Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Duplicate of another approved link: 11950074


(Jezebel)   And in the race to the bottom of humanity between Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Traitor Green, MTG has regained the lead even after Boebert's really awful week   (jezebel.com) divider line
    More: Asinine, Rape, George W. Bush, United States House of Representatives, Child sexual abuse, Pregnancy, War rape, rape survivor, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene  
•       •       •

1257 clicks;  Favorite

47 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2021-12-01 9:21:08 AM  
"If you won't have more babies, who's going to change my PJs in the nursing home? Get back to firin' them out like chaff out of a combine!"
 
2021-12-01 9:33:16 AM  
That woman is simply a menace.  I don't know what her end game is.  Is it just extreme attention whoring for its own sake?
 
2021-12-01 9:33:58 AM  
She's like the perfect Platonic form of Karen, to which all other Karens aspire to be.
 
2021-12-01 9:36:42 AM  
Totally shocking they'd turn on their own for supposed apostasy
 
2021-12-01 9:38:39 AM  
LOL, "Your out of your league"
 
2021-12-01 9:39:22 AM  

Diogenes: That woman is simply a menace.  I don't know what her end game is.  Is it just extreme attention whoring for its own sake?


Fame is a hell of a drug.

// as any child psychologist will tell you, kids who crave attention can get it by being assholes or angels
// so when does she grow out of it?
 
2021-12-01 9:40:54 AM  

qorkfiend: Totally shocking they'd turn on their own for supposed apostasy


I'd say it's textbook fascism but I doubt any of them have studied.
 
2021-12-01 9:41:43 AM  
I honestly don't know which one is which.
 
2021-12-01 9:42:04 AM  
She literally has nothing to do so she's a media gadfly and her brain dead supporters think she's working for them.
 
2021-12-01 9:42:56 AM  
You know, I gotta side with MTG on this one. If you're going to say that abortion is murder because a zygote is a baby, it's totally hypocritical to say it's okay to murder someone because they're the product of a rape. Like....if a fetus is a baby, would you say it's okay to murder a toddler because they resulted from a rape pregnancy? If you're going to be an asshole, at least be a consistent asshole. Rape exceptions are just a way of taking the most distasteful aspect out of an already indefensible position. It's a way to be an asshole without sounding like an asshole.
 
2021-12-01 9:43:54 AM  
At least MTG has a consistent pro-life opinion. If you truly believe life begins at conception then why would you make exceptions for rape or incest or anything?

Does life begins at conception except for fetuses that are products of rape? Sorry little rape fetuses but God never gave you a soul so it's abortion for you?

MTG has a consistent "pro-life" opinion in all it's horrors and brutal consequences
 
2021-12-01 9:44:09 AM  

tinsguy: She literally has nothing to do so she's a media gadfly and her brain dead supporters think she's working for them.


You misspelled "grifter." You might want to get a new spellchecker.
 
2021-12-01 9:45:17 AM  
See, that never works for me. The cave woman is more attractive than MTG and has kind eyes.

I don't know what MTG is, but she's something far worse than a cave woman.
 
2021-12-01 9:45:19 AM  

gwoardnog: I honestly don't know which one is which.


Truthfully, it doesn't matter either.
 
2021-12-01 9:46:19 AM  
Oops, my comment has no context because the previous comment was deleted. I guess we're deleting the MTG-to-cave-woman comparison photos now?

Did MTG complain or something?
 
2021-12-01 9:46:24 AM  

JerkStore: See, that never works for me. The cave woman is more attractive than MTG and has kind eyes.

I don't know what MTG is, but she's something far worse than a cave woman.


Something about her Mom and a pitbull?
 
2021-12-01 9:46:56 AM  

Meatsim1: At least MTG has a consistent pro-life opinion. If you truly believe life begins at conception then why would you make exceptions for rape or incest or anything?

Does life begins at conception except for fetuses that are products of rape? Sorry little rape fetuses but God never gave you a soul so it's abortion for you?

