Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NYPost)   Louis CK pops up out of hiding, unsheathes tour dates, asks everyone to come take a look   (nypost.com) divider line
    More: Creepy, Madison Square Garden, Comedy, sexual harassment scandal, Louis C.K., fierce backlash, 53-year-old C.K., United States, New York City  
•       •       •

902 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 05 Aug 2021 at 12:30 AM (11 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



177 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2021-08-05 7:24:03 AM  
I see AmbBooze has been polishing their trolling skills, at least relative to the last thread I saw them in.
 
2021-08-05 7:24:58 AM  

Mugato: Crosma: arrogantbastich: Aside from him being a jerk off, he pretty much burned out his schtick years ago.

Maybe he can open for Cosby?

Ha! You just equated consensual kink activity with rape. Brilliant! Funny guy here.

I thought he beat off in front of women without their consent.


From what I understand, he had their consent but didn't understand the power imbalance. Basically people were afraid to say no.
 
2021-08-05 7:25:46 AM  

AmbassadorBooze: tfresh: AmbassadorBooze: Clarence Brown: For very complicated reasons, I found myself in conversation with the owner of a comedy club that immediately started employing him, and that person said, "Well, he has a right to make a living."

I was gobsmacked. I still wish I'd said, "No one is denying him the right to dig ditches."

Cancel all places that employ Louis CK.

Problem solved.  Once cancelled, make sure people and places stay cancelled.  Make the cancelled crawl to the teat of trump to survive.  Especially in hollywood.  Just farking cancel the people and make them go to putin or to trump.  Make them beg to eat at the butthole of trump just to survive.  Let the trump hole feed them like a momma bird puking into it's babies mouths.  Have them gobble it all up.

But cancel culture isn't supposed to exist.

🤷

Lets make it exist.  When a person is objectively bad, cancel them.  Have everybody in the party stop selling them stuff.  Stop employing them.  Stop servicing them.  Divorce them.  Have the banking institutions close their accounts.  Stop acknowledging their existance such that if they are walking down the street, you don't see them and you just bowl them right over if they are in your way. Make them go to Trump and beg to have mamma bird feed them just to survive.  Asking people nicely to keep their limp dicks in their pants has failed.  Time for people to fear taking their flacid cis male white cocks out in front of people without written consent, in triplicate, and with 30 days public notice for comments.

Problem solved.


Isn't that what the Red Chinese do with their social currency programme? No thanks
 
2021-08-05 7:31:01 AM  

hoodiowithtudio: Mugato: Crosma: arrogantbastich: Aside from him being a jerk off, he pretty much burned out his schtick years ago.

Maybe he can open for Cosby?

Ha! You just equated consensual kink activity with rape. Brilliant! Funny guy here.

I thought he beat off in front of women without their consent.

From what I understand, he had their consent but didn't understand the power imbalance. Basically people were afraid to say no.


Alright then, is it as bad as drugging women and raping them? Of course not. It's still farking creepy.
 
2021-08-05 7:34:40 AM  

Mugato: hoodiowithtudio: Mugato: Crosma: arrogantbastich: Aside from him being a jerk off, he pretty much burned out his schtick years ago.

Maybe he can open for Cosby?

Ha! You just equated consensual kink activity with rape. Brilliant! Funny guy here.

I thought he beat off in front of women without their consent.

From what I understand, he had their consent but didn't understand the power imbalance. Basically people were afraid to say no.

Alright then, is it as bad as drugging women and raping them? Of course not. It's still farking creepy.


Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.
 
2021-08-05 7:39:06 AM  
some of you have never been to a good party
 
2021-08-05 7:42:48 AM  

hoodiowithtudio: Mugato: hoodiowithtudio: Mugato: Crosma: arrogantbastich: Aside from him being a jerk off, he pretty much burned out his schtick years ago.

Maybe he can open for Cosby?

Ha! You just equated consensual kink activity with rape. Brilliant! Funny guy here.

I thought he beat off in front of women without their consent.

From what I understand, he had their consent but didn't understand the power imbalance. Basically people were afraid to say no.

Alright then, is it as bad as drugging women and raping them? Of course not. It's still farking creepy.

Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.


Or maybe, just as he had been presenting himself in his stand up for decades, he's just an awful person with little to no empathy.

