Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(BBC-US)   Deepfake porn videos are coming and not in a good way   (bbc.com) divider line
    More: Sick, Pornography, new laws, Government plans, parts of the UK, porn video, such actions, largest deepfake porn website, first time  
•       •       •

4767 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Oct 2022 at 8:50 AM (15 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



152 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2022-10-21 8:52:34 AM  
lazy totalfarkers/mods putting out linx with no comments to comment on!

not going to rtfa no matter how much you shills for the clickbait industrial complex want me to!!

/!!!
 
2022-10-21 8:52:56 AM  
"They put my face on a porn video" - Elizabeth II.
 
2022-10-21 8:53:48 AM  
I think she did it herself.
 
2022-10-21 8:53:51 AM  
Can they deepfake a large penis, onto a home video porn?

Asking for a friend.
 
2022-10-21 8:54:38 AM  
Scrubs - Perry's Perspective
Youtube JY4FpTyhIIo
 
2022-10-21 8:54:41 AM  
I'd love it... unless it was gay.
 
2022-10-21 8:54:54 AM  
I played around with deepfake generators when they first started getting publicity. Frankly, it's not worth the effort trying to match the source and target images.
 
2022-10-21 8:55:05 AM  
Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.
 
2022-10-21 8:55:18 AM  
On one hand it would be disturbing to have a deep fake porn on yourself.

On the other hand, only people who watch porn are going to see it, and your already aligned against them so... isn't it to be expected?

and on the other other hand, if you don't watch porn, how would you know that was porn of you?
 
2022-10-21 8:55:27 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 8:56:39 AM  

Hinged: I'd love it... unless it was gay.


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 8:58:25 AM  

brainlordmesomorph: I think she did it herself.


Why?
 
2022-10-21 9:00:19 AM  

wouldestous: lazy totalfarkers/mods putting out linx with no comments to comment on!

not going to rtfa no matter how much you shills for the clickbait industrial complex want me to!!

/!!!


Time to switch to decaff there buddy
 
2022-10-21 9:01:21 AM  

Creoena: Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.


In this case at least, it's more about destroying the target, not tantalizing the user.
 
2022-10-21 9:01:41 AM  

Glorious Golden Ass: brainlordmesomorph: I think she did it herself.

Why?


She's a militant anti-porn crusader.
 
2022-10-21 9:01:45 AM  

steklo: [Fark user image 495x475]


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:01:54 AM  

wouldestous: lazy totalfarkers/mods putting out linx with no comments to comment on!

not going to rtfa no matter how much you shills for the clickbait industrial complex want me to!!

/!!!


Are you okay?
 
2022-10-21 9:02:05 AM  
FTFA: "How would they feel if they saw this content?"

If the porn industry doesn't step up their game my parents are going to be disappointed in me. AGAIN.
 
2022-10-21 9:02:31 AM  

KingBiefWhistle: steklo: [Fark user image 495x475]

[Fark user image 400x225]


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:03:37 AM  
"Imagine if your face had been digitally edited into a porn video without your consent and then shared on the internet. "

well, given how much better endowed than me the average porn star is,  I think I would enjoy the sidelong glances and envious stares, but that's just me
 
2022-10-21 9:05:04 AM  

steklo: KingBiefWhistle: steklo: [Fark user image 495x475]

[Fark user image 400x225]

[Fark user image image 400x472]


So, looks like I have a GIS to do after work...for educational purposes.
 
2022-10-21 9:06:09 AM  

Glorious Golden Ass: brainlordmesomorph: I think she did it herself.

Why?


He read like 30% of this article and knows all he needs to know, which is that she's a woman who is outspoken about something so she needs to be subjected to abuse and ridicule
 
2022-10-21 9:06:13 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:06:37 AM  
I assume this is MTG making out with AOC?
 
2022-10-21 9:06:45 AM  

Gleeman: So, looks like I have a GIS to do after work


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:07:27 AM  
celebjihad.comView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:07:28 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:08:30 AM  

Greil: Creoena: Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.

In this case at least, it's more about destroying the target, not tantalizing the user.


Maybe, but while I'm neither the victim of this, nor a woman who has had to put up with men all their life, if I was shown this, I wouldn't see it as destroying the target.  I'd see it as weak little men putting together a deepfake video because they're such weak people they have to resort to this immature shiat in an attempt to destroy a strong woman.
 
2022-10-21 9:08:37 AM  
Several years ago my cousin called me in a panic because someone had edited her daughter's dance recital video. Someone had put swinging dicks on all the girls. Swinging like twirling pasties in an old western dance hall and timed to the music.  My cousin was trying to create a login for a chan board and couldn't figure it out but she was intending to yell at the boys.  I had to explain to her exactly what would happen if she tried that.

With the software getting better, more and more if it will be out there until no one cares.
 
2022-10-21 9:08:47 AM  

Creoena: Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.


Did you read the quotes from the guy who makes them? It pretty much lines up with the stupid online borderline autistic 'libertarian' BS you see at places like 4chan:

He accepts "some women" could be psychologically harmed by being deepfaked, but seems indifferent about the potential impact of the way he is objectifying them. "They can just say, 'It's not me - this has been faked.' They should just recognise that and get on with their day. "From a moral standpoint I don't think there's anything that would stop me," he says. "If I'm going to make money from a commission I would do it, it's a no brainer."