MTG has a consistent "pro-life" opinion in all it's horrors and brutal consequences


Yeah, that other lady is fine with killing (what she considers to be) babies if they're the product of rape. If they're babies, why is it okay to kill them based on how they were conceived? (Of course there's the whole republicans-are-only-empathetic-if-the-thing-affects-them-personally aspect).
 
2021-12-01 9:47:40 AM  

hubiestubert: tinsguy: She literally has nothing to do so she's a media gadfly and her brain dead supporters think she's working for them.

You misspelled "grifter." You might want to get a new spellchecker.


Actually, I misspelled C**t.  :)
 
2021-12-01 9:47:45 AM  
I fantasize about those two...

...in a murder-suicide.
 
2021-12-01 9:48:25 AM  

Meatsim1: At least MTG has a consistent pro-life opinion. If you truly believe life begins at conception then why would you make exceptions for rape or incest or anything?

Does life begins at conception except for fetuses that are products of rape? Sorry little rape fetuses but God never gave you a soul so it's abortion for you?

MTG has a consistent "pro-life" opinion in all it's horrors and brutal consequences


Except when it comes to taking measures to preserve the living already here. She's pro human brood mare.
 
2021-12-01 9:49:14 AM  

Diogenes: That woman is simply a menace.  I don't know what her end game is.  Is it just extreme attention whoring for its own sake?


So you do know what her endgame is.
 
2021-12-01 9:50:39 AM  

Meatsim1: At least MTG has a consistent pro-life opinion. If you truly believe life begins at conception then why would you make exceptions for rape or incest or anything?

Does life begins at conception except for fetuses that are products of rape? Sorry little rape fetuses but God never gave you a soul so it's abortion for you?

MTG has a consistent "pro-life" opinion in all it's horrors and brutal consequences


*its, LOL

/sarcasm
 
2021-12-01 9:50:44 AM  
lol race to the bottom

There is no bottom with these pieces of shiat.
 
2021-12-01 9:51:29 AM  

tinsguy: She literally has nothing to do so she's a media gadfly and her brain dead supporters think she's working for them.


I don't think they believe she's working for them, but I also don't think that's what they wanted. They WANTED this. They wanted a troll who would stick it to the libs. They wanted a show. If they wanted someone who was going to govern in any way, they wouldn't have picked her.
 
2021-12-01 9:51:59 AM  
Apparently making any comment on her looks is misogyny. It's  too bad she is just as unattractive in her soul.
 
2021-12-01 9:52:57 AM  
Mods should save themselves some time and just delete this thread. No good will come from this.
 
2021-12-01 9:53:05 AM  

peterquince: You know, I gotta side with MTG on this one. If you're going to say that abortion is murder because a zygote is a baby, it's totally hypocritical to say it's okay to murder someone because they're the product of a rape. Like....if a fetus is a baby, would you say it's okay to murder a toddler because they resulted from a rape pregnancy? If you're going to be an asshole, at least be a consistent asshole. Rape exceptions are just a way of taking the most distasteful aspect out of an already indefensible position. It's a way to be an asshole without sounding like an asshole.


Why is it hypocritical? We allow people to kill others by claiming self-defense or by claiming they have a position of authority which permits them to do so. That's because we've decided the principle of "thou shalt not kill" can be compromised to serve greater principles. It seems to me that we could similarly compromise a blanket ban on abortion to serve greater principles like women shouldn't be forced to gestate a fetus implanted into her body through a criminal act.
 
2021-12-01 9:54:19 AM  

Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: That woman is simply a menace.  I don't know what her end game is.  Is it just extreme attention whoring for its own sake?

Fame is a hell of a drug.

// as any child psychologist will tell you, kids who crave attention can get it by being assholes or angels
// so when does she grow out of it?


It's FAR too late for that
 
2021-12-01 9:56:19 AM  
GOP: Pro-rapists because why should they punish themselves?
 
2021-12-01 9:57:04 AM  
Boebert and Greene are true believers in the philosophies of there is no such thing as bad press, and when you can't dig any deeper, get a bigger shovel. Never really understood why any adult would want to be a troll for a living. Apparently, there is good money in it.
 
