Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(10TV Columbus)   The Floyd verdict is a drop of water in an ocean of blood. Columbus Police just killed a 16-year-old girl   (10tv.com) divider line
    More: News, Police, English-language films, American films, Family members, Malissa Thomas-St. Clair, Mt. Carmel East Hospital, founder of Mothers of Murdered Columbus Children, police officer  
•       •       •

9290 clicks; posted to Main » and Politics » on 20 Apr 2021 at 8:47 PM (4 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



1053 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | » | Newest

 
2021-04-21 6:27:02 PM  

g.fro: whidbey: g.fro: durbnpoisn: ...
Second, he could have shot her ANYWHERE else that wasn't fatal.
...

I'm going to repeat this however many times is necessary: shooting-to-wound is not a thing.

Something else that needs to change in law enforcement.  Because that's bullshiat.

It's not a matter of law enforcement policy, it's a matter of common sense, morality, and physics.

We want people (including cops) shooting at people less, not more.


It actually sounds like macho bullshiat, and isn't necessary unless that person is a threat.   There is no evidence that Bryant was a threat to anyone, or even if she was perpetrating a crime, since the 911 call stated "females were trying to stab them."

You basically believe cops have the "right" to shoot first, ask questions later.
 
2021-04-21 6:28:41 PM  

Geotpf: The cops were there to offer her sanctuary.  Instead, she got all stabby even after they were already there.


I just can't agree with your first sentence. The cops were there to prevent affray. They weren't her cops. They were everyone's cops. Police are not social workers. And they arrived when the knives were out.

This whole horrible situation is social breakdown. First sanctuary: foster home. If that fails, then where?

Well, pretty obviously, there needs to be a network. Neighbours. Grandparents. Aunts. Uncles. Places where kids can rapidly go to feel safe.

As for twitter clips and youtube feeds, I'm not going to be impressed by them until someone on that street turns up on camera and says, "Yes. I'm sorry. I should have opened my door to that child and kept her safe."
 
2021-04-21 6:30:55 PM  

whidbey: ...

It actually sounds like macho bullshiat, and isn't necessary unless that person is a threat.   There is no evidence that Bryant was a threat to anyone, or even if she was perpetrating a crime, since the 911 call stated "females were trying to stab them."

You basically believe cops have the "right" to shoot first, ask questions later.


How did you derive the exact opposite meaning from what I said?

For the umpteenth time: if the police (or anyone else) are not fully justified in killing someone, they should not be shooting at them!

You must have a very unique understanding of machismo.

And again, I offer no opinion on the details of this specific case.
 
2021-04-21 6:35:07 PM  
And there's that passive aggressive manchild again.

I really feel sorry for some of you, so unable to question the dominant paradigm and choosing to mock others who do.

I'd log off Fark, honestly.   You're just trolling.
 
2021-04-21 6:38:54 PM  

g.fro: whidbey: ...

It actually sounds like macho bullshiat, and isn't necessary unless that person is a threat.   There is no evidence that Bryant was a threat to anyone, or even if she was perpetrating a crime, since the 911 call stated "females were trying to stab them."

You basically believe cops have the "right" to shoot first, ask questions later.

How did you derive the exact opposite meaning from what I said?

For the umpteenth time: if the police (or anyone else) are not fully justified in killing someone, they should not be shooting at them!

You must have a very unique understanding of machismo.

And again, I offer no opinion on the details of this specific case.


Yeah well it should be obvious that I reject that premise, too.  Somebody died because of it, and it looks like that death didn't have to happen given the confusion of the 911 call.

The bottom line is "Defunding the Police" means more than just "take away their $$$."
 
2021-04-21 6:52:10 PM  

whidbey: ...

Yeah well it should be obvious that I reject that premise, too.  Somebody died because of it, and it looks like that death didn't have to happen given the confusion of the 911 call.

The bottom line is "Defunding the Police" means more than just "take away their $$$."


That you reject what premise? That cops shouldn't shoot at people unless absolutely necessary?

I haven't said anything about defunding the police one way or the other. Are you sure you're talking to me, and not someone else?
 
2021-04-21 6:53:48 PM  

g.fro: whidbey: ...

Yeah well it should be obvious that I reject that premise, too.  Somebody died because of it, and it looks like that death didn't have to happen given the confusion of the 911 call.

The bottom line is "Defunding the Police" means more than just "take away their $$$."

That you reject what premise? That cops shouldn't shoot at people unless absolutely necessary?

I haven't said anything about defunding the police one way or the other. Are you sure you're talking to me, and not someone else?


I'm talking to you.  And I'm saying "Shoot to wound" should be a thing.
 
2021-04-21 6:58:15 PM  

whidbey: ...
That you reject what premise? That cops shouldn't shoot at people unless absolutely necessary?

I haven't said anything about defunding the police one way or the other. Are you sure you're talking to me, and not someone else?

I'm talking to you.  And I'm saying "Shoot to wound" should be a thing.


And you clearly know nothing about firearms.
 
