of removing protesters (many camped on private property long after they'd worn out their welcome from the owners) who refused to move on, or, being disproportionately assholes themselves, simply refused to take action against their own.


I have always thought that if the US wanted to invade Canada the reason would probably be for water.

The rest isn't all that important. US has oil and gas and friends with easier to access oil and gas reserves. Trees I guess for building but not worth the cost of invasion.
 
2023-01-27 2:30:34 PM  

Psychopusher: Tucker also has a long tradition of compulsively regurgitating voluminous slurries of acrid fecal matter all over himself, much to the chagrin of his sentient bow tie.

But, y'know, come at us, Tuck.  I think you'll find that our friendly outward demeanour hides a molten crucible of righteous anger that will kick your ass from Vancouver Island to the Long Range Mountains of Newfoundland while singing our national anthem (Bob & Doug McKenzie's "Take Off" featuring Rush's Geddy Lee) and drinking a 2-4 of Molson Dry for every province we cross along the way.


pbs.twimg.comView Full Size
 
2023-01-27 2:30:38 PM  

Mrtraveler01: Andy Andy: Ishkur: You don't want to pick a fight with Canada.

Canada has two national sports and both of them sanction fighting.

There's fighting in curling?

If you get drunk enough.



Shining Path is the name of my drunk curling team
 
2023-01-27 4:35:56 PM  

goodncold: I have always thought that if the US wanted to invade Canada the reason would probably be for water.

The rest isn't all that important. US has oil and gas and friends with easier to access oil and gas reserves. Trees I guess for building but not worth the cost of invasion.


Global warming could make things very interesting.

Fark user imageView Full Size

The US will have lots of solar energy, but not much else. Especially if you like eating food or drinking water.

Canada should start building a wall now....
 
2023-01-27 4:41:20 PM  
To the anti-Canada movie and the South Park reference, here's the trifecta:

Blame Canada - South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut (3/9) Movie CLIP (1999) HD
Youtube bOR38552MJA
 
2023-01-27 5:19:28 PM  
Hate hate hate

Fear fear fear

Repeat repeat repeat
 
2023-01-27 10:11:14 PM  

goodncold: I have always thought that if the US wanted to invade Canada the reason would probably be for water.


Probably to enforce the Monroe Doctrine, which is still in effect.
 
2023-01-27 10:18:22 PM  
Do it, won't be any referees getting in the way this time.
 
2023-01-28 8:59:21 AM  
When is Cucker Tarlson going to enlist?
 
2023-01-28 11:32:02 AM  
I'd take long shot odds on this being him setting up an out for any liability like Hannity may face.

"Hey, c'mon look at the invading Canada show..Every knows this is satire like Colbert did"
 
2023-01-28 11:39:31 AM  

LewDux: Mrtraveler01: Andy Andy: Ishkur: You don't want to pick a fight with Canada.

Canada has two national sports and both of them sanction fighting.

There's fighting in curling?

If you get drunk enough.


Shining Path is the name of my drunk curling team


Box lacrosse is Canada's national summer sport
 
2023-01-28 11:43:26 AM  

goodncold: MikeyFuccon: As noted above, the US did actually attempt that in 1812. With British assistance, Canadians managed to beat them back, and burn down the President's House for good measure (painted white afterwards to cover the soot stains). By the terms of the 1814 Treaty of Ghent that ended the war, the US returned to its 1812 borders. In the Treaty of 1818, Washington and Westminster agreed in principle on the 49th-parallel border between the US and British North America, as it still then was, and that's where the border remains.

Americans prefer to see the conflict as a draw, as the US was not forced to yield territory (though it did so voluntarily in the 1818 Treaty), and neither side was ever again game for a re-match.

Canadians, of course, celebrate the war as a Canadian/British victory, and a key event in building Canadian identity. (Stephen Harper was a big 1812 buff during the Obama Administration for some reason.)

Times have changed.

Annexing the True North (or at least the densely-populated southern part) would not have been an especially difficult assignment for the US armed forces, had President Trump cared enough to replace Justin Trudeau with Maxime Bernier or Danielle Smith---no more difficult than the 1938 annexation of Austria, say. Our southern neighbours outnumber us by about ten to one, and outgun us by a lot more than that.

Among the goals of our foreign policy towards the US (like that of the UK after the war of 1812) is to make sure the US is never again tempted to "liberate" Canada---much like Finnish foreign and economic policy towards the Soviet Union before 1991. Much of the time, that means doing what Uncle Sam wants us to do, regardless of how keen we might be on it. We're NATO members in good standing, for example, and don't seriously oppose US hegemony in the Americas, even when the US is in the hands of someone with little interest in liberal democratic values (a Nixon or a Trump).

If Tucker were serious about regime change in Ca ...


I believe canada gave away a lot of water rights to the us with NAFTA, Mulroney got another paper bag full of cash
 
2023-01-28 11:45:44 AM  
Mulroney got another paper bag full of cash, allegedly
 
2023-01-28 12:21:11 PM  
cdn11.bigcommerce.comView Full Size
 
Displayed 46 of 46 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.