2021-12-01 9:57:08 AM  

Meatsim1: At least MTG has a consistent pro-life opinion. If you truly believe life begins at conception then why would you make exceptions for rape or incest or anything?

Does life begins at conception except for fetuses that are products of rape? Sorry little rape fetuses but God never gave you a soul so it's abortion for you?

MTG has a consistent "pro-life" opinion in all it's horrors and brutal consequences


Oh no what have you done, you're making me agree with MTG.
 
2021-12-01 9:57:35 AM  

Iowan73: tinsguy: She literally has nothing to do so she's a media gadfly and her brain dead supporters think she's working for them.

I don't think they believe she's working for them, but I also don't think that's what they wanted. They WANTED this. They wanted a troll who would stick it to the libs. They wanted a show. If they wanted someone who was going to govern in any way, they wouldn't have picked her.


Also, being a troll works. The media reporting on everything MTG says keeps her narrative in the forefront and reduces liberals to responding to the issues MTG raises.
 
2021-12-01 9:58:27 AM  

Kubo: lol race to the bottom

There is no bottom with these pieces of shiat.


I used to think there has to be.

Then TFG happened and it just kept going.

Then COVID happened, and they starting white knighting for lies and death.

I used to think there had to be.
I used to.
 
2021-12-01 9:59:35 AM  
This is like two mean girls going after each other in high school. It would be hilarious if it weren't so called leaders of their party.
Whatever happened to the crazy legislator who was against incest exceptions because he compared it to horse breeding?
 
2021-12-01 10:01:02 AM  

odinsposse: Iowan73: tinsguy: She literally has nothing to do so she's a media gadfly and her brain dead supporters think she's working for them.

I don't think they believe she's working for them, but I also don't think that's what they wanted. They WANTED this. They wanted a troll who would stick it to the libs. They wanted a show. If they wanted someone who was going to govern in any way, they wouldn't have picked her.

Also, being a troll works. The media reporting on everything MTG says keeps her narrative in the forefront and reduces liberals to responding to the issues MTG raises.


You're right. But shouldn't it be something like living near an airport or train tracks? At some point you just don't hear them anymore.
 
2021-12-01 10:01:09 AM  

Diogenes: That woman is simply a menace.  I don't know what her end game is.  Is it just extreme attention whoring for its own sake?


Which one?

Or, right, both.
 
2021-12-01 10:02:43 AM  

Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: That woman is simply a menace.  I don't know what her end game is.  Is it just extreme attention whoring for its own sake?

Fame is a hell of a drug.

// as any child psychologist will tell you, kids who crave attention can get it by being assholes or angels
// so when does she grow out of it?


She doesn't.  In fact, I'd say she's only growing into it.  There's probably worse to come.  I just hope she starts picking more fights with other Republicans to the point that she gets somewhat isolated or pushes some more less-crazy Republicans to team up with Cheney instead of the neo-fascists.
 
2021-12-01 10:04:01 AM  

Serious Black: peterquince: You know, I gotta side with MTG on this one. If you're going to say that abortion is murder because a zygote is a baby, it's totally hypocritical to say it's okay to murder someone because they're the product of a rape. Like....if a fetus is a baby, would you say it's okay to murder a toddler because they resulted from a rape pregnancy? If you're going to be an asshole, at least be a consistent asshole. Rape exceptions are just a way of taking the most distasteful aspect out of an already indefensible position. It's a way to be an asshole without sounding like an asshole.

Why is it hypocritical? We allow people to kill others by claiming self-defense or by claiming they have a position of authority which permits them to do so. That's because we've decided the principle of "thou shalt not kill" can be compromised to serve greater principles. It seems to me that we could similarly compromise a blanket ban on abortion to serve greater principles like women shouldn't be forced to gestate a fetus implanted into her body through a criminal act.


Mmmm....disagree.

We don't allow people to kill others based on a position of authority. Death sentence is imposed by a jury, not a judge. Juries are considered to have authority - they're considered to be the conscience of the community. Self-defense is based on the principle that a non-tortfeasor life is worth more than a tortfeasor life ... and ONLY in the moment where the victim's life is in imminent danger.

