Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Pittsburgh Tribune-Review)   NFL rules analyst Gene Steratore, a 15-year NFL official, thinks more flags need to be thrown during games   (triblive.com) divider line
    More: Obvious, American football, San Diego Chargers, New York Giants, National Football League, Want, Pittsburgh Steelers, Denver Broncos, false starts  
•       •       •

584 clicks; posted to Sports » on 18 Jan 2023 at 8:50 AM (10 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



26 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2023-01-18 9:30:33 AM  
Fark that guy, he's a Steelers fan.
 
2023-01-18 9:33:38 AM  
Why? Do the games need to be longer so they can fit more Draft Kings and MGM ads in?
 
2023-01-18 9:47:32 AM  

wooden_badger: Why? Do the games need to be longer so they can fit more Draft Kings and MGM ads in?


Don't forget Fan Duel and - most of all - Caesar's

static-prod.adweek.comView Full Size
 
2023-01-18 9:48:56 AM  
More flags or fewer flags, just get the farking call right
 
2023-01-18 10:00:25 AM  

wooden_badger: Why? Do the games need to be longer so they can fit more Draft Kings and MGM ads in?


Because the referees refusing to call obvious penalties is changing the outcome of the game.
 
2023-01-18 10:01:05 AM  

johnny_vegas: More flags or fewer flags, just get the farking call right


It's idiotic that the league uses part time referees. They need to be full time.
 
2023-01-18 10:06:14 AM  
The NFL has good years and bad years.  This was a bad year.  It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:
1. Offensive tackles were allowed to move on the snap command long before the ball was actually snapped.

2. Defensive linemen were allowed to line up with heads and sometimes hands in the neutral zone.

If you get away with it, you continue to do it.  Refs have to throw the flag until it's an ESPN headline if you want to keep the game "pure".  Or change the rules.  But not knowing how a game will be called is a ripe environment for corruption.
 
2023-01-18 10:27:18 AM  
I've definitely seen this over the last several years, including on my team. I've wondered why they don't flag it more often.
 
2023-01-18 10:30:33 AM  

Nana's Vibrator: The NFL has good years and bad years.  This was a bad year.  It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:
1. Offensive tackles were allowed to move on the snap command long before the ball was actually snapped.

2. Defensive linemen were allowed to line up with heads and sometimes hands in the neutral zone.

If you get away with it, you continue to do it.  Refs have to throw the flag until it's an ESPN headline if you want to keep the game "pure".  Or change the rules.  But not knowing how a game will be called is a ripe environment for corruption.


3. Offensive linemen allowed to line up well off the line of scrimmage.
 
2023-01-18 10:48:34 AM  

meanmutton: Nana's Vibrator: The NFL has good years and bad years.  This was a bad year.  It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:
1. Offensive tackles were allowed to move on the snap command long before the ball was actually snapped.

2. Defensive linemen were allowed to line up with heads and sometimes hands in the neutral zone.

If you get away with it, you continue to do it.  Refs have to throw the flag until it's an ESPN headline if you want to keep the game "pure".  Or change the rules.  But not knowing how a game will be called is a ripe environment for corruption.

3. Offensive linemen allowed to line up well off the line of scrimmage.


Yes.  The rule was that only part of your body needs to break the plane of one teammate lined up inside.  A V-like formation was OK as long as there was a connection.  Now they practically line up in the backfield with nothing connecting their plane to the center's.
 
2023-01-18 10:49:54 AM  
Ah, yes, the "Jason Peters Special". When we wasn't busy being hurt during his last few years on the Eagles, he was making it a practice to see just how much jump he could get pre-snap before the refs noticed, mainly because he was older and slower and couldn't move as well anymore.
 
2023-01-18 10:56:11 AM  

wooden_badger: Why? Do the games need to be longer so they can fit more Draft Kings and MGM ads in?


Calling an extra 2 false starts a game would add 50 total seconds (after a penalty, the play clock goes to 25 not 40).

Nor would they go to a commercial during that.

Nana's Vibrator: The NFL has good years and bad years.  This was a bad year.  It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:
1. Offensive tackles were allowed to move on the snap command long before the ball was actually snapped.

2. Defensive linemen were allowed to line up with heads and sometimes hands in the neutral zone.

If you get away with it, you continue to do it.  Refs have to throw the flag until it's an ESPN headline if you want to keep the game "pure".  Or change the rules.  But not knowing how a game will be called is a ripe environment for corruption.