/Wife loved him, I could barely tolerate him.
 
2021-08-05 7:45:21 AM  

luidprand: hoodiowithtudio: Mugato: hoodiowithtudio: Mugato: Crosma: arrogantbastich: Aside from him being a jerk off, he pretty much burned out his schtick years ago.

Maybe he can open for Cosby?

Ha! You just equated consensual kink activity with rape. Brilliant! Funny guy here.

I thought he beat off in front of women without their consent.

From what I understand, he had their consent but didn't understand the power imbalance. Basically people were afraid to say no.

Alright then, is it as bad as drugging women and raping them? Of course not. It's still farking creepy.

Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.

Or maybe, just as he had been presenting himself in his stand up for decades, he's just an awful person with little to no empathy.

/Wife loved him, I could barely tolerate him.


I didn't care for him. I tried watching his standup, nothing.
 
2021-08-05 7:52:19 AM  
I see the Fark Woke Brigade has made it in here early to conflate what Louis CK did with others who did far worse.
 
2021-08-05 8:06:18 AM  

Jake Havechek: You should have said that people have a right to not see an unsolicited jerk off session backstage with him.


Asking first negates the unsolicited part, doesn't it?

hoodiowithtudio: Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.


I don't think people should kink shame.  I never thought he was the god of stand-up like most of Fark did, but just like with Joss, eventually people eat their gods.
 
2021-08-05 8:22:57 AM  

AmbassadorBooze: TDWCom29: AmbassadorBooze: nakmuay: AmbassadorBooze: tfresh: AmbassadorBooze: Clarence Brown: For very complicated reasons, I found myself in conversation with the owner of a comedy club that immediately started employing him, and that person said, "Well, he has a right to make a living."

I was gobsmacked. I still wish I'd said, "No one is denying him the right to dig ditches."

Cancel all places that employ Louis CK.

Problem solved.  Once cancelled, make sure people and places stay cancelled.  Make the cancelled crawl to the teat of trump to survive.  Especially in hollywood.  Just farking cancel the people and make them go to putin or to trump.  Make them beg to eat at the butthole of trump just to survive.  Let the trump hole feed them like a momma bird puking into it's babies mouths.  Have them gobble it all up.

But cancel culture isn't supposed to exist.

🤷

Lets make it exist.  When a person is objectively bad, cancel them.  Have everybody in the party stop selling them stuff.  Stop employing them.  Stop servicing them.  Divorce them.  Have the banking institutions close their accounts.  Stop acknowledging their existance such that if they are walking down the street, you don't see them and you just bowl them right over if they are in your way.  Make them go to Trump and beg to have mamma bird feed them just to survive.  Asking people nicely to keep their limp dicks in their pants has failed.  Time for people to fear taking their flacid cis male white cocks out in front of people without written consent, in triplicate, and with 30 days public notice for comments.

Problem solved.

Oh it exists, but magats tend to ignore it when it actually happens.

[sfanytime-images-prod.secure.footprin​t.net image 375x542]

OK.  So, we can all agree to cancel CK, and anybody that employs him.  Have the part leadership issue a shunning order so everybody is on board and get the banks and credit companies to start closing accounts in the morning.

Sounds like a plan is forming!

I remember when shtick accounts actually made an effort to be funny

Not trying to be funny.  Trying to make the world a better place.


No, you're not interesting enough.
You're cancelled. Sorry, no going back now.
 
2021-08-05 8:25:49 AM  

mjbok: Jake Havechek: You should have said that people have a right to not see an unsolicited jerk off session backstage with him.

Asking first negates the unsolicited part, doesn't it?

hoodiowithtudio: Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.

I don't think people should kink shame.  I never thought he was the god of stand-up like most of Fark did, but just like with Joss, eventually people eat their gods.


Can I pull my cock out and start jacking it in front of your female family members? I got the time.
 
2021-08-05 8:29:48 AM  

AmbassadorBooze: TDWCom29: AmbassadorBooze: nakmuay: AmbassadorBooze: tfresh: AmbassadorBooze: Clarence Brown: For very complicated reasons, I found myself in conversation with the owner of a comedy club that immediately started employing him, and that person said, "Well, he has a right to make a living."

I was gobsmacked. I still wish I'd said, "No one is denying him the right to dig ditches."