In your example, the benefit would run the other way. The aborting mother would be the one creating a risk to the (ostensible) baby's life, giving the baby the right to murder the mother in self-defense.

/ Again, just to be clear, I'm totally 100% pro-choice. Just pointing out that the principle that "abortion is murder unless the pregnancy is really sad" is even more dickish than the principle that "abortion is murder". It's entirely PR in order to get people to think they're less sociopathic than they really are.
 
2021-12-01 10:05:40 AM  
"Pro-abort?"

Like "democrat" as an adjective today's conservatives sure make a habit out of shortening words. Don't they know that's exclusively the duty of the Ministry of Truth, or as they know it Minitrue.

Orwell from "Politics and the English Language:"

When the general atmosphere is bad, language must suffer. I should expect to find - this is a guess which I have not sufficient knowledge to verify - that the German, Russian and Italian languages have all deteriorated in the last ten or fifteen years, as a result of dictatorship. But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought

Orwell observed that totalatarian regimes and their followers of the left and right tend to do this with language.
 
2021-12-01 10:07:07 AM  

peterquince: Serious Black: peterquince: You know, I gotta side with MTG on this one. If you're going to say that abortion is murder because a zygote is a baby, it's totally hypocritical to say it's okay to murder someone because they're the product of a rape. Like....if a fetus is a baby, would you say it's okay to murder a toddler because they resulted from a rape pregnancy? If you're going to be an asshole, at least be a consistent asshole. Rape exceptions are just a way of taking the most distasteful aspect out of an already indefensible position. It's a way to be an asshole without sounding like an asshole.

Why is it hypocritical? We allow people to kill others by claiming self-defense or by claiming they have a position of authority which permits them to do so. That's because we've decided the principle of "thou shalt not kill" can be compromised to serve greater principles. It seems to me that we could similarly compromise a blanket ban on abortion to serve greater principles like women shouldn't be forced to gestate a fetus implanted into her body through a criminal act.

Mmmm....disagree.

We don't allow people to kill others based on a position of authority. Death sentence is imposed by a jury, not a judge. Juries are considered to have authority - they're considered to be the conscience of the community. Self-defense is based on the principle that a non-tortfeasor life is worth more than a tortfeasor life ... and ONLY in the moment where the victim's life is in imminent danger.

In your example, the benefit would run the other way. The aborting mother would be the one creating a risk to the (ostensible) baby's life, giving the baby the right to murder the mother in self-defense.

/ Again, just to be clear, I'm totally 100% pro-choice. Just pointing out that the principle that "abortion is murder unless the pregnancy is really sad" is even more dickish than the principle that "abortion is murder". It's entirely PR in order to get people to think they're less sociopath ...


The core argument of the pro-life crowd is "it's a person".

Well, if a person is inside my wife's genitals without her permission, she is allowed to remove them, by force if needed. If that force is lethal, so be it.

If it's not a person, an abortion is nothing more than excising unwanted material.
If it is a person, you are allowed to defend yourself against it using your body against your will.
 
2021-12-01 10:07:56 AM  

JerkStore: Oops, my comment has no context because the previous comment was deleted. I guess we're deleting the MTG-to-cave-woman comparison photos now?

Did MTG complain or something?


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-12-01 10:08:54 AM  

kobrakai: Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: That woman is simply a menace.  I don't know what her end game is.  Is it just extreme attention whoring for its own sake?

Fame is a hell of a drug.

// as any child psychologist will tell you, kids who crave attention can get it by being assholes or angels
// so when does she grow out of it?

It's FAR too late for that


New Rising Sun: She doesn't.  In fact, I'd say she's only growing into it.  There's probably worse to come.  I just hope she starts picking more fights with other Republicans to the point that she gets somewhat isolated or pushes some more less-crazy Republicans to team up with Cheney instead of the neo-fascists.


Siri, what is a rhetorical question?

