Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(SBJ)   Apple to Big Ten: Saaay, can we touch base on getting TV rights for football? We've come into a bit of money and are now interested in what you're selling   (sportsbusinessjournal.com) divider line
    More: Followup, Golf, Southeastern Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference, Big 12 Conference, Division I, Big Ten Network, Insight Bowl, Big Ten Conference  
•       •       •

359 clicks; posted to Sports » on 01 Jul 2022 at 5:18 AM (22 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

 
2022-07-01 6:55:03 AM  
3 votes:

IlGreven: Juuuuuust what we need: TV sports rights to be Balkanized across so many different platforms that you need to take out a second mortgage to watch them all...and most people don't even have a house to put a first mortgage on.


It always amazes me that the reason that we started moving away from having cable is because people were annoyed they were paying too much and getting too many channels they only watched once in a while and didn't need most of the time.

And now we're moving towards paying too much for getting services we only watch once in a while and don't need most of the time.

People are not all that smart.
 
2022-07-01 6:34:33 AM  
2 votes:
Juuuuuust what we need: TV sports rights to be Balkanized across so many different platforms that you need to take out a second mortgage to watch them all...and most people don't even have a house to put a first mortgage on.
 
2022-07-01 7:53:31 AM  
2 votes:

IlGreven: Juuuuuust what we need: TV sports rights to be Balkanized across so many different platforms that you need to take out a second mortgage to watch them all...and most people don't even have a house to put a first mortgage on.


It's not great, but it's still a step up from where we currently are with Bally and the regional networks/blackouts. I'm looking forward to Apple's deal with the MLS, as finding and watching MLS games is a nightmare at times.
 
2022-07-01 8:52:15 AM  
2 votes:

IlGreven: Juuuuuust what we need: TV sports rights to be Balkanized across so many different platforms that you need to take out a second mortgage to watch them all...and most people don't even have a house to put a first mortgage on.


College started this several years ago when each conference started their own channel. Sucked then and it's not going to get any better with streaming.
 
2022-07-01 12:37:31 PM  
1 vote:
Apple TV+ is by far the least accessible, least consumer friendly of the streaming services, and that says a lot
 
2022-07-01 1:35:25 PM  
1 vote:

Eddie Hazel's E string: The Bestest: Apple TV+ is by far the least accessible, least consumer friendly of the streaming services, and that says a lot

...why? How many iPhones, iPads, iMacs have sold in this country in the last 5 years? Apple TV+ is also available on Roku, Amazon's Fire Stick, etc.

I'm not even a subscriber, but what makes it less accessible than Netflix, Hulu, etc?


of the dozen of devices in my home that plays just about every other streaming service without issue, none of them except the PCs can play Apple TV, and those can only do so via browser. The litany of issues surrounding AppleID, -especially- if you don't own any Apple products, is another layer on top of that.
 
2022-07-01 1:40:14 PM  
1 vote:

mechgreg: FriarReb98: IlGreven: Juuuuuust what we need: TV sports rights to be Balkanized across so many different platforms that you need to take out a second mortgage to watch them all...and most people don't even have a house to put a first mortgage on.

It always amazes me that the reason that we started moving away from having cable is because people were annoyed they were paying too much and getting too many channels they only watched once in a while and didn't need most of the time.

And now we're moving towards paying too much for getting services we only watch once in a while and don't need most of the time.

People are not all that smart.

The nice thing is with streaming services is that you can bounce around between different ones from month to month. With cable to get a decent price you pretty much had to lock into a year+ long contract (one where they could raise prices at any time). Plus if you cancelled you cable for a few months when you weren't watching then reactivated it they would surely hit you with a bunch of stupid activation fees.


https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/newsletter/2022-04-05/here-are-four-charts-that-explain-future-of-streaming-the-wide-shot

That truth won't stay true forever. Right now they're in the carrot strategy to fight churn, but eventually, the stick will come. Anti-churn cancellation fees are going to come, maybe by the end of the year.
 
2022-07-01 2:04:23 PM  
1 vote:

LL316: There's going to be 2 60 team conferences. 20 teams in 3 divisions.

Hopefully this means we can finally implement relegation into things. I've long thought the MAC title winner should be playing for a spot in the B1G, and the bottom 2 B1G teams could play the night before the conference championship game to see who gets to stay with the money. Same with Sun Belt and SEC, Mt West and Pac 12, and I guess Conf USA and ACC?  Independents can gft.


Doesn't work when entire conferences and most of others are not aligned simply for sports or they are but won't be too keen to see their basketball program relegated because their football team stunk for one season.

People love to talk relegation in college conference threads, which I do think is an interesting thought experiment, but if anyone actually thinks anything like that would ever truly be implemented they're way off base. Universities and their respective athletic departments are far more complicated entities than stand alone soccer clubs. We can't even implement relegation for the MLS in America.
 
2022-07-01 3:00:27 PM  
1 vote:

FriarReb98: IlGreven: Juuuuuust what we need: TV sports rights to be Balkanized across so many different platforms that you need to take out a second mortgage to watch them all...and most people don't even have a house to put a first mortgage on.

It always amazes me that the reason that we started moving away from having cable is because people were annoyed they were paying too much and getting too many channels they only watched once in a while and didn't need most of the time.

And now we're moving towards paying too much for getting services we only watch once in a while and don't need most of the time.

People are not all that smart.


TBF I'd rather pay for individual channels than pay Fox News a dime.
 
Displayed 9 of 9 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.