Cancel all places that employ Louis CK.

Problem solved.  Once cancelled, make sure people and places stay cancelled.  Make the cancelled crawl to the teat of trump to survive.  Especially in hollywood.  Just farking cancel the people and make them go to putin or to trump.  Make them beg to eat at the butthole of trump just to survive.  Let the trump hole feed them like a momma bird puking into it's babies mouths.  Have them gobble it all up.

But cancel culture isn't supposed to exist.

🤷

Lets make it exist.  When a person is objectively bad, cancel them.  Have everybody in the party stop selling them stuff.  Stop employing them.  Stop servicing them.  Divorce them.  Have the banking institutions close their accounts.  Stop acknowledging their existance such that if they are walking down the street, you don't see them and you just bowl them right over if they are in your way.  Make them go to Trump and beg to have mamma bird feed them just to survive.  Asking people nicely to keep their limp dicks in their pants has failed.  Time for people to fear taking their flacid cis male white cocks out in front of people without written consent, in triplicate, and with 30 days public notice for comments.

Problem solved.

Oh it exists, but magats tend to ignore it when it actually happens.

[sfanytime-images-prod.secure.footprin​t.net image 375x542]

OK.  So, we can all agree to cancel CK, and anybody that employs him.  Have the part leadership issue a shunning order so everybody is on board and get the banks and credit companies to start closing accounts in the morning.

Sounds like a plan is forming!

I remember when shtick accounts actually made an effort to be funny

Not trying to be funny.  Trying to make the world a better place.


Your "better place" already exists in China, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and about half of Afghanistan.
 
2021-08-05 8:36:03 AM  

Jake Havechek: mjbok: Jake Havechek: You should have said that people have a right to not see an unsolicited jerk off session backstage with him.

Asking first negates the unsolicited part, doesn't it?

hoodiowithtudio: Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.

I don't think people should kink shame.  I never thought he was the god of stand-up like most of Fark did, but just like with Joss, eventually people eat their gods.

Can I pull my cock out and start jacking it in front of your female family members? I got the time.


That's between you and the ladies!
(My guess is their answer is no.)
 
2021-08-05 8:40:18 AM  

Jake Havechek: What a total jerkoff.


come on....
 
2021-08-05 8:41:23 AM  

Jake Havechek: Can I pull my cock out and start jacking it in front of your female family members? I got the time.


Someone doesn't understand consent, and I ain't talking about Louie.
 
2021-08-05 8:43:13 AM  

Crosma: Jake Havechek: Can I pull my cock out and start jacking it in front of your female family members? I got the time.

Someone doesn't understand consent, and I ain't talking about Louie.


So it would be okay with you, then?
 
2021-08-05 8:46:10 AM  

Jake Havechek: So it would be okay with you, then?


I mean, if my mom and my sister are asked by some internet rando if they want to see some dude jacking off, and they said yes, why would it matter how I felt about it? that's between them.
 
2021-08-05 8:47:15 AM  

Jake Havechek: mjbok: Jake Havechek: You should have said that people have a right to not see an unsolicited jerk off session backstage with him.

Asking first negates the unsolicited part, doesn't it?

hoodiowithtudio: Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.

I don't think people should kink shame.  I never thought he was the god of stand-up like most of Fark did, but just like with Joss, eventually people eat their gods.

Can I pull my cock out and start jacking it in front of your female family members? I got the time.


Well, if they agree to, sure, I guess, I mean, if that's you're thing. Since that's this is about. That was his "thing". And they agreed. Now whether they agreed because of the power involved is another story and where Louis CK loses me, but please do keep up with your dishonest argument here.
 
2021-08-05 8:54:17 AM  
Good lord, Fark is full of assholes. The guy did bad things, no doubt. He has also paid dearly for it. But it's never enough for the Fark judgement squad. The guy should never be allowed on stage again for the rest of his life? Who do you think you are to pass such harsh judgement on others? How did your sense of fairness get so out of whack? It's so easy to be an absolutist when it's someone else's life in the balance.
 
2021-08-05 8:56:08 AM  
Lot of pervert supporters in this place. Sickos.
 
2021-08-05 9:02:35 AM  

Jake Havechek: Lot of pervert supporters in this place. Sickos.


Prude.
 