2021-04-21 7:10:49 PM  

g.fro: whidbey: ...
That you reject what premise? That cops shouldn't shoot at people unless absolutely necessary?

I haven't said anything about defunding the police one way or the other. Are you sure you're talking to me, and not someone else?

I'm talking to you.  And I'm saying "Shoot to wound" should be a thing.

And you clearly know nothing about firearms.


We know that with years of training, helicopters, radios, body armor, taser, a fleet of gun wielding swat teams that a bunch of cops cannot subdue one person without killing them.

We need to take their guns away.

P.s. I was a bad person when I was younger and have been stabbed three times. All hilt deep. Only once did I even go to the hospital and they basically gave me twelve stitches and a par on the back. All of them were stab wounds in or around the stomach area. Why do you think most stabbing deaths have something like 13-20 stabs. It is hard to stab someone to death, this ain't the movies.
 
2021-04-21 7:16:27 PM  

g.fro: whidbey: ...
That you reject what premise? That cops shouldn't shoot at people unless absolutely necessary?

I haven't said anything about defunding the police one way or the other. Are you sure you're talking to me, and not someone else?

I'm talking to you.  And I'm saying "Shoot to wound" should be a thing.

And you clearly know nothing about firearms.


Not really talking about them, actually. We are talking about officers who shot a girl 4 times in the chest.
 
2021-04-21 7:22:22 PM  

whidbey: ...

Not really talking about them, actually. We are talking about officers who shot a girl 4 times in the chest.


The only thing I have talked about in this whole thread is how and why shooting-to-wound is not a valid tactic.

You keep insisting it is, even though you don't know what you are talking about.

Why don't you just admit you made a misstatement out of ignorance and move on?
 
2021-04-21 7:24:07 PM  

thiefofdreams: ...

We need to take their guns away.

...


I've said twice that the police have made a pretty good argument for that.
 
2021-04-21 7:25:46 PM  

g.fro: whidbey: ...

Not really talking about them, actually. We are talking about officers who shot a girl 4 times in the chest.

The only thing I have talked about in this whole thread is how and why shooting-to-wound is not a valid tactic.


Your circular logic is noted.

You keep insisting it is, even though you don't know what you are talking about.

Why don't you just admit you made a misstatement out of ignorance and move on?


Um, no?  I made no ignorant statements.   And part of "defunding the police" is restricting this kind of terrible power if not stripping it altogether.
 
2021-04-21 7:27:37 PM  

whidbey: And there's that passive aggressive manchild again.


A young girl was killed, whidbey. Could you at least show some empathy and respect, please.
 
2021-04-21 7:29:47 PM  

PartTimeBuddha: whidbey: And there's that passive aggressive manchild again.

A young girl was killed, whidbey. Could you at least show some empathy and respect, please.


It's all I have been doing.   You might take that up with the poo flingers in here upset that their Thin Blue Line has been successfully challenged. :)
 
2021-04-21 7:31:15 PM  

whidbey: ..
Your circular logic is noted.

You keep insisting it is, even though you don't know what you are talking about.

Why don't you just admit you made a misstatement out of ignorance and move on?

Um, no?  I made no ignorant statements.   And part of "defunding the police" is restricting this kind of terrible power if not stripping it altogether.


So not only do you not know anything about guns and use of force, you also don't know what circular logic is.

Your repeated statements advocating shooting at someone with the intent to wound rather than kill are ignorant. They are made out of a lack of knowledge. It has been repeatedly explained to you not only that you are wrong, but why you are wrong.

I never said anything about defunding the police.
 
2021-04-21 7:37:38 PM  

g.fro: whidbey: ..
Your circular logic is noted.

You keep insisting it is, even though you don't know what you are talking about.

Why don't you just admit you made a misstatement out of ignorance and move on?

Um, no?  I made no ignorant statements.   And part of "defunding the police" is restricting this kind of terrible power if not stripping it altogether.

So not only do you not know anything about guns and use of force, you also don't know what circular logic is.


You basically said "shoot to wound isn't a thing because I said so."  Circular logic.

Your repeated statements advocating shooting at someone with the intent to wound rather than kill are ignorant. They are made out of a lack of knowledge. It has been repeatedly explained to you not only that you are wrong, but why you are wrong.

You haven't explained anything, honestly.

I never said anything about defunding the police.

Well I did.  And that not only includes defunding, but having strict guidelines for how force with a deadly weapon should be used.
 
2021-04-21 7:46:31 PM  

whidbey: ...

You basically said "shoot to wound isn't a thing because I said so."  Circular logic.

...

You haven't explained anything, honestly.

I never said anything about defunding the police.

Well I did.  And that not only includes defunding, but having strict guidelines for how force with a deadly weapon should be used.


You must have a short memory.

To save you the hassle of scrolling up, I will repeat the main reasons why.

Every shot fired is a use of deadly force. The bullet doesn't know, nor does it care, about your intentions.

A wound that is "intended" to be non-lethal can very easily prove lethal.

A shot aimed at an extremity is more likely to miss the target altogether. That bullet is still going to hit something. The chances of hitting a bystander are much higher than when a shot is fired at the center of a target's mass.

