Skip to content
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Star)   Good to know our brave officers are fearlessly patrolling Pornhub to keep us safe (possible nsfw content on page)   (dailystar.co.uk) divider line
    More: Giggity, Horry County, South Carolina, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, U.S. Route 17 in South Carolina, Surfside Beach, South Carolina, Sexual intercourse, Human sexuality, beach area, Human sexual behavior  
•       •       •

5035 clicks; posted to Main » on 17 Apr 2021 at 7:45 AM (4 weeks ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook



62 Comments     (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2021-04-17 4:32:55 AM  
So, about 10yrs ago my buddy showed me an email he got from his mother in law... she sent him a link for one of those "Ice Age" movies... or, maybe it was "Frozen".... anyway, click the link... straight to Pornhub. I mean, It WAS the movie and not porn but the ads alone.... and... just.... also it had the pornhub logo in the lower right corner the whole time... it raised a lot of questions about the grandparents that nobody wanted to ask.
 
2021-04-17 7:17:33 AM  
Many brave kittens were sacrificed during the investigation into this heinous, illicit sexing by two consenting adults.  Good job cops!
 
2021-04-17 7:31:05 AM  
I do volunteer patrols there all the time. I consider it to be part of my civic duties.
 
2021-04-17 7:43:58 AM  
Are these heinous videos available online so that I might review then to determine what the appropriate level of outrage should be?

/kthxbye
 
2021-04-17 7:47:52 AM  
Just working the beat
 
2021-04-17 7:50:09 AM  
What a waste of tax dollars.
 
2021-04-17 7:51:01 AM  

Monty_Zoncolan: So, about 10yrs ago my buddy showed me an email he got from his mother in law... she sent him a link for one of those "Ice Age" movies... or, maybe it was "Frozen".... anyway, click the link... straight to Pornhub. I mean, It WAS the movie and not porn but the ads alone.... and... just.... also it had the pornhub logo in the lower right corner the whole time... it raised a lot of questions about the grandparents that nobody wanted to ask.


Was she hot?
 
2021-04-17 7:52:04 AM  
Oh no sex things might corrupt the children before we can shoot them
 
2021-04-17 7:55:10 AM  
I would just claim green screen technology.

It would probably work on 90+% of technology illiterate judges.
 
2021-04-17 7:56:46 AM  
I thoroughly dislike a legal system like this.

Ignoring all the much more serious crimes than some hiding of pickles, it simply shouldn't be possible for a crime to be a 3 year sentence in prison yet also just be 2 years probation and a one thousand dollar fine. If three years is reasonable, the probation is not. If probation is reasonable, then 3 years in prison is not.
 
2021-04-17 7:58:57 AM  

Smackledorfer: I thoroughly dislike a legal system like this.

Ignoring all the much more serious crimes than some hiding of pickles, it simply shouldn't be possible for a crime to be a 3 year sentence in prison yet also just be 2 years probation and a one thousand dollar fine. If three years is reasonable, the probation is not. If probation is reasonable, then 3 years in prison is not.


It's because the "righteous" and "sanctimonious" old geezers think sex is DURRR DEEEE.
 
2021-04-17 8:00:08 AM  

Smackledorfer: I thoroughly dislike a legal system like this.

Ignoring all the much more serious crimes than some hiding of pickles, it simply shouldn't be possible for a crime to be a 3 year sentence in prison yet also just be 2 years probation and a one thousand dollar fine. If three years is reasonable, the probation is not. If probation is reasonable, then 3 years in prison is not.


I agree. I don't think we really understand the psychological and societal ramifications that 3 years in prison carries. I can't fathom the ways it would (quite literally) ruin my life.

Granted it dissuades me from committing crimes, so I get that, but I do think we too easily say "well this wasn't a Serious crime so just a couple years in prison will do it."
 
2021-04-17 8:01:59 AM  
Also, I have no problem with this being a crime. I don't want people filming porn on a ferris wheel at an amusement park. That is not something we should be looking the other way on.

As for how it was discovered, does anyone object to prosecuting Jan. 6 terrorists based on their self-published videos alone?
 
2021-04-17 8:02:02 AM  
Was it rape? No? Then why prosecute?

The statute of limitations for public indecency should be twenty minutes or whatever the average time it takes to chase down a streaker who does their cardio is.
 