2021-08-05 9:03:54 AM  
He had a good set at Skankfest 2 years ago.  Wasn't a big fan of his, but it was decent.
 
2021-08-05 9:08:21 AM  
People are just going to have to accept that he's still marketable. I promise the vast majority of his fans don't give a single shiat about him jerking off on a phone call, they just want to hear the funny man say funny things.
 
2021-08-05 9:09:22 AM  

Jake Havechek: mjbok: Jake Havechek: You should have said that people have a right to not see an unsolicited jerk off session backstage with him.

Asking first negates the unsolicited part, doesn't it?

hoodiowithtudio: Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.

I don't think people should kink shame.  I never thought he was the god of stand-up like most of Fark did, but just like with Joss, eventually people eat their gods.

Can I pull my cock out and start jacking it in front of your female family members? I got the time.


If they say they're fine with it, sure.

Jake Havechek: Lot of pervert supporters in this place. Sickos.


What people do in their sex lives is between them and the multiple people that are okay with whatever is being done.    Unless you are only lights out, missionary, straight sex, I'm sure someone finds what you do in the privacy of your bedroom perverted.
 
2021-08-05 9:15:57 AM  

mudesi: I see the Fark Woke Brigade has made it in here early to conflate what Louis CK did with others who did far worse.


So, you're advocating a race to the bottom then?
 
2021-08-05 9:19:11 AM  

Jake Havechek: mjbok: Jake Havechek: You should have said that people have a right to not see an unsolicited jerk off session backstage with him.

Asking first negates the unsolicited part, doesn't it?

hoodiowithtudio: Assuming he did it with their alleged consent, I view as a mental illness.

I don't think people should kink shame.  I never thought he was the god of stand-up like most of Fark did, but just like with Joss, eventually people eat their gods.

Can I pull my cock out and start jacking it in front of your female family members? I got the time.


Did you ask before you did it?
 
db2
2021-08-05 9:20:42 AM  
Yeah, he messed up, but wasn't it basically a matter of misreading the mood, and thus making a rather inappropriate advance at some women? It wasn't like he was forcing himself on anybody, was he? Serious question, because it seemed like a transgression roughly on par with the whole Paul Ruebens thing. Not sure if I missed some important details or something.
 
2021-08-05 9:26:25 AM  

db2: Yeah, he messed up, but wasn't it basically a matter of misreading the mood, and thus making a rather inappropriate advance at some women? It wasn't like he was forcing himself on anybody, was he? Serious question, because it seemed like a transgression roughly on par with the whole Paul Ruebens thing. Not sure if I missed some important details or something.


There was no physical contact, but the women involved stated that they felt like they couldn't say no due to his proximity to and power in the industry.

Plus he lied about it for years, which will obviously impact the people that spoke up about the behavior.
 
2021-08-05 9:32:02 AM  

db2: It wasn't like he was forcing himself on anybody, was he?


In the scenarios he was in he would be considered a "peer" and as such the power structure would denote that his actions are considered harassment.

It also come to bear that being a white male working in the field he does when this happened also means that he has considerably more advantages than females, and thus even at a level of "equals" they still were at a disadvantage over him.
 
2021-08-05 9:35:19 AM  

Skarekrough: mudesi: I see the Fark Woke Brigade has made it in here early to conflate what Louis CK did with others who did far worse.

So, you're advocating a race to the bottom then?


You guys are seriously farked up.  I don't even know if it's worth the time to point out obvious things to you people, but here goes.

Louis CK did not drug anyone, did not touch, fondle, or grope anyone, did not rape anyone.

"But there was a power imbalance derpity detpity do!"

Fine.  He had "power".  You know what?  Unless someone is pointing a farking gun to your farking head, you also have the power to say "no thanks, not really into that sort of thing" when someone ASKS you whether or not you'd like to watch him take out his dick and jerk off in front of you.

He's got a weird, creepy kink.  He's not Bill Cosby or Harvey Weinstein.  He deserves to have his life back.  You guys really need to get over yourselves.  But I won't hold my breath, because nuance and critical thinking are not strong suits for the Woke Brigade, and I'm already regretting wasting my time.
 
db2
2021-08-05 9:37:22 AM  

Skarekrough: db2: It wasn't like he was forcing himself on anybody, was he?