The firing of a gun is a use of lethal force. If one is not justified in killing someone, one is not justified in using lethal force.

Again, not discussing defunding.
 
2021-04-21 7:50:57 PM  

fortheloveof: Be polite walk on the right: tonguedepressor: Wow, is this war? Cuz it kinda feels like war.

its because parents don't beat their kids any more

/kid doesnt get what they want
//they throw tantrums

So they are already half way to being police.


I'm lookin' forward to beatin' the sh*t out of my kids. For no reason whatsoever. "Wha'd ya hit me for?!"

"Get out there and mow the lawn, for Christ's sake!" There's therapy for ya, mowin' the lawn and crying; "the Leary kid's in therapy again, their lawn looks unbelieveable!"

/Denis L3ary
//no cure for cancer*
 
2021-04-21 7:52:51 PM  

Hoblit: Nidiot: SanityIsAFullTimeJob: Totally Sharky Complete: SMH

[Fark user image image 644x506]

If it appears to the cop that you're about to stab someone, it may not turn out well for you.

Alternative headline could run along the lines of 'Decisive police action saves girl (in pink) from vicious stabbing'.

I'm just assuming her black life matters.

Or... how about "police help kill 16 year old girl's attackers with gunfire"

I've read over and over that it's okay to defend yourself but I guess the cops thought differently. The tazer wasn't going to help those other girls enough so gunfire it is.

It's always best to let your attackers get you because nobody can trust the police to sort anything out before firing their side-arm.

/Do this, don't do that
//don't do this, do that
///whatever fits the scenario in which the police's victim can be blamed


I confess that to me your post is not exactly clear. It is okay to defend yourself. The deceased girl was not defending herself, she was attacking people.

She hurled herself at one girl and bowled her over like a skittle (poor thing had a very undignified pose shown to the world and got kicked in the head too) and then Stabby McStabface attempted to stab another girl in pink who was originally standing twenty or thirty feet away from her.

If you advance towards your supposed 'attackers' when they are just standing around and not attacking you, then you are no longer defending yourself, you are now assaulting them. Self defence means to protect yourself from harm, not attack anyone and everyone in the vicinity.

The police officer basically shot a person as they were assaulting another person with a deadly weapon. A single knife wound in the right place could easily have killed that girl in pink. If I was about to be stabbed, I think I'd be pretty grateful if a police officer shot the person stabbing me.

As to people saying things like "ever been in a fight, adrenaline rush" etc. No I have not, and I would not, and what the eff is wrong with you that you fight like wild and savage animals?

If I felt threatened yet was able to get inside in order to get a knife, I'd have locked myself inside and waited there for police to arrive. I'd expect any sane person to do just that.
 
2021-04-21 8:01:21 PM  

whidbey: PartTimeBuddha: whidbey: And there's that passive aggressive manchild again.

A young girl was killed, whidbey. Could you at least show some empathy and respect, please.

It's all I have been doing.   You might take that up with the poo flingers in here upset that their Thin Blue Line has been successfully challenged. :)


I have no truck nor business with the morons. Don't believe you're doing anything useful by engaging with them.

Neither am I impressed with upsetting people over their imaginary Thin Blue Line. I'm opposed to your thinking that doing so is worthy of a ":)". A kid died, for God's sake. I hate it, and you hate it, but your smiley face is contemptible and should ask you not to do that again.

This was a deathshow. It was horrible. But the officers didn't have time to get between the girl with the weapon and her intended victim. This all happened dreadfully fast. If there had been time, perhaps they would have done so, but there wasn't.

In a decent society, the bullies and the girl would have been separated and ushered to safety well before the police turned up. The only way anyone is going to stop 15 year olds from fighting, particularly in a group setting, is separation by authority figures or tear gas.

It's horrible. It shouldn't have happened. I hate killer cops. A host of social structures failed before this poor girl was forced to turn a knife on her oppressors.
 
2021-04-21 8:01:36 PM  

lolmao500: Skyfrog: Knife crime is a big problem in the UK, yet somehow the police there are able to disarm them and take them into custody all the time without even shooting them once, let alone 10 or 15 times. If only we knew their secrets. In this case even a taser would have immediately dropped the girl and ended the fight without killing anyone, but the first thing our cops do is yank out their guns. A bunch of kids are fighting? Better point your gun at them immediately and get ready to blow them away.

Dont even shoot in front of the girl to scare her/make her stop or try to shoot her in the leg or something. 4 bullets to the chest.

Cops think they are in a rambo movie or something.


the thing @ cops is you only hear the bad stories

/and cops taking cancer-stricken kids to Disneyland*
//I still don't like them
///"Cops Have 222 Ways to Screw You Over"
 
2021-04-21 9:14:29 PM  

Avery_Shine: You guys are going way overboard with everything being a murder. I just have my concealed carry and by law I am justified to shoot another person commit murder


you should randomly meet a cop.
 
