Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Nuclear agency plans five new plutonium buildings at Los Alamos lab. You'd think that'd be hard on employees but oh well   (news.yahoo.com) divider line
    More: Interesting, United States Department of Energy, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Nuclear weapon, Savannah River Site, Plutonium, PUREX, Nuclear proliferation, Radioactive waste  
•       •       •

340 clicks; posted to STEM » on 19 May 2022 at 5:05 PM (19 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



14 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2022-05-19 3:07:37 PM  
How to make Plutonium
Youtube -sh5XZo5wRE
 
2022-05-19 3:35:36 PM  
Scott Wyland, The Santa Fe New Mexican

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2022-05-19 3:41:54 PM  
Hey won't you build me a bomb?
Jeff & Jane Hudson - Los Alamos (1983)
Youtube YUAduIWK5QY
 
2022-05-19 4:30:25 PM  
Subby said "hard on."
 
2022-05-19 5:07:40 PM  
I don't think buildings should be made out of uranium.  It isn't that sturdy of a building material.
 
2022-05-19 5:13:21 PM  
If you want to have nuclear weapons and reactors... it costs money. Upgrades are a good thing. Rejoice!
 
2022-05-19 5:30:31 PM  
live.staticflickr.comView Full Size
 
2022-05-19 5:40:05 PM  
Ummm...do we really need more nukes?

Or is this just some sort of maintenance of existing nukes? TFA talks about ramping up production of triggers, so it sounds like they're trying to build more weapons, not just refurbish existing ones.

Anyone care to comment?
 
2022-05-19 5:57:21 PM  

Flowery Twats: Ummm...do we really need more nukes?

Or is this just some sort of maintenance of existing nukes? TFA talks about ramping up production of triggers, so it sounds like they're trying to build more weapons, not just refurbish existing ones.

Anyone care to comment?


"Instead of making newer weapons of mass destruction, we should just concentrate on making use of the ones we already have at home."

-Dr. Clayton Forrester
 
2022-05-19 7:54:52 PM  

Flowery Twats: Ummm...do we really need more nukes?

Or is this just some sort of maintenance of existing nukes? TFA talks about ramping up production of triggers, so it sounds like they're trying to build more weapons, not just refurbish existing ones.

Anyone care to comment?


Triggers utilize a short-lifetime actinide and (iirc without looking anything up) beryllium, such that when crushed together by the chemical implosion wave, the alpha rays from the actinide are guaranteed to spall a few neutrons off the beryllium during maximum compression and initiate mega-big-ba-da-boom.

The short life of the trigger's actinide means they require regular maintenance/replacement. This is a significant part, btw, of why a lot of us suspect that a large fraction of Russia's nukes are nothing but dirty bombs at this point.

There's also an increasing need for Pu-238 for deep space missions, in light of... *ahem*... certain logistic problems likely to arise in terms of the supply from Russia. Which we depended on because flushing money down the drain on pointless wars in the middle east and criminalizing being nonwhite were more important than our ability to do science (among other things).
 
2022-05-19 8:17:15 PM  
Yee haw!

external-content.duckduckgo.comView Full Size
 
2022-05-19 8:51:26 PM  

Flowery Twats: Ummm...do we really need more nukes?

Or is this just some sort of maintenance of existing nukes? TFA talks about ramping up production of triggers, so it sounds like they're trying to build more weapons, not just refurbish existing ones.

Anyone care to comment?


You can do more with Pu than just build nuclear bombs.

But this is the US here, so, I doubt it's an ice drill for a Europa submersible mission the need it for.
 
2022-05-19 9:51:21 PM  

Flowery Twats: Ummm...do we really need more nukes?

Or is this just some sort of maintenance of existing nukes? TFA talks about ramping up production of triggers, so it sounds like they're trying to build more weapons, not just refurbish existing ones.

Anyone care to comment?


After a while the decay products poison the yield of nuclear weapons. If let go too long they cease working. The plutonium has to be reprocessed to remove the impurities. In some cases the pu-239 will neutron capture to become pu-240 and pu-241. If these isotopes get too high it is cheaper to make fresh pu-239 than seperate the heavier isotopes.
 
2022-05-20 9:21:57 AM  
img-9gag-fun.9cache.comView Full Size
 
Displayed 14 of 14 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.