In the scenarios he was in he would be considered a "peer" and as such the power structure would denote that his actions are considered harassment.

It also come to bear that being a white male working in the field he does when this happened also means that he has considerably more advantages than females, and thus even at a level of "equals" they still were at a disadvantage over him.


Were these women club-goers that happened to be at his show, or people in the industry that he may have been working with directly? I was always surprised at the amount of backlash he got for what initially sounded like just making slimy advances on girls at the club. He shouldn't have been doing it, obviously, but I wouldn't have expected quite this level of demonizing him for it.
 
2021-08-05 9:38:50 AM  
I wouldn't be comfortable at all with having to watch someone masturbate but it wouldn't be nearly as harmful an experience as someone touching me when I did not consent to be touched. In the former situation I can look away or close my eyes and what is going on in front of me kind of goes away but if someone is touching you without your consent, disconnecting from that is far harder to do. Just saying that equating what Louis CK did to what Cosby or Weinstein did is ridiculous.

There's a kind of evil-sickness in the cancel culture where some get off on the idea of destroying someone else.
 
db2
2021-08-05 9:45:28 AM  

db2: Skarekrough: db2: It wasn't like he was forcing himself on anybody, was he?

In the scenarios he was in he would be considered a "peer" and as such the power structure would denote that his actions are considered harassment.

It also come to bear that being a white male working in the field he does when this happened also means that he has considerably more advantages than females, and thus even at a level of "equals" they still were at a disadvantage over him.

Were these women club-goers that happened to be at his show, or people in the industry that he may have been working with directly? I was always surprised at the amount of backlash he got for what initially sounded like just making slimy advances on girls at the club. He shouldn't have been doing it, obviously, but I wouldn't have expected quite this level of demonizing him for it.


Okay, read up on it a bit more. Sounds like there were some more serious incidents, but he wasn't at Matt Lauer levels of predator. Again, definitely very inappropriate behavior, but it doesn't sound like he needs to be stoned in the street quite yet.
 
2021-08-05 9:46:08 AM  

mudesi: He deserves to have his life back.  You guys really need to get over yourselves.  But I won't hold my breath, because nuance and critical thinking are not strong suits for the Woke Brigade, and I'm already regretting wasting my time.


He didn't lose his life though. The article is about him doing a tour.

Do you think that people should be forced to like him and go to his shows again? That studio heads should be forced to greenlight his projects? Since you're not woke, explain how giving his life back should go.

He farked up and his career took a hit, but he's still working.  It's not some grand conspiracy against him.
 
2021-08-05 9:47:36 AM  

db2: Skarekrough: db2: It wasn't like he was forcing himself on anybody, was he?

In the scenarios he was in he would be considered a "peer" and as such the power structure would denote that his actions are considered harassment.

It also come to bear that being a white male working in the field he does when this happened also means that he has considerably more advantages than females, and thus even at a level of "equals" they still were at a disadvantage over him.

Were these women club-goers that happened to be at his show, or people in the industry that he may have been working with directly? I was always surprised at the amount of backlash he got for what initially sounded like just making slimy advances on girls at the club. He shouldn't have been doing it, obviously, but I wouldn't have expected quite this level of demonizing him for it.


It was fellow comedians, and he had "make or break" power over most of their careers. There was an obvious power imbalance that everyone was aware of. For example, Garfunkel and Oates (Kate Micucci and Riki Lindhome) felt that they had no choice when he cornered them in a hotel room.

Also, it is perfectly fine to kink shame, especially if your kink is forcing women to watch you spank it. That's what all those private virtual chat session are for. I think.

/Seriously, how does that work? Is it like phone sex, but with bad camera work?
 
2021-08-05 9:51:28 AM  

Karma Chameleon: Thats what the world needs, more middle-aged white guy opinions.


He's Hispanic / Mexican, but okay.
 
2021-08-05 9:55:56 AM  

Cosmic Cowboy: Good lord, Fark is full of assholes. The guy did bad things, no doubt. He has also paid dearly for it. But it's never enough for the Fark judgement squad. The guy should never be allowed on stage again for the rest of his life? Who do you think you are to pass such harsh judgement on others? How did your sense of fairness get so out of whack? It's so easy to be an absolutist when it's someone else's life in the balance.