2021-04-21 9:30:05 PM  

clams_casino: Which exactly, of Ma'Khia Bryant's rights were violated?


real pro-life of you dude

how about her inalienable right as an American to a jury trial for a possible charge of attempted assault?
 
2021-04-21 9:53:42 PM  

Nidiot: I'd have locked myself inside and waited there for police to arrive. I'd expect any sane person to do just that.


The child killed was a child. It would have been much better if she wasn't a child, and had acted with the awareness of a mature adult, but that isn't what she was. "I wouldn't have done what she did" isn't compelling.
 
2021-04-21 9:54:22 PM  

Kittypie070: clams_casino: Which exactly, of Ma'Khia Bryant's rights were violated?

real pro-life of you dude

how about her inalienable right as an American to a jury trial for a possible charge of attempted assault?


She kinda gave that up when she attacked another person with a deadly weapon.

Since this afternoon it's come out that:

A: she didn't call 911
B: She wasn't unarmed
C: She was the aggressor
D: the 3 above points completely shatter the narrative that was being painted

This thread died quicker than a slug in Salt once those screaming points were disproven.
 
2021-04-21 9:57:20 PM  
And I'm usually the first to call cops on their BS. In this case, a cop had to shoot and kill an armed assailant to protect another person.

It sucks that she was only 15, but she shouldn't have been trying to kill someone.
 
2021-04-21 10:14:00 PM  

Kittypie070: clams_casino: Which exactly, of Ma'Khia Bryant's rights were violated?

real pro-life of you dude

how about her inalienable right as an American to a jury trial for a possible charge of attempted assault?


The use of police deadly force is governed by the 4th Amendment, which isn't actually inalienable, but I digress.

The 4th Amendment provides that the government can't deprive you of those rights listed within it without, among other things, probable cause. There was clearly probable cause to believe she was about to commit a crime (aggravated assault/attempted murder), and the use of deadly force in the preservation of life by the government has been recognized by the courts as legal for as long as they've been looking at it.
 
2021-04-21 10:30:48 PM  

HideAndGoFarkYourself: Kittypie070: clams_casino: Which exactly, of Ma'Khia Bryant's rights were violated?

real pro-life of you dude

how about her inalienable right as an American to a jury trial for a possible charge of attempted assault?

The use of police deadly force is governed by the 4th Amendment, which isn't actually inalienable, but I digress.

The 4th Amendment provides that the government can't deprive you of those rights listed within it without, among other things, probable cause. There was clearly probable cause to believe she was about to commit a crime (aggravated assault/attempted murder), and the use of deadly force in the preservation of life by the government has been recognized by the courts as legal for as long as they've been looking at it.


But how much of a weak-ass dick do you have to be to shoot a teenaged girl.
 
2021-04-21 11:29:24 PM  

PartTimeBuddha: Nidiot: I'd have locked myself inside and waited there for police to arrive. I'd expect any sane person to do just that.

The child killed was a child. It would have been much better if she wasn't a child, and had acted with the awareness of a mature adult, but that isn't what she was. "I wouldn't have done what she did" isn't compelling.


Attempting to stab someone is pretty poor behaviour no matter how old you are. She was certainly old enough to know better than to do that.
 
2021-04-21 11:42:37 PM  

iron de havilland: HideAndGoFarkYourself: Kittypie070: clams_casino: Which exactly, of Ma'Khia Bryant's rights were violated?

real pro-life of you dude

how about her inalienable right as an American to a jury trial for a possible charge of attempted assault?

The use of police deadly force is governed by the 4th Amendment, which isn't actually inalienable, but I digress.

The 4th Amendment provides that the government can't deprive you of those rights listed within it without, among other things, probable cause. There was clearly probable cause to believe she was about to commit a crime (aggravated assault/attempted murder), and the use of deadly force in the preservation of life by the government has been recognized by the courts as legal for as long as they've been looking at it.

But how much of a weak-ass dick do you have to be to shoot a teenaged girl.


When said teenage girl is armed with a knife and attacking another teenaged girl, it isn't being weak defending the one being attacked.  Just because you are not an adult doesn't mean you can't kill when using weapons.  The suspect/victim made some very poor choices that day and unfortunately, it cost her life.
 
2021-04-22 12:28:15 AM  

Brosephus: rekabis: >In the video, the teen appears to attempt to stab two people with a knife before the officer fires his weapon.

If you, as a cop, come across someone actively stabbing someone else, you don't hesitate - you pretty well take immediate action to avoid having the person with the knife kill anyone else.

I understand you. I agree with your conclusion as well. The one thing I see you not being fair with is the beginning of your argument. There's a slight, but subtle change in your argument which has very profound differences and would change the reaction.

Appears to attempt to stab vs actively stabbing is two totally different perceptions and actions. The former is a subjective analysis and could be a situation where someone else could have a different view. The latter would have blood spillage and be unquestionable in any light.

One of the cases that changed my professional view on use of force was John Crawford III, which also happens to have occurred in Ohio. In his particular case, a 911 caller reported someone pointing a gun at people. The responding officer dropped Crawford as soon as he was encountered with no commands given and no time taken to assess the immediate situation.

