Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Man to divorce court judge: "This divorce won't be equitable unless I get to keep this book of my ex-wife's nudes." Judge: "I'll allow it"   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

4337 clicks; posted to Main » on 27 Sep 2022 at 7:02 AM (10 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



104 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2022-09-27 4:02:30 AM  
He's only doing it to upser her.She should be all, "Sure. I'll put a bow on it for you, pencil prick.r
 
2022-09-27 4:24:25 AM  
Ahrr, this picture will serve me well on those lonely nights at sea.
 
2022-09-27 6:43:04 AM  
Burn it.
 
2022-09-27 7:04:39 AM  
Enh, it was a gift she gave him. A divorce doesn't get to erase that.
 
2022-09-27 7:08:13 AM  
I'll need to see the evidence before I can make a decision.

Heeeey! Nice t*ts!
 
2022-09-27 7:09:56 AM  
I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.
 
2022-09-27 7:11:10 AM  
1. I agree.
2. You have a better chance of keep that, if you use your own cellphone. Take the vid/images yourself and, also burn the files to 100s of dvdroms, and thumb drives, and anything else with a memory or hard drive space.  And, even rename files and their dot file type and places those on anything that will let. And also in any and all random folders on all computers, laptops, and tablets and new cellphones and any place else.
3. God farking luck taking anything away from.
4. Evil menacing laughter.
5. Hahaha.
6. The cloud.
7. Email that to all you other email.  In winzip files renamed and file type changed and with a password.
8. Finely, print that and place those in books. All your books. And in records in the bank.
And in family albums behind old pictures in the very back.
9. Hahaha.
 
2022-09-27 7:11:38 AM  

BafflerMeal: Enh, it was a gift she gave him. A divorce doesn't get to erase that.


Nude pictures when kept in a situation like that are clearly being kept as a retaliatory measure.  Anything truly intimate needs to be in a special category that a judge can require to be returned or proven destroyed, not just "I did pinky swear bullshiat."
 
2022-09-27 7:11:43 AM  

Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.


Yet.
 
2022-09-27 7:12:45 AM  

WickerNipple: Burn it.


🥺
 
2022-09-27 7:12:58 AM  

hissatsu: Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.

Yet.


Let me know when you find a link...lol
 
2022-09-27 7:13:15 AM  

Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.


🙄🤣🧐🤔🥸🤨
 
2022-09-27 7:18:36 AM  
If anyone reads the article... Yeah, I know.
The order is to have the nudity edited out before handing over to husband. Was a gift, he should get the original product.
 
2022-09-27 7:19:55 AM  

Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.


Yet.
 
2022-09-27 7:20:45 AM  

hissatsu: Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.

Yet.


😒
 
2022-09-27 7:22:12 AM  

BafflerMeal: Enh, it was a gift she gave him. A divorce doesn't get to erase that.


agreed
 
2022-09-27 7:23:14 AM  
"won the right to edit the photos to hide her body"
 
2022-09-27 7:23:22 AM  
ok i can't get the story to load.  why is the judge ok with this? or dose the story say?
 
2022-09-27 7:25:27 AM  
In all the difficulty of living through a broken marriage, for many people the thought of sex with anyone, nevermind the ex, seems like an emotionally taxing chore.  Why would you even want this person's photos?

/in divorce being vindictive is the most important
 
2022-09-27 7:29:05 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size

Be careful what you wish for.
 
2022-09-27 7:29:09 AM  

hissatsu: Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.

Yet.


"Since I ordered her to return the book to him, it is his possession and he can do what he wishes without reprisal. Case dismissed with prejudice!"
 
2022-09-27 7:31:04 AM  

Yellow Beard: She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.


Either she's lucky or we're lucky.  No way to tell until it's too late, in both cases.
 
2022-09-27 7:44:26 AM  

ltdanman44: BafflerMeal: Enh, it was a gift she gave him. A divorce doesn't get to erase that.

agreed


Intimate photos (and videos) I think are gifts that expire upon the end of any relationship.

Even if the person doesn't ask for them back, you should delete/destroy any you have cause what those photos represent is over now.
 
2022-09-27 7:46:17 AM  
When the guy is in a new relationship and his new girlfriend/wife finds the album and asks him why he has that, what is he going to answer?

-No honey, I'm totally not still obsessed with my ex.
-Honey, I totally forgot I had that.
-I kept it for artistic reason, see the way the camera brought out her sexiness? Totally artistic.

Or, is he going to double down?

-Honey, this is what you're competing against!
 
2022-09-27 7:52:48 AM  

The_Shade_Richard_Swift: Or, is he going to double down?

-Honey, this is what you're competing against!


obsessed?
No.
This here is a quality woman doing a quality BJ. Step up your game dear. And put down the 🍩 🍩 🍩 🍩 🍩
 
2022-09-27 7:57:29 AM  
Ladies, this is why all boudoir photo shoots should be mutual; that way, you can threaten to keep his erotic photos as mutually assured blackmail too.
 