I'm curious - other than a public apology to start to repair his own image (which didn't come out until it was basically forced), what has he done to make recompense for his serial abuse of people under his control?  Has he worked to boost the careers of those he violated?  Used his power and standing to make things right?  Worked to create a more just and fair environment for women in his part of showbusiness?

Or did he do what most of these creeps do - lay low for a few years doing very little, living on their substantial wealth until public memory faded a little?  I haven't seen much in the way of Louis putting in a lot of effort to fix the problem he exemplified or repair the damage.

Just going away for a while and "not doing it again" doesn't make things any better.
 
2021-08-05 9:57:41 AM  
Saw him live a few years ago. He was brilliant. I have no doubt he still is.

What he did was wrong. And it was wrong for him to take so long to acknowledge this and apologize for it.

But, bottom line, if you don't want to see him, don't buy tickets.
 
2021-08-05 10:00:04 AM  
White dudes are making a comeback!

It's about bloody time.
 
2021-08-05 10:03:14 AM  

Befuddled: I wouldn't be comfortable at all with having to watch someone masturbate but it wouldn't be nearly as harmful an experience as someone touching me when I did not consent to be touched. In the former situation I can look away or close my eyes and what is going on in front of me kind of goes away but if someone is touching you without your consent, disconnecting from that is far harder to do. Just saying that equating what Louis CK did to what Cosby or Weinstein did is ridiculous.

There's a kind of evil-sickness in the cancel culture where some get off on the idea of destroying someone else.


"If someone has coerced you into participating in a sexual act, you can just close your eyes!" is the most Fark-like take on this possible.
 
2021-08-05 10:12:14 AM  

HotWingConspiracy: mudesi: He deserves to have his life back.  You guys really need to get over yourselves.  But I won't hold my breath, because nuance and critical thinking are not strong suits for the Woke Brigade, and I'm already regretting wasting my time.

He didn't lose his life though. The article is about him doing a tour.

Do you think that people should be forced to like him and go to his shows again? That studio heads should be forced to greenlight his projects? Since you're not woke, explain how giving his life back should go.

He farked up and his career took a hit, but he's still working.  It's not some grand conspiracy against him.


Fair enough, but I'm responding to the comments in this thread.

From the things people say about Louis CK on the Internet, you'd think he was Satan himself and not just some schlub who likes kinky shiat.
 
2021-08-05 10:14:25 AM  

Khellendros: Cosmic Cowboy: Good lord, Fark is full of assholes. The guy did bad things, no doubt. He has also paid dearly for it. But it's never enough for the Fark judgement squad. The guy should never be allowed on stage again for the rest of his life? Who do you think you are to pass such harsh judgement on others? How did your sense of fairness get so out of whack? It's so easy to be an absolutist when it's someone else's life in the balance.

I'm curious - other than a public apology to start to repair his own image (which didn't come out until it was basically forced), what has he done to make recompense for his serial abuse of people under his control?  Has he worked to boost the careers of those he violated?  Used his power and standing to make things right?  Worked to create a more just and fair environment for women in his part of showbusiness?

Or did he do what most of these creeps do - lay low for a few years doing very little, living on their substantial wealth until public memory faded a little?  I haven't seen much in the way of Louis putting in a lot of effort to fix the problem he exemplified or repair the damage.

Just going away for a while and "not doing it again" doesn't make things any better.


He isn't obligated to make the world a better place. He wasn't even obligated to apologize. His only obligation is to stop doing the bad things he was doing.
 
2021-08-05 10:26:05 AM  

Jensaarai: "If someone has coerced you into participating in a sexual act, you can just close your eyes!" is the most Fark-like take on this possible


So you think seeing something horrible is equivalent to personally experiencing something horrible. If forced to choose between seeing someone masturbate in front of you and having unwanted sexual touching, you'd say "meh", they're basically the same?

If watching something is the same thing as participating, then I as well as so many others have done some really incredible things, like battling Thanos for the Infinity Gauntlet.

A very troubling thing that has happened in the last thirty-something years is the normalization of the evil twisting of other people's statements that is the hallmark of the right's assault on all things good.
 
2021-08-05 10:26:44 AM  

mudesi: Louis CK did not drug anyone, did not touch, fondle, or grope anyone, did not rape anyone.