// in theory, she COULD grow out of it - people well older than her have turned their shiat personalities around - but if she's not given any boundaries and gets well more attention for being outlandishly racist and cruel than she ever could for being a responsible member of Congress adult, what incentive does she have?
// I mean, other than basic morality
// but if that were in play, we wouldn't be here in the first place
 
2021-12-01 10:10:05 AM  
They really look very similar. Could they be the same person with different dye jobs? Have we seen them in the same room at the same time?
 
2021-12-01 10:13:51 AM  

peterquince: Serious Black: peterquince: You know, I gotta side with MTG on this one. If you're going to say that abortion is murder because a zygote is a baby, it's totally hypocritical to say it's okay to murder someone because they're the product of a rape. Like....if a fetus is a baby, would you say it's okay to murder a toddler because they resulted from a rape pregnancy? If you're going to be an asshole, at least be a consistent asshole. Rape exceptions are just a way of taking the most distasteful aspect out of an already indefensible position. It's a way to be an asshole without sounding like an asshole.

Why is it hypocritical? We allow people to kill others by claiming self-defense or by claiming they have a position of authority which permits them to do so. That's because we've decided the principle of "thou shalt not kill" can be compromised to serve greater principles. It seems to me that we could similarly compromise a blanket ban on abortion to serve greater principles like women shouldn't be forced to gestate a fetus implanted into her body through a criminal act.

Mmmm....disagree.

We don't allow people to kill others based on a position of authority. Death sentence is imposed by a jury, not a judge. Juries are considered to have authority - they're considered to be the conscience of the community. Self-defense is based on the principle that a non-tortfeasor life is worth more than a tortfeasor life ... and ONLY in the moment where the victim's life is in imminent danger.

In your example, the benefit would run the other way. The aborting mother would be the one creating a risk to the (ostensible) baby's life, giving the baby the right to murder the mother in self-defense.

/ Again, just to be clear, I'm totally 100% pro-choice. Just pointing out that the principle that "abortion is murder unless the pregnancy is really sad" is even more dickish than the principle that "abortion is murder". It's entirely PR in order to get people to think they're less sociopath ...


The thousands of cops and military members who have killed others and evaded prosecution for such killings would beg to differ.
 
2021-12-01 10:14:53 AM  

Dr Dreidel: Siri, what is a rhetorical question?


64.media.tumblr.comView Full Size
 
2021-12-01 10:19:24 AM  
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-12-01 11:00:29 AM  

Serious Black: peterquince: Serious Black: peterquince: You know, I gotta side with MTG on this one. If you're going to say that abortion is murder because a zygote is a baby, it's totally hypocritical to say it's okay to murder someone because they're the product of a rape. Like....if a fetus is a baby, would you say it's okay to murder a toddler because they resulted from a rape pregnancy? If you're going to be an asshole, at least be a consistent asshole. Rape exceptions are just a way of taking the most distasteful aspect out of an already indefensible position. It's a way to be an asshole without sounding like an asshole.

Why is it hypocritical? We allow people to kill others by claiming self-defense or by claiming they have a position of authority which permits them to do so. That's because we've decided the principle of "thou shalt not kill" can be compromised to serve greater principles. It seems to me that we could similarly compromise a blanket ban on abortion to serve greater principles like women shouldn't be forced to gestate a fetus implanted into her body through a criminal act.

Mmmm....disagree.

We don't allow people to kill others based on a position of authority. Death sentence is imposed by a jury, not a judge. Juries are considered to have authority - they're considered to be the conscience of the community. Self-defense is based on the principle that a non-tortfeasor life is worth more than a tortfeasor life ... and ONLY in the moment where the victim's life is in imminent danger.

In your example, the benefit would run the other way. The aborting mother would be the one creating a risk to the (ostensible) baby's life, giving the baby the right to murder the mother in self-defense.

/ Again, just to be clear, I'm totally 100% pro-choice. Just pointing out that the principle that "abortion is murder unless the pregnancy is really sad" is even more dickish than the principle that "abortion is murder". It's entirely PR in order to get people to think they're l ...


Cops have NO authority to kill people. They just get away with it because we've cultified them.
 
Displayed 47 of 47 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.