Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNBC)   Hey Clarence: you forgot Loving v. Virginia   (cnbc.com) divider line
    More: Awkward, Roe v. Wade, Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Clarence Thomas, United States Constitution, Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia  
•       •       •

5577 clicks; posted to Politics » on 24 Jun 2022 at 5:46 PM (7 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



219 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2022-06-24 3:02:03 PM  
Do NOT think for even a second that shiatbag wouldn't gleefully slap down Loving v. Virginia for other people, then go right on living his fat, happy, lavishly-compensated life with Mrs. Ginni Q.Terrorist like nothing happened, because who's gonna do anything abut them? Ditto for other rich assholes, like McConnell.

OTOH, you actually work for a living? These pus smears will come after your marriage license in a heartbeat.
 
2022-06-24 3:12:20 PM  
No no no, y'see that's different.  Being black is not a choice.

/Same thing lots of you Farkers have been saying to us queers whenever we compare gay civil rights to the early civil rights movement for people of color.
//F*ck you, too
///Every f*cking one of you
 
2022-06-24 3:22:04 PM  
I wish more people understand what this is all about.   it's actually pretty simple.

NO, WE SAID YOU CANT DO THAT!

that's it.  that's what abortion is about, gay rights, raising the minimum wage, and most other progressive ideas.

Jan. 6?  No, we said Biden can't be president.

fixing climate change?  same thing.

stop arguing with these people points and start just calling them out on their core belief structure.
 
2022-06-24 3:24:51 PM  

blastoh: I wish more people understand what this is all about.   it's actually pretty simple.

NO, WE SAID YOU CANT DO THAT!

that's it.  that's what abortion is about, gay rights, raising the minimum wage, and most other progressive ideas.

Jan. 6?  No, we said Biden can't be president.

fixing climate change?  same thing.

stop arguing with these people points and start just calling them out on their core belief structure.


BEARS REPEATING REPEATEDLY.
 
2022-06-24 3:26:47 PM  

blastoh: stop arguing with these people points and start just calling them out on their core belief structure.


I'm not allowed to say what we should actually be doing to conservatives right now, or I'll get a time out for it.
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 4:10:07 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 5:12:02 PM  

Weaver95: blastoh: stop arguing with these people points and start just calling them out on their core belief structure.

I'm not allowed to say what we should actually be doing to conservatives right now, or I'll get a time out for it.
[Fark user image 425x181] [View Full Size image _x_]


Obviously this is America and you are entitled to opinions on which you won't act, but that you do not act on the one you are afraid of uttering speaks for you.
 
2022-06-24 5:46:56 PM  
Justice Uncle Thomas Nazifarker.
 
2022-06-24 5:48:10 PM  
Gee, I wonder why that is?

I wouldn't be shocked if they reversed all divorces next.  My ex and I absolutely do not want to get back together.  If we did, it'd have happened two years ago.
 
2022-06-24 5:48:49 PM  

duppy: Do NOT think for even a second that shiatbag wouldn't gleefully slap down Loving v. Virginia for other people, then go right on living his fat, happy, lavishly-compensated life with Mrs. Ginni Q.Terrorist like nothing happened, because who's gonna do anything abut them? Ditto for other rich assholes, like McConnell.

OTOH, you actually work for a living? These pus smears will come after your marriage license in a heartbeat.


See also Melania versus Magat's bloviating about immigration
 
2022-06-24 5:49:34 PM  
But we preserved the dignity, civility, and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court by refusing to add justices proportional to the number of circuit courts at the federal level. Aren't all these dead women worth the cost of making sure the Supreme Court isn't changed?
 
2022-06-24 5:50:04 PM  
He would be the first to say that they're not married, that she owns him.


Ok, probably not. But it seems plausible.
 
2022-06-24 5:50:36 PM  
fark this country's Christofascist horseshiat and anyone who supports it
 
2022-06-24 5:52:22 PM  
Clarence is just the perfect name for that guy.
 