I've noticed 1 happening for a few years now.  It's gotten worse last year and this year though.  I see offensive linemen barely move their body and get a false start, but they completely get out of their stance and move backwards 5 feet and it isn't called.  Makes zero sense.  The latter is obviously an advantage.  The former... not really.

2 is called quite frequently.
 
2023-01-18 10:59:20 AM  

Nana's Vibrator: It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:


what i find odd, re the NFL rule on seven players must be on the offensive *ahem* line, is the wedge-ish formation where the guards and tackles are sagged 2' each, respectively, behind the center.  then, you'll sometimes see a TE, equally sagged off.

and then, when the WR isn't quiiiiiiiiiiiite lined up with the center, who gets flagged for illegal formation?  the WR.  Happened either this week or last in a prime time game.  the "7 men on the offensive line" rule is getting really weird, for some teams.

but yeah, if they don't call it, fine.
 
2023-01-18 11:07:03 AM  

Nana's Vibrator: A V-like formation was OK as long as there was a connection. Now they practically line up in the backfield with nothing connecting their plane to the center's.


rickythepenguin: the wedge-ish formation where the guards and tackles are sagged 2' each, respectively, behind the center. then, you'll sometimes see a TE, equally sagged off.


great minds think alike.....
 
2023-01-18 11:20:11 AM  
You can see penalty worthy actions on every play. It's no big thing, you'll just see a swing in Monday morning sports stories moving from non-calls to let them play begging.
 
2023-01-18 11:46:34 AM  
My conspiracy theory is that the NFL likes poor officiating because it drives controversy and keeps people's attention. A little like how every pro wrestling storyline is "the corporate bigwigs are rigging wrestling against us!!!"

/I am not saying the nfl is rigged. It is not.
//but maybe fans are more engaged if their unfairness senses are tingling.
 
2023-01-18 12:34:39 PM  
I remember a game years ago that had numerous flags in the first half and it was annoying , enough so that the ref after making the penalty call said "lets play some football" or something close to that.
 
2023-01-18 4:20:00 PM  
i stopped watching the games because i could see the penalties, and the players get frustrated because they were being held yet Refs were not calling it.

they just want fast exciting high scoring games so Darft Kings gets more money, and fantasy players have something to do and talk about
 
2023-01-18 4:23:43 PM  
If they have been calling it consistently wrong for the season, the most idiotic thing you could do would be to change how they are calling it in the playoffs.

Unenforced or incorrectly enforced rules are far less problematic than inconsistently enforced rules.

If you want to change how rules are enforced, you start next year in the preseason.
 
2023-01-18 4:27:08 PM  

Nana's Vibrator: The NFL has good years and bad years.  This was a bad year.  It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:
1. Offensive tackles were allowed to move on the snap command long before the ball was actually snapped.

2. Defensive linemen were allowed to line up with heads and sometimes hands in the neutral zone.

If you get away with it, you continue to do it.  Refs have to throw the flag until it's an ESPN headline if you want to keep the game "pure".  Or change the rules.  But not knowing how a game will be called is a ripe environment for corruption.


You could be correct about heads and hands in the neutral zone, but it was pointed out to me a long time ago about the center stretching the ball forward. The neutral zone is where the ball was. If the center scoots the ball forward a bit, it's gonna look like the D is in the zone.
 
2023-01-18 5:15:39 PM  

knbwhite: Nana's Vibrator: The NFL has good years and bad years.  This was a bad year.  It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:
1. Offensive tackles were allowed to move on the snap command long before the ball was actually snapped.

2. Defensive linemen were allowed to line up with heads and sometimes hands in the neutral zone.

If you get away with it, you continue to do it.  Refs have to throw the flag until it's an ESPN headline if you want to keep the game "pure".  Or change the rules.  But not knowing how a game will be called is a ripe environment for corruption.

You could be correct about heads and hands in the neutral zone, but it was pointed out to me a long time ago about the center stretching the ball forward. The neutral zone is where the ball was. If the center scoots the ball forward a bit, it's gonna look like the D is in the zone.


This is also correct.  The center is allowed to adjust the ball for grip but sure enough they'll line up almost like a frog instead of a stance and while they "adjust the ball for grip" they end up sliding forward.

In the older days some defenses would huddle right at the ball and the D tackles would break the huddle and turn around and pretend to clumsily kick it and reset it a few ticks back toward the offense while they were still in a huddle.