My problem with that case was that the immediate area where someone is pointing a gun at people would be chaos. There would be people running, possibly screaming, and maybe hiding. When you look at the security video from Wal-Mart's system, people were casually shopping as though nothing is going on because it wasn't. Had the officer taken 2-3 extra seconds to pay attention to the surrounding environment, Crawford may very well be alive today.

As officers, we have a great responsibility to protect our community and all residents. That responsibility has to be treated with the utmost respect, and we have to be sure that our actions are the best actions that any other officer would take. We also have to treat people like we would want our family or loved ones treated. No matter how bad or evil we think someone is, they are still someone's family member or loved one.

This particular case will be deemed justified simply because the victim had a knife. People keep talking about her stabbing others, but I haven't co.e across any reports or videos showing paramedics treating anyone there for anything, including abrasions from hitting the concrete in the driveway. People all around are making assumptions about this without knowing the full story.


I would just like to thank you for your dedication of being a good person whose trying to help their community. Keep up the good work because this country needs more people like you. You've been very forthcoming concerning your job and what it entails.
 
2021-04-22 12:28:20 AM  

Daedalus27: iron de havilland: HideAndGoFarkYourself: Kittypie070: clams_casino: Which exactly, of Ma'Khia Bryant's rights were violated?

real pro-life of you dude

how about her inalienable right as an American to a jury trial for a possible charge of attempted assault?

The use of police deadly force is governed by the 4th Amendment, which isn't actually inalienable, but I digress.

The 4th Amendment provides that the government can't deprive you of those rights listed within it without, among other things, probable cause. There was clearly probable cause to believe she was about to commit a crime (aggravated assault/attempted murder), and the use of deadly force in the preservation of life by the government has been recognized by the courts as legal for as long as they've been looking at it.

But how much of a weak-ass dick do you have to be to shoot a teenaged girl.

When said teenage girl is armed with a knife and attacking another teenaged girl, it isn't being weak defending the one being attacked.  Just because you are not an adult doesn't mean you can't kill when using weapons.  The suspect/victim made some very poor choices that day and unfortunately, it cost her life.


I'd rather see adults being smart enough to not execute children. Particularly when the adult involved goes straight for lethal power before anything else.

There are better solutions to problems than shooting first and asking questions later would be the main bullet point I'm trying to get across here is all I'm suggesting.
 
2021-04-22 12:31:32 AM  

iron de havilland: I'd rather see adults being smart enough to not execute children


If the cop had not shot and the pink-girl got killed, the same people are biatching about how "the poor innocent girl got killed for no reason" would be biatching about "that cop just let pink girl die, he should have done something".
 
2021-04-22 12:33:11 AM  

JuggleGeek: iron de havilland: I'd rather see adults being smart enough to not execute children

If the cop had not shot and the pink-girl got killed, the same people are biatching about how "the poor innocent girl got killed for no reason" would be biatching about "that cop just let pink girl die, he should have done something".


If he didn't have a gun, this wouldn't be a thread.
 
2021-04-22 12:38:01 AM  
The tone change in this thread is hilarious.

Carry on with the shiatshow, but remember to never believe your lying eyes.
 
2021-04-22 12:57:29 AM  

ISmartAllMyOwnPosts: The tone change in this thread is hilarious.

Carry on with the shiatshow, but remember to never believe your lying eyes.


So, how do you feel about police brutality in the US? Do you feel that extrajudicial killings, like in TFA are justified?

Should police officers be held to any kind of standard? It's possible, perhaps, that members of the police could be held to standards that approach the standards members of the military are held to.

Would you agree with that?

Do you think it's OK for gang members to roll up and arbitrarily execute people? Because as far as I'm aware, that's what the executioners of Tamir Rice did, and they've not been punished for their crime.

And the filth that killed Ma'Khia Bryant doesn't appear to have put much more thought into the execution he carried out that day.

America's going to have to have a reckoning soon. Does it want a police force made of white supremacists who shoot first and ask questions later, or does it want people who like the concept of justice?
 
2021-04-22 1:07:07 AM  

Brosephus: rekabis: >In the video, the teen appears to attempt to stab two people with a knife before the officer fires his weapon.

If you, as a cop, come across someone actively stabbing someone else, you don't hesitate - you pretty well take immediate action to avoid having the person with the knife kill anyone else.

I understand you. I agree with your conclusion as well. The one thing I see you not being fair with is the beginning of your argument. There's a slight, but subtle change in your argument which has very profound differences and would change the reaction.

Appears to attempt to stab vs actively stabbing is two totally different perceptions and actions. The former is a subjective analysis and could be a situation where someone else could have a different view. The latter would have blood spillage and be unquestionable in any light.

One of the cases that changed my professional view on use of force was John Crawford III, which also happens to have occurred in Ohio. In his particular case, a 911 caller reported someone pointing a gun at people. The responding officer dropped Crawford as soon as he was encountered with no commands given and no time taken to assess the immediate situation.