2022-09-27 8:01:53 AM  

Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.


That's the reason she did not want to give them back, because she knew it would eventually end up on the Internet
 
2022-09-27 8:10:32 AM  

Nana's Vibrator: In all the difficulty of living through a broken marriage, for many people the thought of sex with anyone, nevermind the ex, seems like an emotionally taxing chore.  Why would you even want this person's photos?

/in divorce being vindictive is the most important


I found someone's wedding album at work.  Assuming someone had lost it, I asked around until I found someone who recognized one of the people. When I took it to him, he was surprised, but thanked me and then promptly dropped it in the garbage saying that was two wives back.

Apparently, a custodian saw it in the trash but didn't want to throw it away in case it was put in the trash by accident so they just left it out for someone to find.
 
2022-09-27 8:14:49 AM  

Nana's Vibrator: In all the difficulty of living through a broken marriage, for many people the thought of sex with anyone, nevermind the ex, seems like an emotionally taxing chore.  Why would you even want this person's photos?

/in divorce being vindictive is the most important


Connect those dots. Why would someone want nude photos of someone they are vindictive towards?
 
2022-09-27 8:19:26 AM  

LeftisRightisWrong: Nana's Vibrator: In all the difficulty of living through a broken marriage, for many people the thought of sex with anyone, nevermind the ex, seems like an emotionally taxing chore.  Why would you even want this person's photos?

/in divorce being vindictive is the most important

Connect those dots. Why would someone want nude photos of someone they are vindictive towards?


In retrospect this is a biatchy way for me to put it, sorry. I'm having an irritable morning. The most likely reason this dude wants these photos is to hurt her, either by posting them online or hanging the threat/risk of him doing so over her head.

The judge is even more of a turd by demanding she take them to an unknown person and have them remove them, and also giving the husband final authority on whether or not the photos have been changed/removed  enough.
 
2022-09-27 8:20:55 AM  
It's violating and it's incredibly embarrassing and humiliating,' she said.
'The only way I can hopefully protect someone else from going through the same situation is to tell my story and expose that these are the types of things that he thinks are OK.'


Kinda undermines your position when you were the one thinking that these were the "types of things that were OK" to begin with, and gifted photos of yourself in seggsi undies.

/Barbra Streisand to the red fark-phone.
 
2022-09-27 8:22:27 AM  
The photographer is a pretentious ass for not working with her on this.
 
2022-09-27 8:23:00 AM  

uttertosh: It's violating and it's incredibly embarrassing and humiliating,' she said.
'The only way I can hopefully protect someone else from going through the same situation is to tell my story and expose that these are the types of things that he thinks are OK.'

Kinda undermines your position when you were the one thinking that these were the "types of things that were OK" to begin with, and gifted photos of yourself in seggsi undies.

/Barbra Streisand to the red fark-phone.


Glenlivet to you dear sir 🥂
 
2022-09-27 8:24:28 AM  
Oh in Salt Lake City, would she be shunned by the community, run out of town or burned for being a witch for being so immodest.
 
2022-09-27 8:25:09 AM  

uttertosh: It's violating and it's incredibly embarrassing and humiliating,' she said.
'The only way I can hopefully protect someone else from going through the same situation is to tell my story and expose that these are the types of things that he thinks are OK.'

Kinda undermines your position when you were the one thinking that these were the "types of things that were OK" to begin with, and gifted photos of yourself in seggsi undies.

/Barbra Streisand to the red fark-phone.


I don't think she thinks the boudoir photos themselves are embarrassing or humiliating. I think she thinks them being owned by somebody with whom she is no longer romantically entwined is embarrassing and humiliating.

Like, taking sexy underwear photos for my boyfriend? OK. Him refusing to delete them upon request in the event of our breakup? Humiliating.
 
2022-09-27 8:28:36 AM  

misanthropicsob: Like, taking sexy underwear photos for my boyfriend? OK. Him refusing to delete them upon request in the event of our breakup? Humiliating.


Exactly.  And that is lame. It's like trying to undo actual events.  It's revisionist dog poop. Yes, ladies and gentlemen this did in fact, factually happen.  At one point WE both wanted each other.  Despite accounts to the contrary.
Table flip.
 
2022-09-27 8:30:02 AM  
I wouldn't want pictures of my ex. I don't want to ever see her again. I even made my family take down group photos with her in them because I couldn't stand seeing her every time I visited my parents' house.

I will never in a million years understand people who get divorced but still want to maintain contact or obsess over the person they left/who left them. You had a chance, you blew it as a couple, stop living in the past.

I got a divorce to get hundreds of miles away from her and her abusive craziness. Even if I had a book of "boudoir" photos of her, I wouldn't use it or look at it because just seeing her triggers bad memories, not eroticism. The very thought makes my skin crawl.
 
2022-09-27 8:34:04 AM  

BafflerMeal: Enh, it was a gift she gave him. A divorce doesn't get to erase that.