/Game of inches
 
2023-01-18 5:28:19 PM  

johnny_vegas: More flags or fewer flags, just get the farking call right


The amount of calls gotten wrong or right probably hasn't changed over the years. It's just the advent of super slo mo technology that happens after every play, where every little muscle twitch is available has made cruising critiquing the refs a lot easier, given that they have to call the game at the speed of the play
 
2023-01-18 5:45:49 PM  

rickythepenguin: Nana's Vibrator: It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:

what i find odd, re the NFL rule on seven players must be on the offensive *ahem* line, is the wedge-ish formation where the guards and tackles are sagged 2' each, respectively, behind the center.  then, you'll sometimes see a TE, equally sagged off.

and then, when the WR isn't quiiiiiiiiiiiite lined up with the center, who gets flagged for illegal formation?  the WR.  Happened either this week or last in a prime time game.  the "7 men on the offensive line" rule is getting really weird, for some teams.

but yeah, if they don't call it, fine.


Your receiver widest out on each side has to be on the LOS. All other eligible receivers have to be in the backfield. If there are any players between the TE and wide receiver on the line it's an illegal formation.

To your point tho, yes, the wedges are getting out of control. Tackles are playing way too far back and it causes too much confusion whether TEs are actually along the LOS or in the backfield.
 
2023-01-18 6:04:04 PM  

mattgsx: rickythepenguin: Nana's Vibrator: It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:

what i find odd, re the NFL rule on seven players must be on the offensive *ahem* line, is the wedge-ish formation where the guards and tackles are sagged 2' each, respectively, behind the center.  then, you'll sometimes see a TE, equally sagged off.

and then, when the WR isn't quiiiiiiiiiiiite lined up with the center, who gets flagged for illegal formation?  the WR.  Happened either this week or last in a prime time game.  the "7 men on the offensive line" rule is getting really weird, for some teams.

but yeah, if they don't call it, fine.

Your receiver widest out on each side has to be on the LOS. All other eligible receivers have to be in the backfield. If there are any players between the TE and wide receiver on the line it's an illegal formation.

To your point tho, yes, the wedges are getting out of control. Tackles are playing way too far back and it causes too much confusion whether TEs are actually along the LOS or in the backfield.


There just have to be 2 ends covering the tackles on each side, no more, no less, but they can stand anywhere on the line of scrimmage from the tackle to the sideline (exceptions in offset formations, but there still just need to be 7 players on the line of scrimmage)

If there's a wide receiver (y or flanker or whatever the local offense wants to call him) on the tight end side, only one of those 2 has to cover the tackle - the other one can't break the plane of a LOS guy.  But they do it often and it never gets called.  When the two of them shift for coverage they never set for one second before one goes in motion.  It literally never gets called.

/Also, backs in motion often angle forward toward the LOS before the ball is snapped and that never gets called either.
 
2023-01-18 7:27:41 PM  

mattgsx: rickythepenguin: Nana's Vibrator: It was clear refs collectively allowed 2 things this year they hadn't in the past:

what i find odd, re the NFL rule on seven players must be on the offensive *ahem* line, is the wedge-ish formation where the guards and tackles are sagged 2' each, respectively, behind the center.  then, you'll sometimes see a TE, equally sagged off.

and then, when the WR isn't quiiiiiiiiiiiite lined up with the center, who gets flagged for illegal formation?  the WR.  Happened either this week or last in a prime time game.  the "7 men on the offensive line" rule is getting really weird, for some teams.

but yeah, if they don't call it, fine.

Your receiver widest out on each side has to be on the LOS. All other eligible receivers have to be in the backfield. If there are any players between the TE and wide receiver on the line it's an illegal formation.

To your point tho, yes, the wedges are getting out of control. Tackles are playing way too far back and it causes too much confusion whether TEs are actually along the LOS or in the backfield.


With crowd noise such as a thing, the offensive advantage of knowing the snap count is taken away. I wouldn't mind if the rules get updated because of this. As a fan of execution of quality football, I'm not a fan of the 12th man farkery.
 
2023-01-19 11:37:36 AM  

knbwhite: With crowd noise such as a thing, the offensive advantage of knowing the snap count is taken away. I wouldn't mind if the rules get updated because of this. As a fan of execution of quality football, I'm not a fan of the 12th man farkery.


A basic snap count isn't impacted by crowd noise. Fancy ones and audibles can be impacted.
 
Displayed 26 of 26 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.