TWX [TotalFark]
2021-04-17 8:04:08 AM  
FTFA: The couple were originally arrested on January 16 by Horry County police

Ok that's funny.
 
TWX [TotalFark]
2021-04-17 8:05:33 AM  

log_jammin: I do volunteer patrols there all the time. I consider it to be part of my civic duties.


Username euphemistically checks out.
 
2021-04-17 8:12:38 AM  

TWX: FTFA: The couple were originally arrested on January 16 by Horry County police

Ok that's funny.


Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-04-17 8:23:29 AM  
Tr0mBoNe: Oh no sex things might corrupt the children before we can shoot them

frinkiac.comView Full Size
 
2021-04-17 8:31:37 AM  
A three year sentence seems absurd.
A nice big fine and community service would be more appropriate.
 
2021-04-17 8:35:07 AM  
Sex!
Natures Entertainment System!


Those that are too ugly, old, lazy, or stupid to do it should not be allowed to criticize it.
Stay home and eat porridge dreary people.
 
2021-04-17 8:42:00 AM  
Is this worth community service or something? Sure. Sex in public should probably be discouraged. Prison or probation though? That seems way excessive.
 
2021-04-17 8:45:32 AM  
So this and killing black people is what is what your tax dollars pay for people!
 
2021-04-17 8:45:47 AM  
The 3 year sentence, most likely, isn't based on just this incident.  I remember reading about this same couple about 4-5 months ago having public sex other places.  They had a handslap then. If you continue, the penalty gets worse.

And cops searching sites like pornhub are many times looking for underage "actors" or missing/runaways.
 
2021-04-17 8:56:07 AM  

FloriduhGuy: So this and killing black people is what is what your tax dollars pay for people!


When society says, "Let's round up most of the former school bullies and give them guns", this is pretty much what happens.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2021-04-17 8:56:13 AM  
The corresponding indecency law up here requires proof that somebody saw the exposure and was shocked and alarmed. No harm, no foul.
 
2021-04-17 9:00:30 AM  

ZAZ: The corresponding indecency law up here requires proof that somebody saw the exposure and was shocked and alarmed. No harm, no foul.


So someone can be arrested just because some sexual repressed jerk was offened? That's not good.
 
2021-04-17 9:01:20 AM  

loral: The 3 year sentence, most likely, isn't based on just this incident.  I remember reading about this same couple about 4-5 months ago having public sex other places.  They had a handslap then. If you continue, the penalty gets worse.

And cops searching sites like pornhub are many times looking for underage "actors" or missing/runaways.


It's still absurdly excessive.
As a taxpayer, I don't have the means to give three hots and a cot for three years to people who screw on Ferris wheels.
I don't care if they did it twice.
 
2021-04-17 9:03:16 AM  

Tyrone Slothrop: ZAZ: The corresponding indecency law up here requires proof that somebody saw the exposure and was shocked and alarmed. No harm, no foul.

So someone can be arrested just because some sexual repressed jerk was offened? That's not good.


Well, so-called "decency" laws shouldn't exist at all, but that's sort of a different topic.
 
2021-04-17 9:13:19 AM  
Remember..Body parts (You know, we all have those) are terrible and shameful....But blowing peoples
bodies apart is brave and entertaining...
 
2021-04-17 9:16:54 AM  

Mr. Shabooboo: Tr0mBoNe: Oh no sex things might corrupt the children before we can shoot them

[frinkiac.com image 640x480]


I thought they shut that place down?
 
2021-04-17 9:16:59 AM  
Well if it keeps them off the street preventing them from killing random black people then I'm all for it.
 
WGJ [TotalFark]
2021-04-17 9:22:59 AM  
I did some research and concluded no thanks
Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-04-17 9:26:03 AM  

jso2897: Tyrone Slothrop: ZAZ: The corresponding indecency law up here requires proof that somebody saw the exposure and was shocked and alarmed. No harm, no foul.

So someone can be arrested just because some sexual repressed jerk was offened? That's not good.

Well, so-called "decency" laws shouldn't exist at all, but that's sort of a different topic.


Alltogether?
 
2021-04-17 9:27:14 AM  
They need to learn from the master, Ted Cruz.  His videos manage anonymous backgrounds, almost like watching the Blair Witch Project scenes but in broad daylight.
 