My problem with that case was that the immediate area where someone is pointing a gun at people would be chaos. There would be people running, possibly screaming, and maybe hiding. When you look at the security video from Wal-Mart's system, people were casually shopping as though nothing is going on because it wasn't. Had the officer taken 2-3 extra seconds to pay attention to the surrounding environment, Crawford may very well be alive today.

As officers, we have a great responsibility to protect our community and all residents. That responsibility has to be treated with the utmost respect, and we have to be sure that our actions are the best actions that any other officer would take. We also have to treat people like we would want our family or loved ones treated. No matter how bad or evil we think someone is, they are still someone's family member or loved one.

This particular case will be deemed justified simply because the victim had a knife. People keep talking about her stabbing others, but I haven't co.e across any reports or videos showing paramedics treating anyone there for anything, including abrasions from hitting the concrete in the driveway. People all around are making assumptions about this without knowing the full story. ...


What complete and utter horseshiat. This case will be justified BECAUSE IT IS. She was aggressively attempting to stab people. At the moment right before the shots she's got her arm back and is taking her second swipe at somebody with a knife. 

"Nobody got hit by the bullets that were shot, so nobody was shooting."

That's the shiat you're trying to say, but with a knife.

JFC.
 
2021-04-22 1:22:55 AM  

HideAndGoFarkYourself: What complete and utter horseshiat. This case will be justified BECAUSE IT IS. She was aggressively attempting to stab people. At the moment right before the shots she's got her arm back and is taking her second swipe at somebody with a knife. 

"Nobody got hit by the bullets that were shot, so nobody was shooting."

That's the shiat you're trying to say, but with a knife.

JFC.


User name checks out...  And it should continue to check out until it fails to check out.
 
2021-04-22 1:23:19 AM  

iron de havilland: If he didn't have a gun, this wouldn't be a thread.


And if knife girl hadn't been trying to stab pink girl, this wouldn't be a thread, but you don't see anything wrong with that.

People like you are screaming "abolish the police" and you're fine with people just knifing each other, shooting each other, whatever, anything goes.  You're rooting for anarchy.

Yes, there are lots of examples of police brutality, but that's not what the evidence shows in this case.
 
2021-04-22 1:32:44 AM  

JuggleGeek: iron de havilland: If he didn't have a gun, this wouldn't be a thread.

And if knife girl hadn't been trying to stab pink girl, this wouldn't be a thread, but you don't see anything wrong with that.

People like you are screaming "abolish the police" and you're fine with people just knifing each other, shooting each other, whatever, anything goes.  You're rooting for anarchy.

Yes, there are lots of examples of police brutality, but that's not what the evidence shows in this case.


You get the difference between police violence and random violence, where police might actually be able to make a difference, right?
 
2021-04-22 1:40:19 AM  

Brosephus: HideAndGoFarkYourself: What complete and utter horseshiat. This case will be justified BECAUSE IT IS. She was aggressively attempting to stab people. At the moment right before the shots she's got her arm back and is taking her second swipe at somebody with a knife. 

"Nobody got hit by the bullets that were shot, so nobody was shooting."

That's the shiat you're trying to say, but with a knife.

JFC.

User name checks out...  And it should continue to check out until it fails to check out.


"UsEr NaMe ChEcKs OuT." - Guy with no ability to respond to anything intelligently.

This shooting was 100% justified and your bullshiat attempts to play the "oh, we don't know what she was going to do with the knife she had already swiped at one person with and was on the upswing at a second" is ridiculous and quite frankly, stupid as hell.

You know damn well that if that knife was swinging at you, you'd hope the person doing the swinging was shot by the cop. Don't even farking say you wouldn't.
 
2021-04-22 1:45:09 AM  

iron de havilland: You get the difference between police violence and random violence, where police might actually be able to make a difference, right?


I do. And I'm aware that this was already a violent situation before the cops showed up.

Your hero was actively attacking people.  This is not the Tamir Rice situation you want to pretend it is.
 
2021-04-22 1:47:47 AM  

Brosephus: HideAndGoFarkYourself: What complete and utter horseshiat. This case will be justified BECAUSE IT IS. She was aggressively attempting to stab people. At the moment right before the shots she's got her arm back and is taking her second swipe at somebody with a knife. 

"Nobody got hit by the bullets that were shot, so nobody was shooting."

That's the shiat you're trying to say, but with a knife.

JFC.


User name checks out...  And it should continue to check out until it fails to check out.

I was originally going to just let this go, but I'm not. If you're going to suggest what I'm trying to say, then just ask me. Don't try to put words in my mouth. You don't see me trying to put anything in yours, right?

You don't know me, and I don't know you. I have no idea of what you do for a living, but I do know my job damned well. I've been carrying a badge and gun since I graduated from the Federal Academy at Glynco, GA on Jan 3, 2008. Since then, I've worked in a law enforcement capacity in locations where guns are the last resort. They're so much of a last resort that if any of us have to pull a gun, then the fecal matter has truly hit the fan. Therefore, unlike most street cops, I'm neither badge nor gun heavy.

