Skip to content
Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(MIT)   Subby thought Zero Trust meant not trusting the wine in front of you OR the wine in front of the man in black, but apparently it doesn't and this article dizzied his intellect   ( divider line
    More: Interesting, Security, zero-trust architecture, study team's first step, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, assistant head of Lincoln Laboratory, Cyber Security, trust security, zero-trust architectures  
•       •       •

512 clicks; posted to STEM » on 18 May 2022 at 4:06 PM (20 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook

Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2022-05-18 3:43:59 PM  
1 vote:
When Google decided to implement zero trust, they basically rebuilt their business from the ground up to support all the changes required. It's a fantastic model, the only one I'd want to use if I was starting from scratch, but is untenable for most businesses at this point in time.

That said, you can and absolutely should start using zero trust principles wherever you can, just don't expect it to fit everywhere all at once unless you're in a position to rebuild everything. And if you are in that position, please hire me.
2022-05-19 3:43:00 AM  
1 vote:

Raoul Eaton: As soon as I see "paradigm shift" I stop reading.  Always.

You'll miss out on all the synergies with that attitude.
Displayed 2 of 2 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.