2022-06-24 5:52:23 PM  
Perhaps we should have a look at the anti mixed race marriage laws that were so popular?  As I recall the penalty involved a short length of rope and the nearest tree.
 
2022-06-24 5:53:26 PM  
He's such a miserable, rapist fark.  I hope his wife goes to prison and he dies alone and in great pain.
 
2022-06-24 5:53:33 PM  
It's almost like conservatives only care about rights that directly affect them and don't care about any of the others. Almost.
 
2022-06-24 5:53:37 PM  

duppy: Do NOT think for even a second that shiatbag wouldn't gleefully slap down Loving v. Virginia for other people, then go right on living his fat, happy, lavishly-compensated life with Mrs. Ginni Q.Terrorist like nothing happened, because who's gonna do anything abut them? Ditto for other rich assholes, like McConnell.

OTOH, you actually work for a living? These pus smears will come after your marriage license in a heartbeat.


And on that same note, if any 16-year-old daughter (or mistresses....or 16-year-old mistresses) of the 6 justices finds herself in a wee bit of trouble and needs to get it taken care of, it WILL get taken care of. And without a moment of hesitation or obstruction or doubt, and most importantly, many many miles away from any protestor who would accost her and scream at her that she will go to Hell for doing it.
 
2022-06-24 5:54:06 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 5:54:24 PM  
Time to start looking into moving to Colorado. Any parent with a daughter who doesn't consider getting out of a wingbat state with trigger laws, if possible, is a shiat parent. Even with rape and incest considerations, what state shines in prosecutions in that department?

Fascism is marching across America right the fark now.
 
2022-06-24 5:55:06 PM  
Why stop at Loving v Virginia? I bet that they'd really love to bring back Minor v. Happersett.

/ that's the one that held that women have no right to vote, despite being citizens
 
2022-06-24 5:55:38 PM  
What if this was a long con for Clarence to get out of his marriage?
 
2022-06-24 5:56:10 PM  

duppy: Do NOT think for even a second that shiatbag wouldn't gleefully slap down Loving v. Virginia for other people, then go right on living his fat, happy, lavishly-compensated life with Mrs. Ginni Q.Terrorist like nothing happened, because who's gonna do anything abut them? Ditto for other rich assholes, like McConnell.

OTOH, you actually work for a living? These pus smears will come after your marriage license in a heartbeat.


Yeah I called it a while back about birth control, they want to create a near slave class.

They overturn Loving v. Virginia my wife and I will have to move... I'd be a durty mixed minority male married to white wimmins. Not a good thing.
 
2022-06-24 5:56:15 PM  
So is he saying this shiat to get GOP favor because his wife is about to find out the part of farking around ??
 
2022-06-24 5:56:15 PM  
In more civilized times people would be drug in to the streets and beaten with whatever was at hand for this kind of tyrannical overreach.

Day's still young though, and night hasn't fallen.
 
2022-06-24 5:56:21 PM  

Weaver95: blastoh: stop arguing with these people points and start just calling them out on their core belief structure.

I'm not allowed to say what we should actually be doing to conservatives right now, or I'll get a time out for it.
[Fark user image 425x181] [View Full Size image _x_]


I'm not American.  If the goatfarking neocons can call for "regime change" in foreign countries and then blithely murder thousands of civilians in those countries and get away with it, I can call for regime change in the United States of Gilead and point out how many sturdy lampposts there are in downtown DC and get away with it.
 
2022-06-24 5:56:53 PM  
He also conveniently cited courthouses as one of the only places a ban on carrying firearms doesn't run afoul of the 2nd amendment.

I'd call him a piece of shiat, but I can't because pieces of shiat aren't this transparent.
 
2022-06-24 5:59:13 PM  
 
2022-06-24 5:59:39 PM  

gunga galunga: duppy: Do NOT think for even a second that shiatbag wouldn't gleefully slap down Loving v. Virginia for other people, then go right on living his fat, happy, lavishly-compensated life with Mrs. Ginni Q.Terrorist like nothing happened, because who's gonna do anything abut them? Ditto for other rich assholes, like McConnell.