The presence of a knife in a fight is all that's necessary at that instant for deadly force to be applicable. It didn't matter what she was doing. She was fighting with a knife in her hand. THAT IS MY DAMNED POINT. Not that horse shiat you think I was saying.

As I told others earlier, I would not have used a gun in that situation, because we don't go to our guns. We tend to be hands on physical with people who want to fight. If necessary, we'll go to OC, baton, or the taser. I'd estimate that about 90% of our encounters at my work site are hands, and hands only. In addition to my current position, I've had the benefit of training with other federal agencies where hand-to-hand is the usual go to. I've had some edged weapon (knife) fighting and defensive training as well as some jujitsu styled defense.

By no stretch am I some Billy Baddass, nor do I pretend to be one. I simply have a very different mindset on how to defuse volatile situations. I understand and know what street cops deal with because I come from a family of street cops. My brother in law works with a gang unit, so there's been some coordination between my agency and his group. I'm not discounting what that officer did. I understand what he did. Use of force is subjective, and he did what he thought he had to do. Under the circumstances, he will be cleared and back on duty. I know that. I agree with that. My point is that there's usually a different way to approach the same situations, and those different approaches will lead to different outcomes.

So save your JFCs and other bullshiat for someone else, and you can stay the hell away from my comments in the future for all I care.
 
2021-04-22 1:48:54 AM  

HideAndGoFarkYourself: You know damn well that if that knife was swinging at you, you'd hope the person doing the swinging was shot by the cop. Don't even farking say you wouldn't.


I know damn well how to handle myself if someone's swinging a knife. I don't need a cop to shoot someone either because I am a damn cop. So, now, go and truly hide and fark yourself.
 
2021-04-22 1:56:39 AM  

Brosephus: Brosephus: HideAndGoFarkYourself: What complete and utter horseshiat. This case will be justified BECAUSE IT IS. She was aggressively attempting to stab people. At the moment right before the shots she's got her arm back and is taking her second swipe at somebody with a knife. 

"Nobody got hit by the bullets that were shot, so nobody was shooting."

That's the shiat you're trying to say, but with a knife.

JFC.

User name checks out...  And it should continue to check out until it fails to check out.

I was originally going to just let this go, but I'm not. If you're going to suggest what I'm trying to say, then just ask me. Don't try to put words in my mouth. You don't see me trying to put anything in yours, right?

You don't know me, and I don't know you. I have no idea of what you do for a living, but I do know my job damned well. I've been carrying a badge and gun since I graduated from the Federal Academy at Glynco, GA on Jan 3, 2008. Since then, I've worked in a law enforcement capacity in locations where guns are the last resort. They're so much of a last resort that if any of us have to pull a gun, then the fecal matter has truly hit the fan. Therefore, unlike most street cops, I'm neither badge nor gun heavy.

The presence of a knife in a fight is all that's necessary at that instant for deadly force to be applicable. It didn't matter what she was doing. She was fighting with a knife in her hand. THAT IS MY DAMNED POINT. Not that horse shiat you think I was saying.

As I told others earlier, I would not have used a gun in that situation, because we don't go to our guns. We tend to be hands on physical with people who want to fight. If necessary, we'll go to OC, baton, or the taser. I'd estimate that about 90% of our encounters at my work site are hands, and hands only. In addition to my current position, I've had the benefit of training with other federal agencies where hand-to-hand is the usual go to. I've had some edged weapon (knife) fighting and defens ...


I've been in this job far longer than you. I'm well aware of what you said, and you're minimizing the entire situation because the attempted murderer missed her target.

You're not going hands on with somebody who has a knife and is actively swinging it at another person, and you know it. Stop trying to play Fark Hero.
 
2021-04-22 2:05:43 AM  

HideAndGoFarkYourself: Brosephus: Brosephus: HideAndGoFarkYourself: What complete and utter horseshiat. This case will be justified BECAUSE IT IS. She was aggressively attempting to stab people. At the moment right before the shots she's got her arm back and is taking her second swipe at somebody with a knife. 

"Nobody got hit by the bullets that were shot, so nobody was shooting."

That's the shiat you're trying to say, but with a knife.

JFC.

User name checks out...  And it should continue to check out until it fails to check out.

I was originally going to just let this go, but I'm not. If you're going to suggest what I'm trying to say, then just ask me. Don't try to put words in my mouth. You don't see me trying to put anything in yours, right?

You don't know me, and I don't know you. I have no idea of what you do for a living, but I do know my job damned well. I've been carrying a badge and gun since I graduated from the Federal Academy at Glynco, GA on Jan 3, 2008. Since then, I've worked in a law enforcement capacity in locations where guns are the last resort. They're so much of a last resort that if any of us have to pull a gun, then the fecal matter has truly hit the fan. Therefore, unlike most street cops, I'm neither badge nor gun heavy.

The presence of a knife in a fight is all that's necessary at that instant for deadly force to be applicable. It didn't matter what she was doing. She was fighting with a knife in her hand. THAT IS MY DAMNED POINT. Not that horse shiat you think I was saying.