Gifts are serious business.
There was a case where a guy met a girl, and she ended up giving him a BJ. Well he goes home and she uses the semen he left in her mouth to make her self pregnant and then demand child support. He cries foul to the judge saying he left it her mouth, and since he didn't have vaginal sex with her, it's her own fault for making herself pregnant on purpose. The judge ruled the spunk he gave her was technically a gift that she was allowed to do with as she pleased.
 
2022-09-27 8:40:44 AM  
I still have some nudes of my ex wife she left on my computer and some negatives from a film role from like 20 years ago.

/Initially I didn't know they were there.  I found the computer one later on and going through a one of picture envelopes, there was a note that said "CVS (or whoever) doesn't develop certain pictures." I looked at the negatives and a few were her spread out naked on the bed. I didn't take those pictures of her...
 
2022-09-27 8:41:29 AM  
No thanks, you keep em

sltrib.comView Full Size
 
2022-09-27 8:43:50 AM  
Well, now I see what became of Stevo from SLC Punk. He became an asshole judge.

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-09-27 8:46:39 AM  
I know it's fark and we don't read articles here, but her actual complaint is that the judge ordered her to give the photos to a 3rd party for editing because the original photographer refused.  Ex doesn't want and is not getting nudes.
 
2022-09-27 8:53:16 AM  

MythDragon: BafflerMeal: Enh, it was a gift she gave him. A divorce doesn't get to erase that.

Gifts are serious business.
There was a case where a guy met a girl, and she ended up giving him a BJ. Well he goes home and she uses the semen he left in her mouth to make her self pregnant and then demand child support. He cries foul to the judge saying he left it her mouth, and since he didn't have vaginal sex with her, it's her own fault for making herself pregnant on purpose. The judge ruled the spunk he gave her was technically a gift that she was allowed to do with as she pleased.


Username checks out
 
2022-09-27 8:54:31 AM  
Lol. Look at the guy who can't even read the bullet points in bold.
 
2022-09-27 8:57:05 AM  

bglove25: I know it's fark and we don't read articles here, but her actual complaint is that the judge ordered her to give the photos to a 3rd party for editing because the original photographer refused.  Ex doesn't want and is not getting nudes.


"Lindsay Marsh is legally required to keep the originals until December, in case her ex objects to any of the edits."

He gets final say on whether or not he's happy with the removals.
 
2022-09-27 9:00:26 AM  

MythDragon: BafflerMeal: Enh, it was a gift she gave him. A divorce doesn't get to erase that.

Gifts are serious business.
There was a case where a guy met a girl, and she ended up giving him a BJ. Well he goes home and she uses the semen he left in her mouth to make her self pregnant and then demand child support. He cries foul to the judge saying he left it her mouth, and since he didn't have vaginal sex with her, it's her own fault for making herself pregnant on purpose. The judge ruled the spunk he gave her was technically a gift that she was allowed to do with as she pleased.


Yep. Here in Texas, being good to a girlfriend's kids from an other man, can legally make you have to keep doing that if that relationship ends.
 
2022-09-27 9:01:00 AM  

MythDragon: I still have some nudes of my ex wife she left on my computer and some negatives from a film role from like 20 years ago.

/Initially I didn't know they were there.  I found the computer one later on and going through a one of picture envelopes, there was a note that said "CVS (or whoever) doesn't develop certain pictures." I looked at the negatives and a few were her spread out naked on the bed. I didn't take those pictures of her...


Opps
 
2022-09-27 9:05:10 AM  

bglove25: I know it's fark and we don't read articles here, but her actual complaint is that the judge ordered her to give the photos to a 3rd party for editing because the original photographer refused.  Ex doesn't want and is not getting nudes.


Bummer.
Because I think it's an interesting thought exercise.  Because, do our memories belong to us? Even if they have other people in them? Would we delete people's memories if we could? Should we? Is that appropriate? Why?
Considering we're our memories.  We're even others memories of us.
This is like killing a construct of a person.
Makes me think of electro shock.
 
TWX
2022-09-27 9:05:24 AM  

OtherLittleGuy: hissatsu: Yellow Beard: I know this is a strange idea but how about not having nude photos taken in the first place. She's just lucky they weren't put on the internet.

Yet.

"Since I ordered her to return the book to him, it is his possession and he can do what he wishes without reprisal. Case dismissed with prejudice!"


The judge could invoke copyright law, he owns a licensed copy for personal use but no rights to redistribute or to make digital versions of the content of the book.  The copyright is retained by the creator of the work.
 
2022-09-27 9:10:35 AM  

chawco: He's free to remember all he wants.


For now.
Tell me all kinds of special interest won't raise hell the millisecond we can digitize our memories.  It's going to be a shiat show of epic size.
People will legitimately freak out and be sueing everyone and thier buddies. And relatives and exes and co-workers and everyone in between. It will be legal Armageddon.
 
Displayed 50 of 104 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.