2021-04-17 9:28:52 AM  

Mr. Shabooboo: Remember..Body parts (You know, we all have those) are terrible and shameful....But blowing peoples
bodies apart is brave and entertaining...


One of the things that really annoyed me in Netflix's Punisher series was that in a sex scene his wife's breasts were obscured, but they had no problem showing a guy's eyes getting gouged out in detail. America!
 
2021-04-17 9:37:46 AM  

ChubbyTiger: Is this worth community service or something? Sure. Sex in public should probably be discouraged.


It's Myrtle Beach. Sex in public is the least offensive thing that happens there.
 
2021-04-17 9:37:51 AM  

WGJ: I did some research and concluded no thanks
[Fark user image 850x478]


That tattoo makes it look like her belly has tits.
 
2021-04-17 9:47:32 AM  
They look related. I know, welcome to Pornhub, blah blah.
 
2021-04-17 10:01:08 AM  

jso2897: loral: The 3 year sentence, most likely, isn't based on just this incident.  I remember reading about this same couple about 4-5 months ago having public sex other places.  They had a handslap then. If you continue, the penalty gets worse.

And cops searching sites like pornhub are many times looking for underage "actors" or missing/runaways.

It's still absurdly excessive.
As a taxpayer, I don't have the means to give three hots and a cot for three years to people who screw on Ferris wheels.
I don't care if they did it twice.


That's just because you want to sit in the wet spot.
 
2021-04-17 10:02:05 AM  

WGJ: I did some research and concluded no thanks
[Fark user image image 850x478]


So the "Champion" across their chest...that's ironic, right?
 
2021-04-17 10:19:43 AM  
First I'm in the phone book, now my name is tattooed on your ass.  You know, I bet more people have seen that than the phone book.
 
2021-04-17 10:19:51 AM  

Manfred J. Hattan: ChubbyTiger: Is this worth community service or something? Sure. Sex in public should probably be discouraged.

It's Myrtle Beach. Sex in public is the least offensive thing that happens there.


Yeah, public sex is one thing....but she also peed in the elevator.  EWWW
 
2021-04-17 10:22:23 AM  
I can think of a lot of crimes worthy of a three year sentence where that never happens.
 
2021-04-17 10:30:06 AM  
"The Penis is Evil. The Gun is good!"

Fark user imageView Full Size
 
2021-04-17 10:30:43 AM  
I think public sex is wrong and should be banned. Not for moral reasons as much as sanitary reasons.

There is a whole list of bodily fluids produced/used during sex that I don't want to see in public.

Let alone accidentally touch.


Prison is too severe. Just fine them a percentage of their income.
 
2021-04-17 10:31:25 AM  

GardenWeasel: What a waste of tax dollars.


3 year sentence (suspended in favor of completing two years probation) for a victimless crime.

One wonders who reported it or why they would even bother. It seems to me that even if they cared that much about 'public sex' that a good stern warning that 'we are on to you' would suffice.
 
2021-04-17 10:43:50 AM  

WGJ: I did some research and concluded no thanks
[Fark user image image 850x478]


Damn that gal got a chin on her
 
2021-04-17 10:53:34 AM  

Hoblit: GardenWeasel: What a waste of tax dollars.

3 year sentence (suspended in favor of completing two years probation) for a victimless crime.

One wonders who reported it or why they would even bother. It seems to me that even if they cared that much about 'public sex' that a good stern warning that 'we are on to you' would suffice.


Heck, it could have been the owners of the Ferris wheel complaining to police about multiple couples having romps on their Sexwhe...er Skywheel.

Just a guess after searching sex on Ferris wheel and finding a couple pages returned.  Don't judge me - you know I'm not the only one who searched it.
 
2021-04-17 10:55:45 AM  

The_Philosopher_King: I think public sex is wrong and should be banned. Not for moral reasons as much as sanitary reasons.

There is a whole list of bodily fluids produced/used during sex that I don't want to see in public.

Let alone accidentally touch.


Prison is too severe. Just fine them a percentage of their income.


Divide by zero error..... :D
 
2021-04-17 10:55:49 AM  
Next thing you know masturbating on a plane will be illegal too!
 
Displayed 50 of 62 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking





On Twitter



  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.