As I told others earlier, I would not have used a gun in that situation, because we don't go to our guns. We tend to be hands on physical with people who want to fight. If necessary, we'll go to OC, baton, or the taser. I'd estimate that about 90% of our encounters at my work site are hands, and hands only. In addition to my current position, I've had the benefit of training with other federal agencies where hand-to-hand is the usual go to. I've had some edged weapon (knife) fighting and defens ...

I've been in this job far longer than you. I'm well aware of what you said, and you're minimizing the entire situation because the attempted murderer missed her target.

You're not going hands on with somebody who has a knife and is actively swinging it at another person, and you know it. Stop trying to play Fark Hero.


Gone hands on with a person swinging a knife before. Did I long before I became an officer. I did it to save a friend who was fighting in a club. I got a small cut in the process, but I didn't need stitches, and my friend didn't get stabbed. Sometimes, you do things without considering the danger to yourself because you're focused on helping someone you care about.

I'm not minimizing anything. Neither am I trying to play Fark Hero. I am who I am, and that's due to my experiences in life. Some have been good and others bad. So, for the final time tonight, sincerely go hide and fark yourself. I'm done with you and this conversation. You can say what you choose. I simply choose to ignore you.

✌🏽
 
2021-04-22 2:08:20 AM  

Brosephus: HideAndGoFarkYourself: Brosephus: Brosephus: HideAndGoFarkYourself: What complete and utter horseshiat. This case will be justified BECAUSE IT IS. She was aggressively attempting to stab people. At the moment right before the shots she's got her arm back and is taking her second swipe at somebody with a knife. 

"Nobody got hit by the bullets that were shot, so nobody was shooting."

That's the shiat you're trying to say, but with a knife.

JFC.

User name checks out...  And it should continue to check out until it fails to check out.

I was originally going to just let this go, but I'm not. If you're going to suggest what I'm trying to say, then just ask me. Don't try to put words in my mouth. You don't see me trying to put anything in yours, right?

You don't know me, and I don't know you. I have no idea of what you do for a living, but I do know my job damned well. I've been carrying a badge and gun since I graduated from the Federal Academy at Glynco, GA on Jan 3, 2008. Since then, I've worked in a law enforcement capacity in locations where guns are the last resort. They're so much of a last resort that if any of us have to pull a gun, then the fecal matter has truly hit the fan. Therefore, unlike most street cops, I'm neither badge nor gun heavy.

The presence of a knife in a fight is all that's necessary at that instant for deadly force to be applicable. It didn't matter what she was doing. She was fighting with a knife in her hand. THAT IS MY DAMNED POINT. Not that horse shiat you think I was saying.

As I told others earlier, I would not have used a gun in that situation, because we don't go to our guns. We tend to be hands on physical with people who want to fight. If necessary, we'll go to OC, baton, or the taser. I'd estimate that about 90% of our encounters at my work site are hands, and hands only. In addition to my current position, I've had the benefit of training with other federal agencies where hand-to-hand is the usual go to. I've had some edged ...


Literally nobody believes you're hand-to-hand fighting with anyone with a knife, get over your hero complex and join the rest of us in reality. i'm glad I don't have to work with you, you sound like you'd let a co-worker get stabbed while you debated whether the person swinging the knife at them really intended to stab them.
 
2021-04-22 4:01:55 AM  
In the video, the teen appears to attempt to stab two people with a knife before the officer fires his weapon.

Once upon a time a crackhead tried to stab me with a steak knife.  I pinned him to a wall and took his knife away from him.  I had probably spent less than $300 on classes during the barely two years of martial arts training that I had at the time.  Best money I ever spent.

This anecdote is why I honestly belief that a minimum of two years of some kind of martial arts training should be a prerequisite for all police officers.  Maybe if they actually had the ability to pacify a 16 year old teenager or 90 year old man without reaching for a gun things might change, but so long as we keep letting these epic pussies get in there and have access to guns then guns are going to stay their default mode for every situation.
 
2021-04-22 4:08:11 AM  

NephilimNexus: In the video, the teen appears to attempt to stab two people with a knife before the officer fires his weapon.

Once upon a time a crackhead tried to stab me with a steak knife.  I pinned him to a wall and took his knife away from him.  I had probably spent less than $300 on classes during the barely two years of martial arts training that I had at the time.  Best money I ever spent.

This anecdote is why I honestly belief that a minimum of two years of some kind of martial arts training should be a prerequisite for all police officers.  Maybe if they actually had the ability to pacify a 16 year old teenager or 90 year old man without reaching for a gun things might change, but so long as we keep letting these epic pussies get in there and have access to guns then guns are going to stay their default mode for every situation.


Be careful. You're going to be accused of trying to be a Fark Hero talking like this. Seems that if someone has a knife, you must use a gun because there's no way to stop them otherwise. It's not possible to pin someone to a wall or grab and pin down an arm to a table if the person has a knife. The knife makes them impossible to control or even come close enough to touch without you getting stabbed.
 
Displayed 50 of 1053 comments


Oldest | « | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | » | Newest


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking




On Twitter


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.