"But there was a power imbalance derpity detpity do!"

Fine.  He had "power".  You know what?  Unless someone is pointing a farking gun to your farking head, you also have the power to say "no thanks, not really into that sort of thing" when someone ASKS you whether or not you'd like to watch him take out his dick and jerk off in front of you.


It's always an educational endeavor when others explain where the bar sits for moral decrepitude.
 
2021-08-05 11:12:18 AM  

AmbassadorBooze: TDWCom29: AmbassadorBooze: I remember when shtick accounts actually made an effort to be funny

Not trying to be funny.

You'd be better off if this was true. Unfortunately for you, however....

Imagine a world where a powerful cis white male in Hollywood didn't whip out his flacid cock.  Well, we don't live in that world, because we only asked politely they didn't do it.  So, to get that world, we have to do something different.  We have to make the powerful white hollywood cis males fear whipping out their tiny dicks.  What I'd a legal form of fear?  Canceling them.  They dontbhave a right to work at any private company or stage.  They don't have a right to an account with a private credit company. They don't have right to purchase private property from people.  If we all stop servicing these pervs, they will have to go live with their maga chuds instead of Hollywood and new York city.  They can go live in Mara lago.  Have CK and coumo go suck up to trump.  They all like grabbing pussy probably.  Let them whip out their tiny white pricks in front of maga chuds.  Shun abusers and gropers from good society.  Make the party disavow them completely and shun them to a maga zone.


I'm assuming you do this here because Babylon Bee keeps rejecting your submissions
 
2021-08-05 11:13:36 AM  

TDWCom29: AmbassadorBooze: TDWCom29: AmbassadorBooze: I remember when shtick accounts actually made an effort to be funny

Not trying to be funny.

You'd be better off if this was true. Unfortunately for you, however....

Imagine a world where a powerful cis white male in Hollywood didn't whip out his flacid cock.  Well, we don't live in that world, because we only asked politely they didn't do it.  So, to get that world, we have to do something different.  We have to make the powerful white hollywood cis males fear whipping out their tiny dicks.  What I'd a legal form of fear?  Canceling them.  They dontbhave a right to work at any private company or stage.  They don't have a right to an account with a private credit company. They don't have right to purchase private property from people.  If we all stop servicing these pervs, they will have to go live with their maga chuds instead of Hollywood and new York city.  They can go live in Mara lago.  Have CK and coumo go suck up to trump.  They all like grabbing pussy probably.  Let them whip out their tiny white pricks in front of maga chuds.  Shun abusers and gropers from good society.  Make the party disavow them completely and shun them to a maga zone.

I'm assuming you do this here because Babylon Bee keeps rejecting your submissions


But if it makes you feel any better you roped in a bunch of idiots who believe cancel culture is real. Which is like fooling a baby into thinking you've disappeared because you left the room
 
2021-08-05 11:16:32 AM  
I wish "woke cancel culture" was as powerful as some idiots make it out to be.
 
2021-08-05 11:19:30 AM  

mudesi: Skarekrough: mudesi: I see the Fark Woke Brigade has made it in here early to conflate what Louis CK did with others who did far worse.

So, you're advocating a race to the bottom then?

You guys are seriously farked up.  I don't even know if it's worth the time to point out obvious things to you people, but here goes.

Louis CK did not drug anyone, did not touch, fondle, or grope anyone, did not rape anyone.

"But there was a power imbalance derpity detpity do!"

Fine.  He had "power".  You know what?  Unless someone is pointing a farking gun to your farking head, you also have the power to say "no thanks, not really into that sort of thing" when someone ASKS you whether or not you'd like to watch him take out his dick and jerk off in front of you.

He's got a weird, creepy kink.  He's not Bill Cosby or Harvey Weinstein.  He deserves to have his life back.  You guys really need to get over yourselves.  But I won't hold my breath, because nuance and critical thinking are not strong suits for the Woke Brigade, and I'm already regretting wasting my time.


I don't know about you but "Being asked by my boss if I'd like to see him yank his hog." is not something anybody should be worried about when going to work.
 
2021-08-05 11:26:38 AM  
Go ahead, email me your wife's text number and I'll send her a video of me jacking it. It's not like I'm touching her, am I right?
 
Displayed 50 of 177 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.