So, basically, just "I don't know what you're being so sensitive about.  I just made you a target of sexual aggression for an unknown number of strangers on the internet without your consent.  Jesus, get over it already.  The guy was talking about how he made them of his co-workers he wanted to jerk off to.  If he's doing that he's getting his source data (probably) from things like instagram and tiktok.  It's like jerking off to your co-worker's vacation bikini pics taken to the next level.  They don't care that it's not real.

This guy is saying it's harmless and lets him "control his nerves" around his hot coworkers.  I'd say it's the opposite...he's taking this fantasy to an even higher level, which means the potential fall is that much worse when whichever coworker he's been cranking it to does something that shatters that illusion in his mind.
 
2022-10-21 9:09:16 AM  
Hi, guys! What's going on..

upload.wikimedia.orgView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:10:39 AM  

Bslim: Hi, guys! What's going on..

[upload.wikimedia.org image 256x388]


Those episodes were cringy AF
 
2022-10-21 9:10:50 AM  
Not that I approve, but isn't this why deepfakes were invented?  Pretty sure putting Natalie Portman in a Brazzers video was like the #1 thing anyone ever deepfaked.

/I'm making that up, but if rule 34 applies, please let me know.
 
2022-10-21 9:12:34 AM  

Creoena: Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.


They made a live action Lion King movie. It appears we have a strong drive to create "real" artificial stuff.
 
2022-10-21 9:13:00 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:13:11 AM  
Get on it boys

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:14:27 AM  
Would a Putin on Gaddafi deep fake be a good way to use the tech?
 
2022-10-21 9:14:31 AM  

DON.MAC: Several years ago my cousin called me in a panic because someone had edited her daughter's dance recital video. Someone had put swinging dicks on all the girls. Swinging like twirling pasties in an old western dance hall and timed to the music.  My cousin was trying to create a login for a chan board and couldn't figure it out but she was intending to yell at the boys.  I had to explain to her exactly what would happen if she tried that.

With the software getting better, more and more if it will be out there until no one cares.


That's actually what will happen. No one will actually believe it is you, once they become ubiquitous.
 
2022-10-21 9:14:38 AM  

Magorn: "Imagine if your face had been digitally edited into a porn video without your consent and then shared on the internet. "

well, given how much better endowed than me the average porn star is,  I think I would enjoy the sidelong glances and envious stares, but that's just me


Don't forget how much longer they can go as well.  fark yeah make me look like a stud.
 
2022-10-21 9:15:04 AM  

Glorious Golden Ass: brainlordmesomorph: I think she did it herself.

Why?


1. I was half-kidding.

2. for the same reasons Q-Derps vandalize their own property and claim ANTIFA did it.
   Lots of free press for her anti-porn crusade
   She gets to play the victim, even though legitimate porn is victimless
   no one was talking about her anti-porn crusade yesterday, but we are now
 
2022-10-21 9:15:25 AM  
The guy in the shiny green suit is finally going to get his nude photo of Walter Brennan. Obscure?
 
2022-10-21 9:15:27 AM  

Herbert's Hippopotamus: Bslim: Hi, guys! What's going on..

[upload.wikimedia.org image 256x388]

Those episodes were cringy AF


What really grinded my gears is when he went off on Barclay, the farking hypocrite.
 
2022-10-21 9:15:55 AM  

Hinged: I'd love it... unless it was gay.


Wait, there is porn that isn'tgay? I thought that was my only option! All this time I've been...when there have been ladies I could watch while....why did I not know this???

Eh, fark it, I'll just stick with the gay stuff, it's all I've known and to change now would be weird.
 
2022-10-21 9:16:07 AM  

Fano: Creoena: Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.

They made a live action Lion King movie. It appears we have a strong drive to create "real" artificial stuff.


That's fine, but last time I checked, Lion King wasn't pron featuring real people deepfaked to have sex.  I guess there's an obvious line that should exist between cute lions and deepfaked women.

/I'm sure something in this post made furries all excited and noting some exceptions
 
2022-10-21 9:17:54 AM  
Deepfaked: 'They put my face on a porn video'


Shocking. The anti-porn crusader suffers consequences of the Streisand Effect.
 
2022-10-21 9:18:22 AM  
Next you're going to tell me that's not her real step-brother and she's not really stuck!
 
2022-10-21 9:18:24 AM  

Creoena: Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.


i.pinimg.comView Full Size

i.kym-cdn.comView Full Size
 
2022-10-21 9:19:42 AM  

Creoena: Greil: Creoena: Deepfakes are something I'll never understand.  Even taking the morality out of it, how farking desperate are you to see a certain person having sex that you fake it to accomplish?  IT'S NOT HER.  It's not farking real.

In this case at least, it's more about destroying the target, not tantalizing the user.

Maybe, but while I'm neither the victim of this, nor a woman who has had to put up with men all their life, if I was shown this, I wouldn't see it as destroying the target.  I'd see it as weak little men putting together a deepfake video because they're such weak people they have to resort to this immature shiat in an attempt to destroy a strong woman.


That's because that's what it is. it's up to the Brits if it works.
 
2022-10-21 9:19:51 AM  
They put Kate Isaac's face onto porn?  What a wicked thing to do, to make me dream of her!
 
2022-10-21 9:20:36 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
Displayed 50 of 152 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.