OTOH, you actually work for a living? These pus smears will come after your marriage license in a heartbeat.

And on that same note, if any 16-year-old daughter (or mistresses....or 16-year-old mistresses) of the 6 justices finds herself in a wee bit of trouble and needs to get it taken care of, it WILL get taken care of. And without a moment of hesitation or obstruction or doubt, and most importantly, many many miles away from any protestor who would accost her and scream at her that she will go to Hell for doing it.


This. While I hate to drag others into this, they'd better be following these people around over time. On a long enough timeline every single one of them will have something happen. Remember, in Texass, getting an abortion is a crime, even if it happens in Commiefornia. Any of these nozzles living in states like that should be under observation. WHEN (not if) something happens, well, that's a heck of a thing to have hanging over someone. Quite a skeleton to keep hidden.
 
2022-06-24 5:59:53 PM  
I am still waiting for Clarence Thomas to have his Sergeant Vernon Waters "A Soldier's Story" moment:

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 6:00:03 PM  
i.imgflip.comView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 6:00:06 PM  
But how can that be ? I was assured, nay , guaranteed , that that was not even part of the discussion or even a supposed goal by every single damn rwnj radio host at least 2 months ago ! And I was a fool for even thinking such a thing!!!
 
2022-06-24 6:00:26 PM  
My GF, who does not FARK, asked me to share this:

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 6:02:07 PM  

iheartscotch: Why stop at Loving v Virginia? I bet that they'd really love to bring back Minor v. Happersett.


Dred Scott II : Judgement Day
 
2022-06-24 6:02:18 PM  

duppy: Do NOT think for even a second that shiatbag wouldn't gleefully slap down Loving v. Virginia for other people, then go right on living his fat, happy, lavishly-compensated life with Mrs. Ginni Q.Terrorist like nothing happened, because who's gonna do anything abut them? Ditto for other rich assholes, like McConnell.

OTOH, you actually work for a living? These pus smears will come after your marriage license in a heartbeat.


A duppy is an African world for ghost.

Btw 100%
 
2022-06-24 6:02:34 PM  

C18H27NO3: [i.imgflip.com image 500x618]


That's a woman having fun. Ginni was raised by theocratic fascists, and has nothing in common with the person in the photo.
 
2022-06-24 6:03:17 PM  

a_room_with_a_moose: My GF, who does not FARK, asked me to share this:

[Fark user image 425x566]


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 6:04:11 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size


Thanks, Joe, for leading the hearings.
 
2022-06-24 6:04:15 PM  
Harris did not forget, and included it in her speech about what rights are now lost because privacy is no longer read into the constitution. Harris is way, way ahead of all the news editorials so far, it seems. Her speech was excellent.
 
2022-06-24 6:04:16 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size

"Don't matter. I kinda hate that biatch anyway."
 
2022-06-24 6:09:21 PM  
They will have Handmaid and BeerBro take care of Loving. Conservatives only ever care when it affects them so they wouldn't burden Thomas with this one.
 
2022-06-24 6:09:26 PM  

Weatherkiss: But we preserved the dignity, civility, and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court by refusing to add justices proportional to the number of circuit courts at the federal level. Aren't all these dead women worth the cost of making sure the Supreme Court isn't changed?


We can't expand it. The shiathead Dems won't go for it and the Reps would block it. Then, when the Reps win the presidency they'll do it, justifying it by saying we were going to.

It should happen, I want it to happen, it happening would save lives, but trying to make it happen wouldn't work and it'd backfire.
 
2022-06-24 6:10:33 PM  
i.imgflip.comView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 6:11:28 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: No no no, y'see that's different.  Being black is not a choice.
/Same thing lots of you Farkers have been saying to us queers whenever we compare gay civil rights to the early civil rights movement for people of color.


This. Many people who excoriate Republicans continue to not understand what we're dealing with.

First, Republicans don't think there's any contradiction in their New York gun law decision and this. The Second Amendment exists. It was written into the Constitution. The right to an abortion (or the right to privacy from which it came) wasn't. The "founders" didn't think a right to privacy was important, thus they didn't bother to protect it by calling it out. Therefore, it shouldn't exist.

That's their argument.

Now, the race thing is slightly different. Black Republicans like Clarence absolutely get no credit whatsoever from most racists in this country. Clarence is a useful idiot, nothing more. They don't respect him. Why would they? He's not supposed to be there. He's a tool, much like the white justices Republicans put on the Court are tools, it's just that Clarence has been there longer and served his purpose. He was placed on the Court as a way to blunt the criticism of Republicans as racist. That's why he's there. They'd much prefer him to be white, but liberals being the whiny babies they are, George Bush (the first one) put him on the Court as a way of saying, "Look, we're not racist, we've got a black guy on the court, too!" It's the same way they cultivate rich gay people and women, to blunt the obvious fact that for the most part, they have nothing but contempt for all those groups. But they'll gladly accept the help of these traitors, if it gets them what they really want: the destruction of the very idea of "civil rights." And that means ALL the rights: employee rights. The rights of women, of LGBTQ people, people of color. Non-citizens. People in jail and prison. People accused of a crime but not able to hire a lawyer. The disabled. etc. If Clarence thinks his blackness will be any sort of shield against his own personal rights, he's extremely stupid, but he's old and probably won't live long enough to see the Loving decision set aside. They'll wait until after he's dead as a courtesy for his years of service to the rightwing zealot cause.

None of these rights are enshrined in the Constitution and thus none, as far as these zealots are concerned, should be dictated by the federal government. The states' rights thing is the means by which they destroy these freedoms we've come to take for granted for the past 60 years.

The setting aside of the Roe v. Wade decision is the proof of concept.  Who knows what's next? Griswold v. Connecticut? Obergefell? Lawrence v. Texas? I assume we'll find out pretty soon. I'm guessing it'll be Obergefell. They'll wait awhile longer to make being gay illegal again.

But her emails, right?
 
2022-06-24 6:11:49 PM  

Weatherkiss: But we preserved the dignity, civility, and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court by refusing to add justices proportional to the number of circuit courts at the federal level. Aren't all these dead women worth the cost of making sure the Supreme Court isn't changed?


I don't know, I'm kind of on the fence about that.
 
2022-06-24 6:12:04 PM  

karl2025: LThen, when the Reps win the presidency they'll do it, justifying it by saying we were going to.

It should happen, I want it to happen, it happening would save lives, but trying to make it happen wouldn't work and it'd backfire.


Spoiler: They're going to try do that anyway. If there was a single lesson to be learned today, it's that Republicans don't give a damn about precedent. Trump's triple justices are another piece of proof.
 
2022-06-24 6:15:47 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: No no no, y'see that's different.  Being black is not a choice.

/Same thing lots of you Farkers have been saying to us queers whenever we compare gay civil rights to the early civil rights movement for people of color.
//F*ck you, too
///Every f*cking one of you


c.tenor.comView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 6:16:27 PM  

inglixthemad: duppy: Do NOT think for even a second that shiatbag wouldn't gleefully slap down Loving v. Virginia for other people, then go right on living his fat, happy, lavishly-compensated life with Mrs. Ginni Q.Terrorist like nothing happened, because who's gonna do anything abut them? Ditto for other rich assholes, like McConnell.

OTOH, you actually work for a living? These pus smears will come after your marriage license in a heartbeat.

Yeah I called it a while back about birth control, they want to create a near slave class.

They overturn Loving v. Virginia my wife and I will have to move... I'd be a durty mixed minority male married to white wimmins. Not a good thing.


Lol "near"
 
2022-06-24 6:16:34 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-06-24 6:17:04 PM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
Displayed 50 of 219 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.